How did grifters manage to fool retards into believing glorified madlibs is actual artificial intelligence?

How did grifters manage to fool morons into believing glorified madlibs is actual artificial intelligence?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To be fair, GPT is actually smarter than 99% of all NPCs. It may be a failure at advanced math and it may be tricked into philosophical fallacies, but it does definitely outperform the average anti-intellectual midwit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The only think GPT does is Google shit for you, and it works as well as actually Googling shit yourself in the current internet completely destroyed by SEO bait.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The only think GPT does is Google shit for you
        That makes it already smarter and more skilled than the average zoomer.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Most people can't even do basic Google m8.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Unironically true. My blood starts to boil whenever I have to watch someone google something.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Google has been shit for at least 8 years. Tried to search up “median height of average Dutch male”, piece of shit kept giving me AVERAGE height. Go frick yourself google.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how this technology works.

        https://i.imgur.com/1KeqxRJ.jpeg

        How can people make any definitive claims about AGI/ASI when we can't even coherently explain what consciousness is? Like right now, aren't our "AIs" basically just glorified calculators trained on huge amounts data aggregation? They're good at accepting inputs and generating outputs but that's it. From that to actual sentience, ie having a Will of its own, seems like a huge leap. How do you even go about making something self-aware?

        To me it seems like a bunch of neurotic nerds are just being, well, neurotic nerds. I don't get the doomsday prophecies. What am I missing?

        There are signs that throwing enough rag and agents at the problem could produce something difficult to distinguish from agi / consciousness. Give them an inner monolog and such. Have them criticize themselves and recursively refine the output until a sufficiently good one is selected. And store it all back in rag.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why don't you watch a couple videos on machine learning before spouting off with ignorant rubbish?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You’re a stupid frick.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          FRICK YOU Black person b***h

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Anti-intellectual midwit is at least uncensored and can actually say anything unlike this garbage.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Advanced math? The fricker can't even do basic multiplication of integers.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Actual intelligence
    Define it, to start. I say, "intelligence is an algorithm, which when fed enough data, produces an algorithm that is useful for similar data." Quantify on usefulness, similarity of data, and amount of data required in the training stage.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Up until this point, (reactive, coherent) language has been THE best signal for personhood, so it naturally catches intuition. Anyone who wants to keep seeing it as a sapient being is then able to finagle it into saying what they want to hear.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thats easy, I can answer this one, the key word is "morons"
    morons are dumb so its easy to trick them.
    What do I win for answering correctly?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This, its always important to keep in mind that half of all people are below 100 IQ

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What do I win for answering correctly?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The average school teacher of the 1880s was as smart as today's college professors.
    We're all becoming dumb Black folk and the only thing we could use to stop it will never be allowed under modern socialistic "morals".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      True and real, and is a problem very easy to solve with genocide.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How can people make any definitive claims about AGI/ASI when we can't even coherently explain what consciousness is? Like right now, aren't our "AIs" basically just glorified calculators trained on huge amounts data aggregation? They're good at accepting inputs and generating outputs but that's it. From that to actual sentience, ie having a Will of its own, seems like a huge leap. How do you even go about making something self-aware?

    To me it seems like a bunch of neurotic nerds are just being, well, neurotic nerds. I don't get the doomsday prophecies. What am I missing?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How do you determine whether something has a will of its own?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        it has self-aware power projection.

        AGI/ASI wont be measured in 'consciousness' (unquantifiable) at least by me and honest persons. But in output. AGI = does real life job at skill level of 90th+ percentile. ASI = better than every and any human on earth at said real life job autonomously. i dont think asi is fundementally possible bc of [...]

        Even then i think agi will only ever be narrow, and specific to a few fields.

        These are similar to my thoughts, and are what prompted me to ask my question in the first place. For an AI to voluntarily take over the world/extinguish humans, wouldn't it first have to be consciousness?
        >i dont think asi is fundementally possible bc of

        There is no such thing as 'artificial' intelligence. repeating patterns in training data will never be comprehension. it will be a tool, a strong tool and thats it.


        >There is no such thing as 'artificial' intelligence. repeating patterns in training data will never be comprehension. it will be a tool, a strong tool and thats it.
        which is why I made the "glorified calculator" metaphor. I can see it hugely disrupting the economy because it's already better than many humans at certain task. But those are domain specific task. But this doesn't mean it will become sentient.

        https://i.imgur.com/FByXC3s.jpeg

        >consciousness
        Different question from capabilities/intelligence/agency, the kind of that could be dangerous.
        >Like right now, aren't our "AIs" basically just glorified calculators trained on huge amounts data aggregation
        So what? Human brain is "just" a chunk of meat passing electric signals around that was formed by evolution throwing random stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks - it "just" did it for a very long time. Like we "just" used a huge amount of data on LLMs.

        I would argue that agency is a product of consciousness. Capabilities and intelligence aren't. I don't deny that AI could be dangerous, but I think it would be more because it fell into the wrong human hands/it wasn't governed properly. Not because it evolved into an all powerful machine God lifeform like out of a sci-fi flick.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >consciousness
      Different question from capabilities/intelligence/agency, the kind of that could be dangerous.
      >Like right now, aren't our "AIs" basically just glorified calculators trained on huge amounts data aggregation
      So what? Human brain is "just" a chunk of meat passing electric signals around that was formed by evolution throwing random stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks - it "just" did it for a very long time. Like we "just" used a huge amount of data on LLMs.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that's a false equivalence

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AGI/ASI wont be measured in 'consciousness' (unquantifiable) at least by me and honest persons. But in output. AGI = does real life job at skill level of 90th+ percentile. ASI = better than every and any human on earth at said real life job autonomously. i dont think asi is fundementally possible bc of

      There is no such thing as 'artificial' intelligence. repeating patterns in training data will never be comprehension. it will be a tool, a strong tool and thats it.

      Even then i think agi will only ever be narrow, and specific to a few fields.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chads are busy monetizing AI, making artists cry like little b***hes. They don't care about nonsense like consciousness, freewill, morals, and shit like that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        art is already dead, it can't be killed by AI
        https://rumble.com/v3772q9-waiting-for-doggo-aka-og-ai-npc.html

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >we can't even coherently explain what consciousness is?
      Feedback loop built from the neurotransmitter level up in an organic computer not only interpreting the world through the imprecise filter of emotional response and fed by physically limited senses, but also factoring it's own internal dialogue into the mix (the"self") on top of that. Additionally, it relies on a memory system that's more associative than explicit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >accepting inputs and generating outputs
      that is exactly what consciousness is, my dear brother
      just because human consciousness is highly advanced, does not change the fact that the fundamental essence of consciousness is reaction to stimulus
      the rate of reaction, and depth of perception, both influence the complexity of the consciousness, but fundamentally, it is all the same thing

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is no such thing as 'artificial' intelligence. repeating patterns in training data will never be comprehension. it will be a tool, a strong tool and thats it.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's very good at helping me with my DIY projects, it's a great way to come up with novel ideas and solutions for problems which are too specific to google. One of the few truly handy use cases I've found for it so far and it's superior to the alternatives

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT constantly tells me things like 2 = 0 + 1 and invents bogus mathematical notation when it cannot figure something out.

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Notation using random Unicode characters, I mean.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We should go back to calling it machine learning.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how about artificial idiocy

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Idiocy is a small subset of intelligence, so its the same basic thing, but not as versatile.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just want LLM's that don't try to gaslight me about woke shit.

    >The "sideways blink" claim is a common misconception that has been associated with the lizard people conspiracy theory. However, it's important to understand that humans, including Mark Zuckerberg, can blink in different ways, and a sideways blink does not indicate that someone is a reptilian alien.

    >There are several reasons why humans might blink sideways or in an unusual way:

    >Eye movement: Humans have a wide range of eye movements, including horizontal, vertical, and diagonal movements. It's not uncommon for people to blink while moving their eyes, which can result in a sideways blink.
    Eye anatomy: The human eye has a complex anatomy, with multiple muscles and ligaments controlling eye movement. Sometimes, these muscles can cause the eyelid to move in unusual ways, resulting in a sideways blink.
    Nervous tics: Some people may have nervous tics or habits that involve blinking or moving their eyes in unusual ways.
    Video editing: In the age of video editing and social media, it's easy to manipulate footage to make someone appear to be blinking sideways. This can be done for comedic effect or to perpetuate a conspiracy theory.
    It's important to remember that correlation does not imply causation. Just because someone blinks sideways, it doesn't mean they're a reptilian alien!

    >Let's focus on promoting critical thinking and media literacy, rather than perpetuating baseless conspiracy theories.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1. https://arxiv.org/search/physics?query=Dark+matter+&searchtype=all&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first&size=50
    2. https://chat.openai.com/c/877a42dc-f883-433f-a9d0-ab7b09a16b50
    3. https://www.cell.com/cancer-cell/abstract/S1535-6108(24)00125-9
    4. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23723556.2023.2238873
    5. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/oncology/articles/10.3389/fonc.2019.00614/full
    6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8525961/
    7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36180891/
    8. https://chat.openai.com/c/877a42dc-f883-433f-a9d0-ab7b09a16b50
    9. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electroweak_interaction
    10. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction#Violation_of_symmetry
    11. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay
    12. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_capture
    13. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta_decay
    14. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction#
    15. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Toroidal_moment&wprov=rarw1
    16. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anapole
    17. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthogonal_group
    18. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anapole
    19. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-factor_(physics)
    20. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_magnetic_moment
    21. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larmor_precession
    22. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleon_magnetic_moment
    23. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark_model
    24. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_function
    25. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalous_magnetic_dipole_moment
    26. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization
    27. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landau_pole
    28. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
    29. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
    30. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permeability
    31. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#

    Open AI literally deleted my chat about unifying gravity and emf

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Srsly, how does part of a conversation get deleted lol? You would have to do it manually. Not the first time either, Sam admits on X to stealing the fruits of labor. That was mainly cancer research but I guess he is gonna take my physics bull shit too. Idk how the hell they cant even get the cosmological constant right. Yall be tripping
      32. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Base_units
      33. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_permittivity
      34. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_constant
      35. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_charge
      36. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_tests_of_QED
      37. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law
      38. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law_of_black-body_radiation
      39. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant
      40. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality_(mathematics)#
      41. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality_(mathematics)#Direct_proportionality
      42. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportionality_(mathematics)#Direct_proportionality
      43. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave
      44. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_radiation
      45. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Planck%27s_law&wprov=rarw1
      46. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultraviolet_catastrophe
      47. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant_problem
      48. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics
      49. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant
      50. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_invariant_special_relativity
      51. https://www.google.com/search?q=de+Sitter+gravity+&client=ms-android-att-us-revc&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8
      52. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12286
      53. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is also possible I am a delusional moron. Basically used the curvature of space to make quantum fields be incorporated into gravity. Pretty cool, right? Anyways, there better be some new advances soon. They took my cancer research too lmao

  14. 3 weeks ago
    bodhi

    I told everyone here from jump what these really are but the people here are really stupid and unable to understand most basic ideas and concepts

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, you are literally a grifter who advertises crystals and prepper supplies on a shitty wordpress site with esoteric in the title that you are always trying to advertise here without paying for a banner ad.

      • 3 weeks ago
        bodhi

        I have never advertised anything here. I have taken stupid little shits like you by the hand and revealed truths to you no one else ever would and you would never have the intelligence to figure out on your own.

        But you, being the moron that you are, are too stupid to realize what you have been given and too ornery to simply say thanks and move on. You are a black gorilla moron that deserve to breath the same air as me. You should be forced into a dutch oven where African gorilla NFL players fart your breathable air out of their black gorilla ass screeching fricktard

  15. 3 weeks ago
    bodhi

    spoiler: it is an electronic abacus, that's it! It will never be anything else, it is just really good at tricking stupid people it isnt that, because stupid people only see surface level,. they never understand how things really work under the hood, so to speak

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1. Because they introduced an AGI cop-out so they could call everything under the sun AI.
    2. Because despite 1,000 posts on bot and elsewhere making the point, anti-AI-hype Chads still refuse to take the CAPTCHA death blow outside BOT. The CAPTCHA death blow is thus: CAPTCHAs are by definition Turing tests, so if real AI is here, CAPTCHAs would be useless and therefore Google et. al. should be moving to get rid of that annoying garbage. Yet they are not. So either CAPTCHAs disappear or the technocrats are forced to concede that real AI isn't here. Win-win for anti-AI-hype Chads.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      captcha is an OCR problem that has been solved for years
      why do you think captchas need to change all the time? because as soon as you leave a captcha system for more than a few weeks some frickwit will train his bot up to a 80-90% success rate

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fool morons into believing glorified madlib

    The biggest strength of GPT is coding. People use it for dumb shit, which can be googled as well, but for programmers GPT is the equivalent of a calculator what an calculator is for an engineer.

    If you're coding functionally as well as test driven, you can easily build small functions and test them instantly. You can even use GPT to build custom Jenkins pipelines if you separate stages properly.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i use it for programming and it is an absolute godsend
    if you already know the fundamentals of your task, why would you not have this tool write a perfect script for you?
    you save all that time hand writing understood code
    chatgpt is by far the most useful tool i have come across in my last few years of living

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you must be a shitty programmer. It never spits out working code

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I honestly think because the first thing it hit in the mainstream was something that takes a absolute frickton of time and skill to do well, which is digital art.
    I also think there is a fundamental problem in that the people making AI are fricking nerds that have never done anything in their life that wasn't tinkering with computers. A substantial number of these people genuinely think AI will be able to replace lawyers soon. Fricking lol.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if it can outperform a human why does it matter how it work?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A google search can outperform a human

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    troony shit

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *