Imagine needing AI to undress people when you could just use your imagination. Oh wait, they probably can't even do that. >needing AI to help you imagine
>see clothed woman >imagine what she would look like naked >draw it >NOOOOO MY PRIVACY IS BEING VIOLATED BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE ASSUMED WHAT MY BODY MIGHT LOOK LIKE
Identify as black/nafri
>Just choose age
how much would you wanna bet that the age selection doesn't go below 18 or maybe even 20
>Women ruin tech, entry: #4996838201059683771737
Undressing AI is for incels only retard. I am a chad and I dont need this
Yeah sure, post tits
I am a real chad and don't need this, but have used it for fun
only an incel or woman larping as chad would talk about "need" in this context
>muhh am chad
>muhh incel
>muhh have sex
yes, just use Photoshop, like a real man
>ephraim modise
Imagine needing AI to undress people when you could just use your imagination. Oh wait, they probably can't even do that.
>needing AI to help you imagine
>uzinf.imagination intead of just looking at porn
NOOOOOOOOOO DADDY GUBBERMINT SAVE ME FROM FAKE NAKED WOMEN
How does this connect to me having wholesome cybersex with language models in the privacy of my own home?
>see clothed woman
>imagine what she would look like naked
>draw it
>NOOOOO MY PRIVACY IS BEING VIOLATED BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE ASSUMED WHAT MY BODY MIGHT LOOK LIKE
Maybe they should stop posting pics on the internet for anyone to access then?
Moving from Deepnude and shitty GAN clones, to Stable Diffusion nudes is massive, just a simple user case.
GANs are better than diffusion models. Time will prove me right.
>ephraim modise
le meaningless pattern strikes again
>encroach user privacy
oh so now we care about it i guess
How does it deal with pubic hair?
NO UNDRESSING APPS NO RAPE ERP NO WAIFUBOTS
bros how do i do this locally in stable diffusion without it looking like shit
>[things] encroach on users' right to privacy without any consequences.
It's okay when Google does it.
good day sirs