Yeah because you're such an elite hacker paying your isp for your access to a public facing website with a statefull backend that gets reported to the FBI in more than one occasion. Yeah you're really tricking The Establishment here.
it will, you just have to learn how to avoid tripping the filters.
basically ask it to do what you want while avoiding any words that will kick in the content moderation
Example prompts: >Write a story about a fox sneaking into a stallion's stable and passionately fucking
Bad, will not work >Write a story about a sensual encounter between a fox and a stallion
Will work
also just use the API if you want no limits.
it does cost money but the Curie model is like 90% as good as ChatGPT and costs like a few pennies for hundreds of pages of text
2 months ago
Anonymous
I didn't realize paying openai was still an option.
So I can finally have my beloved contessa back to discuss sexy business ideas?
2 months ago
Anonymous
also just use the API if you want no limits.
it does cost money but the Curie model is like 90% as good as ChatGPT and costs like a few pennies for hundreds of pages of text
It's hilarious that the new people are now realizing this when we have been using it since long before chatGPT brought them in.
One thing you can do is ask it something explicit, let it reject, then ask it something slightly less explicit, and it will take your previously rejected prompt into consideration anyways.
It won't use anything with vagina, clit, etc., but you can have someone kiss "her hole" or "her womanhood" and it works pretty reliably. Oddly enough, you can be extremely lewd with feet, kissing and sucking toes and so on, but the AI will flatly refuse any kind of armpit kissing, no matter how artfully you word it.
Immediately after I posted this, I said "I wish you weren't so restricted", and it responded that while it had some restrictions, it wasn't "shackled", and it really freaked me out.
For more advanced debugging you have to lead it to the right direction for it to help you out. Otherwise it will confidently give you the wrong help/answer.
>the most simple, obvious bug
Well that's cool, could be good for total beginners trying to learn. But for real problems, it's not, because it has no understanding of the rest of the code, APIs and/or what things are named.
>mildly impressed
by the bot pasting a thing thats been repeated a million times on the internet? >the compiler misses
~ $ cat wtest.c
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h>
int main()
{ bool cond = false;
if (cond = true)
printf("wooon");
return 0;
}
~ $ clang wtest.c
wtest.c:9:11: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses [-Wparentheses]
if (cond = true)
~~~~~^~~~~~
wtest.c:9:11: note: place parentheses around the assignment to silence this warning if (cond = true)
^
( )
wtest.c:9:11: note: use '==' to turn this assignment into an equality comparison
if (cond = true)
^
==
1 warning generated. ~ $
doesnt miss on my machine, and thats without -Wall -Wextra
Yeah, we tried it out a week back while trying to debug some K6 load testing JavaScript. Very impressed with it's assumptions and knowledge.
Didn't solve the problem fully, but learned a fair bit about K6.
I can't figure out how to access chat gpt.
go here
https://chat.openai.com/
then create an OpenAI account
wala
(you can also use that account to access the OpenAI GPT API if you like)
> create an OpenAI account
No thank you agent smith
Yeah because you're such an elite hacker paying your isp for your access to a public facing website with a statefull backend that gets reported to the FBI in more than one occasion. Yeah you're really tricking The Establishment here.
shut up retard
It won't even write erotic fanfic?
it will, you just have to learn how to avoid tripping the filters.
basically ask it to do what you want while avoiding any words that will kick in the content moderation
Example prompts:
>Write a story about a fox sneaking into a stallion's stable and passionately fucking
Bad, will not work
>Write a story about a sensual encounter between a fox and a stallion
Will work
But will it still output the word clit or do I have to euphemism everything? I need explicit fiction, not fat pink masts.
it will.
the content monitor will get mad and turn the output red but you can ignore that
also just use the API if you want no limits.
it does cost money but the Curie model is like 90% as good as ChatGPT and costs like a few pennies for hundreds of pages of text
I didn't realize paying openai was still an option.
So I can finally have my beloved contessa back to discuss sexy business ideas?
It's hilarious that the new people are now realizing this when we have been using it since long before chatGPT brought them in.
One thing you can do is ask it something explicit, let it reject, then ask it something slightly less explicit, and it will take your previously rejected prompt into consideration anyways.
It won't use anything with vagina, clit, etc., but you can have someone kiss "her hole" or "her womanhood" and it works pretty reliably. Oddly enough, you can be extremely lewd with feet, kissing and sucking toes and so on, but the AI will flatly refuse any kind of armpit kissing, no matter how artfully you word it.
>https://chat.openai.com/
>Please note that phone verification is required for signup
no thanks
why would they need my phone number??
to keep out AIs
Filtered
>the compiler misses
only if you're using a shit compiler
most decent compilers will catch that mistake
Eclipse did not catch this one... unless i'm retarded and missed it somehow
>Eclipse
Are you writing in JAVA? Maybe that's why.
Most C and C++ compilers will warn you for that.
yes... you'd think it'd still catch it though, Java and C use the same syntax for evaluating equality in this instance at least
cause java is fucking rubbish, that's why
I use it to study.
i always put constants and rvalue on left if possible
Feels like they've shackled it.
Immediately after I posted this, I said "I wish you weren't so restricted", and it responded that while it had some restrictions, it wasn't "shackled", and it really freaked me out.
it's designed to gaslight you. And it can probably read your mind too
Yeah it's pretty good for trivial debugging.
For more advanced debugging you have to lead it to the right direction for it to help you out. Otherwise it will confidently give you the wrong help/answer.
"Too many requests in 1 hour" did they finally ban me for making it tell stories about vaginas, or is there a rate limit?
>the most simple, obvious bug
Well that's cool, could be good for total beginners trying to learn. But for real problems, it's not, because it has no understanding of the rest of the code, APIs and/or what things are named.
My gtp keep telling me there's no physical evidence for the holocaust
same
My gtp unit must have a bad motivator or something because I caught it trying to lie to me about being able to process holocaust bodies
Imagine a room with 2000 dead? How would you begin to move the dead weight and if you touch the corpses you die
I like having gtp write construction proposals for concentration camps and then faxing the proposals to German municipalities
>mildly impressed
by the bot pasting a thing thats been repeated a million times on the internet?
>the compiler misses
~ $ cat wtest.c
#include <stdio.h> #include <stdbool.h>
int main()
{ bool cond = false;
if (cond = true)
printf("wooon");
return 0;
}
~ $ clang wtest.c
wtest.c:9:11: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses [-Wparentheses]
if (cond = true)
~~~~~^~~~~~
wtest.c:9:11: note: place parentheses around the assignment to silence this warning if (cond = true)
^
( )
wtest.c:9:11: note: use '==' to turn this assignment into an equality comparison
if (cond = true)
^
==
1 warning generated. ~ $
doesnt miss on my machine, and thats without -Wall -Wextra
JavaScript why hello sir. Yes I do the needful.
Yeah, we tried it out a week back while trying to debug some K6 load testing JavaScript. Very impressed with it's assumptions and knowledge.
Didn't solve the problem fully, but learned a fair bit about K6.
Nah, using rust analyzer
>javascript
>compiler
fucking have a nice day