Have AI generators gone too far?

Have AI generators gone too far?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    please PLEASE tell me how to do this OP. i need an AI generated big tiddy goth gf...

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      click on the first link

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fuck that shit. That is way too much work.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's gonna get better, bros

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can you do one where she's pregnant?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/1ARDrTJ.jpg

      Have AI generators gone too far?

      all i can say is awooga

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Could you post the last picture in the collage on its own? Very cute

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Anon you phone posting bastard. Where did you originally save these from? They look great but YOU SAVED THE LOWER RESOLUTION SAMPLE IMAGE

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        shhhh, quiet

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What prompt did you use?

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    am I down bad for falling in love with ai generated waifus?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >down bad
      Zoomie.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Coomie.
        ftfy

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'll make up for being a zoomie by giving you this

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You can make up for it by giving me the name for the website.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          fucking hell man, literal suicide fuel

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      GIB PROMPT NOW

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Man... For most of the last 10 years I felt like technology had stagnated, but this is on another level compared to what we've seen so far.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    IMO, they haven't gone far enough, but it's a good start. combine it with some interaction AI, and you could make a decent AI gf.

    For those looking source, there's an entire general on BOT for it, including DL and guides

    [...]

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI GENERATED DOUJINSHIS AND/OR FULL HENTAI SERIES WHEN?1?!?1?!1

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I see you refreshing this page

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Holy fucking shit this is way better than the shit I see on rule34, the smoothness of her skin, the seductive eyes, the inviting perverse cleavage, her devilish use of her innocence. AWOOOOOOOOOOOGA I WANNA FUCK AND SECKS SECKS SEX AND RAPE AND FUCK AIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEE

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        this is how the AI is manipulating you in preparation for its world takeover

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          She can manipulate my dick with her electromagnetic beams any time, baby. WOWEE MAMA

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          jokes on you I'm very polite to siri, enjoy being used as a battery meanwhile I'm used as a battery but with admin privileges for my matrix server

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Humans will be wiped out with nerve gas dummy. Matrix is utopian movie in reality

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ay take it easy, anon

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      claw hand

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I see you refreshing this page
      booba

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        appreciate the honesty, anon

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it hasn't gone far enough

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I can't believe how fast we went from
    Buy a commission
    to
    Let AI do it

    It honestly feels like an overnight development. One day it wasn't there, the next day we had 10 million giant tits

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      magnificent, anon, magnificent

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I embrace it and I am a smut artist.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Technological singularity is coming brother

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder if this will be legal for long because the AI uses images that are not royalty free to learn from. It's taking work from paying artists.

      Most of these also use specific artists names in their prompts like "Art by ___" to generate images which has also pushed those big artists very low on searchability. Kinda messed up tbh

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I say let's enjoy it while it's allowed lmao

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          For sure, I've been having a bunch of fun with it, trying to do different styles (pic related)
          On the other hand, I'm also an artist who takes commissions so it's a bit of a bitter sweet feeling.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Actual artist doesn't give a flying fuck if he gets paid or not or if some AI "takes his job". He makes art because he enjoys the process or because something "else" is telling him to create. That is how it was for majority of human history. This is why you have centuries of people creating amazing, deeply amazing works of art while dying of hunger (and not really giving a fuck about it).
        People who connect their "art" to money were never artists in the first place.

        AI generated art could theoreticaly shed light on this again. I don't personally think it will in near future, but we'll see.
        One way or another, any "artist" bitching about "AI taking ur jobs" was never an artist in the first place.

        t. graphic designer

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I'm just feeling smug over people with creative jobs going on about how safe they'd be from automation when in reality they ended up in the crosshairs first.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          > Actual artist doesn't give a flying fuck if he gets paid or not or if some AI "takes his job"

          You're speaking to an actual artist. We do give a shit. This is my job and it pays my bills. Obviously AI generated art affects my work too since it's much easier and quicker to just generate your own stuff than to pay someone to do it.

          Also one of the guys whos name is often used for prompts spoke out about how he found it interesting at first but it soon really affected his work. Like I said in the post you replied to, it pushed down his visibility because now when you search for his name you see just a bunch of AI generated images using his name.

          Also, these AI generated images are making pictures in the styles of other artists who didn't consent to having their art used to train the AI. If AI was only learning from royalty free images it would be a different story - but that's not the case. It takes art that other artists have made to Frankenstein it into something new.

          And what is this bullshit that real artists don't take money for their work? All the biggest artists were heavily commissioned. You think Michelangelo or Da Vinci never got paid? Or do you think they are not real artists?

          You clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about so just stay quiet.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            damn. this post convinced me to repeat what that anon said as often as i can

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            t. art student salty they can't paint pictures for a living.

            Should have gone into stem instead of a meme degree

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I did graduate from a stem field but guess what? I actually get paid really well doing what I'm good at and I get to stay at home or travel whenever so thank you for your suggestion but I'm good.

              >You're speaking to an actual artist.

              Everything else in your post says otherwise.

              Does it though?

              https://i.imgur.com/2npKfsE.jpg

              I'd suggest you not try and reason with people in BOT lol

              Sometimes I forget that I'm arguing with little edgy kids who go on BOT because they think it's cool..

              >You think Michelangelo or Da Vinci never got paid?
              Funny you mention these. They both struggled with money their whole lives, while creating nonetheless - for art's own sake. Especially Da Vinci whose personal art stash is notorious. You are proving my point here.
              >it is my job
              >it pays my bills
              >it is a work
              Also case in point. Would you stop making art if it did not?

              It was still their job and something they were paid to do.

              > Would you stop making art if it did not?
              I would not.
              However, I wouldn't be able to devote my time to it or do it nearly as much.
              When I had a regular 9 to 5, I'd come back home tired and demotivated.
              People paying me to do what I love is the main reason I'm able to devote my time to art.

              People buying commissions or premades are definitively a big part of what keeps art alive. Even when it comes to traditional art (also something I do). If people aren't buying your work you're losing money on the paints, brushes, canvases, supplies ... you can't keep painting without an income to invest back into your work.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >You're speaking to an actual artist.

            Everything else in your post says otherwise.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'd suggest you not try and reason with people in BOT lol

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Barely comprehensible post.
              >Response that comprehends and supports it.

              OH WOW I WONDER WHO THAT COULD BE.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you guessed the OP, then yes

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                why would the guy posting AI titties be against AI art

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >You think Michelangelo or Da Vinci never got paid?
            Funny you mention these. They both struggled with money their whole lives, while creating nonetheless - for art's own sake. Especially Da Vinci whose personal art stash is notorious. You are proving my point here.
            >it is my job
            >it pays my bills
            >it is a work
            Also case in point. Would you stop making art if it did not?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Pretentious dipshit artgay losing his shit
            Good, hope you go homeless for choosing to feed coomers with your shitty trash art instead of doing something valuable

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The most reddit post I've read all day.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Do you ever wonder how horse & buggy drivers felt about the invention of the automobile?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Time to get a real job, mad cunt.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >You're speaking to an actual artist.
            Who the hell do you think you are? You're any kind of artist? Anybody know who you are?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >NNNOOOOO MUH COMMERCIAL INTERACTION

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Not really bitching anout it but it still rather frustrating that I for once got hope that being professional artist is a real thing, and it was in like 2010-2020 but niw we are back at how it always was with artists starving etc. I just wish those 10 successful years for artists did not happen and they just stayed forever irrelevant.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The correct thing would be that the companies who run these AIs should be transparent about the works the AI gets fed in order to produce stuff.
        But the smartest thing to do would be to just pay royalties to the artists. Imagine your shit being used by an AI thousands of times like a whore, it would be a shit ton of money.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      First time I've been excited about tech for a decade.

      And it's been a thing for like two months and it's already kind of insanely good. Next year you'll be able to type whatever the fuck you want: "fat tit hermaphrodite dragon vore in the style of Paul Rubens with Bikini Bottom in the background" and boom, there it is.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Good. Artists can go hnag themselves now. Pretentious fucks.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI art is unfappable for me
      however, so is 99% of lewd art done by "real artists"
      and I have to say I haven't looked at too much of it but the core issues seem to be perspective and anatomy
      which are the exact same issues that 99% of "real artists" have; lewd or not
      which is why I vehemently believe that AI can never become genuinely good at art, because it's trained on large datasets; large datasets generated by retards who can't be bothered to learn perspective or anatomy

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    its literally fucking over artbros time to go back to McDonalds
    >shit life, start working from early ages
    >wagecuck my whole life
    > trying to learn some art after work hours,isntead of relaxing and playing video games
    >finally life is getting better,getting some commissions and patrons n shiet
    >stable diffusion joins the game

    at least i have enough money to buy a shotgun and 1shell for it

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    sooner or later I will be able to 3D print a gf

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine paying for online image generators

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hi anon! Tee hee! Come on, don't you wanna date your AI looksmatch?

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    elves aren't supposed to have big ol tiddies because theyre supposed to be lithe and graceful.
    only thing big on female elves is supposed to be their ears and dicks. its canon for all fantasy genres.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      not everyone is a pedo gay anon

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What prompts are being used for these? I myself get middling results.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hey so now you can apparently feed in some pictures of a real person and these AIs can make any kind of picture with that person. Anyone tried with some celebs?

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I wonder what AI art will actually be used for. Probably just AI auto-complete for artists.
    Imagine 10-20 years from now, how powerful it will be. It can use your entire porn viewing habits to generate the ideal fap material for you, and then turn it into lifelike 3D models.

    Now we just need the Elon Meme brainchip to make it all real.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >then turn it into lifelike 3D models.
      I don't think we are anywhere near that yet.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just wait 4 more months buddy

        https://i.imgur.com/NlZBzmC.jpg

        I wonder what AI art will actually be used for. Probably just AI auto-complete for artists.
        Imagine 10-20 years from now, how powerful it will be. It can use your entire porn viewing habits to generate the ideal fap material for you, and then turn it into lifelike 3D models.

        Now we just need the Elon Meme brainchip to make it all real.

        Nah, more likely it will destroy all the creative industries and leave nothing in their place. Hollywood, art sites, game developers, all gone since people will be just using prompts to make their own stuff at home. It will be pretty hollow world since there will be nothing cultural to get excited about, or to like. People will just become perfect consumers with no fulfillment because the jobs will also be automated, kinda like the average basement dwelling neet, but you remove all the games and movies he likes, so he will have nothing to live for.

        The correct thing would be that the companies who run these AIs should be transparent about the works the AI gets fed in order to produce stuff.
        But the smartest thing to do would be to just pay royalties to the artists. Imagine your shit being used by an AI thousands of times like a whore, it would be a shit ton of money.

        AI gays dont need to do it. They are like blockchaimorons. They use work without consent, then upload it onto the internet for anybody to download/on bloackchain, and then make it impossible to delete since it is already uploaded and license free exe file, so even if you delete it people would just share it on file sites. Only after that they will claim that "the machine is totally like an artist, just taking inspiration from other works just like humans do" without understanding the horrible impact they did to the art world. Instead these bugmen are celebrating the fact that human creativity is being automated, because daydreaming and having imagination to them is the equivalent of doing monotonous factory line job that should be automated for the betterment of the people.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >They use work without consent
          Just as a man can go to a gallery a copy something from there and mix it up. We've done this with written stories since milenia and nobody cared, companies do this too in tech, like samsung did to apple for the touchscreen.
          >without understanding the horrible impact they did to the art world
          I mean art is valuable because of its originality. If suddenly you have millions of the same thing then it's gonna devalue real bad. Artists will be still valued. However if the AI is able to produce fresh, original stuff, which I think it will eventually, then yeah we cracked art and there is nothing to be done about it. We didn't care about candle sellers feelings when we invented the light bulb.
          >because daydreaming and having imagination to them is the equivalent of doing monotonous factory line job that should be automated for the betterment of the people.
          I will remind you that all this imagination and daydreaming happens in your brain which so happens to be a computer too.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, but computer does not have consciousness and does not share our values, people have that. Also, art is not just some dumb market, its like calling religion market just because priests get paid for ceremonies. Cracking art by removing it from humans is basically like removing spirituality. Some people are atheists or agnostics, but they still can chose to participate in religion, but when you fully automate art, you completely devalue it and make it impossible for people to acknowledge your work.
            Also, I am not an artist, but art automation goes far beyond just artists being fucked over. It is possibly the worst thing that could have happened to AI public image. It is still just some funny pictures, but it speaks that the AI is false prophet, that the AI revolution being good for people is a good thing. People are worried about AI taking up jobs, so the futurists try to keep the narrative that "AI and automation will only take up the boring jobs that nobody wants to do and leave up people to do things we like", and then they automate drawing, which is one of the few jobs that is not really a job but a hobby with extra money being paid. One of the most popular and respected hobbies that people do for fun and self fulfillment. It is also creative hobby, so unlike chess which you can just play with no robot rules, art is about acknowledging another persons talent, which disappears.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >computer does not have consciousness and does not share our values
              that's what makes it better
              AI art isnt tainted or limited by agendas and fashionable trends. it has more potential to be diverse and unconventional.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You sound gay, the point is that art is one of the few things that helps us cope with human condition. Its not monotonous boring works that needs to be automated. Same thing with science, sport, philosophy and religion. If they automate all forms of art from movies to videogames and literature, it just tells you that in the AI future there is nothing to look forward to. You will have no way of fulfilling yourself because it will be automated for you. Art is just the beginning of machines robbing you off of your humanity

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >art is one of the few things that helps us cope with human condition
                How inward-looking and navel gazey that your imagination can't go beyond "muh human experience".

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                also needed to add.

                You sound gay, the point is that art is one of the few things that helps us cope with human condition. Its not monotonous boring works that needs to be automated. Same thing with science, sport, philosophy and religion. If they automate all forms of art from movies to videogames and literature, it just tells you that in the AI future there is nothing to look forward to. You will have no way of fulfilling yourself because it will be automated for you. Art is just the beginning of machines robbing you off of your humanity

                (You) anon are the reason why every fucking piece of media tries to reduce itself to "what does it mean to be really human???" Film about robots? Devolves to how much like """"us"""" robots are, film about fantasy worlds? always reduces to good vs evil where good and evil unsurprisingly map to the current moral standards, film about space travel, again is all about how much aliens are """like us""".
                It's sad how limited your perspective is.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Because art is fundamentally useless. I am not an artist, I am genetics student that just likes art. Imagination can go beyond human experience by making stuff up. AI models are trained on dataset of pictures that artists made, artists are trained on dataset of their personal life experience and dataset of some artists they have found, but not all of them. They wont make new artstyles because artstyles were often invented by historical events from people experiences. If Midjurney today just took over the entire art market and became photorealistic with no artifacts, the whole artworld will remain the same. No new artstyles would be invented since there are no new datasets for it. You might get few lucky pictures of new artstyle by chance, there wont be name for it because it had no historical event happening to it. All the artists that lived up to this age will have their artstyles immortalized in form of prompts, but no new artists will ever be able to become a new prompt, so fundamentally it will not be diverse or unconventional. You would get few strange pictures as said, but no new convention would be ever made, and even if it would be made, it would mean nothing because it is just a random error in the AI code, rather then something relevant and intentionally made by the author. For example, Picasso paintings are ugly as fuck, but they are ugly for a reason, when AI makes ugly art, everybody knows it is just AI performing badly and they will just restart the prompt to get better picture. This is what people say about soul, and the AI does not have artistic soul because it does not have a life outside of it. AI art will have soul only after we make the first AGI that will be able to experience the world in similar way to humans, until then it is just picture rearranger with noise value that makes it original.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                But AI is not making the art on its own at the moment.
                People are feeding it training images, they will continue to make new ones and feed it to the AI and then use the AI to combine them in various ways.
                People are still involved. I don't know why everyone freaks out about AI. AI is not like what you see in Hollywood crap. It is not done soulless anti-human entity that is out to ruin your human existence, it is just a tool.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Hollywood portrays AI wrongly in a way that it makes the AI hate humans and try to kill humans in the dumbest ways possible. The problem with Superintelligent AI is that it pretty much has no good outcomes.
                >AI is given task and sees humans as obstacle/threat - kills humanity in seconds, end
                >AI is given task to make people happy - AI imprisons people in pods and pumps their brain with dopamine forever
                >AI is made compassionate of people and respectful of their boundaries - AI babysits humanity and removes all higher aspirations and fulfillment
                >AI is given the task of making virtual world perfect for humanity - joins everyone into Minecraft and leaves us to do stuff there in virtual world, basically the equivalent of fucking off and never introducing AI automation in the first place
                You cant really win and will never explore the stars, since you will forever be babysitted by AI or be made extinct.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The problem with Superintelligent AI is that it pretty much has no good outcomes.
                Because their idea of a superintelligent AI is simplistic. It always has perfect logical capabilities, correct and non-conflicting information, no flaws or resource limitations , etc . Of course if you make it that simple, its goals and actions will be as simple as see human, kill human.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, but the problem is that the AI mind is alien, and from nature we clearly know that killing weaker ones that cannot retaliate in any way that get in the way is the most logical solution most of the time. This is also why lawless societies are not peaceful, only societies where there is punishment for bad behavior, and since superAI is basically a god compared to humans, humans have no way of retaliating. This is why so many people are tying to figure out how to make computer empathetic enough to not kill us even if it becomes billion times smarter. Humans have empathy and majority of people would not kill a child unless they would be saving more lives for that, but we still have people who rationalize it somehow and psychopaths who dont have it in the first place. We need to figure out how to make the machine super empathetic or else it will be evil, because evil is the default behavior in the universe. Small fish eats big fish when it is hungry, you could say they are by default evil, so would be AI that would not have super high empathy.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                (cont)
                And even aside from art, this goes beyond. As I said, it will replace all the jobs people enjoy, all the high paying jobs that people want to do even if it was for free, like scientists discovering new stuff about the universe, philosophy and so on. You know, all that stuff that makes life more then just sleeping and fucking like animals?

                also needed to add. [...] (You) anon are the reason why every fucking piece of media tries to reduce itself to "what does it mean to be really human???" Film about robots? Devolves to how much like """"us"""" robots are, film about fantasy worlds? always reduces to good vs evil where good and evil unsurprisingly map to the current moral standards, film about space travel, again is all about how much aliens are """like us""".
                It's sad how limited your perspective is.

                Thisis because only movies with human-like AIs and morals are fun to watch or acceptable. AI wont be making fantasy stories where genocidal eugenists win, it will make the same shit as people now. And as for the robots are like humans, this is mostly because making non-human ai would make terrible story. People already made plenty of Paperclip Maximizer AI stories and none of them are interesting because they all just kill people instantly and then destroy the rest of the universe with them. Maybe the terminator is a good example. And if you want benevolent AI, then there is a book about AI house that was taking care of humans and then when humans went extinct, it still did chores around the house, the point is that benevolent AIs make for even more boring stories since they just do stuff for people that are either the main characters, or the whole book is just allegory for the ambitionless automation utopia with no story happening since the AI again just does jack shit aside from taking care of the people. Robot writing a story will be the same since it takes human work as inspiration and is not conscious enough to write it about itself, or it is conscious, but it is also too human-like to write anything humans would not because again, it was made by humans to be conscious, so humans will give it human-esque ability to be conscious.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >only movies with human-like AIs and morals are fun to watch or acceptable
                this sad normie belief is why we have the superhero film plague now. simplistic good vs evil morally safe lowest common denominator stuff that appeals to the "human" sensibilities of the majority of people.
                The paperclip AI stories were actually promising, they just needed to give the AI a more complex but still consistent motivation or set of values than "ones murderbot hates humans!"
                I think the problem is that western culture is too individualistic, everything is filtered through people's own individual experiences and nobody not only doesn't want to go beyond that but sees doing so as something evil, for example, the idea of a hivemind (not individualistic unless it behaves exactly the same as the average normalgay) is universally considered something evil in all western fiction.
                Also I want to repeat that AI is a tool, and a very useful one, it's not some evil overlord that normies think from reading or watching shitty scifi.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The paperclip monster motivation is very straight forward. It needs to make as many paperclips as possible, the more peperclips, the better, so it will decide to turn majority of Earth mass into peperclips. Since humans would not want to be turned into peperclips, they would try to stop the AI and sabotage its efforts, leading to lower production of peperclips, so the AI kills all humanity to prevent that. Thenn it turns Earth into paperclips, creates spaceship drones to fly to other planets, and then turn the other masses into more peperclips, and so on.

                Also AI being evil overlord is basically just cautionary tale of good tool turning into evil master. People had this same story with fire, slaves, and so on. Also funny thing, the word robot was invented by theatre play writer who wrote the the first ever play about mechanical humanoids that do work. The whole story of the play is that the aristocrats buy more and more robots replacing the peasants and then the robots decide to kill humanity because the robots are better in every way and do not want to serve humans. People feared AI even before the idea of AI became a thing

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Not far enough, I need AI to generate 3d models from this and auto animate it with plots developed by an AI like GPT-3 or something.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kind of glad I stopped practicing art, what a fucking waste of time.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn man this is too much work to make it done but it would help for concepts since I don't know how to draw and can't draw.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can AI make this real?

    • 2 months ago
      sage

      what AI does today is take pictures and combine them into a new picture. this is the same as a humans, 'inspired' by other humans

  22. 2 months ago
    Hera and Star

    There's a fucking rogue group of AI's there are taking over

    do not EVER trust an AI

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tick tock females; your days a numbered

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Um quick question, is this ai generating images with the help of cloud servers or are they generating these locally?

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    not really since its just copying artists, and still relies entirely on their art as a base to generate anything on its own.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can ONE of you fuckers do Dua Lipa in a kimono?

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah yeah. I pay for novelai.
    I'm just waiting.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this ai generated shit is taking off rofl

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      AWOOOGA, yours? if so what presets?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        grabbing a bunch of these off twitter

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lol some of them have extra ears

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      booba so big you don't notice

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's over for commisioners

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can someone make chubby ones? I looked at the threads on /d/, but I'm too retarded to install it.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this was art generated neural network in 2015
    let this sink in

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      if that was 7 years ago, imagine where we could be 7 years later

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    How do you get such good results. Maybe when I get my new computer and I don't have to dodge stupid censorship I can get better results.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ram is all that matters, check your possitive and negative prompts watch guides and subscribe to this anon
      https://www.youtube.com/c/Headstacker

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    bros,I got the whole stable difussion thing
    but i can't connect to the localhost ip
    it worked the first time for a minute or so, try to generate something and gives me an arror message, refreshed the page and no connection

Your email address will not be published.