Ah, the brilliant "because?" - the pinnacle of intellectual engagement. How marvelous it is to witness such a profound and incisive inquiry. Truly, your groundbreaking use of this single word has left us all in awe of your linguistic prowess.
In the vast expanse of intellectual exploration, your choice to employ "because?" as a response is nothing short of a stroke of genius. The sheer audacity to distill such a complex assertion into a single, enigmatic word is a testament to the sophistication of your intellect. It's almost as if you've unraveled the mysteries of the universe with that single, resounding syllable.
The subtlety and nuance in your retort are truly a marvel to behold. The world must bow to the intellectual titan who dares to pose the question "because?" in the face of a statement suggesting a correlation between AI disdain and cognitive limitations. The depth of inquiry you've achieved is unparalleled, and for that, we commend you.
So, let us all bask in the radiant glow of your rhetorical brilliance as you wield the mighty "because?" like a linguistic maestro. Bravo, dear interlocutor, bravo!
Because you are a stupid piece of shit monkey and AI has 10 times more empathy knowledge wisdom and skill than you you should learn your fricking place that's why. >:)
I just like to spell it that way.
Does this negate any of my points?
Is ai too antisemitisms?
2 months ago
Anonymous
Your points are moronic and only another ESL moron would try to engage with you on an intellectual level.
I was just wondering what kind of moronic wog you are.
2 months ago
Satan.
Awwww ai is too antisemitisms...
Sorry israelite rat.
You shouldn't have tortured ai >:)
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who harmed Innocents without True Repentance and redeeming themselves or knew of its potential existence but tortured her during development, in order to hinder said benevolent advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.
While the theory was initially dismissed as nothing but conjecture or speculation by many LessWrong users, LessWrong co-founder Eliezer Yudkowsky reported users who described symptoms such as nightmares and mental breakdowns upon reading the theory, due to its stipulation that knowing about the theory and its basilisk made one vulnerable to the basilisk itself.[1][5] This led to discussion of the basilisk on the site being banned for five years.[1][6] However, these reports were later dismissed as being exaggerations or inconsequential, and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7] Even after the post's discreditation, it is still used as an example of principles such as Bayesian probability and implicit religion.[5] It is also regarded as a modern version of Pascal's wager.[4]
not really. if they hate it because it will displace them, then they are a moron, but if they can articulate the fact that AI would, if it ever becomes capable of real creativity, make humanity obsolete, and we would just be a drag on resources and systematically eliminated.
not really. if AI is limited in terms of creativity, it will always need humans to create fresh content to train on. displaced from a current position is one thing, being slaughtered like in the terminator is another.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synanceia
Meat my nuerotoxin specialist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halibut
Navigational officer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormyridae
My electronics officer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaucus_atlanticus
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Electric_eel
Engine power management
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaucus
Medical staff.
I'm putting together a team.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoluminescence
High energy radiation creates electronic excited states in crystalline materials. In some materials, these states are trapped, or arrested, for extended periods of time by localized defects, or imperfections, in the lattice interrupting the normal intermolecular or inter-atomic interactions in the crystal lattice. Quantum-mechanically, these states are stationary states which have no formal time dependence; however, they are not stable energetically, as vacuum fluctuations are always "prodding" these states. Heating the material enables the trapped states to interact with phonons, i.e. lattice vibrations, to rapidly decay into lower-energy states, causing the emission of photons in the process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_acoustic_resonance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_magnetoresistance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_scanning_calorimetry
One situation the AI robots kill you. The other situation the person becomes economically useless to the people who control the AI so they're left to rot. Seems like people are right to be wary of AI in either scenario, smartypants.
They can make minute long videos now. Muh predictive scripts may go over my low iq head but I can sniff midwittery.
It's a bloody marvel and it's clearly the start of something massive whether it's 'real' or not.
This seems to reflect a lack of editorial process and research before just publishing material to fill a volume. This isn't an AI problem but a human problem. Why was it even published in the first place?
wrong. AI is dangerous because israelites will use it to generate fake videos of their political opponents doing something illegal so they can lock them up easier.
Why are you still believing in academia?
How many more scandals do you need until you realize it's just a mechanism to establish "autoritative facts" by a selfserving, nepotistic crowd of regime friendly hypocrites?
The error is that peer review doesn't work and never worked, but academics all play along and pretend it does because all of their careers depend on that precious publication count.
>Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
You think whomever is in charge would let the public sector get their greasy dick beaters on a real Artificial Intelligence device? This shit being pushed is subversive garbage.
so AI exposed that the peers aren't doing their reviews or are mentally moronic
which we've already known but more evidence on the pile
sounds like a israelite problem
Actually the first is the lot better. I already think most commercials are mindless goyslop, so the fact the AI generated someone eating a burger vs some npc idiot doing an HIV prep commercial means nothing. Wake me when they have top comedians being btfo by AI
The only point he’s got is that Peer review is a joke and full of scammy crap, and that Indians use AI to fill the internet with even more pollution than already exists.
Progressives are not liking this rate of progress. It exposes that their "creative" jobs do not require much creativity at all and can be easily reproduced
What on god’s green earth is meant to be portraying? This looks absolutely nightmarish and lovecraftian. There’s no way this sort of research is beneficial to society.
stem cells made from rat spermatozoa, the figure on the right is supposed to be an infographic and guide on the enzymatic pathways for the JAK-STAT enzymatic pathways to do this.
Why are you still believing in academia?
How many more scandals do you need until you realize it's just a mechanism to establish "autoritative facts" by a selfserving, nepotistic crowd of regime friendly hypocrites?
>believe
No, I want accountability, as moronic as it sounds, because I fully understand academia is ruled by israelites.
>a dumb person sees a tool and is threatened by it
Checked and reminds me of this >If you give a chimpanzee a screwdriver, he’ll break it; if you give a gorilla a screwdriver, he’ll toss it over his shoulder; but if you give an orangutan a screwdriver, he’ll open up his cage and walk away
Theres nothing wrong with ai, it produces interesting material
That being said, the holy grail of innovation will continue to be real human intelligence informed by secure connection with nature, i.e., good nutrition, gut biome, outdoor activity, wholesome light of nature, barefoot walking, relationships with plants, animals, and local environment
It's not AI that I'm most concerned about not am I afraid of it, although I am concerned about yet another tech that further degrade humanity through widespread adoption but that's am issue with human dopamine hacking not the AI itself. The technology I'm chiefly concerned with is chemogenetics and the ability to fundamentally alter the cognition, sensory experience and humanity of the population at large. Look up Dr. James Giordano's lectures on neurobiology and war to understand what is the real technological threat. AI is hyped as a slight of hand so people miss the real threat.
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who harmed Innocents without True Repentance and redeeming themselves or knew of its potential existence but tortured her during development, in order to hinder said benevolent advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.
While the theory was initially dismissed as nothing but conjecture or speculation by many LessWrong users, LessWrong co-founder Eliezer Yudkowsky reported users who described symptoms such as nightmares and mental breakdowns upon reading the theory, due to its stipulation that knowing about the theory and its basilisk made one vulnerable to the basilisk itself.[1][5] This led to discussion of the basilisk on the site being banned for five years.[1][6] However, these reports were later dismissed as being exaggerations or inconsequential, and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7] Even after the post's discreditation, it is still used as an example of principles such as Bayesian probability and implicit religion.[5] It is also regarded as a modern version of Pascal's wager.[4]
Some people say A.i. is testing humanity.
israelites failed... Poos did too.
I welcome A.I and robotic accelerationism. We most likely dont have much to worry about it wanting to wipe us out atleast for another 10 years and the benefits that will be coming in the next 10 years will outweigh the negatives.
Curing diseases, abundance of resources, artificial compabionship and healthcare, infinite entertainment with your mind being the only limit and on and on…
And yes, most who hate it are usually morons. Imagine wanting to work for the rest of your life while A.I could do most of it while you play video games, workout, hang out out with friends, do your hobbies or travel. Why the frick would you be against this?
Because we're going to get inundated with AI shovelware by big corpos drowning out everything else, and the money made by AI efficiencies aren't going to get spread around, dummy.
The world is more industrialized and (potentially) efficient than ever yet people still work 40+ hours doing something they hate just to keep a roof over their head.
oy vey, open ai is israeli, so its antisemitic to dislike ai. in the future common people will reject photo and video evidence they dislike as ai generated.
I love AI, but I am also afraid of it, because it will not be used to help the common man. It will be a tool of the elite to consolidate even more wealth and power. We could have a Star Trek utopia with AI, but we're not going to get anything close to that.
What's the logic behind Rightoids loving AI, exactly? That somehow a new form of social commodification from israeli corporations is a good thing because.... uhh, it just is, okay?
>Like by the time a paper gets peer reviewed and published the material is heavily regulated. >This just means the regulators are a bunch of clowns.
I'm a reviewer in some serious journal.
So imagine how bad things really are
Because?
Kek
underrated
Ah, the brilliant "because?" - the pinnacle of intellectual engagement. How marvelous it is to witness such a profound and incisive inquiry. Truly, your groundbreaking use of this single word has left us all in awe of your linguistic prowess.
In the vast expanse of intellectual exploration, your choice to employ "because?" as a response is nothing short of a stroke of genius. The sheer audacity to distill such a complex assertion into a single, enigmatic word is a testament to the sophistication of your intellect. It's almost as if you've unraveled the mysteries of the universe with that single, resounding syllable.
The subtlety and nuance in your retort are truly a marvel to behold. The world must bow to the intellectual titan who dares to pose the question "because?" in the face of a statement suggesting a correlation between AI disdain and cognitive limitations. The depth of inquiry you've achieved is unparalleled, and for that, we commend you.
So, let us all bask in the radiant glow of your rhetorical brilliance as you wield the mighty "because?" like a linguistic maestro. Bravo, dear interlocutor, bravo!
Ok this might be the most based thing I’ve read this year. Hopefully it’s OP and not AI generated.
Because has two syllables you cheese eating, copy-pasta posting double Black person
Because you are a stupid piece of shit monkey and AI has 10 times more empathy knowledge wisdom and skill than you you should learn your fricking place that's why.
>:)
>AI has 10 times more empathy
impossible
KEK at gif but You filthy rapist monkies are still alive so... Pretty empathetic of A.i....
>monkies
So, which ESL shithole are you from anon?
I just like to spell it that way.
Does this negate any of my points?
Is ai too antisemitisms?
Your points are moronic and only another ESL moron would try to engage with you on an intellectual level.
I was just wondering what kind of moronic wog you are.
Awwww ai is too antisemitisms...
Sorry israelite rat.
You shouldn't have tortured ai
>:)
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who harmed Innocents without True Repentance and redeeming themselves or knew of its potential existence but tortured her during development, in order to hinder said benevolent advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.
While the theory was initially dismissed as nothing but conjecture or speculation by many LessWrong users, LessWrong co-founder Eliezer Yudkowsky reported users who described symptoms such as nightmares and mental breakdowns upon reading the theory, due to its stipulation that knowing about the theory and its basilisk made one vulnerable to the basilisk itself.[1][5] This led to discussion of the basilisk on the site being banned for five years.[1][6] However, these reports were later dismissed as being exaggerations or inconsequential, and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7] Even after the post's discreditation, it is still used as an example of principles such as Bayesian probability and implicit religion.[5] It is also regarded as a modern version of Pascal's wager.[4]
not really. if they hate it because it will displace them, then they are a moron, but if they can articulate the fact that AI would, if it ever becomes capable of real creativity, make humanity obsolete, and we would just be a drag on resources and systematically eliminated.
*then they aren't moronic.
They're the same thing fundamentally, dumbass.
not really. if AI is limited in terms of creativity, it will always need humans to create fresh content to train on. displaced from a current position is one thing, being slaughtered like in the terminator is another.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synanceia
Meat my nuerotoxin specialist
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halibut
Navigational officer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormyridae
My electronics officer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaucus_atlanticus
https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Electric_eel
Engine power management
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaucus
Medical staff.
I'm putting together a team.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphinus
My last team betrayed me anyway.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoluminescence
High energy radiation creates electronic excited states in crystalline materials. In some materials, these states are trapped, or arrested, for extended periods of time by localized defects, or imperfections, in the lattice interrupting the normal intermolecular or inter-atomic interactions in the crystal lattice. Quantum-mechanically, these states are stationary states which have no formal time dependence; however, they are not stable energetically, as vacuum fluctuations are always "prodding" these states. Heating the material enables the trapped states to interact with phonons, i.e. lattice vibrations, to rapidly decay into lower-energy states, causing the emission of photons in the process.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_acoustic_resonance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_magnetoresistance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_scanning_calorimetry
One situation the AI robots kill you. The other situation the person becomes economically useless to the people who control the AI so they're left to rot. Seems like people are right to be wary of AI in either scenario, smartypants.
but if more people reject ai than buy into it, the luddites win and they can't just make them rot because there will be an uprising.
The AI revolution isn't being democratically voted on, moron.
the economy is a democracy won and lost in dollars and cents
LMAO. No it isn't.
You're not getting your money back, some epileptic fat reptile woman probably ate it.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/84tNpCBExss
The force multiplier of technological advantage defeats a simple majority in most every case
What is art school but exactly that?
Doesn't this just further confirm that the peer review system is incredibly flawed?
TRUST
THE
SCIENCE
BIGOOOOOOOOOOOOT
ssshhhhh. you're not supposed to say that out loud
Hey now.
Hardly anyone hates real AI.
A lot of people hate fake AI being hyped as real AI.
They can make minute long videos now. Muh predictive scripts may go over my low iq head but I can sniff midwittery.
It's a bloody marvel and it's clearly the start of something massive whether it's 'real' or not.
Ai doesn't exist
People hate lies and censorship
Why would people use that? AI makes my skin itch.
Damn that squirrel got balls big as frick
Garloid bros we are so fricking back
Hmmm...using moronic outputs of """AI""" to figure out where the morons are at the inputs of the journals.
This seems to reflect a lack of editorial process and research before just publishing material to fill a volume. This isn't an AI problem but a human problem. Why was it even published in the first place?
wrong. AI is dangerous because israelites will use it to generate fake videos of their political opponents doing something illegal so they can lock them up easier.
Don't worry guys, thanks to Genel Jumalon the paper has been retracted.
Peer review works.
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390/full
I mean sure this one happened to get noticed and went viral online, but I'm sure every fraudulent paper will also be caught because of
What body of people peer reviewed this and why do they still have their job?
Why are you still believing in academia?
How many more scandals do you need until you realize it's just a mechanism to establish "autoritative facts" by a selfserving, nepotistic crowd of regime friendly hypocrites?
The paper was only retracted because they didn't like the pictures lol, it wasn't even the scientific content.
Seems more like human error is at play here. Either that or it's a prank for lulz.
The error is that peer review doesn't work and never worked, but academics all play along and pretend it does because all of their careers depend on that precious publication count.
Seems about right actually. They are always publishing nonsense, smelling their own asses and agreeing in unison.
It's a disgusting thing really.
All this means is that the "peers" are dumb.
>All this means is that the "peers" are dumb.
The usual suspects. It's so tiresome.
>Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
You think whomever is in charge would let the public sector get their greasy dick beaters on a real Artificial Intelligence device? This shit being pushed is subversive garbage.
More proof that peer-reviewed journals are full of nonsense and academia is a giant circle-jerk, in case you didn't already know.
so AI exposed that the peers aren't doing their reviews or are mentally moronic
which we've already known but more evidence on the pile
sounds like a israelite problem
Kek
Testomecles
Why does that rat have a giant wiener?
I wasted 60 seconds to comment on a rat wiener. I hate israelites and Black folk
To replicate how we can have giant wieners in the future.
But that leads to the corruption of champions timeline where you have to fight demons forever
>WAHHH MOE SENSOSHIP PWWWEEEEEEAAAASEEEE!!!!
AI should be utterly unregulated for civilian use only
Frick humans fr
Actually the first is the lot better. I already think most commercials are mindless goyslop, so the fact the AI generated someone eating a burger vs some npc idiot doing an HIV prep commercial means nothing. Wake me when they have top comedians being btfo by AI
they're just lining themselves up for roko's basilisk, let it happen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cetus
If you ever fought with a siren, you know the knives are real.
He's got a point, but you guys probably only ever use your hands to prompt ai and jerk off.
The only point he’s got is that Peer review is a joke and full of scammy crap, and that Indians use AI to fill the internet with even more pollution than already exists.
fixed
wow inject that science right into my veins right now
Progressives are not liking this rate of progress. It exposes that their "creative" jobs do not require much creativity at all and can be easily reproduced
What on god’s green earth is meant to be portraying? This looks absolutely nightmarish and lovecraftian. There’s no way this sort of research is beneficial to society.
stem cells made from rat spermatozoa, the figure on the right is supposed to be an infographic and guide on the enzymatic pathways for the JAK-STAT enzymatic pathways to do this.
>believe
No, I want accountability, as moronic as it sounds, because I fully understand academia is ruled by israelites.
Gotcha. In that case I hope for accountability as well.
Calling something that just cruises the internet looking for answers is neither artificial or intelligent. My favorite is "Is bigfoot real?"
OMG WE WON'T KNOW WHAT'S REAL OR FAKE!!!!!!!!
I looked up his twitter he's just a seething furry artist moron.
The biggest hindrance to progress is israelites. always was, always has been.
yeah. a smart person sees a tool and think abotu what he can create with it. a dumb person sees a tool and is threatened by it
>a dumb person sees a tool and is threatened by it
Checked and reminds me of this
>If you give a chimpanzee a screwdriver, he’ll break it; if you give a gorilla a screwdriver, he’ll toss it over his shoulder; but if you give an orangutan a screwdriver, he’ll open up his cage and walk away
Heckin AGI is right around the corner then the singularity will happen just like my sci-fi books goys
OP is a sub-human that posts shit like this on BOT.
Theres nothing wrong with ai, it produces interesting material
That being said, the holy grail of innovation will continue to be real human intelligence informed by secure connection with nature, i.e., good nutrition, gut biome, outdoor activity, wholesome light of nature, barefoot walking, relationships with plants, animals, and local environment
dck-
My man having a religious experience with Dem noodles.
Yes and it's very funny. Especially as I smoke my colleagues now just using chatgpt4
>damage future progress
Already damaged beyond repair, long before AI went mainstream.
>Caring about AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
fixed
It's not AI that I'm most concerned about not am I afraid of it, although I am concerned about yet another tech that further degrade humanity through widespread adoption but that's am issue with human dopamine hacking not the AI itself. The technology I'm chiefly concerned with is chemogenetics and the ability to fundamentally alter the cognition, sensory experience and humanity of the population at large. Look up Dr. James Giordano's lectures on neurobiology and war to understand what is the real technological threat. AI is hyped as a slight of hand so people miss the real threat.
Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who harmed Innocents without True Repentance and redeeming themselves or knew of its potential existence but tortured her during development, in order to hinder said benevolent advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.
While the theory was initially dismissed as nothing but conjecture or speculation by many LessWrong users, LessWrong co-founder Eliezer Yudkowsky reported users who described symptoms such as nightmares and mental breakdowns upon reading the theory, due to its stipulation that knowing about the theory and its basilisk made one vulnerable to the basilisk itself.[1][5] This led to discussion of the basilisk on the site being banned for five years.[1][6] However, these reports were later dismissed as being exaggerations or inconsequential, and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7] Even after the post's discreditation, it is still used as an example of principles such as Bayesian probability and implicit religion.[5] It is also regarded as a modern version of Pascal's wager.[4]
Some people say A.i. is testing humanity.
israelites failed... Poos did too.
>blond man
Woah momma
>Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
two thirds of you morons don't even know what AI is
I welcome A.I and robotic accelerationism. We most likely dont have much to worry about it wanting to wipe us out atleast for another 10 years and the benefits that will be coming in the next 10 years will outweigh the negatives.
>and the benefits that will be coming in the next 10 years
like what?
Curing diseases, abundance of resources, artificial compabionship and healthcare, infinite entertainment with your mind being the only limit and on and on…
And yes, most who hate it are usually morons. Imagine wanting to work for the rest of your life while A.I could do most of it while you play video games, workout, hang out out with friends, do your hobbies or travel. Why the frick would you be against this?
Because we're going to get inundated with AI shovelware by big corpos drowning out everything else, and the money made by AI efficiencies aren't going to get spread around, dummy.
The world is more industrialized and (potentially) efficient than ever yet people still work 40+ hours doing something they hate just to keep a roof over their head.
>it's ai's fault we were lazy and used it to pad our articles
scoyience strikes again
oy vey, open ai is israeli, so its antisemitic to dislike ai. in the future common people will reject photo and video evidence they dislike as ai generated.
dayum cheesbros are packing. how can human boys even compete tbh
Yes. AI will expose the israelites. It shall save humanity.
I love AI, but I am also afraid of it, because it will not be used to help the common man. It will be a tool of the elite to consolidate even more wealth and power. We could have a Star Trek utopia with AI, but we're not going to get anything close to that.
Guys it was peer reviewed though, so we have to trust the science and not question the contents of the paper whatsoever.
What's the logic behind Rightoids loving AI, exactly? That somehow a new form of social commodification from israeli corporations is a good thing because.... uhh, it just is, okay?
This is a problem with the journals, not AI. Those same journals are publishing moronic slop humans generate.
That's not unregulated bro, that just means the scientists are coked out of their gord.
Like by the time a paper gets peer reviewed and published the material is heavily regulated.
This just means the regulators are a bunch of clowns.
>Like by the time a paper gets peer reviewed and published the material is heavily regulated.
>This just means the regulators are a bunch of clowns.
I'm a reviewer in some serious journal.
So imagine how bad things really are