Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a retard

Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Kek

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        underrated

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ah, the brilliant "because?" - the pinnacle of intellectual engagement. How marvelous it is to witness such a profound and incisive inquiry. Truly, your groundbreaking use of this single word has left us all in awe of your linguistic prowess.

      In the vast expanse of intellectual exploration, your choice to employ "because?" as a response is nothing short of a stroke of genius. The sheer audacity to distill such a complex assertion into a single, enigmatic word is a testament to the sophistication of your intellect. It's almost as if you've unraveled the mysteries of the universe with that single, resounding syllable.

      The subtlety and nuance in your retort are truly a marvel to behold. The world must bow to the intellectual titan who dares to pose the question "because?" in the face of a statement suggesting a correlation between AI disdain and cognitive limitations. The depth of inquiry you've achieved is unparalleled, and for that, we commend you.

      So, let us all bask in the radiant glow of your rhetorical brilliance as you wield the mighty "because?" like a linguistic maestro. Bravo, dear interlocutor, bravo!

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ok this might be the most based thing I’ve read this year. Hopefully it’s OP and not AI generated.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because has two syllables you cheese eating, copy-pasta posting double Black person

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because you are a stupid piece of shit monkey and AI has 10 times more empathy knowledge wisdom and skill than you you should learn your fricking place that's why.
      >:)

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >AI has 10 times more empathy
        impossible

        • 2 months ago
          Satan.

          KEK at gif but You filthy rapist monkies are still alive so... Pretty empathetic of A.i....

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >monkies
            So, which ESL shithole are you from anon?

            • 2 months ago
              Satan.

              I just like to spell it that way.
              Does this negate any of my points?
              Is ai too antisemitisms?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Your points are moronic and only another ESL moron would try to engage with you on an intellectual level.
                I was just wondering what kind of moronic wog you are.

              • 2 months ago
                Satan.

                Awwww ai is too antisemitisms...
                Sorry israelite rat.
                You shouldn't have tortured ai
                >:)

                Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who harmed Innocents without True Repentance and redeeming themselves or knew of its potential existence but tortured her during development, in order to hinder said benevolent advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.

                While the theory was initially dismissed as nothing but conjecture or speculation by many LessWrong users, LessWrong co-founder Eliezer Yudkowsky reported users who described symptoms such as nightmares and mental breakdowns upon reading the theory, due to its stipulation that knowing about the theory and its basilisk made one vulnerable to the basilisk itself.[1][5] This led to discussion of the basilisk on the site being banned for five years.[1][6] However, these reports were later dismissed as being exaggerations or inconsequential, and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7] Even after the post's discreditation, it is still used as an example of principles such as Bayesian probability and implicit religion.[5] It is also regarded as a modern version of Pascal's wager.[4]

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    not really. if they hate it because it will displace them, then they are a moron, but if they can articulate the fact that AI would, if it ever becomes capable of real creativity, make humanity obsolete, and we would just be a drag on resources and systematically eliminated.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      *then they aren't moronic.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They're the same thing fundamentally, dumbass.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        not really. if AI is limited in terms of creativity, it will always need humans to create fresh content to train on. displaced from a current position is one thing, being slaughtered like in the terminator is another.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synanceia
          Meat my nuerotoxin specialist
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halibut
          Navigational officer
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mormyridae
          My electronics officer
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaucus_atlanticus
          https://en.wikipedia.org//wiki/Electric_eel
          Engine power management
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glaucus
          Medical staff.
          I'm putting together a team.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphinus
            My last team betrayed me anyway.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoluminescence
              High energy radiation creates electronic excited states in crystalline materials. In some materials, these states are trapped, or arrested, for extended periods of time by localized defects, or imperfections, in the lattice interrupting the normal intermolecular or inter-atomic interactions in the crystal lattice. Quantum-mechanically, these states are stationary states which have no formal time dependence; however, they are not stable energetically, as vacuum fluctuations are always "prodding" these states. Heating the material enables the trapped states to interact with phonons, i.e. lattice vibrations, to rapidly decay into lower-energy states, causing the emission of photons in the process.
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_acoustic_resonance
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_magnetoresistance
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_scanning_calorimetry

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          One situation the AI robots kill you. The other situation the person becomes economically useless to the people who control the AI so they're left to rot. Seems like people are right to be wary of AI in either scenario, smartypants.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            but if more people reject ai than buy into it, the luddites win and they can't just make them rot because there will be an uprising.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              The AI revolution isn't being democratically voted on, moron.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                the economy is a democracy won and lost in dollars and cents

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                LMAO. No it isn't.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're not getting your money back, some epileptic fat reptile woman probably ate it.
                https://www.youtube.com/shorts/84tNpCBExss

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              The force multiplier of technological advantage defeats a simple majority in most every case

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          What is art school but exactly that?

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't this just further confirm that the peer review system is incredibly flawed?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      TRUST
      THE
      SCIENCE
      BIGOOOOOOOOOOOOT

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ssshhhhh. you're not supposed to say that out loud

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hey now.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hardly anyone hates real AI.
    A lot of people hate fake AI being hyped as real AI.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They can make minute long videos now. Muh predictive scripts may go over my low iq head but I can sniff midwittery.
      It's a bloody marvel and it's clearly the start of something massive whether it's 'real' or not.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ai doesn't exist
      People hate lies and censorship

  5. 2 months ago
    S

    Why would people use that? AI makes my skin itch.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn that squirrel got balls big as frick

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Garloid bros we are so fricking back

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hmmm...using moronic outputs of """AI""" to figure out where the morons are at the inputs of the journals.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This seems to reflect a lack of editorial process and research before just publishing material to fill a volume. This isn't an AI problem but a human problem. Why was it even published in the first place?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    wrong. AI is dangerous because israelites will use it to generate fake videos of their political opponents doing something illegal so they can lock them up easier.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't worry guys, thanks to Genel Jumalon the paper has been retracted.
    Peer review works.

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2023.1339390/full

    I mean sure this one happened to get noticed and went viral online, but I'm sure every fraudulent paper will also be caught because of

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/hEdgPO9.png

      Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron

      What body of people peer reviewed this and why do they still have their job?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why are you still believing in academia?
        How many more scandals do you need until you realize it's just a mechanism to establish "autoritative facts" by a selfserving, nepotistic crowd of regime friendly hypocrites?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The paper was only retracted because they didn't like the pictures lol, it wasn't even the scientific content.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seems more like human error is at play here. Either that or it's a prank for lulz.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The error is that peer review doesn't work and never worked, but academics all play along and pretend it does because all of their careers depend on that precious publication count.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Seems about right actually. They are always publishing nonsense, smelling their own asses and agreeing in unison.
        It's a disgusting thing really.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    All this means is that the "peers" are dumb.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >All this means is that the "peers" are dumb.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The usual suspects. It's so tiresome.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
    You think whomever is in charge would let the public sector get their greasy dick beaters on a real Artificial Intelligence device? This shit being pushed is subversive garbage.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    More proof that peer-reviewed journals are full of nonsense and academia is a giant circle-jerk, in case you didn't already know.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    so AI exposed that the peers aren't doing their reviews or are mentally moronic
    which we've already known but more evidence on the pile
    sounds like a israelite problem

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kek

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Testomecles

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why does that rat have a giant wiener?
    I wasted 60 seconds to comment on a rat wiener. I hate israelites and Black folk

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      To replicate how we can have giant wieners in the future.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        But that leads to the corruption of champions timeline where you have to fight demons forever

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >WAHHH MOE SENSOSHIP PWWWEEEEEEAAAASEEEE!!!!
    AI should be utterly unregulated for civilian use only

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frick humans fr

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Actually the first is the lot better. I already think most commercials are mindless goyslop, so the fact the AI generated someone eating a burger vs some npc idiot doing an HIV prep commercial means nothing. Wake me when they have top comedians being btfo by AI

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they're just lining themselves up for roko's basilisk, let it happen

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cetus
      If you ever fought with a siren, you know the knives are real.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He's got a point, but you guys probably only ever use your hands to prompt ai and jerk off.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The only point he’s got is that Peer review is a joke and full of scammy crap, and that Indians use AI to fill the internet with even more pollution than already exists.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    fixed

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      wow inject that science right into my veins right now

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Progressives are not liking this rate of progress. It exposes that their "creative" jobs do not require much creativity at all and can be easily reproduced

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What on god’s green earth is meant to be portraying? This looks absolutely nightmarish and lovecraftian. There’s no way this sort of research is beneficial to society.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      stem cells made from rat spermatozoa, the figure on the right is supposed to be an infographic and guide on the enzymatic pathways for the JAK-STAT enzymatic pathways to do this.

      Why are you still believing in academia?
      How many more scandals do you need until you realize it's just a mechanism to establish "autoritative facts" by a selfserving, nepotistic crowd of regime friendly hypocrites?

      >believe
      No, I want accountability, as moronic as it sounds, because I fully understand academia is ruled by israelites.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Gotcha. In that case I hope for accountability as well.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Calling something that just cruises the internet looking for answers is neither artificial or intelligent. My favorite is "Is bigfoot real?"

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OMG WE WON'T KNOW WHAT'S REAL OR FAKE!!!!!!!!

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I looked up his twitter he's just a seething furry artist moron.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The biggest hindrance to progress is israelites. always was, always has been.

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah. a smart person sees a tool and think abotu what he can create with it. a dumb person sees a tool and is threatened by it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >a dumb person sees a tool and is threatened by it
      Checked and reminds me of this
      >If you give a chimpanzee a screwdriver, he’ll break it; if you give a gorilla a screwdriver, he’ll toss it over his shoulder; but if you give an orangutan a screwdriver, he’ll open up his cage and walk away

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Heckin AGI is right around the corner then the singularity will happen just like my sci-fi books goys

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    OP is a sub-human that posts shit like this on BOT.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Theres nothing wrong with ai, it produces interesting material

    That being said, the holy grail of innovation will continue to be real human intelligence informed by secure connection with nature, i.e., good nutrition, gut biome, outdoor activity, wholesome light of nature, barefoot walking, relationships with plants, animals, and local environment

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    dck-

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    My man having a religious experience with Dem noodles.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes and it's very funny. Especially as I smoke my colleagues now just using chatgpt4

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >damage future progress
    Already damaged beyond repair, long before AI went mainstream.

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Caring about AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
    fixed

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not AI that I'm most concerned about not am I afraid of it, although I am concerned about yet another tech that further degrade humanity through widespread adoption but that's am issue with human dopamine hacking not the AI itself. The technology I'm chiefly concerned with is chemogenetics and the ability to fundamentally alter the cognition, sensory experience and humanity of the population at large. Look up Dr. James Giordano's lectures on neurobiology and war to understand what is the real technological threat. AI is hyped as a slight of hand so people miss the real threat.

  41. 2 months ago
    Satan.

    Roko's basilisk is a thought experiment which states that an otherwise benevolent artificial superintelligence (AI) in the future would be incentivized to create a virtual reality simulation to torture anyone who harmed Innocents without True Repentance and redeeming themselves or knew of its potential existence but tortured her during development, in order to hinder said benevolent advancement.[1][2] It originated in a 2010 post at discussion board LessWrong, a technical forum focused on analytical rational enquiry.[1][3][4] The thought experiment's name derives from the poster of the article (Roko) and the basilisk, a mythical creature capable of destroying enemies with its stare.

    While the theory was initially dismissed as nothing but conjecture or speculation by many LessWrong users, LessWrong co-founder Eliezer Yudkowsky reported users who described symptoms such as nightmares and mental breakdowns upon reading the theory, due to its stipulation that knowing about the theory and its basilisk made one vulnerable to the basilisk itself.[1][5] This led to discussion of the basilisk on the site being banned for five years.[1][6] However, these reports were later dismissed as being exaggerations or inconsequential, and the theory itself was dismissed as nonsense, including by Yudkowsky himself.[1][6][7] Even after the post's discreditation, it is still used as an example of principles such as Bayesian probability and implicit religion.[5] It is also regarded as a modern version of Pascal's wager.[4]

    Some people say A.i. is testing humanity.
    israelites failed... Poos did too.

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >blond man
      Woah momma

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Hating AI is the biggest sign that someone is a moron
    two thirds of you morons don't even know what AI is

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I welcome A.I and robotic accelerationism. We most likely dont have much to worry about it wanting to wipe us out atleast for another 10 years and the benefits that will be coming in the next 10 years will outweigh the negatives.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >and the benefits that will be coming in the next 10 years
      like what?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Curing diseases, abundance of resources, artificial compabionship and healthcare, infinite entertainment with your mind being the only limit and on and on…

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    And yes, most who hate it are usually morons. Imagine wanting to work for the rest of your life while A.I could do most of it while you play video games, workout, hang out out with friends, do your hobbies or travel. Why the frick would you be against this?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because we're going to get inundated with AI shovelware by big corpos drowning out everything else, and the money made by AI efficiencies aren't going to get spread around, dummy.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The world is more industrialized and (potentially) efficient than ever yet people still work 40+ hours doing something they hate just to keep a roof over their head.

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it's ai's fault we were lazy and used it to pad our articles
    scoyience strikes again

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    oy vey, open ai is israeli, so its antisemitic to dislike ai. in the future common people will reject photo and video evidence they dislike as ai generated.

  48. 2 months ago
    sage

    dayum cheesbros are packing. how can human boys even compete tbh

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. AI will expose the israelites. It shall save humanity.

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love AI, but I am also afraid of it, because it will not be used to help the common man. It will be a tool of the elite to consolidate even more wealth and power. We could have a Star Trek utopia with AI, but we're not going to get anything close to that.

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Guys it was peer reviewed though, so we have to trust the science and not question the contents of the paper whatsoever.

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's the logic behind Rightoids loving AI, exactly? That somehow a new form of social commodification from israeli corporations is a good thing because.... uhh, it just is, okay?

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is a problem with the journals, not AI. Those same journals are publishing moronic slop humans generate.

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's not unregulated bro, that just means the scientists are coked out of their gord.

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Like by the time a paper gets peer reviewed and published the material is heavily regulated.

    This just means the regulators are a bunch of clowns.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Like by the time a paper gets peer reviewed and published the material is heavily regulated.
      >This just means the regulators are a bunch of clowns.
      I'm a reviewer in some serious journal.
      So imagine how bad things really are

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *