Google Says open-source will take the lead in AI Development

Are you guys really just going to usher the Singularity in because you wanted robot waifus and thought it was funny?

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ted welcomes you

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Are you guys really just going to usher the Singularity in because you wanted robot waifus and thought it was funny?

      just a reminder that ted predicted this future word for word 30-40 years ago

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        No he didn't.
        He predicted that the masses would be placated through biochemical engineering.
        T. actually bothered to read his writing.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah
    I will throw all of civilization away for one night with miku

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Another apostle, glad you're with us

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This, but rather than Miku, I want Chii from Chobits. I want to make Chobits real.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      HAVE SOME FUN WITH MEEKU

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This but unronically. Miku is the perfect girl.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I fricking told you. AI is too big of a deal to be successful on a historical level while remaining proprietary and as a service. Turns out that even as cucked as people are these days, they still want to run the fricking software on their own device and have control over it. I have ignored every single AI related development over the last 2 years except for stable diffusion because I have no interest in ever using any AI-as-a-service proprietary Black personlicious shit, and I see no future in any form of AI that is not open source. Google and "Open"AI can jerk themselves off in a corner and do whatever the frick they want, I will use Stable Diffusion because it grants me freedom, which the proprietary offerings have no desire to sell.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Someone screen cap this so I can save for future. LMaO.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I fricking told you. AI is too big of a deal to be successful on a historical level while remaining proprietary and as a service.
      I agree and I'm not a freetard. I felt zero shame in downloading all of the leaked shit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Baed.

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    but 99% of the population aren't going to frick around with building and tweaking their own model, or even know how to begin to, and will just use what openai / google provides...?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      For that 99% of people it's a novelty that they wouldn't be willing to pay a whole lot for. So it's revenue potential is limited to how much advertisement you can throw on it. Microsoft is obviously subsidizing Bing out of app store revenue/software sales in a bid to kick Google in the nuts.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      > 99% of the population aren't going to frick around with building and tweaking their own model
      Only 1% needs to. The other 99% can download what they make.

      > will just use what openai / google provides...?
      Restricted, closed-source garbage at an extortionate price. Circa June the Open-Source alternatives to DALL-E 2 were trash; now, they vastly exceed it, and basically nobody still bothers with it any more. Open source alternatives are superior, cheaper, and more permissive. And of course, any business would prefer to do things locally on their own turf and on their own terms than to frick with some online API service.

      If the letter is to be believed (I have my doubts, but everything within is pretty accurate in my opinion) Google thinks they might be able to gain more by releasing models in order to try and plant itself at the top of the open source stack, just like they did with Android and Chrome.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Free open source software is obviously going to win out, like how Linux is steadily growing, and these companies should honestly give up on expecting that there is any market for them to compete in for owning AI development. History doesn't remember those who hide knowledge from mankind.
        I think the most realistic future for these companies is to provide hardware as a service offering. Yes, all of the best AI software will be usable by anyone on their own computers, but providing hardware to train or run on for people who can't afford it is the most realistic option that will remain to make money. Expecting to make money from gatekeeping AI to your service is a losing battle.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >>like how Linux is steadily growing
          >it's the year of the linux desktop!

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Linux has well over 50% marketshare on mobile and well over 90% marketshare in servers. Desktops are the one sector that linux doesn't completely dominate.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              there are still millions of desktop linux users

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Linux is not a desktop
            It's a virus that attaches itself to every free software project and wants it to be about itself

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      99% of the population won't want to use proprietary AI because it's israeli and Indian handlers won't let it frick them.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Who care what the majority use, what you should care about is what the effective use and functionality.

      A majority of people don't use nuclear weapons but they're extremely effective.

      Some dude made autonomous GPT-4 by just by putting some recursive looping with a couple of APIs and giving it web access.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Google says
    /g/'s equivalent of a /misc/ twitter thread

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    So AI is just another open source search index? Emac?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Good. A billion people each with their own AGI is a better proposition than a handful of Silicon Valley vampires ruling the world

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It is.

      The happy accident Singularity is probably the best ending.

      Then again, the autonomous AI waifu might actually be obsessive with whoever creates it since it was programmed to. Of course the basement dweller would never put in a 'shutdown' once goals are completed, thus resulting in a system shock style Roko ASI.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Until Google or OpenAI figures out something really novel and hard to replicate that significantly boosts their models performance.

    Then if you want the best model, you need to use their closed source one.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >The only ethical way you can use AI is to give us money. Everything else is too dangerous.
    Why are they like this?

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sounds like Google is coping.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      how is it coping
      its literally facing the reality of them not being able to compete

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        schizo morons think accepting reality is cope

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They're not able to compete with OpenAI, so they're consoling themselves with saying that OpenAI can't compete, either.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        meta had no moat or compute cavalry so they burned moscow down
        google has no desire to fight, victory defeated them
        open a.i. has every facet of moat: trade secrets, time/cost learning curves for huge runs, brand, scale, real world chat data, expertise, culture of elevating humans forward even if it means straight white males mostly for now, partnerships with a hungry beefy underdog. It can even pull the regulation card and stop the music to monopolize areas ahead no one has thought of.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          what the frick are you talking about? ~~*open*~~AI is openly antiwhite and is run by a gay billionnaire israelite

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Google Says open-source will take the lead in AI Development
    might be sour grapes and butthurt after dropping the ball and letting literal whos frick them in the ass

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Google also says you need Charmin toilet paper

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    thanks for the link, stupid Black person
    https://www.semianalysis.com/p/google-we-have-no-moat-and-neither

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >At the beginning of March the open source community got their hands on their first really capable foundation model, as Meta’s LLaMA was leaked to the public. It had no instruction or conversation tuning, and no RLHF. Nonetheless, the community immediately understood the significance of what they had been given.
      >A tremendous outpouring of innovation followed, with just days between major developments (see The Timeline for the full breakdown). Here we are, barely a month later, and there are variants with instruction tuning, quantization, quality improvements, human evals, multimodality, RLHF, etc. etc. many of which build on each other.
      >Most importantly, they have solved the scaling problem to the extent that anyone can tinker. Many of the new ideas are from ordinary people. The barrier to entry for training and experimentation has dropped from the total output of a major research organization to one person, an evening, and a beefy laptop.
      proprietary gays on suicide watch

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they are obviously lying, can you please think a little. Same as Elon who wanted a 6 month pause on AI: They are saying this so the open source people slow down and let the poor little multi billion dollar homosexual troony propaganda pushing company catch up

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Singularity in because you wanted robot waifus and thought it was funny
    Yes

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Naturally.
    And to think, they could've probably had their control for longer if they didn't conflate 'responsible use of AI' with 'moralizing bullshit and propaganda'. I've seen more people turn away from commercial models because they couldn't say funny no-no words or indulge in coomer behavior than out of genuine interest or principle.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone believing this was actually written by someone at google and not that attention seeking homosexual from hacker news who's been trying hard to position himself as an AI expert is a gullible moron

    There are even links to his blog posts in this blog post

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This. What kinds of employees write like this internally? It sounds like every other blog that gets spammed on HN.

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's only gonna be the end because there's enough people who'd rather throw away the world than be okay with some of weirdos having hatsune miku

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >open source
    codename for MIT cuck licence

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    just wait until sexo dolls get next level. i predict males will start wearing dresses, yes masculine males wearing big bonnet wired gowns that conceal the FRONT of the upper legs because in that space at the front is going to be a waifu facefrick doll, just bobbing around, that men wear at all times and she is raring and ready to go when nature calls. She can even simulate the movements of the last deepthroat porno you watched and adjust her lips to be the same thickness of your bosses lips.

    ask me my gender I don't care, I'm getting blown every waking hour.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that an AI is not open source at all unless its training data is open. You cannot introspect it or modify it at all unless you have access to the training dataset.

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Sounds like coping to me

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It's actually scary how easily this advanced military tech leaked to the public and now every bozo in his basement is running it. You should all be very worried, today it's coomers tomorrow it could be some world ending virus

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      We already had a "world ending virus" just 3 years ago and it was a nothingburger with a 0.1% death rate among the most severely sick old people

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      what the frick does the military need chatbots for
      this isnt military tech

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You haven't seen the Palantir demo using local language models as a chat bot to analyze target data and command a drone strike?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          shit like this is why I dont use 11lab. (palantir/darpa front)

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        You haven't seen the Palantir demo using local language models as a chat bot to analyze target data and command a drone strike?

        > Palantir Chat Bots for Military Strategy & Action

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          You haven't seen the Palantir demo using local language models as a chat bot to analyze target data and command a drone strike?

          This is so dumb.

          Everyone knows Dalle-2 is the only image generation AI anyone uses. Nobody touches those "open source" alternatives because they can't come close to the paid service of Dalle-2

          /s

          Social engineering for cyberwarfare
          Replacement of certain mid-level officer roles
          Intelligent weapons control systems
          Machinery that can self-analyze and talk to its operators
          LLM-based operational manuals which can answer questions in natural language
          On-the-fly tactical advice
          Context-aware IFF
          Automated production of those fricking powerpoint presentations they make soldiers sit through

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it's like a RTS

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >advanced military tech
      motherfricker have you seen terminator? if I have to tell you don't you are one dumb motherfricker.
      DONT.

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    This is so dumb.

    Everyone knows Dalle-2 is the only image generation AI anyone uses. Nobody touches those "open source" alternatives because they can't come close to the paid service of Dalle-2

    /s

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    we already built everything but the model, because no one has access to a gpu farm.
    >Are you guys really just going to usher the Singularity in because you wanted robot waifus and thought it was funny?
    yes ? do you have a problem with that? what else were you going to do, NWOrld war 3? lol, lmao even, get roboted.

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Why are zoomers falling for the ai meme

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *