She's blaming a proprietary service that, while it certainly uses criteria as unknown and arbitrary as what people use to evaluate people once they've got their heads so far up their corporate asses they don't really understand what applicants are like, at least for certain, the AI isn't capable of empathy.
If I'm going to watch nine second short content, I will choose Snapchat Spotlight over TikTok every time. There's something about the content on TikTok that gets people addicted. My girlfriend spends multiple hours every day scrolling through videos without even watching then and it disturbs me. Today I spent a relatively healthy level of three minutes on Snapchat Spotlight.
You get 5 minutes to answer 5 questions, and answer them. You get graded by a robot instead of a human.
What the frick is an AI interview? Is this a thing companies do now? I've somehow managed to dodge 3 rounds of layoffs in the last few years, so I haven't had to go interviewing in a while
Your resume now gets AI filtered, so fix it before you send it. >now
Well, machine-filtering for resumes has been a thing for a few years now.
What the frick is an AI interview? Is this a thing companies do now? I've somehow managed to dodge 3 rounds of layoffs in the last few years, so I haven't had to go interviewing in a while
>I was hesitant, and blundered my way through the first question, beating myself up for my pauses >I tend to be quite confident in interviews. It certainly wasn’t the case this time. >The next question included a term I’d never heard of before, meaning I panicked when answering.
This person admits they failed 2 out of 5 questions in an interview.
This. All the FUD out there about software dev jobs being harder to get immediately become clear when you realize that 397 of the 400 applicants are just hopeful starry-eyed dipshits who barely know what's going on.
If you have even half a clue what you're doing, you're a top 10% dev easily.
>was it because they couldn't sense my body language or communication skills?
Why does it fricking matter you're a dev not a hr manager. AI automated interviews are based because they are the ultimate filter.
She was applying for a journalism job, not a dev job, I don't know why OP didn't mention this. Let's not pretend that there are any real standards for technical skills for modern journalists.
I dont get it, like was she on cam and an AI judged her or did she type things into a chatbox with an AI? what job was this even for? what kind of company would even bother with something so gimmicky?
This is the natural result of companies using automated systems to moderate and manage people. You should have spoken out about it a long time ago. Now it's too late.
why? all this is going to do is drive corporations further and further into irrelevance
the same tools that enable big corpos to treat humans like cattle also enable us as individuals and small groups to start our own businesses with little issue
the "monolithic corpo" business model was always unsustainable and now will be less relevant than ever as more and more people realize you can just do stuff on your own and make money
Eh, I think the number of incompetent programmers is exaggerated. It's worth keeping in mind that you can filter applicants hard, accepting only the top few %, and end up with a population of average programmers.
that depletes the competent people supply fast, and you get the same horde of morons shuffled from interview to interview, so everyone has these stories
My point exactly, but perhaps not expressed clearly. You can't draw conclusions about the pool of all programmers based on the pool of job applicants because the latter is so skewed. The best people in our field only attend a few interviews before getting hired, or don't interview at all because it's the companies who reach out to them and try to convince them. The kind of people who think that git is an abbreviation of GitHub and their favorite programming language is Visual Studio use a spray-and-pray strategy and attend hundreds of job interviews. So when companies say, "we only hire the top 1%", they can actually be right as long as they're talking about top 1% applicants rather than top 1% programmers.
>couodn't sense my body language
AI DOESN'T CARE ABOUT BOOBA OR THE EMPTY PROMISES OF SUCH
OHMY GOD LMAO AOLLLKSENDBOBSANDVAGENEKMSNDNXNXN ROASTIES ETERNALLY TOASTIED
Come on anon. American and Australian women are just regular women like anywhere else. Which two groups of women are small, weird, with much higher IQs than average? It's autogynephilic trans women and Ashkenazi israeli women. The only two groups of women that routinely succeed in tech.
>snapchat
do the kids still use snapchat these days? I thought you zoomers moved on to the tiktok
Do you still use email? I thought boomers moved on to youtube.
She's blaming a proprietary service that, while it certainly uses criteria as unknown and arbitrary as what people use to evaluate people once they've got their heads so far up their corporate asses they don't really understand what applicants are like, at least for certain, the AI isn't capable of empathy.
Doesn't mean she deserved it the job though.
>Before I even knew how to jerk off at thirteen years old, I had a crush on a PokeGirl.
If I'm going to watch nine second short content, I will choose Snapchat Spotlight over TikTok every time. There's something about the content on TikTok that gets people addicted. My girlfriend spends multiple hours every day scrolling through videos without even watching then and it disturbs me. Today I spent a relatively healthy level of three minutes on Snapchat Spotlight.
>I don't have a drinking problem
>AI interview
can someone explain how this works to someone not living in freedom land?
You get 5 minutes to answer 5 questions, and answer them. You get graded by a robot instead of a human.
Your resume now gets AI filtered, so fix it before you send it.
>now
Well, machine-filtering for resumes has been a thing for a few years now.
What kind of "news" site is this? Britbongs, are you people aware of this?
are merry go rounds satanic?
the absolute state
how fricking tall was the carousel?
the term for those type of news companies is tabloid, its made for women and its the type of shit you'd find on a table at a hair salon
I see that attention-seeking tripgays are still a thing.
UK is freedom land?
>questioning if something is the cause is the same as saying it's the cause.
I get you hate women, but get a grip.
What the frick is an AI interview? Is this a thing companies do now? I've somehow managed to dodge 3 rounds of layoffs in the last few years, so I haven't had to go interviewing in a while
>compares youtube to email
Why wouldn't you just have an AI take your AI interview?
>I was hesitant, and blundered my way through the first question, beating myself up for my pauses
>I tend to be quite confident in interviews. It certainly wasn’t the case this time.
>The next question included a term I’d never heard of before, meaning I panicked when answering.
This person admits they failed 2 out of 5 questions in an interview.
>meaning I panicked when answering.
>I didn't fail because I'm a dumb piece of shit, but because I'm just a bit panicky!
>knowing the latest buzzwords is the same as skill
I hope you never interview anyone
I used to feel incompetent as a dev but ever since i started doing programming interviews i feel much safer about my job.
This. All the FUD out there about software dev jobs being harder to get immediately become clear when you realize that 397 of the 400 applicants are just hopeful starry-eyed dipshits who barely know what's going on.
If you have even half a clue what you're doing, you're a top 10% dev easily.
>was it because they couldn't sense my body language or communication skills?
Why does it fricking matter you're a dev not a hr manager. AI automated interviews are based because they are the ultimate filter.
women can't fathom being graded on actual merit instead of getting a free pass for having boobs... whoops I mean "social skills"
She was applying for a journalism job, not a dev job, I don't know why OP didn't mention this. Let's not pretend that there are any real standards for technical skills for modern journalists.
I dont get it, like was she on cam and an AI judged her or did she type things into a chatbox with an AI? what job was this even for? what kind of company would even bother with something so gimmicky?
This is the natural result of companies using automated systems to moderate and manage people. You should have spoken out about it a long time ago. Now it's too late.
why? all this is going to do is drive corporations further and further into irrelevance
the same tools that enable big corpos to treat humans like cattle also enable us as individuals and small groups to start our own businesses with little issue
the "monolithic corpo" business model was always unsustainable and now will be less relevant than ever as more and more people realize you can just do stuff on your own and make money
Don't blame her. Maybe she got an extremely hard algorithmic challenge requiring a PhD in computer science, such as fizzbuzz.
>fizzbuzz
Once I learned that people get filtered by this, I stopped being worried.
Eh, I think the number of incompetent programmers is exaggerated. It's worth keeping in mind that you can filter applicants hard, accepting only the top few %, and end up with a population of average programmers.
that depletes the competent people supply fast, and you get the same horde of morons shuffled from interview to interview, so everyone has these stories
My point exactly, but perhaps not expressed clearly. You can't draw conclusions about the pool of all programmers based on the pool of job applicants because the latter is so skewed. The best people in our field only attend a few interviews before getting hired, or don't interview at all because it's the companies who reach out to them and try to convince them. The kind of people who think that git is an abbreviation of GitHub and their favorite programming language is Visual Studio use a spray-and-pray strategy and attend hundreds of job interviews. So when companies say, "we only hire the top 1%", they can actually be right as long as they're talking about top 1% applicants rather than top 1% programmers.
i remember this
i wrote a comment on the article showing how to do fizzbuzz in CSS and got banned from their comment section
>couodn't sense my body language
AI DOESN'T CARE ABOUT BOOBA OR THE EMPTY PROMISES OF SUCH
OHMY GOD LMAO AOLLLKSENDBOBSANDVAGENEKMSNDNXNXN ROASTIES ETERNALLY TOASTIED
>girl
>in tech
There are only two small groups of women that can be technologically competent. Pretty obvious what they are, both start with A.
American and Australian?
Come on anon. American and Australian women are just regular women like anywhere else. Which two groups of women are small, weird, with much higher IQs than average? It's autogynephilic trans women and Ashkenazi israeli women. The only two groups of women that routinely succeed in tech.
kek
>nuh igyou
>why is <false statement>
You are completely moronic.
Not him but it appears to be true. Probably just all the arabs bringing down the average if I had to speculate.
also most israeli israelites are not ashkenazi
also israelites game IQ tests just like the chinks do
when someone says 'transbien' I see "straight male creep"
Autistic and Asexual, of course.
>A
utistic?
ctually male?
so AI is now enforcing the patriarchy. what a shit world
>couldn't sense my body language
Based AI not hiring people for breasts.
>I didn't get the job because it couldn't sense my body language
>i wasn't able to abuse being a woman and flash my cleavage at it
>not including a link or any context
>unironically Windows 11
why is this facebook boomer reading shit on 500pt font making this thread on BOT?
Putin is right, the west must be destroyed and rebuild
im confused how this line of thought occurs
>it couldnt be me
>no, it must be my wifi
>body language
what did she mean by this
ficky ficky
tl;dr: I couldn't use my breasts and a low-cut top to get the job, AI Is sexist
>I couldn't entice the male interviewers with the possibility of sex with me
>how could this happen?
>I am so used to getting what I want