Elon Musk hires 100 new content moderators in response to Taylor Swift AI controversy

https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1752085407859122478
Elon Musk’s X is in the process of hiring 100 content moderators for a new office in Austin, Texas, an executive said on Saturday.
X in recent days was compelled to block some searches for Swift as pornographic deepfake images of the singer have circulated online.
Attempts to search for her name without quote marks on the site Monday resulted in an error message and a prompt for users to retry their search, which added, “Don’t fret — it’s not your fault.”

However, putting quote marks around her name allowed posts to appear that mentioned her name.
Sexually explicit and abusive fake images of Swift began circulating widely last week on X, making her the most famous victim of a scourge that tech platforms and anti-abuse groups have struggled to fix.
“This is a temporary action and done with an abundance of caution as we prioritize safety on this issue,” Benarroch, head of business operations at X, said in a statement.

Unlike more conventional doctored images that have troubled celebrities in the past, the Swift images appear to have been created using an artificial intelligence image-generator that can instantly create new images from a written prompt.
After the images began spreading online, the singer’s devoted fan base of “Swifties” quickly mobilized, launching a counteroffensive on X and a #ProtectTaylorSwift hashtag to flood it with more positive images of the pop star.
Some said they were reporting accounts that were sharing the deepfakes.

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hiring 100 content moderators
    "Free Speech"...
    Did he install the chip in his own brain? Is that why he's glitching out?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Freedom of speech not freedom of reach. Someone needs to be the curator.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Define "reach" in this context, please.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Define "reach" in this context, please.

        yeah and who gets to create those definitions, and why do they think their opinion is superior to anyone else's?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's called a violation of the 1st amendment. Elon musk will be sued now. We will own Twitter.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the jooz got to him anon

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    choosing someone for looks alone is a soulless endeavor

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lol

    >uses twitter
    >complains about censorship/moderation
    >spends 57 gazillion dollars to buy twitter and make it all about frozen peaches
    >fires most of the moderators
    >over time he realizes you cant run a social media platform without heavy moderation
    >eventually hires back all moderators

    its like when you warn your kid not to do X or else they'll get hurt, and they get all 'youre not the boss of me old man' and then they go and do it and then get hurt and then youre just kinda left watching from the sidelines with a big 'told you so' shit eating grin, but its not really that satisfying its really just sad

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >>over time he realizes you cant run a social media platform without heavy moderation
      Moderation of what?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ....users

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >....users
          And how does one moderate a user? That is, what metrics are used to determine if a 'user' requires this undefined moderation?

          so strange how they never want to answer this but love to talk so much

          >they never want to answer this
          It is because there are ulterior motives. There is no other reason to hide behind such verbiage. It's textbook political pablum meant to obfuscate intents.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        so strange how they never want to answer this but love to talk so much

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would be easier to ban all Taylor swift references from x. Ban it all

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's what this horseshit comes down to. Instead the Swift psyop is being leveraged to further the technocratic machinations of the delusional elitists.
      Your solution is the simplest and most appropriate.
      If that twat has a problem with being an 'art project', then just ban HER from the lexicon.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I bet the new twitter will soon be as censored as the old one. You could tell it at the point he hired the Davos plant. The musk hype is already beyond it‘s peak, eventually people will come to terms.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >We have the tech to make pics of her forcing shota to lick her butthole
    >Black folk only create some fricking reddit tier shit where she shows her shity ass (with clothes off course)
    Why anons? WHY?!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're using DallE to make them so they don't have full control. They have to find loopholes to get around the filters, that's why you see really weird but not actually hardcore images.
      StableDiffusion is run by the user and can do whatever you train it to do, but it's a more involved process and the quality is not as good.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can get some pretty incredible results from SD1.5 with controlnets these days.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so it's fine to use AI to make a unique face that doesn't exist in reality, unless it looks similar to the top pop idol used to control the masses? am i getting that right?

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the controversy is being drummed up as a political stunt to draw even more attention. this is just the same ol' rigamarole of controversy used to distract the masses as a vain attempt at misdirection. This makes me wonder what else is going on right now that they want us to ignore.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would never post explicit tay images

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what a fricking dork

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you've been keep up with the recent adventures of Elon he's been totally buck broken by israelites again.
    He was getting a little too free spirited so they forced him to come kneel before them.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >He was getting a little too free spirited so they forced him to come kneel before them.
      What threats did they use on him, though? Subsidy cuts and lawfare? No more SpaceX contracts?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Banking. It's all high finance. He's funded completely by the biggest bankers in the world. Rich men come and go, but they stay the same.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Twatter and Rat Elon is killing Nitter
    I'm not making an account you albino Black person.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    The Wickedest Weasels

    Tay Tay has been confirmed a CIA plant.

    Now what Taycels?

    ?si=EtI95NlZX455JI8S

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We knew it

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The House Always Wins

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's Proof the pentagon is behind the Taylor swift psyop. How can pol be right every mother fricking time? Literally psychic https://nypost.com/2024/01/29/business/elon-musks-x-to-hire-100-content-moderators-in-wake-of-taylor-swift-ai-fiasco/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Everybody given slightly above average cognitive capabilities has called it by now. Her good songs are from 8 plus years ago. Now suddenly the pleb goes crazy about her, when there isn’t even any good music since close to a decade. The chances of this being organic are rather low. You are completely right this is further strong evidence.
      A hundred moderators because silly ai pictures of a mediocre looking older women?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Did you know more than two thirds of the top 40 hits in the last twenty five years were written by only TWO men?
        They both just crank out thousands of songs lyrics a year and all pop singers buy them in bulk.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I’ve heard something along these lines, but never looked into it. I‘m quite sure there are some stealthy undercurrents at work in Hollywood to say the least. Quite blatantly a lot of it is agenda driven.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If I'm not misremembering one of the guys basically wrote every single song that's ever been made with that
            "wuh-oh-wuh-oh!" Kind of whooping vocalization that's in half the millennial pop songs. Masonic code or a goblin who's written 10,000 almost identical songs trying to fill space on his page after his brain has melted, you decide.

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Look no further than the buildings where they are celebrating their awards. MC means master of ceremony I think I‘ve some idea, how this relates to their cults.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > TWO men

          What are their names?
          Kind of sounds like this MAD TV skit
          https://youtu.be/CbHvnIzEkOQ

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Musk just patched last Nitter hole,
    Frick this guy

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why doesn't the moron just ban porn?

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >somewhere out there is an entire office dedicated to deleting pics of Taytay's ass
    life's a trip, dawg.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I remember waaay back in the days of my youth, on deviantart there was a rule against hard dicks, but not soft dicks, so a mod had to actually look at every picture of a dick and check off if he thought it was hard or not.
      There were people being paid minimum wage to stare at dicks all day and check hard or soft.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        is that where trannies came from?

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would probably be cheaper and less of a problem to ban all things swifty like including the swifty minions like they would anyone else.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would be funny if it was the old mods from twitter that made the ai swifties trying to get their jobs back

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    porn is obscenity and not covered under freedom of speech

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sneaking in censorship b4 the elections
    perfect, everybody loves le taylor

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thread is moving so fast no one will see this link

    https://pixhost.to/gallery/ZN4dH

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Elon Musk wants to put chips in your brain

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Elon Musk wants to put chips in your brain
      Why hasn't he put it in himself?

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is like the Groid Floyd overreaction. nobody cared until the video was spammed around the world. why are people such sheeple?

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >safety
    >images
    Nani

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Twitter is already way more moderated in 2024 than any social media platform was in 2020. I hadn’t touched social media in years, so the first thing I did when I went on twitter was type the N word to see if it really has freedom of speech, was banned in a millisecond for hate speech and now the platform demands pictures of my drivers license if I want to create a new account. I fail to see how moderation and censorship is better on Twitter in 2024 than it was in 2020. Like I can still make a fake Facebook account without a drivers license and if I do get in trouble for wrong think, it’s usually months later, not instantly before anyone can even see my post. Twitter having freedom of speech is fake news. It’s basically Nikki Haley’s wet dream.

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This psyop is so fricking shitty. Elon Musk needs to get fricking killed.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *