Does it actually matter anymore if it shuts down when we can just have an AI regenerate all the lost content?
Does it actually matter anymore if it shuts down when we can just have an AI regenerate all the lost content?
Does it actually matter anymore if it shuts down when we can just have an AI regenerate all the lost content?
CHINKMOOT I'VE HAD ENOUGH OF THESE FUCKING RETARDED POLnagger THREADS JUST MAKE A FUCKING CONTAINMENT BOARD ALREADY
Why the casual racism?
so what happens if the AI loses its data?
racism isnt this big bad boogyman, naggers aren't going to suddenly excel if white middle-aged Karens are sucking them off
do you want information to be available only behind a paywall?
>we can just have an AI regenerate all the lost content
nice trips but how do you plan to do that exactly?
If you don’t DIY storage then you don’t care about what gets lost.
ask AI to regenerate all the stuff that was on megaupload
How can AI "regenerate" the lost content?
it utilizes its superintelligence to invent tiem travel
If you think about it, they are sitting on a gold mine of training data for AI. They should just make the Internet AI.
>Books you thought you knew happen slightly differently, and lines you thought you knew are phrased mildly differingly.
>Famous speeches sound more rigid. You haven't heard a single stutter, or "um", or any reasonable, natural pauses of any kind. The crowd is unnaturally still and docile.
>Citations all lead to dead links. Attempts at regenerating their content results in an article you've never read, on a topic that never happened.
Great idea, retard.
That sounds hella rad.
>slightly differently
More like completely differently.
Whoever had the most content online was the one who dictates what the AI spits out. If your book was not digitalized well, or was overshadowed by shitty online content, well, that's it.
How do you regenerate something that is permenantly lost???
Lets say we're talking about a JPG. Knowing the the hash of the file and a general description, just instruct the AI to recreate it. For example; "a JPG image of a naked woman being fucked by a dog, dimensions 700x700px with the hash of "b6b53b8e67c81aef55a7928d... etc"
Now the AI will make it for you
>implying she wouldn't end up with 15 fingers per hand, an extra foot, man face and dog wouldn't become a fursuit
You have a lot of faith in AI with its current capabilities.
The image would have to match the hash (generated from the original file, you do store hashes of your important files right) so only the correct image will be generated
That would be significantly less efficient than just using the hash to create the image file, which is already impossible for computers today to do.
One guy did try to use it for image compression actually
https://pub.towardsai.net/stable-diffusion-based-image-compresssion-6f1f0a399202
You're under the wild and retarded assumption that said AI will be trained in an accurate and truthful way... which will you have the materials to cross reference to verify?
No. There is literally nothing on the internet worth saving. I'm not being edgy or sardonic, I 100% believe that nothing on the internet is worth saving.
i already saved everything that was worth saving