Do you suspect that the militarization of AI will ever churn out functioning combat units to replace humans in the field? The way AI is, I can only see it still processing within defined parameters so it would be useful in this sense.
 |
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
|
there are already ai dronestrikes, but theres internal rules that a human has to confirm the ai decision. maybe those rules will change someday
Okay, let me parse that for you, buttachoke. If AI gets to the point that drones and droids become a reality, it will not be the development of mechanical design by which a nation will win its conflicts, but of biological destitution of the other side.
As a partition of this train of bot, is it not plausible the United States has already developed an intense biological and genetic overview of all peoples, creed, and society? That by default of our massive military industrial systems, and by proxy our adjacent pharmaceutical and medical industries, we already understand how to target and eliminate entire peoples by the distribution of their gene expression and groups? That it is not a science fiction flippancy that we can murder-nuke entire demographics already, but that these weapons have been and currently are, thoroughly tested on domestic and foreign populaces?
Mechanical warfare is completely meaningless if the populace is gone from which it is supposed to protect. This is largely why immigration is not much of an issue in the long run, but only if it’s chosen to be modified by which that course of action should mean anything.
>Mechanical design to produce biological destitution
Thanks for your word salad shart of a post
If you can’t branch a word to mean many similar things it’s a sign of low intelligence.
Yes, your post was low intelligence and off topic. Thanks for playing.
The problem with lower minded individuals such as yourself is that you simply cannot realize a more capable threshold than what you are limited and bound in; your socialization, your biology, your neural makeup, even likely your peers have inundated you with a performance that is incapable of finding a way out of your current boundary. By chastising the use of words, instead of figuring out the intent of the message they make up, you deride your own self by failing to see that there are more critical and salient solutions to your own existence and problems that could be, yet you choose to revel in pedantic semantics in order to obey slave methodology meant to control you.
If you do not even have the reading comprehension to correctly object to why mechanical design (machines and arms) will NOT subdue biological destitution (viruses, targeted cancers, and aerosols), then you will not gain anything from this further explanation into the psyche of the enslaved, as you are a slave, and slaves do not have valid voices.
Checked. But how could someone escape and continue to escape if their prison walls are continually shifting, like representing societies ever-changing variables? If they can't enlighten themselves spontaneously then what good is it to try to save them? They will most likely go right back to being animals and not human beans.
Do you really think that anon is enlightened and above societal slavery because it knows how to use a thesaurus? Get real anon.
I'd at least like to hear the answer.
Like any environmental affect, it’s possible for slaves to be pulled out of their chained pits and not step back in. What takes me to type for a small moment is exponentially worth more spiritually than the physical effort of which it took. As you can likely tell, assuming you are reading through the thread, is that there is a substantial differentiation of a sort between myself and contrast to the invalids screeching. They’re so focused on the semantics and the physical appearance of a message that they cannot see the ideas there to help them, by which the intent matters. Flash traumatizing them by agitating their psyches is in my opinion a valid method to instigate higher thought out of their lowly minds. It’s the only way they’ll have any chance to become higher minded; through force.
It’s not that they will all be able to stop behaving like beasts, but perhaps one of them may find his way out. That’s reason enough to at least try to explain intimate concepts publicly. Again, I’ve already provided enough information to reflect on in a personal manner, I won’t read any further replies regardless if they’re challengers or inquiring. Have a good night.
You think you're higher minded? I haven't had a good laugh all day, thank you for that.
Anon, let me give you a little dose of reality. You're what people call 'an arrogant prick' because even though you think of yourself as an intellectual messiah to others, your status in life is no different than anyone else's, so nobody has any need, or want, for your absolutely unrealistic form of speech that's a shitty ego galavanting as care for others. You should seriously consider killing yourself.
He’s clearly explained that his arrogance shouldn’t matter.
I’m the anon you replied to. Checked again by the way. First I do understand that there is a distinction of the masses and geniuses but if a common guy is told something is true how is he supposed to know it’s true and even more important accept that it’s true? I think the people in this thread you are chastising are a good example of your own situation. If he can’t see like you then why is he at fault for not being able to see what you can? What I mean is if he doesn’t understand because he is literally incapable then isn’t this just smacking a handicapped person? You correct one step and he takes two back but he returns three steps back the next day. I noticed you did not say he could become like you, only that he could avoid being an “animal”. What id really like to know is what specific topics could make someone become enlightened? You say simple messages can change people so I’d like something more than derision. I did like the concept of zombies even if it is in my opinion scifi but I don’t think that warrants you to just leave the thread after you basically called everyone a bunch of Black folk. I would like a real reply though because it’s clear you are being earnest.
Anon, I don't think you understand that he is putting on a façade that is nowhere near his daily reality. You're asking for guidance from a blind man.
I think that’s what he’s trying to hint at though. He’s clearly exaggerating himself as a character or something but putting some meaningful stuff in there as like a game or trolling. So I’d like some more clarification and if he doesn’t post again he’s a coward and narcissist.
youre describing the trends of human behavior as a whole
>intense overview of all peoples, creed, and society
yeah you mean the act of "observance"?
or are you talking about targeted pharma and food
for example- sure chinas distriibution of plastic toys is actively harming our populace and plastic is a transgenerational mutagen
are you talking about the widespread distribution of harmful material like that?
If you're gonna samegay, then at least don't write in the same style and spacing as you did in your original post, dumb fricking chimp.
are you schizo
Surely you can extrapolate? I think for the most part you are capable of arriving to conclusions about what I’ve said, that are similarly approximate enough. But it is just one more grievance I have with the inadequate, whether you are or not. Can one not just think for a further second upon the novel, to have intermittence from winning a stance of contrived argument? Is it not just meaningful to indulge within the hypothetical?
You are very dumb.
Your megalomania is making me laugh
I really just wanted you to touch on the specific phenomena you were describing. Also, I wonder if you see what youre describing as warfare. or, is "war" just semantics to box in the concept of violence groups enact on each other. No argument, just prodding for more/being greedy
I believe that “war” is already occurring on a literal level, and it likely always will be. Another world war has been predicted for so long it’s expected, by the average man and the intellectual alike. However as you’ve pointed out, there are other “wars” at hand, some of them entirely individual, and so diluted from the concept of convention that it should really just be called violence.
When you graduate for simple chemistry you are put on a government list, and gradually you are deprioritized from a concern and perhaps even removed from these lists and white listed over time. Yet the controversy remains, as technology furthers, how long will it be before small groups of people can wreak havoc on the unaware? How long before the individual can wage a vow of destruction against a nation? If you could find a way to kill other people without being caught, would you do it? There are people who have died long ago, people at this very moment, and people being born just now and in this future, with an intent to kill as many people as possible. Their reasons differ, their methods will fail - But some will succeed, and what I find incredulous yet I’ve surrendered too, that these people have already found their way into weapons of mass destruction, biological destruction. At this point we would need control of the mind to mitigate this. Bizarrely, I do not believe we are that far off from a controlled populace, literally.
do you think that a controlled populace is in vain as technology continues to progress. Its unclear to me who truly wins, or is this autophagy in action as the human race "falls" to other mechanisms. i have trouble accepting on a grand scale that humanity in some form wont somehow survive, as hopefully individual attacks wouldnt be all encompassing in their destruction. but that might just be my attept at being hopeful as the full understanding and acceptance of this phenomenon damages my ability to function on a social level
Outside of any exponential deviation of current technological advancement, I find it likely people will be able to be controlled retroactively, and more than just influenced as they currently are, whether figurative or the literal. The grotesque idea of inhaling smart dust and becoming a zombie is not outside the realm of fiction for your children, especially if that dust can slowly “crawl” up into the nasal cavity, through the blood brain barrier. How do you remove agents that supplant themselves inside the surface of the brain? You don’t, you leave it there, and hopefully these things clear out, assuming they aren’t “alive”. That’s ignoring the most obvious infiltration method, that of the circulatory system throughout the body. Self replicating control mechanisms? Technically, we already have such designs. It seems rather ridiculous that we are on the precipice of real mass clinical trials within just current to two generations, and yet you already have in the mainstream the acknowledgement that the mind is what power will claw for.
Conspiracy theories are forewarning. They are often decentralized in preconception, and return to a centralized communal pool to build out thought. These theories and ideas do not have to be correct to amalgamate similar, adjacent truth. In practice, it is actually better to obtusely recognize that collective consciousness distinctly builds reality, or at least a prediction of it. It is not that we have to believe in flat earth, aliens, or “smart dust”, but that we only need to yield the approximate boundaries to which these concepts provoke. By allowing loose ideation, one can actually find themselves closer to what is true than believing or dismissing in any one concept.
Personally, I do not believe that the destruction of humanity by our own follies and fears will occur, but devastation? Genocide? The eradication of entire peoples or beliefs? These are all possible, simply because we can see them.
Thanks for teaching me today. I enjoy the concept of loose ideation.
I was taught through work that the development disease and the cure for so many debilitating ailments have been underway for years and act as primary agents in our way of life. I'm still young, but identifying its existence is some progress.
I hope you have a good night.
By "control of the mind" do you feel there is the possibility of mitigating violence and warfare?
If an urge is subdued, is the action prevented? How far could external control really go in practice? Is our population not already subdued to an insidious extent? It is likely that the action might not always be stopped, but to control the best one might be controlled physically, figuratively, spiritually - it could be good enough to stabilize and domesticate entire peoples to the point the very few are playing simulators. And, as a point of indulgence, if everyone is aware of one another at the hierarchal top of the ladder, for the most part in ambiguous form, is it not a mutual engagement? A competitive collaboration? Yes, eat the ones who fall, but if you are alive why not smile to the next smile?
I find it likely that war in the future will not be as prevalent aesthetically, even if it will always exist technically. So long as we keep on within technological expansion, we will see mitigating eugenics programs born with no one to sound the alarm of such presence. The first to control such harm are the first to choose what happens.
Using a thesaurus like this should be illegal.
Oh, I mean "felonious". That makes me sound so much smarter.
>Mechanical warfare is completely meaningless if the populace is gone from which it is supposed to protect.
you don't seem to get it, the army is not protecting the population, it's protecting it's investment/working force.
>the same linear thinking fails to extrapolate beyond what is written
Your anguish is very sad, and it’s common for low intelligence to mistake different posters as the same when they’re emotionally attached to the idea that they’re right or better. What’s more, if you were mathematically inclined, you’d be able to realize two people talking and one seething loser (You), would add up to around the same amount of posts.
That’s why you’re so funny, you have to try and get approved consensus from others to try and build an insult, or a derision. See
again, you’re literally trapped in a cycle of pathetic impotence. You can break out if you’d stop shaking.
And yet here you are, damage controlling because you know I'm right. I can guarantee you you don't talk like that in real life.
No, here I am passing by in a few moments of both our time, trying to help you escape your dung hole because I recognize you are trapped in several slave mechanisms and do have the capability of breaking out, only if you’d desire to find a way out. Refer to
, and read it through every other day, thinking about why you might be trapped and why I seem so “bad.”
What you have to realize before you or anyone else can move forward, is that consciousness must be released, or unlocked. You have your thoughts, you have your reactions and emotions, yet you need something to occur internally or externally to jump start you out of your current modus operandi, and that is usually accomplished through traumatic experience, or harrowing revelation.
It’s possible to simply start thinking different because one passerby mentions something. So here I am, telling you that I see you’re stuck, and that it’s possible to unstick yourself from the mud. At this point, whether or not you take my advice seriously, is only your consideration. I’ve done my part, you’ve received some very useful information, no need for me to idle here any further.
I'm not reading all that, homosexual. Go be stupid and off topic somewhere else.
AI doesn't exist
>dude, muh soience fiction moooooooovies!!!
Can you gays philosophize somewhere else? You're off topic.
>24 posts
>8 IPs
just one cringey desperate for attention samegay self bumping his vanity thread over and over again
It's the same megalomaniac gay who can't help but use absolutely non-realistic language to have a schizo discussion with himself.
No, there needs to be a certain amount of human sacrifice to keep the higher ups happy.
yes, its only a matter of time
Interesting topic. Gay ass thread.