CURRENT GEN GPT 398 TIMES FASTER THAN HUMAN PROGRAMERS

https://twitter.com/abacaj/status/1777574208337215678

Really though, this would have been completely unthinkable 5 years ago, but now it's here, and commercially available.

How fricked will your job be in 5 years?

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    at this point im getting unsure about my career

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >How fricked will your job be in 5 years?
    In 5 years there will be no programmers

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    *makes 7,053,568 compile errors in ur path*
    *uses single letters as variables and remakes variables down the line*
    *uses syntax from another language*
    *makes nonsense comments on code that makes it impossible to decipher*
    *steals code from github without including license*
    *takes longer to fix than it does to just write it yourself*
    *has been at this level for years and is actively being shilled on bot DOT org (-nel) (replace DOT with .)*

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >locked to a certain timeframe so can't handle constantly changing tech like android, web, other libraries
      >copy-paste from online indian tutorials
      >most of the time spent guiding it to do the right thing and adding context
      >can't handle project above the imposed character limit
      >can't fix complicated bugs with pointers, ipc, and drivers

      I have been using chatgpt as a helping hand since it came out. if anyone thinks that gpt can replace programmers they know nothing about programming

      >know nothing about programming
      AKA have never shipped a product. Only script-kiddies needing AI to move files around think it can replace programming jobs.
      I am actually all in for AI replacing stackoverflow or prolonged docs searching.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      But enought about Pajeets. AI poses a significant danger to real programmers.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Oh no, another demoralization thread!. What shall we do?. No, no, no, no, no, no, no... etc.

        >real programmers.
        Maybe to you FizzBuzz morons, but to everyone else that gets paid to solve problems and code?, no, not really.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > twitter nobodies
      > schizo screenshots
      literally shitcoins 2.0 but with far more moronic people involved. what a fricking disaster.

      factual

      and it'll still be worth it, and you'll be paid the wages of 10 developers for your time. good for you.
      except the tech also obsoletes 100 other developers in the meantime, so I hope you're in the top 1%

      > schizo gibberish from a fricking idiot
      lmao. two more weeks etc.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        sperg

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      don't forget, also writes trivial exploitable code.
      usually some overflowing arithmetic or otherwise, because it's basically trained on babby tier educational sources.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >*uses syntax from another language*
      kek this gets me every time
      >chatgpt write this and this function in javascript
      >randomly adds in 2 lines of java after 150 lines
      ye it's surely gonna replace us soon, just 2 more years am I right

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is what chess players thought until Deep Blue beat Kasparov. Programmers are like chess players in that sense, arrogant pricks with specific domain knowledge who think they are untouchable.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          apples to oranges comparison

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            thats the usual cope, then you cry like everyone else getting replaced thinking writing code is somethign ai cant do, you think companies dont know you can be replaced? the ai companies already planning to do it because is already tested if anything they dont wanna cause an uproar like automation on industries in general, they can replace humans in a lot of shit but that would cause chaos specially on things that require a career becoming obsolete, is not like they cant do it is that they dont wanana do it yet or at least slowly to avoid the economic collapse.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      bloody frick you

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ok I get it that you hate indians, but this is an AI thread.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Hearty kek

        I have been using chatgpt as a helping hand since it came out. if anyone thinks that gpt can replace programmers they know nothing about programming

        Agreed. Helps a lot to avoid verbose documentation or clickfarm websites with shitskins telling you how to do some basic shit like mass rename files. Ironically, in producing AI, they ended up producing excellent indexing algos that blow google out of the water in every way

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Okay, but enough about programmers, let's talk about gpt.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      you do know a model improves with every iteration, yes? is it really that hard to understand?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >it'll keep improving at this speed because...it just will, OK?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >it won't keep improving at this speed because...it just will, OK?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >improves with every iteration

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's BOT?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Still waiting for one of these magic models to fix Kuroba-dev.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    67 issues about replacing master/slave.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I have been using chatgpt as a helping hand since it came out. if anyone thinks that gpt can replace programmers they know nothing about programming

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This. Helpful tool but if you don't know how to program it will create more problems than it fixes.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You're moronic. Fixing code is not the same as writing code from scratch. With enough context (aka code) it's doing very well to fix even obscure issues.
      t. Using GPT since november 2022

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >With enough context (aka code) it's doing very well to fix even obscure issues.
        Oops... hey guys everyone look over here we got an incoming freshman here thinking GPT really can replace programmers LOL! Looks like someone haven't really been working in larger scale projects or dealt with complicated matters in software designs. Your little weather app or tic tac toe app doesn't count so simmer down lil bro!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Moving the goalposts
          I never said it can replace programmers, but it certainly can fix minor issues that would take several days for devs to fix because they don't have time to do so.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You're evaluating where they are now, without looking at where they will be based on where they were.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          People like this make me wish AI really could replace programmers in large projects. They can never be like "Oh wow, cool" and leave it at that.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        have you seen any of these AI agent pull requests lmao
        yea, it takes 10 minutes because it gives a rats ass about what is actually happening in the code. go look at the curl pull requests that completely ignored lines of code and completely ignored the responses from the developer. it's shit, I wouldn't let these things even update my readme

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Moving the goalposts
        I never said it can replace programmers, but it certainly can fix minor issues that would take several days for devs to fix because they don't have time to do so.

        So we just went from AI replacing pajeets to AI replacing whitoids lmao
        Any 2$ an hour jeet can write shit code and the AI will fix everything KEK
        GET FRICKED WHITEY

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it will kill bootcamp webdevs and that's a good thing. but llms are utterly incapable of systems design, and cannot write maintainable code. realistically, they never will, llms simply do not have the ability to plan or reason about a problem. that would require true AGI.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Planning is a lot like next token prediction, so yes it can.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >that would require true AGI.
        The entire history of AI is people saying this about things and then it turning out that whatever it is can be solved with mundane statistically methods and a lot of computing power.

        you certainly could be replaced by llm

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah I really don't get how these people think this shit will solve all our problems. It sucks dick at being creative. Just look at how no one gives a frick about AI art anymore. These models cannot reason or plan. Are they useful? Yes. Can they problem solve? No. Will they ever do that better than people who know what they're doing? Not in their current form.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >that would require true AGI.
      The entire history of AI is people saying this about things and then it turning out that whatever it is can be solved with mundane statistically methods and a lot of computing power.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    We'll all go back to working in factories where high mechanical precision will be necessary. Carrying boxes and the like. How fun!

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    trannies are going to petition to ban ai due to copyright and hurting minorities chances for jobs.
    we end up with a million pajeets making shitcode as a result

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >faster
    Cool. How accurate is it?

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good thing I didn't listen to BOT about learning to program

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the new meta is to not learn to code

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You mean mantra?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You mean manga?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You mean tnd?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Probably produces garbage code/side effects in a real project

    What kind of issues does this "SWE-bench lite" even contain in the first place

    Are they highly specific issue descriptions/requirements which you only see in mature code bases or more vague ones

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What's to stop people from just training an LLM on the benchmark problems?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.swebench.com/
        >SWE-bench is a dataset that tests systems’ ability to solve GitHub issues automatically. The dataset collects 2,294 Issue-Pull Request pairs from 12 popular Python. Evaluation is performed by unit test verification using post-PR behavior as the reference solution.
        https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06770
        SWE bench is easy problems than pass unit test.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This thing will shit out so many CVEs, my career is safe :^)

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Don't care I'm going to program 'til I die.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Productivity increases
    Short term losses as demand is met with fewer man hours
    "Learn to code" jobs will be dead within a year even for 3rd world
    Long term benefits as demands scale up
    You should already be accustomed to lateral movement across companies or a independent consulting

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Most programmers should have never had their job. Most humans, in general, are completely inadequate garbage at what they do. Society simply does not filter its creations hard enough.
    Is this surprising?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Society simply does not filter its creations hard enough
      it does it filters out the competent people so theres no competition

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This means I can do one year of work in one day. So I can make a AA game in 2 or 3 days.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    copy and pasting is infinitely faster than both

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I wish poopgpt was as good as people claim, but it fricking sucks. It can't solve any of my problems and it just makes me waste more time because of its hallucinations.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That's nice. Make sure to keep using it for all your projects.
    When you finally realise that your codebases are an unmaintainable pile of shit that almost nobody is prepared to work with resulting in a complete loss of institutional knowledge... give me a call, I'll save you.
    Just be aware my services do not cost $20/mo.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      and it'll still be worth it, and you'll be paid the wages of 10 developers for your time. good for you.
      except the tech also obsoletes 100 other developers in the meantime, so I hope you're in the top 1%

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >When you finally realise that your codebases are an unmaintainable pile of shit that almost nobody is prepared to work with resulting in a complete loss of institutional knowledge
      This happens with human devs regardless

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good. I hate computers. Get me the frick out of here. If it weren't for the pay cut I'd become an apprentice electrician.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    LLMs are fricking terrible at anything that's not writing actual text.
    Why can't normalgays realise it already, they're "large language models", not "large programming models" or "large engineering models". The sad part is it cannot even do text right.
    My company wants our newest industrial use device to be ATEX IEC60079-7 certified, so i turn to ChatGPT to summarise section of the standard and it gives me information so wrong i can't believe my eyes

    Engineers and actual programmers are never losing their jobs, at least to LLMs

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think LLMs have shot themselves in the foot. Internet is going to get flooded with generated content which means that content can't be used to effectively train new models. AI research is following predictable hype cycles. We're past the peak already and stagnation will follow. There will be no AGI for a long time.
      >nobody really understands intricacies of human brain
      >some söydevs from silicon valley think they can challenge nature with their primitive models

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >nobody really understands intricacies of human brain
        Its really mind boggling how this is mentioned so rarely. The hubris of those tech pricks thinking they can whip up an AGI when nobody understands how intelligence actually works in the first place is astounding

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It's not complicated. It's something you can literally scan down to a neuron (the most granular) level.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not complicated. It's something you can literally scan down to a neuron (the most granular) level.
            Surely you won't have a problem to explain something simple then, for example, how does the brain store data? Lets say there is this little saying that I like, its effectively just a text string. How is it stored in my brain? Does the brain keep a string literal somewhere? How is it represented? When I want to retrieve it to speak or write it, what do the neurons do?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              When you memorize a saying or a piece of information, it is not stored as a literal string of text in your brain. Instead, the information is encoded in the connections between neurons, a process known as synaptic plasticity.

              Here's a simplified explanation of how this works:

              1. Encoding: When you learn a new piece of information, like a saying, your brain processes it through various sensory inputs (e.g., visual, auditory). This activates specific patterns of neurons in different brain regions, such as the hippocampus, which is crucial for forming new memories.

              2. Synaptic plasticity: As these neurons fire together, the connections (synapses) between them become stronger. This process is known as long-term potentiation (LTP). The strengthened connections form a neural network that represents the stored information.

              3. Consolidation: Over time, the memory undergoes consolidation, where it is transferred from short-term storage (hippocampus) to long-term storage in various cortical areas of the brain. This process involves the strengthening and reorganization of neural connections.

              4. Retrieval: When you want to recall the saying, your brain activates the neural network that represents the stored information. The activation spreads through the network, allowing you to access and reconstruct the memory. This process involves the coordinated activity of multiple brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, which is important for memory retrieval.

              It's important to note that memories are not stored in a single location but are distributed across multiple brain regions. The exact pattern of neural activity that represents a specific memory is unique to each individual and can change over time as the memory is updated or associated with new information..

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                thanks chatgpt

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Claude Opus actually, you fricking Black person israelite.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Nooo you're not allowed to ask GPT!! You just aren't okay!! W-what if it's inaccurate?? We need to fact-check this!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >When you learn a new piece of information, like a saying, your brain processes it
                I bet you feel smug now that you've got your electronic monkey to regurgitate this information for you. I don't want vague information about which brain area might have a function in what cognitive process, I want to know the mechanics. I'm an engineer, tell me exactly how I am able to store that bit of information down to the nitty gritty.

                What you gave me is the equivalent of staring at a computer under power and inferring how it does things by measuring the power draw of individual components.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                When you learn a saying, specific neurons fire in a unique pattern, triggering the release of neurotransmitters at synapses. If the same neurons fire together repeatedly, the synapses undergo long-term potentiation (LTP):

                1. More neurotransmitters are released by the presynaptic neuron due to changes in calcium signaling and vesicle fusion.
                2. The postsynaptic neuron develops more receptors (e.g., AMPA and NMDA) and becomes more sensitive to neurotransmitters.
                3. Structural changes occur, like the growth of dendritic spines, increasing the surface area for synaptic transmission.

                LTP also triggers gene expression and protein synthesis (e.g., CREB and BDNF), creating new synapses or modifying existing ones. The strengthened connections form an engram - a specific pattern of neuronal activation representing the stored saying. This involves multiple brain regions, including the hippocampus for initial encoding and the cortex for long-term storage.

                When you recall the saying, the engram is reactivated, firing the neurons in a similar pattern to when you learned it. This reactivation, orchestrated by regions like the prefrontal cortex, allows you to access and reconstruct the stored information.

                In summary, the saying is stored as a unique pattern of strengthened synaptic connections, not as a literal string of text. Recalling it involves reactivating this specific neuronal pattern.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not complicated
            >it's just neurons lol
            Neurons don't just exist there by themselves as an isolated system. Change a balance of chemicals a bit and everything changes. Complexity of brains and human body in general is just insane. Some rudimentary matrix multiplications repeated a shit load of times won't come even close to exhibit similar behavior.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You realise that by posting that chart you're only serving to illustrate that how the human brain is well within our understanding dont you? And since it is within our understanding and it can just be put into a .png or .pdf it can certainly be processed by something like Claude or GPT.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Here, I summarized AGI:

                A = B * C

                Now go forth and create the singularity.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >just put this anatomy book into claude and it will generate an efficient brain sim algorithm!
                Maybe in 30 years when we have 500T param models.

                Biology is just chemistry with a layer inbetween, chemistry is just maths with a layer inbetween, computers do maths.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                That's great and all, but the current systems don't have nearly enough transistors to create a ANN on the same scale as the brain.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You forgot the RELU.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >just put this anatomy book into claude and it will generate an efficient brain sim algorithm!
                Maybe in 30 years when we have 500T param models.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >even the ai doubters who think its just autocomplete concede that we're ~30 years from complete ASI
                Over, innit?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >~30 years from complete ASI
                That's based on the assumption that we'll have hardware powerful enough to just braindead brute-force some useful algorithm out.
                We could probably do it right now if they dedicated all those giant supercomputers to it. Supposedly Microsoft is making some giant AI supercomputer, maybe they'll try to make a giant model to run on that, but I'm not entirely sure it's possible with publicly traded companies to run an experiment that expensive.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                You need to have a nice day. Low IQ useless eaters like yourself are holding back humanity.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                With one equation I will utterly define the entirety of everything that has existed or will ever exist, thus all problems are solved.

                U=1

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Reductionist drivel. Try harder.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              honestly have a nice day it'll optimize the rest of humanity's intelligence

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            the most granular level is the synapse for which it is actually almost impossible to truly capture since you've got abstract concepts at play and it doesn't work in vitro

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/AEJuVl4.jpg

          >It's not complicated
          >it's just neurons lol
          Neurons don't just exist there by themselves as an isolated system. Change a balance of chemicals a bit and everything changes. Complexity of brains and human body in general is just insane. Some rudimentary matrix multiplications repeated a shit load of times won't come even close to exhibit similar behavior.

          >When you learn a new piece of information, like a saying, your brain processes it
          I bet you feel smug now that you've got your electronic monkey to regurgitate this information for you. I don't want vague information about which brain area might have a function in what cognitive process, I want to know the mechanics. I'm an engineer, tell me exactly how I am able to store that bit of information down to the nitty gritty.

          What you gave me is the equivalent of staring at a computer under power and inferring how it does things by measuring the power draw of individual components.

          This.
          The computer power analogy is pretty good.
          It's kind of like how we have no idea how DNA truely works. Sure we can frick around with a couple genes on a fruit fly and make it grow random legs everywhere, but we sure as frick ain't going to make a dragon from scratch

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >no dragons in your lifetime
            ;~;

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      And wtf do you think source code is? Moron?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >My company wants our newest industrial use device to be ATEX IEC60079-7 certified, so i turn to ChatGPT
      This is bait

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why does that sound like bait? I tried to use ChatGPT to explain parts of standard to me (it's like half legalese)
        It's not like i was going to let ChatGPT touch the design at all

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >He didn't use gpt4

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It really is a matter of time until human programmers become irrelevant. This feels like the evolution of chess engines, the difference is that of course programming isn't a sport so companies have no reason not to completely replace humans with AI.
    At the end of the day, just like chess, programming requires no creativity, and every problem has an optimal solution path, just like chess.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >every problem has an optimal solution path
      prove it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If you ever programmed you know that is the case. No need to "prove" it here. The optimal solution is the one which uses the least amount of memory and CPU cycles to achieve a goal. At some point all AI will need is the goal, it can be vague, then you can make changes to what it produces by giving it different instructions.
        This will all be done in natural language, no programmer required.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >The optimal solution is the one which uses the least amount of memory and CPU cycles
          Nocoder.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >butchers the quote
            >gives a vague insult as an argument
            Good one.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >least amount of memory and CPU cycles to achieve a goal
            lmao, this is not even a junior level take, this is a complete nocoder take

            Samegay. Still no argument.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >least amount of memory and CPU cycles to achieve a goal
          lmao, this is not even a junior level take, this is a complete nocoder take

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Hahahahahahah holy shit, are you being paid for this?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          you've never written more than a hello world after following a youtube tutorial.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >The optimal solution is the one which uses the least amount of memory and CPU cycles to achieve a goal.
          thanks for exposing yourself as a fizzbuzzer lmao mong

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      But the problem (if that) is if you automate programmers you can automate literally every other job that can be done on a computer by sicing the ai to write program to do tasks even if one of throwaway programs

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >10 minutes per issue
    Utterly pathetic, Ranjesh can solve 10 issues every minute.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >github
    Is there a local version control system that these agents work on?

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    GitHub is not real life, nice try though.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    every time i was laid off "because you're too expensive" in the past decade, i quadrupled my wage when inevitably, the big boss would call me to extinguish the resulting dumpster fire
    happened with outsourcing to poos, happened with "low-code" hype where big man was expecting business people to ship a working product, will happen again with llms trained on poojeetware from github
    can't wait to get laid off again and be begged to come back half a year later at any cost

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's ogre

  29. 1 month ago
    sage

    Cool, you can now cleanup all those shit issues and focus on actual issues which chatgippity can't solve. Did I mention you need to review and clean all garbage gpt will spout out like some janny?

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The reality isn't as simple and neat as a benchmark unfortunately. This is the equivalent of driving in perfect conditions and claiming you have FSD.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >humans take 1 year to write code
    >I ctrl+C ctrl+V their code
    >I'm 365 times faster than human programmers

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >it's over
    >literal chud face profile picture
    will be funny when businesses try to replace devs with business people for the 100th time and give up and come crawling back. the ceo of my company even said last year we will be able to ship features in 10 minutes with a business analyst prompting, that would normally take a team of devs months to do, yet no one has been replaced yet. Normie executives hate devs with a passion and have tried a million times to replace us but have always failed. they also won't be able to replace artists, vfx and so on. If they could have, it would have already happened.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >use a tree for something
    >feel too lazy to write a slight variation on a breadth first traversal to get all nodes within N links of node X
    >write the function signature and a comment explaining exactly what it should do
    >GPT-4 writes something that LOOKS correct, but has a few swapped variables and a missing line that makes it frick up
    >takes the same amount of time to debug as it would have taken to write
    If you aren’t doing CRUD it still isn’t a threat. If you are doing CRUD you’ve been fricked forever anyway.

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    All this posting about how AI will never replace programmers seems a bit silly. It has already replaced programmers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      name one

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >It has already replaced programmers
      Let's be honest anon, those "programmers" were never meant to be employed anyway.
      AI is the great normalhomosexual killer of the tech world. If you aren't a nerd who's actually passionate about tech and makes tech in your free time, you will be replaced by AI.
      It's the same with art. Actual good artists don't have to worry, but arthoes will lose their income

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        normies have been made infinitely abundant

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >400x faster at writing code that compiles and passes unit tests, no further checks performed
    >with 20% accuracy on babby tier changes
    A faster pajeet, basically.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the people who say AI art is not stealing, then decide to sell 'prompt packs' and are buttblasted when people share them for free never cease to amaze me

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      why do they add 'engineering' to it? sounds like a meme now

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It will be great. I no longer have to talk to ultra autistic cooders. I can just proompt and it will do what I want.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How will you know if your prompt resulted in the correct code normalhomosexual?
      The reality will be the ultra autistic cooder will take your job because he can actually verify (and write, if need be) the code that he prompts out of the LLM

      I love how normalhomosexuals think their "superior" social skills somehow make the good at prompting than less social people.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Reminds me of when people advertised their coding skills by the lines of code per hour.KS0X

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I tried getting chat gpt to do Wordle with clear instructions, it repeat answers, gave me words with banned letters in it, everything wrong

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This is the future

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      More jobs.

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >waow!!! ChatGPT can implement Dijkstra's in 5 seconds!
    why not just
    >google -> cpalgorithms -> dijkstra -> copy paste
    AI is horrendous at solving novel problems efficiently and will just implement a brute force while gaslighting you into thinking its optimal

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *