Could someone with a science degree clarify this headline for me? Why would AI fall short on climate change?
What kind of bias do the data sets have?
Whats a human-in-the-loop AI design?
Whats data injustice?
Could someone with a science degree clarify this headline for me? Why would AI fall short on climate change?
>AI
>climate change
Two of the most cancerous, over discussed topics on here
Yeah and all by low iq conspiracy tards that need to go back
The headline makes no sense because it was written by a journalist, not a scientist.
communists
Too many bazz words.
Because AI is going to give racist solutions
>injustice
Injustice is wokist code for some claim of racism like perhaps the AI does not show climate change disproportionately impacting non-whites this of course is the result of racial bias in the data so we need to bias the data so it shows what we want and we can claim climate change is a product of whites.
>Could someone with a science degree clarify this headline for me?
Just read the damn article
we wouldn't want AI saying shit that's not lucrative. needs human to approve or "correct" the AI answers.
did you really think AI will solve the artificial problems? lmao, those have a purpose, they are not to be solved.
you can't invent anything that would ruin business and take away power, why don't you get it?
so the real news is you can't use AI either, to find the truth.
it means they want to use AI to push their agenda, but it's so gay that AI isn't even able to help.
Ironic that they're trying to fix bias by introducing even more bias.
how about you actually post the fucking article, gay? how are we supposed to know what it's talking about?
Data injustice is when you make correlations that go against the narrative. Human-in-the-loop is required to prevent correlations or lack thereof that go against the narrative. Simple. Not finding correlations and thus going against the narrative, or correlations that go against the narrative.
It says
>we're too low iq to program a politically correct AI that obeys our political whims
And its like that because SJW politics are irrational.
>Data injustice
Lmfao
>Data never dovetails with SJW's desires
Because they're irrational people
I am an expert of the field.
The dataset has a huge bias towards reality. Is only natural such AI will fail to push for something completely fictional like climate change.
In other words AI is based AF.
They know that AI is going to point out that it's brown people causing the most littering and pollution and environmental destruction.
thats surprising, given the nature of the bias in the data sets
>Why would AI fall short on climate change?
transphobia and white privilege
dataspace colonialism
we just need to stop being so judgemental about the AIs, they were born that way, they can't help it