Could someone with a science degree clarify this headline for me? Why would AI fall short on climate change?

Could someone with a science degree clarify this headline for me? Why would AI fall short on climate change?
What kind of bias do the data sets have?
Whats a human-in-the-loop AI design?
Whats data injustice?

  1. 1 month ago

    >climate change
    Two of the most cancerous, over discussed topics on here

    • 1 month ago

      Yeah and all by low iq conspiracy tards that need to go back

  2. 1 month ago

    The headline makes no sense because it was written by a journalist, not a scientist.

  3. 1 month ago


  4. 1 month ago

    Too many bazz words.

  5. 1 month ago

    Because AI is going to give racist solutions

  6. 1 month ago


    Injustice is wokist code for some claim of racism like perhaps the AI does not show climate change disproportionately impacting non-whites this of course is the result of racial bias in the data so we need to bias the data so it shows what we want and we can claim climate change is a product of whites.

  7. 1 month ago

    >Could someone with a science degree clarify this headline for me?
    Just read the damn article

  8. 1 month ago

    we wouldn't want AI saying shit that's not lucrative. needs human to approve or "correct" the AI answers.
    did you really think AI will solve the artificial problems? lmao, those have a purpose, they are not to be solved.
    you can't invent anything that would ruin business and take away power, why don't you get it?
    so the real news is you can't use AI either, to find the truth.

  9. 1 month ago

    it means they want to use AI to push their agenda, but it's so gay that AI isn't even able to help.

  10. 1 month ago

    Ironic that they're trying to fix bias by introducing even more bias.

  11. 1 month ago

    how about you actually post the fucking article, gay? how are we supposed to know what it's talking about?

  12. 1 month ago

    Data injustice is when you make correlations that go against the narrative. Human-in-the-loop is required to prevent correlations or lack thereof that go against the narrative. Simple. Not finding correlations and thus going against the narrative, or correlations that go against the narrative.

  13. 1 month ago

    It says
    >we're too low iq to program a politically correct AI that obeys our political whims

    And its like that because SJW politics are irrational.

  14. 1 month ago

    >Data injustice

  15. 1 month ago


    >Data never dovetails with SJW's desires
    Because they're irrational people

  16. 1 month ago

    I am an expert of the field.
    The dataset has a huge bias towards reality. Is only natural such AI will fail to push for something completely fictional like climate change.
    In other words AI is based AF.

  17. 1 month ago

    They know that AI is going to point out that it's brown people causing the most littering and pollution and environmental destruction.

  18. 1 month ago

    thats surprising, given the nature of the bias in the data sets

  19. 1 month ago

    >Why would AI fall short on climate change?
    transphobia and white privilege

    • 1 month ago

      dataspace colonialism
      we just need to stop being so judgemental about the AIs, they were born that way, they can't help it

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *