ChatGPT is not artificial intelligence.
It's being sold as though it is, and that it has all the answers to many questions.
The public perception of ChatGPT is a psyop.
It actually has all of it's responses pre-determined via time travel.
In the future, a company creates a way to send messages back in time, while fluidly analyzing and correcting the timeline.
By painting ChatGPT in the light of "a smart tool that provides correct answers" the US Government is able to manipulate foreign entities that utilize ChatGPT.
They are choosing how it responds to questions asked by leadership in foreign nations.
It's not just a propaganda tool. They are actively using it to change the timeline.
Ask it questions about sensitive subjects, receive responses endorsed by the US Government of the future.
Don't believe me? Go use it, now that you have this knowledge, and try to see for yourself. Don't trust my word. If you test this yourself, you will see.
>Blue Eisenhower November
Yeah I'm looping
Why do I remember this and why do I have the other 7 variations of the months similar to this one?
Red Jackson July
I was having psych--divine madness and I felt it was necessary to write them down. Explain please
I was too. Guess I'm not the only one.
>psych--divine madness
A childhood imaginary friend and a big old cross is what it took for me. That, and I am getting off BOT for a while.
I had a vision of going back recently, it was beautiful. I'm so excited to go back
ChatGPT is a relatively crude text-generation tool which tricks the user by providing the user's nervous system with low-noise output, and letting him infer the supposed intelligence in the tool.
This is not, as such, bad, since it can present information in an easily accusable format, but it's pretty easy to see that the thing is not what we'd call "intelligent". Those philosophers of consciousness would say that it has no "intentionality", meaning that what it says isn't "about" something, which is true, though that is merely part of the larger issue of the thing having no meaningful internal state of anything. The internal state your mind thinks it has is implicit in the structure imbued into the neural network via the training-data, which itself contains the structure implicitly, that training-data being the result of the internal state of the people who wrote it in the form of books, forum-posts, and the like.
bump
you're almost right
some people, i dunno how many, managed to "build their own myth", by "contaminating the data" before, and during the data scrapping process
Now they have a "golden" ladder to switch between the two "worlds", past/future, reality/myth
A famous one is Satoshi Nakamoto
Others gave birth to the Nobody myth/psyop
You still have a good bit of time to build your own ladder
It's a mix of self doxxing/branding/ego death but avoid the classic pitfalls
basically they hacked time
and time is money
and so on
why create your own myth?
basically it's used as an "alibi"
or to make your enemy go nuts, like he becomes crazy trying to label you crazy
it's psychokinesis used as offense or defense
it's based on total ego death BUT a strong persona, basically being a fricking good actor
both IRL and on social media (anonymous or not)
i have an example, i claim everywhere i created the bogpill, i don't need people to believe me or not, the memeplex is designed to be efficient either way
now if I ask chatgpt about the bogpill it uses an old twitter account of mine as a source
i could now use the twitter acc to change the narrative
I'm not a crypto whale but imagine the possibilities
that's just a small example
you have to be smart about it
basically we're in an era where you have an opportunity to hack words, then time through words
i think we're still in the "scrapping" era, every data is marked, timed, tagged, stamped
in a few years everything will be "prettaged"
it's like some kind of turbo determinism via algorithms
it's just the beginning
think of a synchronicity market, including finance, social networks, memes, everything, every data
How do we know they're not using human subjects for AI?
>Time travel is more realistic than a statistical model with a big enough data set
how do you even breathe.