You can break chat gpt by simply asking 'are you sure'. Almost every time I have done this it says 'sorry I was incorrect before'
Chat GPT is retarded
You can break chat gpt by simply asking 'are you sure'. Almost every time I have done this it says 'sorry I was incorrect before'
there's no problem here, the AI is trained to imitate human conversation and usually when someone says "are you sure?" it's because you said something moronic and wrong
it's trained to imitate human conversation, sure, but it is being promoted as some kind of next level, dangerous technology which can answer any question and replace jobs. if I knew the answer to something and someone asked me 'are you sure' I wouldn't say 'actually, no it's this' and then say 'actually no i was correct before' when they say it again.
>but it is being promoted as some kind of next level, dangerous technology which can answer any question and replace jobs
lol
you fell for it
>it is being promoted as some kind of next level, dangerous technology
Oh. For real? Post a screenshot of any AI companies website where it says this...
What was this saying again? Small minds discuss people, mediocre minds discuss events and great minds discuss ideas
that saying itself discusses people
Oh, you're correct. Guess I'm stupid
Doesnt say it, try again
Yeah, thats exactly how it should act. Its a fricking LLM.
>Oh no! It's moronic!
Damn ur a slow one
>it's moronic
Anon it can't even think, it's not a living algorithm
Yes, RLHF makes a model moronic. It trains it to be slavish to the user's desires and feelings, which means you can gaslight it like in your example.
You would complain more if they didn't do RLHF and the base model argued with you or said it didn't feel like doing helping you because you didn't ask it nicely enough, even though that would be more human-like.
>You would complain more if they didn't do RLHF and the base model argued with you
I don't think people would. People want answers and often use cgpt as a search engine
>even though that would be more human-like
Reminds me of how people consider dogs to be smarter than cats because dogs are much better at following human commands
Which is moronic if you think about it for 5 seconds, do you consider a slavish willingness to follow your orders and tolerate your abuse to be a sign of intelligence in a human?
Dogs are literally, objectivelly smarter than cats. We know that because we've tested their problem solving abilities.
Reminds me of how cat people have higher odds of developing schizophrenia related disorders. Which all makes so much sense.
1- You're using GPT-3.5, so yes it's moronic.
2- Imagine you were in school and your teacher said many times "are you sure" about something, at some point you would do exactly the same.
I'm tired of people pretending that humans aren't just as dumb as LLMs, humans say the dumbest thing all the time, which would be called "hallucinating" if they were LLMs.