Can AI truly create art?

What do you think?
If yes, what are the political implications?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can see the only real meaning in in the top left where the human creation happened. The rest of it is noise

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It generates uncanny images based on an enormous pool of reference. It generates entire novels.
    I'd say yes and no depending on what you call "art"

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Acts of human creation are synthesis: mashing together disparate ideas to find common connections. AI is capable of doing this as well at a scale and speed that is far superior to humans.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      ai is only capable of mashing together disparate human ideas to find common connections. when an ai is fed data from other ai it just gets increasingly incoherent and useless. so it can do it at scale and speed superior to humans but still needs humans to feed it the initial material its working with

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Humans are only capable mashing together ideas of human creation.

        It's not art if it's not created by a human, so no.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Didn't mean to add the second guy

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it has no biological or built in definition of 'good' art. so it has no issue making garbage if given its own shit. it needs a constant supply of 'good' art to reference.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Art didn't exist until AI.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Another thing if people started deleting AI source code in mass, would it auto program itself back into existence? If it can't do that its moronic, fake and gay

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I see a field of maimed corpses in the wake of a floating giant-headed tentacle monster but then as I zoom out I see the hero: a towering armored figure shouting at something with a giant scimitar jammed into the ground.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Have you see that DALL-E shit, of course it can make art, the insane thing is it can randomly generate incredible artwork where as humans are limited by their emotions when it comes to artistic efficiency

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the answer is Mike
      AI BTFO

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      chatgpt4 gets it right: The name of the fourth kid is Mike, as mentioned at the beginning of the statement. The phrase "Mike's mum had 4 kids" implies that one of the kids is Mike.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mike could just be an alias

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Meh, derivative.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Repetitive.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Formulaic.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >in the style of
    It can perform necromancy for me so like in a israelite killing a chicken kinda way I dig it

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    pls stop the artistic screeching you goddamned homos

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI can instantly create art that is 10000x better than the israeli Bauhaus bullshit that has been passed off as """""art""""" for the last 75 years, so yes.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes, but it has no soul. it works by using pattern recognition in huge databases of human creations

    cannot upload image because 4ch not anonymous anymore

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Remember that modern art business is nothing but a giant money washing machine.
    Narrow AI isn't really able to create anything on it's own, only process what you feed it with.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it can be prompted into making something resembling art assembled out of whatever examples of real art were fed into it. so to answer your question yes and no

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's not art if it's not created by a human, so no.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art works by basically guessing what color each pixel should be based on weights and biases that it learned from it's training data. It doesn't so much as create art as much as it produces images.
    I say it's not art because there is no intent behind it. It's not the AI producing the art. It's just spitting out random noise based on a user input.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yes it out performans humans, the creative porn I made it write so far (bypassing censorship with ridiculous concepts) is out of this world
    the 2020s made the world more than the prior 20 years, it feels like Iam cooperating with the smartest alzheimer patient in history with the worlds knowledge at its fingertips
    the output of writing and art of humanity the next 10 years will have shown a quadratic expansion

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it has to come up with something that did not exist before and thats probably hard to eruate because it steals everything and puts it together randomly of sorts

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it is easy and gots spurt of incredible genius and novelity, other times it forgets your name
      it is a million monkeys with typewriters working in concert

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Art is human experience and emotion expressed nondirectly. So no, since it's not humans and it doesn't experience or feel.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You posted it upside down dummy

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art sucks but it makes art troons seethe so I support it

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Viral marketing to get Mr. Haring's name being spoken about again, just as Timex released a new trio of watches with his art on them.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Define art. AI is totally capable of putting a banana on the floor or making colorful "vegana portraits". But only israelites and degenerates consider this as an art.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *