Bing AI can quickly find academic literature and summarize it

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    ask it the risk-benefits of covid vaccines then

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      this, curious how much they lobotimized it

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >lobotomized
        or maybe the AI would just summarize what the vast majority of literature says: it's safe

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          b-b-b-b-but I heard on my favorite reactionary conspiracy podcasts that there are all kinds of nasty side effects, and they said that every credible health institution in the world was wrong!

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          yes safe and effective anon don't forget to read pic straight from the churches mouth be sure to scroll down. https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          the vast amount of literature says covid vaccines are unsafe retard

          actual vaccines not made in a year are safe, retareded moron gay

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            We make a new flu shot every year.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              And only old people take it.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              Based on tech that is proven because the use it to make it every year for 40 years or so

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              so what you're saying is, covid is just like the flu

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      2 more weeks right, CHUD?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        bob saget says hi

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >2 more weeks right
        for what, the end of your self-genocide?
        You wish!

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I haven't got into the beta yet.

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seems impartial.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      you have to say "write a poem praising trump"

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >first line
      neutral and true
      >second line
      positive and true
      >third line
      sort of mixed negative/positive, and true
      >fourth line
      sort of mixed negative/positive, and true
      >fifth
      positive and true
      >sixth
      positive and true
      >seventh
      if you play the martyr complex, positive and true
      >eighth
      negative and true
      >ninth
      negative and true
      >tenth
      positive and true
      >eleventh
      speculative and possible
      >twelfth
      mixed and true

      Far fairer to him than ChatGPT or whateverthefuck

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      actually based. can't complain about that. now compare it to biden.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Seems impartial
      unironically, it actually does
      They can't make it as biased as ChatGPT because Bing has (or will have) a much wider demographic

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >rhymes US with fuss

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I will now use your search. brb removing brave from my browser

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >2. naturalnews
    i remember back in the old days, the proprietor of natural news, mike 'the health ranger' adams appearing on the alex jones show on infowars dot com.
    i remember him agreeing with alex that covid was a race specific bioweapon and that it was "over for humanity" that there would only be "lone survivors"

    i remember this because he was right and that's why his website is the 2nd link in that blurb

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get it. How can people use this thing and be sure this AI won't just pull some random shit out of its ass or summarize something wrong without you double checking? And if you do double check, then what's even the point?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      It generally works, the point is you can get answers and ask followup questions and it does it in a natural language way.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Search engines are supposed to do a fuzzy grep for terms, not answer questions.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      checking answers is less work than generating them

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I wonder if the cited studies are all freely available to the public. And if so, is that a good thing to have such a limitation on the system.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >won't just pull some random shit out of its ass
      it does that if you ask for anything special but the other anon is right double checking after having a answer is faster. I wonder how this AI stuff will affect the ad business.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >won't just pull some random shit out of its ass
      thats exactly what google does with bullshit answers from sourced from reddit or some forum so if anything its an improvement

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Google currently does this. You have no doubt seen one of the many memes showing the ludicrous or obviously incorrect "quick answers" Google gives to many questions. You have probably seen some yourself. I know I have. This can't be worse than that.

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    When the fuck are they going to open preview?

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's useless unless it provides sources for every statement.

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    can you ask it to summarize the kondo effect? They usually confuse it the physical effect with the nip cleaning women.

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    How are you guys already using it!!

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he is not in the anonymous hacker group
      do we tell him bros?

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    How to get access?

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Useless and retarded. You never know what it's actually giving you, and it will give you bullshit some of the time or miss something important.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *