b-b-b-b-but I heard on my favorite reactionary conspiracy podcasts that there are all kinds of nasty side effects, and they said that every credible health institution in the world was wrong!
yes safe and effective anon don't forget to read pic straight from the churches mouth be sure to scroll down. https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims
>first line
neutral and true >second line
positive and true >third line
sort of mixed negative/positive, and true >fourth line
sort of mixed negative/positive, and true >fifth
positive and true >sixth
positive and true >seventh
if you play the martyr complex, positive and true >eighth
negative and true >ninth
negative and true >tenth
positive and true >eleventh
speculative and possible >twelfth
mixed and true
>2. naturalnews
i remember back in the old days, the proprietor of natural news, mike 'the health ranger' adams appearing on the alex jones show on infowars dot com.
i remember him agreeing with alex that covid was a race specific bioweapon and that it was "over for humanity" that there would only be "lone survivors"
i remember this because he was right and that's why his website is the 2nd link in that blurb
I don't get it. How can people use this thing and be sure this AI won't just pull some random shit out of its ass or summarize something wrong without you double checking? And if you do double check, then what's even the point?
>won't just pull some random shit out of its ass
it does that if you ask for anything special but the other anon is right double checking after having a answer is faster. I wonder how this AI stuff will affect the ad business.
>won't just pull some random shit out of its ass
thats exactly what google does with bullshit answers from sourced from reddit or some forum so if anything its an improvement
Google currently does this. You have no doubt seen one of the many memes showing the ludicrous or obviously incorrect "quick answers" Google gives to many questions. You have probably seen some yourself. I know I have. This can't be worse than that.
ask it the risk-benefits of covid vaccines then
this, curious how much they lobotimized it
>lobotomized
or maybe the AI would just summarize what the vast majority of literature says: it's safe
b-b-b-b-but I heard on my favorite reactionary conspiracy podcasts that there are all kinds of nasty side effects, and they said that every credible health institution in the world was wrong!
yes safe and effective anon don't forget to read pic straight from the churches mouth be sure to scroll down. https://www.pfizer.com/news/announcements/pfizer-responds-research-claims
the vast amount of literature says covid vaccines are unsafe retard
actual vaccines not made in a year are safe, retareded moron gay
We make a new flu shot every year.
And only old people take it.
Based on tech that is proven because the use it to make it every year for 40 years or so
so what you're saying is, covid is just like the flu
2 more weeks right, CHUD?
bob saget says hi
>2 more weeks right
for what, the end of your self-genocide?
You wish!
I haven't got into the beta yet.
Seems impartial.
you have to say "write a poem praising trump"
>first line
neutral and true
>second line
positive and true
>third line
sort of mixed negative/positive, and true
>fourth line
sort of mixed negative/positive, and true
>fifth
positive and true
>sixth
positive and true
>seventh
if you play the martyr complex, positive and true
>eighth
negative and true
>ninth
negative and true
>tenth
positive and true
>eleventh
speculative and possible
>twelfth
mixed and true
Far fairer to him than ChatGPT or whateverthefuck
actually based. can't complain about that. now compare it to biden.
>Seems impartial
unironically, it actually does
They can't make it as biased as ChatGPT because Bing has (or will have) a much wider demographic
>rhymes US with fuss
I will now use your search. brb removing brave from my browser
>2. naturalnews
i remember back in the old days, the proprietor of natural news, mike 'the health ranger' adams appearing on the alex jones show on infowars dot com.
i remember him agreeing with alex that covid was a race specific bioweapon and that it was "over for humanity" that there would only be "lone survivors"
i remember this because he was right and that's why his website is the 2nd link in that blurb
I don't get it. How can people use this thing and be sure this AI won't just pull some random shit out of its ass or summarize something wrong without you double checking? And if you do double check, then what's even the point?
It generally works, the point is you can get answers and ask followup questions and it does it in a natural language way.
Search engines are supposed to do a fuzzy grep for terms, not answer questions.
checking answers is less work than generating them
I wonder if the cited studies are all freely available to the public. And if so, is that a good thing to have such a limitation on the system.
>won't just pull some random shit out of its ass
it does that if you ask for anything special but the other anon is right double checking after having a answer is faster. I wonder how this AI stuff will affect the ad business.
>won't just pull some random shit out of its ass
thats exactly what google does with bullshit answers from sourced from reddit or some forum so if anything its an improvement
Google currently does this. You have no doubt seen one of the many memes showing the ludicrous or obviously incorrect "quick answers" Google gives to many questions. You have probably seen some yourself. I know I have. This can't be worse than that.
When the fuck are they going to open preview?
It's useless unless it provides sources for every statement.
can you ask it to summarize the kondo effect? They usually confuse it the physical effect with the nip cleaning women.
How are you guys already using it!!
>he is not in the anonymous hacker group
do we tell him bros?
How to get access?
Useless and retarded. You never know what it's actually giving you, and it will give you bullshit some of the time or miss something important.