Artificial intelligence isnt real its just a predictive algorithm

Artificial intelligence isn’t real it’s just a predictive algorithm

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    wow, so brave of you to say that.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      you seem upset

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        This isn't groundbreaking information, and going against the mainstream news zeitgeist doesn't make you a computer scientist, stick to youtube homosexual

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          frustrated

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            I guess you could say that. frustrated midwits like you think your shitty thread is deserving of any space on this board. have a nice day, it's the only possible way to atone for your wasted bandwidth and oxygen.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Biological intelligence isn’t real it’s just a predictive algorithm

      What makes you think your intelligence is any different.

      Define hard intelligence. Intelligence that behaves like a human? Artificial intelligence is a lot less complex than evolutionary life, but already outperforms humans at games like chess. The human brain is already a predictive algorithm.

      you aren't real you're just a predictive algorithm

      >

  2. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Biological intelligence isn’t real it’s just a predictive algorithm

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      The brain isn’t a computer >:(

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes it is.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's worse

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Neither are electronics, only certain parts are used for computing.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Neither are electronics, only certain parts are used for computing.
          what do you mean? 0 and 1 are on and off currents

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Neither are electronics, only certain parts are used for computing.

            Depends on how you define computing. It doesn't have to be just 0 and 1 since analog computing is used all the time in modern electronics.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        the definition of a computer was literally humans whose sole jobs was to compute things before digital machines, all humans are natural computers

  3. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Artificial intelligence isn’t real
    Oh really... is that why they call it... artificial?

  4. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    What makes you think your intelligence is any different.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Okay I could spend half an hour getting you the many readily available descriptions from neuroscientists about how that's not how brains work, predictive algorithm specialists in computer scientist saying that "artificial intelligence" was a bad choice for a term from the 1970s, science fiction writers saying it's allegorical and not to be taken literally, biologists describing how living sentience does not work this way, and the many examples of hucksters using AI to start financial scams or outright cults - all of which you could easily google yourself if you weren't an obstinate shit-head and had any curiosity about the world around you and the sensible habit of checking your own assumptions for validity - or I could not waste time doing shit you are going to completely ignore and remind you that demanding others prove a negative by default makes you an abject moron and you have to prove your assertion that AI is in any way even remotely within the realm of physical possibility and not a fricking god-in-the-machine mythology for masturbation-addled manchildren.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        So you're just complaining about a term due to the mechanism, but not really the result

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          You. Are. Re-tar-ded.

          What you call "hard artificial intelligence" is not possible inside the staggeringly limited toybox of electronic computers. It is an emergent property of extremely complex self-correcting biological systems within a dynamic environment and are many many magnitudes more complicated than binary or even quantum computing.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            Define hard intelligence. Intelligence that behaves like a human? Artificial intelligence is a lot less complex than evolutionary life, but already outperforms humans at games like chess. The human brain is already a predictive algorithm.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              the human brain is chaotic.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                Chaos is relative. If it exists, there is order to it, I don’t care how chaotic it is.

            • 10 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Muh CHEEEEEESSSSSSSS
              >Muh GOOOOOOOOOOO
              I don't care how many possible moves there are, if it's a constrained ruleset with a finite number of states relatively smaller than the number of atoms in the universe no shit a computer is going to be faster
              Where's the AI that can play chess, draw pictures like DALL-E, can operate a humanoid robot to do housework, and write original novels using the same algorithm? Doesn't exist, and never will exist
              Science is already breeching the cusp of what's physically possible. AGI, wormholes, etc are just the philosopher's stone of today, things that'd be neat if they were possible to create but we never will.

              • 10 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Technonihilism
                *Yawn* let's see in 17 yrs.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            That guy was wrong. You are extra moronic

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >What you call "hard artificial intelligence" is not possible inside the staggeringly limited toybox of electronic computers
            We can sufficiently *model* very small aspects of it but no, the overall brain/mind is not going to be efficiently reproduced with hardware that a century later is still function-designed around performing calculations (a thing we only do as high-level thinking). GPT is not the same thing as mammalian pattern recognition, it just looks like it to people who can't tell the difference (or believe it's close enough not to matter).

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        You. Are. Re-tar-ded.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is copy-pasted from /tg/.

        [...]

        This entire thing is a troll thread and not a very good one.

        [...]

        I hope OP gets perma'd so they stop shitting the place up.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Wow /tg/ is fricking low iq as hell

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            And bot comes across as /misc/ lite, along with BOT and BOT, your point?

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I hope OP gets perma'd so they stop shitting the place up.
          Of all the annoying shits on BOT, the anti-AI cult might actually be the worst. They are such drooling morons it's astounding.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            >anti-AI cult
            You worship a computer program and you call others cultists?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        people are so fricking mad at this copypasta but unable to counter its points because they desperately need to believe we're entering the singularity
        people who do not write software but very likely own crypto or think Web3 is a thing

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Negative responses to this post are being made exclusively by brainlets

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          Please explain how looking at something and deriving information from your surroundings isn’t a flesh prediction/algorithm? You’re thinking thoughts constantly, so that flesh algorithm is working as intended.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Woop a wall of text.
        With lots of words.
        And no sense.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      google chinese room

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        It’s a flawed premise

  5. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's a projection algorithm

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      God I hope Sama will go fricking bankrupt.

  6. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is anything real?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Your stepborther becuase I'm fricker your mother is real retarggot

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        moronic phoneposter

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >no argument
          I won moron

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You aren't, but I am

  7. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I fricking hate LLM so much.
    frick useless piece of PR trash.
    all LLM research are fricking garbage.
    homies, we need to go back to doing AI research pre-LLM.

  8. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    ai isnt what you think it is
    machine learning is just applied statistics
    its just undergrad mathgay shit

  9. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    THE SOUL IS REAL

  10. 10 months ago
    bodhi

    yes it is fake and gay and I have been telling the droolers here this for years

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why are you so stupid bodhi poopy head?

  11. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    you mean ChatGPT... it's static precomputed model, but if it were to modify itself in real time then yes it would be 1:1 human and you can only cope about it

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >but if it were to modify itself in real time then yes it would be 1:1 human
      What? You mean it would be a person, not human? Or that it would be at least self-aware?

      You can train AIs off of AIs. Except they get worse (and more confident), not better.

    • 10 months ago
      bodhi

      low IQ post, a computer can never directly experience anything, it can only "think" in numerical values HUMANS assign meaning too. A computer doesnt what a "human" is, it doesnt even what it is outisde of some ascii value. It doesnt know what color red is or what lizard is and it never can because when you take off the cover it is just an abacus that assigns the letters "tree" to when rows 246 are on on the right and 135 is off on the left. It is fake and gay and you are cringe and moronic

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it can only "think" in numerical values
        Neurons also "think" in numbers. Except numbers are the firing frequency and various electrochemical processes inside of them. There's no reason why "AI" couldn't contain those phenomena in its model.

        • 10 months ago
          bodhi

          nope, doesnt work like that. You missed the part where I said "directly experience" things.

          • 10 months ago
            Anonymous

            There's no such thing as a "direct experience". There are no "pure" experiences whatever that even means.
            A CMOS photo sensor turns incoming photons into electric charge which a controller senses as an electric potential. A photoreceptor cell in a human eye turns photons into membrane electric potential. Both brain and a computer "experience" a voltage difference.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        meds

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          now

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Does a brain neuron know what the color red is outside of a chemical-electric pulse?

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you mean ChatGPT... it's static precomputed model, but if it were to modify itself in real time then yes it would be 1:1 human
      The ability to learn from experience and potentially change a model is A goal, but not the endgame in any way here.

  12. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    no you dont shut up idiot

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      You just made a calculated response, even though your calculations were flawed, you still made them.

  13. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >statistics isn't real math it's just predictive analytics
    It's common for subhuman iq mongoloids to not understand statistics. Humans don't have a natural framework for an intuitive understanding of statistics. Since you are not smart enough to understand what you are talking about I suggest you shut the frick up and try to learn from someone who is not a genetic dead end such as yourself.

  14. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stupid thread you should ball have a nice day

  15. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    you aren't real you're just a predictive algorithm

  16. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >a predictive algorithm
    That is just a simplified way to describe intelligence.

  17. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it’s just a predictive algorithm
    Yes, and the term for this is artificial intelligence.

    What you're looking for is AGI and this is in fact, not yet real and maybe never will.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's real as of 3 months ago

  18. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    well how does it matter my pcs runs all of the time i run all of the time during sleep their is jsut like never realy deep.

  19. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Humans aren’t real it’s just a bunch of cells.

  20. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >if simulating the intelligence of a brain is worth it on any modern computer.
    Human intelligence is an evolutionary response to severe environmental stresses and a few lucky mutations that delayed speech acquisition allowing us to linguistically conceive object-subject relations, in conjunction with the absolute necessity to pass down knowledge generationally in order to survive as a species.
    It's hugely important to understand how many species lived longer on Earth without ever achieving what we call sentience because they found a niche that worked for them. We're 2 million years old and most of what we've achieved happened in a burst 35,000 years ago that eluded other hominids.
    Now, people want to quantify all of that to a set of algorithms unrelated to survival or consequences despite the criticality of those to human intelligence.

  21. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm a predictive algorithm made of atoms.
    My failure rate is still higher than A.I. tho.

  22. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kind of absurd how dualists (rightfully) talk about the hard problem of consciousness but then turn around and say they know for certain AI can't and never will be real.
    How do you know? You don't have access to any potential phenomenal experience an AI may or may not have.

    They don't realize their "you can't know nuffin" argument swings both ways.
    The only thing you can really test is intelligence itself, which AI can pass.

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      please do ML 101, this has been discussed countless times and you pseudo degenerates keep repeating the same BS over and over.
      information grouping can't develop intelligence or awareness

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        >information grouping can't develop intelligence or awareness
        You don't and can't know, unless you can explain the mechanism behind consciousness.

        • 10 months ago
          Anonymous

          >if you can't define intelligence this is intelligence
          into the trash with the rest of your pseudo garbage

  23. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    i have a theory that "people" like you operate similarly to "ai", that's why your superficial perception support this deluded concept.
    intelligence is the ability to use the information you have to construct systematic product, not to repeat or slightly permuted existing information.

  24. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    this entire fricking board is so shit
    does anyone around here ever talk about science or math or anything actually related to BOT or is it just bait threads like this all the time
    I feel like every thread I read is actively killing brain cells, what a shitty fricking board

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I hate BOT
      why are you here?

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        I come back every now and then to see if it improved
        it just remains the same if not gets worse
        at this point the entire board should be nuked and start again
        also too many /misc/ threads here full of absolute moronation

  25. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    COVID was the self replicating AI and the vaxx helped deliver it.
    >over 70% of the worlds population has been inoculated with the [Q]uantum AI
    >13.4 billion doses administered
    Now we just wait for them to roll out the new technohomosexual system and hook up all the cattle to it along with all the IoT devices before the inevitable. Many of the unvaxxed will line up for the boosters once UBI and other benefits are announced.

  26. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Human intelligence is a predictive algorithm. We parse together things we learn and experiences we have and generate thoughts and predictions the same way AI does.

    We just have 3 billions years of trial and error (500mil as sentient life), so our organic intelligence appears more crisp and less clunky

  27. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Thinking is by definition a prediction. Go frick yourself.

  28. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    poo poo thread

  29. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    No one, and I mean NO ONE, can outsmart me!

  30. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I am not real and I'm just a predictive algorithm
    well yes.

  31. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's what the data is demonstrating, yes.

    However there's no reason we couldn't make a computer capable of housing a soul or projecting consciousness or whatever your model is. We just aren't anywhere close yet.

  32. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >materialism is le bad

  33. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Artificial intelligence can just be a predictive algorithm. Self awareness on the other hand will probably take different methods

  34. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think you can't differentiate mind from intelligence.

  35. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Souls aren’t real.

  36. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Artificial intelligence isn’t real
    Yet

    • 10 months ago
      Anonymous

      It will never be real >:(

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        allow AGI to play with even the most restrictive rules you can muster and it's game ovah.

      • 10 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nuh-uh it will be real when I make myself an AI gf that will love me on C++

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Prove it

  37. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing like asking basic reading comprehension questions to a hot new sillyzog valley elelem to make you truly appreciate the human mind.

  38. 10 months ago
    Anonymous

    You've presented this as some sort of ground breaking discovery. Are you lagging?

  39. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >:(

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *