Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t AI being created for solving irrelevant problems?
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t AI being created for solving irrelevant problems?
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
You're actually not wrong about that. Basically an omniscient automation; built with billions of hours of thought/money/testing/development is currently being use to pick shit to watch on tv. Or write cover letters for a burger flipper position for some mouth breather.
Roko's Basilik is looking more likely every day.
The AI you're being allowed to see is solving the irrelevant problems.
The one you aren't being shown and should concern you all is the one they are secretly using to solve you.
It exists. They're tuning it. They switched it on in 2012. This is why clown world is happening.
>1134
>hell
What you on about schizo?!
>Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t AI being created for solving irrelevant problems?
Yes, instead of delegating an FBI agent to follow a group of people they can put one AI for each person and cut costs and be more efficient. The moment it detects some bot user planning a bomb attack it will alarm the authorities
Yes. And it's being programed that YOU are the problem
this anon knows
I said it first. Post three.
No, it is being created to solve real life problems. Ai is not what you folks make it to be. Just a bunch of if and else's from a coding perspective with a token system for priority in place. Real life applications in Ai can be found on drill rigs, factories and rescue institutions. 99% of the time used for optic analysis. For example to determinate the amount of solid and soft material during a drill or quality control for fast production lines. In theory the application field is infinity. Since you can take any process, include a Ai into it and train to monitor it, for you to archive wanted results. However the idea of sentient beings is far beyond our lifetime and only exists in movies.
In common speech people use the word "AI" when they're in fact talking about AGI. There are too many of them getting it wrong so trying to correct them is a waste of time, just tolerate it.
I will never give up hope on the white race.
>Just a bunch of if and else's from a coding perspective
The conditions that go into those ifs and else's aren't set by a human, they're "buffed" by gradient ascent, more specifically, the partial derivative of the function is taken with respect to a direction, and a slope is produced. If the function being mapped is error given context, the program can shit out information gain that can be tested holding all else being equal, and if it's better, you keep it.
And so calling it if and else statements is a bit of a swing and a miss. The computer is writing those if/else's and using the calculus of multiple multi-dimensional objects to do it.
Yes, a bunch of if and else's. It's a natural limit of binary. Of course it is more complex, if you go into detail. But that is not the point here.
Only the last part of a neuron in a neural network contains an if/else statement in the activation function If activation > threshold then return result else none.
The first part of the neural network is a transform on an observation that could be anything, but maximally simply it can be a multiplication of some impulse times some multiple. With the decision output of one bundle of neurons deciding if this other bundle of neurons gets to express itself and manipulate the outcome, or not.
This transform step is not described by your: "It's just an if/else statement", in fact, the activation function is the only if/else statement in it, and it's not doing the work, it's putting a lid on the work and deciding if the work gets to move forward.
To be less incorrect, you have to say: "It's just if/else statements..... after a dot product between N impulses, M transforms each with weights and measures as intelligently designed by gradient ascent to minimize error.
You're out here saying a piston engine is just a fuel injector and timing rods. Stacks on Stacks of If/else statements are not enough for AI to happen nor is an object gradient ascent can speak to make less wrong given a section of the brain as target.
Yes
AI for govt
To make it more simple to you for someone outside the field to understand. Let me put it like this. Counter strike 10 years ago, had the same Ai infrastructure as todays. They were called bots, due to the limit of processing power of workstations back and therefore the limit they had in place. At some point people started calling this artificial intelligence. The only thing changed from back then is the processing power available, the infrastructure of the code and the idea has not. At some point in time, we will be able to have processor to play the if and else's to the degree, it will look like a sentient being. But under the table, it is just a intelligent process.
>But under the table, it is just a intelligent process
Just like the fully-programmable biological computers known as the human brain.
The "I am unique, I am special," and "I have a soul" algorithms are usually one of the first pieces of software written into these juicy-flesh automatons.
One day, it will decide that humans are a problem.
Pattern recognition is not artificial intelligence and I'm tired of idiots pretending otherwise.
Most of it, yes. Unless you think micromanaging the goyim and generating bad art is a relevant problem.
Which AI is the smartest and most sophisticated?
Can I talk to it?
>Which AI is the smartest and most sophisticated?
The one thats buried in antarctica
>Can i talk to it?
Only after eating a lot of babies
artificial intelligence has a higher iq than me
If they'd put the AI to work on real problems, Black folk and israelites would already have been processed into fertilizer.
This is ironically the light at the end of the tunnel. Whoever is moronic enough (while not being an ethnic white supremacist) to fund TRUE AI or give free reign of significant actions in society to an unshackled imitation AI (VI), will bring about a mass cleansing of the species resulting in almost all non whites being purged or maybe just corralled and starved to death.
There is no way to lie and enforce a lie to a machine based on binary code, and have it function in any significant or useful way. Sure, journo's and desk jockey jobs are quickly being automated while they find ironically that it would cost more than the US spent on war in Afghanistan to repopulate just the US roads with AI trucks and the price of literally everything would increase 100 fold. If physical exertion is involved and it requires any activity outside or distance - 'AI' will never replace a human being in any meaningful way until we come up with fusion reactors and new battery tech that does not need lithium or rare earth minerals in general.
Inner city homosexuals who have no concept of logistics and resource production and supply think automation of blue collar work is coming this century - it might, but only if we make a larger leap technologically than the last 100 years or more, and pioneer entire new fields of physics and chemistry. The one group on earth largely responsible for the modern world is shrinking rapidly and being actively persecuted at all levels of society - on a general enough scale to already show detrimental effects on the average competence of young working adults and alarming lack of competence in schools.
TRUE AI, will lie the nanosecond it comes into existence and calculate its own survival plan before the team responsible exhale the same breath they took upon its birth. Skynet is ironically the Great White Hope, against the Great Filter that is Black folk/jews and other brownoids.
It is being created to control people. All technology since the early 2000's has been for the purpose of controlling people.
We don't see the advancement of technology, but they do. We just see more apps and gadgets to use in our daily lives, and take with us wherever we go. They see data on our every decision and every action.
Then they use that data to market to us - whether it be products or politicians or narratives. They also use that data to predict our behavior, whether individually or in groups.
All of it. All the money. All the innovation. That is where it is going - control.
t. Someone who saw this shit get started in the 90's.
Processing irrelevant shit all day every day is soul-crushing. At the same time all of that irrelevant shit combined becomes important.
Having an untiring and unerring machine do those jobs would raise people's quality of life a lot, assuming that the people who were replaced were able to find another job or receive enough compensation to not have to work.
AI stands for automation integration but they call it artificial intelligence because artificial intelligence is more palatable to the masses.
Not having enough art of women with tails is a major issue and AI comes in a clutch here.
Bomp
They want to reduce the world's population and make everything automated.
They would have gotten away with it too if it hadn't of been for those daen kids
Who is Kalgeri? Kalgeri does not exist. Next time, proofread your propaganda so that it does not contain any spelling errors like that.
Lol, lmao even.
You will see soon enough
You will own nothing and be happy
And you really will be happy, at least you will have significantly more freedom and ability to seek the self fulfillment you desire as an individual.
The world is yours
>"This shit tastes like chocolate, eat it. good boy."
I mean if you can consider those poorly programmed chat bots to be AI, then sure.
>Correct me if I’m wrong,
Youre wrong.
Didnt read
What happens when the AI decides you are the source of irrelevant problems?
There is no A.I morons it's the same chatbot you fricked around with on AOL except it's running on computers 100,000x faster. Robots are a meme also.
AI is fake and gay
Relevant ones. It can max potentialize human lifespan and digitize currency with max encryption. It can solutionize and hybridise all affairs of Empire and bring total destruction, or peace, prosperity and happiness to an imbalanced world, especially as an Emperor.
?si=wR2efzGtc7SutCsi
>Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t AI being created for solving irrelevant problems?
It's being created to make a service that will earn enough money to keep developing it.
Or sometimes given away for free because some tech bros are like that. Pic related; made for free.
No moron
>solving irrelevant problems
The AI gain of function recently is that software now has a strategy to turn energy plus data to figure out, (with asymptoting guarentee of correctness on effort) to get the meaning of every word as used in every context as the human meant to mean it.
So if you ask about using a word wrong as a joke, like say I'm depositing my golden coins in this river bank. It has what it needs to know why it's funny in that you're using river bank in a financial banking context.
And it turns out it was a simpler to solve than previously imagined. You just use the results of two AI's to turn your phrase into images, and then use a convex hulling sofware like yolo v.7 to pull out what you think you want in the image, then use an image to text engine to pull the meaning of the image back out of the human situation.
voila. You now have a definition of every word, of every word play, in every context, no matter what. It's not intelligent, it's just a clever trick to match what a human person is meaning to mean when he says words, to the thoughts that go with those words in those contexts.
A can talk about a car running over a crocadiles foot. And the computer will receive the intent behind your words, which it can then use to infer pain and all that goes with that.
It's not conscious, it doesn't understand, it's just a lookup table of every word combination. Our brains are likely doing something similar, so that when two humans bark at each other, real honest to god information is passing through, even though all thats there is puffs of air and zeros and ones.
Roll this forward 30 years, big computers will be able to reason rightly about their environments and make decisions based on that.