Are artists still seething about AI art or have they come to the realization that human made art cannot and will not be replaced?

Are artists still seething about AI art or have they come to the realization that human made art cannot and will not be replaced?

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    For instance I've yet to see AI generators being able to replicate works by contemporary masters like the Chinese artist Ruan Jia

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >For instance I've yet to see AI generators being able to
      What kind of stupid argument is this? Only a year ago I had yet to see AI generators do even 10% of the amazing stuff they're doing now. It means frick all.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/w8WoZcS.jpg

      Guwei Zheng. Famous Singaporean weeb ish artist

      https://i.imgur.com/OXTYpgs.jpg

      Wang Ling aka WLOP, artist who got famous on twitter

      >the Chinese are the only people still learning drawing from the western canon
      Grim

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      nineteen eighty nine tiananmen square massacre

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Poo in the loo

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Truly the epitome of soulless corpo-slop mobile game art, which the ant people will likely always excel at. Machines are too soulful.

  2. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Guwei Zheng. Famous Singaporean weeb ish artist

  3. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    some are, some aren't
    simple as

  4. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    They all roped. And it hasn't replaced human art yet, but it will

  5. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wang Ling aka WLOP, artist who got famous on twitter

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Dude WLOP style can be generated by SD lmao
      https://civitai.com/models/2968/wlop
      Bad example

      You also have shit taste in art btw

  6. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    THE SUBJECT IS ALWAYS A WOMAN BECAUSE BOTH THE ARTIST AND THE VIEWER IS ALWAYS A SIMP

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      the sex drive is an easy way to gather an audience, because everyone has one.
      for other topics, interests are more niche and the audience thus smaller

  7. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >cannot be replaced
    They all got replaced and found a real job/roped.
    They can't make an easy living off DeviantArt commissions anymore.

  8. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    You picked the worst examples, with subject matter and styles the AI particularly excels at.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI sucks hard at interactions and consistent intricate details, but the "style" arguments comes mainly from the pajeet 3dpd spam that is honestly what 90% of ai stuff is. You can have a very flat anime-like style without much trouble.

  9. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Twitter "artist" are not artists, drawing anime shit is not art

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I thought skrilex dubstep wasn't music when it came out and now i nostalgia

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, still seething, this will take years to end, autist.

      >no evidence

      Ai art always feels off. They always have this weird instalike filter

      skill issue on the part of the folks that made that stuff, friend

      Dude WLOP style can be generated by SD lmao
      https://civitai.com/models/2968/wlop
      Bad example

      You also have shit taste in art btw

      You know you're just reinforcing his post, right?
      And you have shit taste in art, moronic coomer.

  10. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI already replaced human art in its shitty toddler form with 7 fingers on each hand. One year from now there will be no way to make a difference who made it. People don't give a frick if AI or not and artists can not compete with AI art. Thanks to superficial homosexuals human art will die in the sense of it wont be applicable to industry and hobbyist will be discouraged. Besides the picture you posted is literally a photo with face replaced with some weeb shit, hardly art

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >One year from now there will be no way to make a difference who made it
      You were saying this a year ago.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Dalle mini was released in April 2022.
        >You were saying this a year ago.
        Who?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Dalle mini was released in April 2022.
          July comes after April.

          When was SD released again?

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Damn, you got me man. Some moron said that the technology will be turborealistic in a year and was wrong. AI is not evolving. Artshitters are safe.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Some moron said that the technology will be turborealistic in a year and was wrong. AI is not evolving. Artshitters are safe.
              Glad we are in agreement.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, just don't forget to cover your ears and scream that AI is useless, you're gonna be safe sister

  11. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    both. ai can only imitate and it's worthless

  12. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love how you gays here always seethe about AI.
    >Ummm ummm it draws 6 fingers and lacks soul!!!
    Yeah, for now. 2 years ago it would have been inconceivable for AI to draw at this level of today. Art, writer, translator and music gays are done, programmers right after them.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      People that "nitpick" on these imperfections don't understand that when someone is amazed by AI art it's because they are amazed by the fact that it's possible for it to work at all

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >are amazed by the fact that it's possible for it to work at all
        This
        but artists are rightfully afraid for losing their furry fart commissions running dry

  13. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ai art always feels off. They always have this weird instalike filter

  14. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing better than a human to know what another human really likes
    If you know what you mean

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      well the problem is that the very best art (actual art) is transcendent and these transcendentals go beyond what it means to be human. whether AI will produce that I don't know, but I do know that human beings aren't producing that level of art anymore.

  15. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is what AI art looked like a year ago

  16. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Every non-crowdfunded artist i know is currently busy learning these tools and adapting their pipelines. Stuff has potential for production.

  17. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most are because they are just
    blindly hating on "muh stolen effort" without realizing it can help to reduce crunch and overworking in the industry, some have realized its benefits and are using it for stuff like quick backgrounds, but they're rare. The seething is so bad that they might cuck themselves big time because they supported copyright adjustments and ended up accidentally supporting Adobe which is now sucking goverments wiener to allow for copyrighting artstyle -> the true death of art.

    As for human made art, it definitely can be replaced in terms of quality, but in terms of creativity each person is unique and thus has their own set of possible unique creations only they can produce.

  18. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are seething because their work got used for free by a giant corporation
    Dystopian shithole where rules and laws are only enforced on poorgays
    Unfortunately nobody blew his head off yet

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Stable Diffusion is literally open source and is currently THE image generator for non-normie users.
      Artists were so moronic and nagging about "ethical" datasets that they even cheered for Adobe Firefly for a moment, lmao.
      They would rather use a paid online proprietary service where a corp has all control, just so that the dataset would be "ethical" instead of going the Blender way and allowing for anyone to use the software for free and mod it for their needs

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Stable Diffusion is literally open source and is currently THE image generator for non-normie users.
        Black person, their work, that they own, and which was not public domain, is now being regurgitated by SD and people are proceeding to use the products of that work for themselves. No permission, no acknowledgement, nothing.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >No permission, no acknowledgement, nothing.
          That's the end goal of open source. Intellectual property is not a property. Information is free to distribute itself. You may proceed to seethe.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            hey man your doodle would fall under the "worst quality" tag anyway we can do fine without it kek

            Don't you fricking nuggets understand?
            You laugh now because your not affected
            But imagine windows starts scanning your fricking code projects and just uses them for their own profit
            How are you clowns always so narrow minded and dense

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              it already does

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Copilot has been a thing for ages.

                >But imagine windows starts scanning your fricking code projects and just uses them for their own profit
                They do it already right now as we speak and in such scale artists have no fricking idea of. Only way to oppose it is to push more projects out in the open, build open source LLMs and datasets and accelerate destruction for-profit proprietary software solutions development.
                Everything should be free and open sourced. You want to make money off it - provide support and on demand services.

                >can't into sarcasm and irony
                lol boomers are so cute when they post

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              >But imagine windows starts scanning your fricking code projects and just uses them for their own profit
              They do it already right now as we speak and in such scale artists have no fricking idea of. Only way to oppose it is to push more projects out in the open, build open source LLMs and datasets and accelerate destruction for-profit proprietary software solutions development.
              Everything should be free and open sourced. You want to make money off it - provide support and on demand services.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Not the same because Windows is closed source, so they would take without giving back, Stability AI took images and gave back a fully open source image generator with a very permissive licensing

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Open source is very evil. AI should stay in the hands of huge corporations, they know how to control it unlike the unwashed masses.

              • 9 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ah yes, leave everything to the profit driven corporations that don't spy on their users to sell data for profit and governments that definitely have the good of humanity in mind

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Copilot has been a thing for ages.

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              Way more coders are commies than artists are they'd just welcome this

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            t. capeshit consoomer

            • 9 months ago
              Anonymous

              You and i both know that capeshit consoomers are exactly ones seething over open source LLMs cause it potentially hurts their production giants daddies profits and steps on oh-so-holy-copyrights. Thanks for setting me up nicely, i guess.
              https://github.com/amotile/stable-diffusion-studio
              https://github.com/GuyTevet/motion-diffusion-model
              https://github.com/jtydhr88/sd-3dmodel-loader
              https://github.com/micwalk/blender-export-diffusion
              https://github.com/sstzal/DiffTalk

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          hey man your doodle would fall under the "worst quality" tag anyway we can do fine without it kek

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      This

      I hope they start suing because you can't just ignore IP laws like that

  19. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    ai won

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >philly
      have a nice day.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        ?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Prompts please, bro?
      thanks

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      spooky hand

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/iKzo41U.jpg

      ?

      who made these? and how?

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Majicmix on civitai

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      I haven't seen much that really impresses me but this is fricking insane.

  20. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand appeal of 1girl ai pinups of noname 3dpd women. Don't you have the whole internet flooded with this shit already?

  21. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    it hilarious that art went first
    it was always art will go last.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Digital art is just matrices. Current AI development is coincidentally mostly applied linear algebra. Im genuinely surprised art is taking so long.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >automation's going to free us up to do the things we like and excel at!
      kek, now we are stuck doing things no one can do well or feel good about doing, forever. Who's bright idea was this?

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Same. I remember this and coder were supposed to go first. I even remember artists being smug about it

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      art didn't go tho

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        it did for all the artists but not the Artists

  22. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    why do all these images of AI thots have that 'look'
    you know what i'm talking about
    hard to put my finger on what exactly it is that gives it away
    i think it's stuff like really contrasty, really saturated, hdr'ish look - usually the sign of amateur work.
    and then one thing in particular is the shadow below the ribs/first abs are usually too exagerrated. this one's really common t bh. it's a shame none of the people who prompt these images even realise it's doing it.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because most prompteurs don't know what they are doing and just spam ~~*4k HDR photo realistic masterpiece*~~ in their prompts because they see it in other prompts without thinking about how it affects the image.

  23. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    i mean, artists are always poor and struggling, unless they're not then they're just money laundering, so i don't see any issues here

  24. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is a huge nothingburger. If your job is at risk from AI, its at a bigger risk of being taken over by someone in Bangalore or Guangzhou.

    It's not like manufacturing went to China because they produced a superior product.

  25. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like how half the subreddits have banned AI art, because potential copyright concerns.
    Meanwhile, Steam allows games with SD assets to be sold, despite Valve being overcautious about most stuff.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Steam has no clue what uses ai or doesn’t

      https://i.imgur.com/zhJH8qv.png

      this is what AI art looked like a year ago

      It was very mid

      Ai art always feels off. They always have this weird instalike filter

      Nah guys are just bad at PROOMPTING

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Steam has no clue what uses ai or doesn’t
        But does it really care?

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          No

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        nice fingers

  26. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most are happy because it's a great tool for productivity boost.
    Midjourney can easily replace pinterest for idea fishing or nice references.
    img2img could give a lot of ideas about art improvement.
    Tedious shit like backgrounds could be easily generated and it's not as easy to spot whether it's generated or not.

    "Pure" AI art is still in grey territory (and will probably stay there for quite some time) due to copyright and all that, so decent artist still have a lot of work. It's just way more effective now.

    It's mostly "social/clickbait artists" that are mad. Cute asian girls in static poses (like in OP pic) had little use in real world, but were a great bait for likes on artstation or anything like that.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >decent artist still have a lot of work
      Decent artists are still going to keep their work because they absolutely outperform AI and are going to in the observable future. It's the lazy coombait artists that are getting fricked.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Tedious shit like backgrounds
      you've never spoken to an artist lol

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you honestly like drawing backgrounds? Most people would rather spend a day polishing characters then doing some boring photobashing or wasting lots of time on houses, trees, houses again.

        >and will probably stay there for quite some time
        wrong

        Who's the creator of AI generated art then? A person that generated it? Artists that were used for learning? Definitely grey territory. It may become less grey with "legally sourced datasets", but for now the patreon coombait it the best you can count on when it comes to money. I've seen some writers with AI generated covers, but most try to stay away from it as far as possible due to the fact that they can't legally "own" it.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          just stop typing things on behalf of 'most people', brother. your weird headcannon isn't real life lol.

          • 9 months ago
            Anonymous

            Just telling what I'm seeing. Work in gamedev myself, but wife is 2D artist. With almost 10 years of 2D art experience (started with music art, moved to gamedev and book covers later). She had to sign a contract with one of her big customers that she's not using AI for her artworks. After a few dramas this became somewhat normal practice in big publishing companies. Small authors/freelancers still doesn't care tho.
            What's your story? Genuinely curious how people use AI or earn money with it.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Who's the creator of AI generated art then
          it's not art, those are pictures. no one generated them because an algorithm isn't sentient, creation requires sentience unlike production

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Most people
          [citation direly needed]

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >and will probably stay there for quite some time
      wrong

  27. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Are artists still seething about AI art
    they will never stop

  28. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is neat for making waifus but it's even more amazing for concept art/generating ideas/concepts. If you do "coffee shop" you'll get tons of different images.

    Or you can make girls, but why limit yourself to one thing?

  29. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >That left hand shoop
    And the fricker ask money for those ai drawings?

  30. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    How close is AI to replacing irl custom designers, sculptors, animatronic makers? BTW have you ever seen an actual painting (physical media)? IMO those always look better than images in computers

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      2 weeks

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      My estimate is about 2 more weeks

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Decades
      But said sculptors (why sculptors?), custom designers, etc., will make the best use of AI.

      These threads always fail to point out that these AI tools will not be as effective in the hands of non-artists and designers, it doesn't replace the experience and know-how of the actual pros.

      The only people who will be adversely affected are coom "artists" and fanartists who aren't worth shit in the first place.

  31. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I’ve gotten banned from 300 art subreddits because the jannies at r/hentai got EXTREMELY angry at my AI art, and they have a lot of janny friends. I’m not even joking. I have no idea why AI art is such a big deal to these gays but I hope it destroys them completely.

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I have no idea why AI art is such a big deal to these gays
      Because it directly threatens coombait artists' livelyhood and they got a lot of simps? It's also an extremely easy way to virtue signal as well.

      • 9 months ago
        Anonymous

        I was referring to the Reddit jannies who are incapable of creating anything.

        • 9 months ago
          Anonymous

          dunno about reddit, maybe their jannies got a friend that acked xherself because of ai or something

  32. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    I do 3d coomer stuff, I noticed a pretty significant drop in views with the advent of AI art. At first it was a small 10-15% views drop per video but it's become 50% drop for some videos. I didn't really expect to be effected since video 3d and 2d image are reasonably different mediums but it turns out coomers don't care. It probably hasn't effected me anywhere near as much as 2d artists but some of the video AI stuff I've seen is getting pretty good. I wouldn't be surprised if in a year or two people can just take crude 3d stuff and slap on a 3d/2d filter for really good videos without jitter.

    It does hurts your ego to see less views on stuff, I thought at first I was maybe making bad content until I noticed a lot of my followers were also following AI coomer accounts and those accounts were getting a lot of views. I can understand why you'd be quite upset if it was effecting how much you make, but I think doing art as your only income in the first place is a bad idea you, end up having to force creativity to keep pumping out content and it reduces quality in the long run.

  33. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why are they all asian

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      because 99% of ai art is prompted by terminal weeb incels

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because almost all ai models are made by Asians

    • 9 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because of asian users and weebs

  34. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    i dunno. seems there are fewer bad ai art generators than bad human artists.

  35. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    At first I thought that she's wearing a BLACKED bra.
    >ctrl+f BLACKED
    It seems I was the only one.

  36. 9 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Mfw so many people still living their revenge fantasy completely out of touch with reality

    Furry fandom is still chugging along just like it did before, no jobs have been lost on that end whatsoever and Patreon payouts haven't declined.
    Artists aren't going anywhere.
    Most of the noise you've seen about AI taking artists jobs are the people who celebrate the supposed job loss and really loud reddit rainbow brigade shitkickers who can't draw and never made a dime to begin with.
    Bottom line is that people who consume AI content over commissions were never paying customers and their attention is irrelevant.
    It doesn't mean shit whether a bunch of Indians or Brazilians give you traffic because they aren't and will never be anyone's customer base.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *