Are artists still seething about AI art or have they come to the realization that human made art cannot and will not be replaced?
Are artists still seething about AI art or have they come to the realization that human made art cannot and will not be replaced?
For instance I've yet to see AI generators being able to replicate works by contemporary masters like the Chinese artist Ruan Jia
>For instance I've yet to see AI generators being able to
What kind of stupid argument is this? Only a year ago I had yet to see AI generators do even 10% of the amazing stuff they're doing now. It means frick all.
>the Chinese are the only people still learning drawing from the western canon
Grim
nineteen eighty nine tiananmen square massacre
Poo in the loo
Truly the epitome of soulless corpo-slop mobile game art, which the ant people will likely always excel at. Machines are too soulful.
Guwei Zheng. Famous Singaporean weeb ish artist
some are, some aren't
simple as
They all roped. And it hasn't replaced human art yet, but it will
Wang Ling aka WLOP, artist who got famous on twitter
Dude WLOP style can be generated by SD lmao
https://civitai.com/models/2968/wlop
Bad example
You also have shit taste in art btw
THE SUBJECT IS ALWAYS A WOMAN BECAUSE BOTH THE ARTIST AND THE VIEWER IS ALWAYS A SIMP
the sex drive is an easy way to gather an audience, because everyone has one.
for other topics, interests are more niche and the audience thus smaller
>cannot be replaced
They all got replaced and found a real job/roped.
They can't make an easy living off DeviantArt commissions anymore.
You picked the worst examples, with subject matter and styles the AI particularly excels at.
AI sucks hard at interactions and consistent intricate details, but the "style" arguments comes mainly from the pajeet 3dpd spam that is honestly what 90% of ai stuff is. You can have a very flat anime-like style without much trouble.
Twitter "artist" are not artists, drawing anime shit is not art
I thought skrilex dubstep wasn't music when it came out and now i nostalgia
Nope, still seething, this will take years to end, autist.
>no evidence
skill issue on the part of the folks that made that stuff, friend
You know you're just reinforcing his post, right?
And you have shit taste in art, moronic coomer.
AI already replaced human art in its shitty toddler form with 7 fingers on each hand. One year from now there will be no way to make a difference who made it. People don't give a frick if AI or not and artists can not compete with AI art. Thanks to superficial homosexuals human art will die in the sense of it wont be applicable to industry and hobbyist will be discouraged. Besides the picture you posted is literally a photo with face replaced with some weeb shit, hardly art
>One year from now there will be no way to make a difference who made it
You were saying this a year ago.
Dalle mini was released in April 2022.
>You were saying this a year ago.
Who?
>Dalle mini was released in April 2022.
July comes after April.
When was SD released again?
Damn, you got me man. Some moron said that the technology will be turborealistic in a year and was wrong. AI is not evolving. Artshitters are safe.
>Some moron said that the technology will be turborealistic in a year and was wrong. AI is not evolving. Artshitters are safe.
Glad we are in agreement.
Yes, just don't forget to cover your ears and scream that AI is useless, you're gonna be safe sister
both. ai can only imitate and it's worthless
I love how you gays here always seethe about AI.
>Ummm ummm it draws 6 fingers and lacks soul!!!
Yeah, for now. 2 years ago it would have been inconceivable for AI to draw at this level of today. Art, writer, translator and music gays are done, programmers right after them.
People that "nitpick" on these imperfections don't understand that when someone is amazed by AI art it's because they are amazed by the fact that it's possible for it to work at all
>are amazed by the fact that it's possible for it to work at all
This
but artists are rightfully afraid for losing their furry fart commissions running dry
Ai art always feels off. They always have this weird instalike filter
Nothing better than a human to know what another human really likes
If you know what you mean
well the problem is that the very best art (actual art) is transcendent and these transcendentals go beyond what it means to be human. whether AI will produce that I don't know, but I do know that human beings aren't producing that level of art anymore.
this is what AI art looked like a year ago
Every non-crowdfunded artist i know is currently busy learning these tools and adapting their pipelines. Stuff has potential for production.
Most are because they are just
blindly hating on "muh stolen effort" without realizing it can help to reduce crunch and overworking in the industry, some have realized its benefits and are using it for stuff like quick backgrounds, but they're rare. The seething is so bad that they might cuck themselves big time because they supported copyright adjustments and ended up accidentally supporting Adobe which is now sucking goverments wiener to allow for copyrighting artstyle -> the true death of art.
As for human made art, it definitely can be replaced in terms of quality, but in terms of creativity each person is unique and thus has their own set of possible unique creations only they can produce.
They are seething because their work got used for free by a giant corporation
Dystopian shithole where rules and laws are only enforced on poorgays
Unfortunately nobody blew his head off yet
Stable Diffusion is literally open source and is currently THE image generator for non-normie users.
Artists were so moronic and nagging about "ethical" datasets that they even cheered for Adobe Firefly for a moment, lmao.
They would rather use a paid online proprietary service where a corp has all control, just so that the dataset would be "ethical" instead of going the Blender way and allowing for anyone to use the software for free and mod it for their needs
>Stable Diffusion is literally open source and is currently THE image generator for non-normie users.
Black person, their work, that they own, and which was not public domain, is now being regurgitated by SD and people are proceeding to use the products of that work for themselves. No permission, no acknowledgement, nothing.
>No permission, no acknowledgement, nothing.
That's the end goal of open source. Intellectual property is not a property. Information is free to distribute itself. You may proceed to seethe.
Don't you fricking nuggets understand?
You laugh now because your not affected
But imagine windows starts scanning your fricking code projects and just uses them for their own profit
How are you clowns always so narrow minded and dense
it already does
>can't into sarcasm and irony
lol boomers are so cute when they post
>But imagine windows starts scanning your fricking code projects and just uses them for their own profit
They do it already right now as we speak and in such scale artists have no fricking idea of. Only way to oppose it is to push more projects out in the open, build open source LLMs and datasets and accelerate destruction for-profit proprietary software solutions development.
Everything should be free and open sourced. You want to make money off it - provide support and on demand services.
Not the same because Windows is closed source, so they would take without giving back, Stability AI took images and gave back a fully open source image generator with a very permissive licensing
Open source is very evil. AI should stay in the hands of huge corporations, they know how to control it unlike the unwashed masses.
Ah yes, leave everything to the profit driven corporations that don't spy on their users to sell data for profit and governments that definitely have the good of humanity in mind
Copilot has been a thing for ages.
Way more coders are commies than artists are they'd just welcome this
t. capeshit consoomer
You and i both know that capeshit consoomers are exactly ones seething over open source LLMs cause it potentially hurts their production giants daddies profits and steps on oh-so-holy-copyrights. Thanks for setting me up nicely, i guess.
https://github.com/amotile/stable-diffusion-studio
https://github.com/GuyTevet/motion-diffusion-model
https://github.com/jtydhr88/sd-3dmodel-loader
https://github.com/micwalk/blender-export-diffusion
https://github.com/sstzal/DiffTalk
hey man your doodle would fall under the "worst quality" tag anyway we can do fine without it kek
This
I hope they start suing because you can't just ignore IP laws like that
ai won
>philly
have a nice day.
?
Prompts please, bro?
thanks
spooky hand
who made these? and how?
Majicmix on civitai
I haven't seen much that really impresses me but this is fricking insane.
I don't understand appeal of 1girl ai pinups of noname 3dpd women. Don't you have the whole internet flooded with this shit already?
it hilarious that art went first
it was always art will go last.
Digital art is just matrices. Current AI development is coincidentally mostly applied linear algebra. Im genuinely surprised art is taking so long.
>automation's going to free us up to do the things we like and excel at!
kek, now we are stuck doing things no one can do well or feel good about doing, forever. Who's bright idea was this?
Same. I remember this and coder were supposed to go first. I even remember artists being smug about it
art didn't go tho
it did for all the artists but not the Artists
why do all these images of AI thots have that 'look'
you know what i'm talking about
hard to put my finger on what exactly it is that gives it away
i think it's stuff like really contrasty, really saturated, hdr'ish look - usually the sign of amateur work.
and then one thing in particular is the shadow below the ribs/first abs are usually too exagerrated. this one's really common t bh. it's a shame none of the people who prompt these images even realise it's doing it.
Because most prompteurs don't know what they are doing and just spam ~~*4k HDR photo realistic masterpiece*~~ in their prompts because they see it in other prompts without thinking about how it affects the image.
i mean, artists are always poor and struggling, unless they're not then they're just money laundering, so i don't see any issues here
AI is a huge nothingburger. If your job is at risk from AI, its at a bigger risk of being taken over by someone in Bangalore or Guangzhou.
It's not like manufacturing went to China because they produced a superior product.
I like how half the subreddits have banned AI art, because potential copyright concerns.
Meanwhile, Steam allows games with SD assets to be sold, despite Valve being overcautious about most stuff.
Steam has no clue what uses ai or doesn’t
It was very mid
Nah guys are just bad at PROOMPTING
>Steam has no clue what uses ai or doesn’t
But does it really care?
No
nice fingers
Most are happy because it's a great tool for productivity boost.
Midjourney can easily replace pinterest for idea fishing or nice references.
img2img could give a lot of ideas about art improvement.
Tedious shit like backgrounds could be easily generated and it's not as easy to spot whether it's generated or not.
"Pure" AI art is still in grey territory (and will probably stay there for quite some time) due to copyright and all that, so decent artist still have a lot of work. It's just way more effective now.
It's mostly "social/clickbait artists" that are mad. Cute asian girls in static poses (like in OP pic) had little use in real world, but were a great bait for likes on artstation or anything like that.
>decent artist still have a lot of work
Decent artists are still going to keep their work because they absolutely outperform AI and are going to in the observable future. It's the lazy coombait artists that are getting fricked.
>Tedious shit like backgrounds
you've never spoken to an artist lol
Do you honestly like drawing backgrounds? Most people would rather spend a day polishing characters then doing some boring photobashing or wasting lots of time on houses, trees, houses again.
Who's the creator of AI generated art then? A person that generated it? Artists that were used for learning? Definitely grey territory. It may become less grey with "legally sourced datasets", but for now the patreon coombait it the best you can count on when it comes to money. I've seen some writers with AI generated covers, but most try to stay away from it as far as possible due to the fact that they can't legally "own" it.
just stop typing things on behalf of 'most people', brother. your weird headcannon isn't real life lol.
Just telling what I'm seeing. Work in gamedev myself, but wife is 2D artist. With almost 10 years of 2D art experience (started with music art, moved to gamedev and book covers later). She had to sign a contract with one of her big customers that she's not using AI for her artworks. After a few dramas this became somewhat normal practice in big publishing companies. Small authors/freelancers still doesn't care tho.
What's your story? Genuinely curious how people use AI or earn money with it.
>Who's the creator of AI generated art then
it's not art, those are pictures. no one generated them because an algorithm isn't sentient, creation requires sentience unlike production
>Most people
[citation direly needed]
>and will probably stay there for quite some time
wrong
>Are artists still seething about AI art
they will never stop
AI is neat for making waifus but it's even more amazing for concept art/generating ideas/concepts. If you do "coffee shop" you'll get tons of different images.
Or you can make girls, but why limit yourself to one thing?
>That left hand shoop
And the fricker ask money for those ai drawings?
How close is AI to replacing irl custom designers, sculptors, animatronic makers? BTW have you ever seen an actual painting (physical media)? IMO those always look better than images in computers
2 weeks
My estimate is about 2 more weeks
Decades
But said sculptors (why sculptors?), custom designers, etc., will make the best use of AI.
These threads always fail to point out that these AI tools will not be as effective in the hands of non-artists and designers, it doesn't replace the experience and know-how of the actual pros.
The only people who will be adversely affected are coom "artists" and fanartists who aren't worth shit in the first place.
I’ve gotten banned from 300 art subreddits because the jannies at r/hentai got EXTREMELY angry at my AI art, and they have a lot of janny friends. I’m not even joking. I have no idea why AI art is such a big deal to these gays but I hope it destroys them completely.
>I have no idea why AI art is such a big deal to these gays
Because it directly threatens coombait artists' livelyhood and they got a lot of simps? It's also an extremely easy way to virtue signal as well.
I was referring to the Reddit jannies who are incapable of creating anything.
dunno about reddit, maybe their jannies got a friend that acked xherself because of ai or something
I do 3d coomer stuff, I noticed a pretty significant drop in views with the advent of AI art. At first it was a small 10-15% views drop per video but it's become 50% drop for some videos. I didn't really expect to be effected since video 3d and 2d image are reasonably different mediums but it turns out coomers don't care. It probably hasn't effected me anywhere near as much as 2d artists but some of the video AI stuff I've seen is getting pretty good. I wouldn't be surprised if in a year or two people can just take crude 3d stuff and slap on a 3d/2d filter for really good videos without jitter.
It does hurts your ego to see less views on stuff, I thought at first I was maybe making bad content until I noticed a lot of my followers were also following AI coomer accounts and those accounts were getting a lot of views. I can understand why you'd be quite upset if it was effecting how much you make, but I think doing art as your only income in the first place is a bad idea you, end up having to force creativity to keep pumping out content and it reduces quality in the long run.
Why are they all asian
because 99% of ai art is prompted by terminal weeb incels
Because almost all ai models are made by Asians
Because of asian users and weebs
i dunno. seems there are fewer bad ai art generators than bad human artists.
At first I thought that she's wearing a BLACKED bra.
>ctrl+f BLACKED
It seems I was the only one.
>Mfw so many people still living their revenge fantasy completely out of touch with reality
Furry fandom is still chugging along just like it did before, no jobs have been lost on that end whatsoever and Patreon payouts haven't declined.
Artists aren't going anywhere.
Most of the noise you've seen about AI taking artists jobs are the people who celebrate the supposed job loss and really loud reddit rainbow brigade shitkickers who can't draw and never made a dime to begin with.
Bottom line is that people who consume AI content over commissions were never paying customers and their attention is irrelevant.
It doesn't mean shit whether a bunch of Indians or Brazilians give you traffic because they aren't and will never be anyone's customer base.