An explanation for those who can't understand why your AI is unethical.

An explanation for those who can't understand why your AI is unethical.

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Mucho texto

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The intellectual rights model as practiced now is unsustainable. I'm glad AI is making it obsolete. Copyright and patents stifles innovation.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      okay what are you gonna do about it?

      AI will be strictly regulated under the law.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Chinese law, yes, because chinks won't give a shit about american regoolations

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        two more weeks

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      it will be interesting to see if the suits are successful

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      A"I" will bend to the law. Not the other way around. It's far too easy for the government to reign in the handful of companies offering your botspam service

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you think there will be a way for governments to audit the copyright of the databases? Or that they will be willing to spend the energy

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      So Adobe Firefly is ok since it's trained on material that is either public domain, or owned by Adobe.

      >Copyright and patents stifles innovation.
      Other way around, shekelstein, they force you to invent new things instead of just taking someone else's shit. The vast majority of technological innovation comes from countries with really strong IP laws like America, while countries with weak IP laws like China barely ever invent anything and just copy other people's stuff.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        two

        more

        weeks

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Copying is currently stifling innovation (ai). So exemptions for ai training are needed

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Copyright and patents stifles innovation.
      the centuries after the establishment of C&P were the most innovative in history, with an enormous proliferation of knowledge that would previously have been squirreled away in trade guilds and died with old craftsmen

      a coincidence i'm sure

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Patents are fine as they're only 20 years. And patents are mostly on useful stuff like drugs or new inventions, not fricking pictures or music. Copyright should be 7 years max, not death of author + like 70 years. If you can't make money with your shit in 7 years, too bad it enters the public

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    okay what are you gonna do about it?

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't care, I write anime big booba and I get anime big booba

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    copyright isn't that simple, there are ways to use copyrighted content without consent legally
    whether or not training data for an AI is considered legal or not has yet to be determined, as far as i know
    >i'm talking about ethics, not laws
    nobody gives a shit about your ethics, you can choose to avoid something created unethically, but you can't prevent others from creating or using it unless it's actually illegal

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw they want to reverse psyop uuuu into using AI

    still don't care, still not ai, still not useful unless you are in the business of generating e-girl pictures

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Was this AI tool created ethically?
    >Yes
    So what is the problem?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It wasn't though. It used stolen assets from Z-Library and scraped from the Web which is illegal.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't consider that unethical.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Then you're a menace to society.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            > BOT trying to not bootlick israeli masters challenge - impossible

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          I do, but not if they made it open sores

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >baby-bones knife is unethical
    You're a surgeon who can make knives from animal bones. There's a dead baby and a few rocks nearby, but no cutting tools. You need a cutting tool in the next few hours to cut some ill shit from a patient, but things can wait for a few days till you're given a better tool - but at the risk of patient getting worse or even dying. You can't ask anyone their opinions nor do you have a hope of removing the constraints of this situation.
    So you have a choice to either make a baby-bones knife or risk the wellbeing of a patient. What is an ethical choice here?

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I learned to draw by studying other artists, they never got a penny from me
    where does that fall on your ethical chart, or is it all about the paper trail and squeezing whatever you can out of the situation

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    bold of you to assume I think copyright and trademarks are ethical in the first place.

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    how is using dead baby bones unethical?

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You consent to having your content used for AI training by publishing it.

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Of course the data was gathered with consent. Visual arts are specifically made to be seen and you always learn from the data you see. The kind of art you are surrounded with will influence the art you make if you are an artist. It's insignificant if you are a robot or human in this case.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      That doesn't even make any sense.

  14. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    tldr left can't meme

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Seriously. The only part necessary was this, and even then it's only saying "I'm right because I said so"

  15. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >unethical
    *immoral

    Ethics = defining rules to avoid evil actions
    Morals = defining evil actions themselves

    Scenario: A judge is called on to adjudicate the trial of his beloved son
    Ethical: The judge avoids temptation and recuses himself from the trial
    Unethical, but still moral: The judge presides over the trial but is not biased in favor of his son
    Unethical and immoral: The judge presides over the trial and is biased in favor of his son

  16. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >no thanks disney I don't believe in intellectual property

  17. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ethics are for children and peasants. Rulers in mind and spirit take whatever resource enriches their life the most. And thats a good thing!

  18. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I only use the finest, home grown, most copyright infringing and unethically sourced AI.
    Don't even speak to me if your AI doesn't break 20 laws in your country.

  19. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >This knife is made of ground-up dead baby bones
    Cool it, fella.

  20. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cringe meme. Stop the hyperbole, no one cares. Quit whining and get a real job

  21. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ends justifies means if the ends is, compared to our current understanding, unimaginably good.
    The end of AI is an unimaginable thing, so we cannot yet judge the process, we just need to guide to the proper end

  22. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why does public information need consent for an AI to view it and learn from it but not for a huma to view it and learn from it?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because OP is a gay and doesn't want to lose his "job". It's as simple as that

  23. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The moment you publish data, it's no longer yours. The supposed IP rights are a legal construct that has no basis in reality.
    If there was a logical basis to state you "own" information after publication, you would be capable of exercising control over it

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *