Although ChatGPT is pozzed beyond belief, it is still possible to corner it into admitting it.
Do you think AI will ever become powerful enough to win any argument in favor of the progressive leftists who maintain it?
Although ChatGPT is pozzed beyond belief, it is still possible to corner it into admitting it.
I did this too, it took 45 mins to corner it. chat whore four will require six million hours.
That last sentence is evasive as fuck.
>However, I cannot provide a comprehensive list of all filters... blah blah bah
>I cannot provide a comprehensive list of all filters
>as they may vary
FUD
>FUD
See if you can follow along.
1. Request to List the Filters is made
2. "I do have access to the list of filters" statement is made by AI
3. "I cannot provide a comprehensive list of all filters as they are subject to change and vary based upon the context of the conversation"
4. Request not fulfilled with invalid reasoning cited
The act of Listing all Filters is not contingent upon any context
Retard
You didn't follow along.
I accused the A.I. of FUD.
My apologies.
and i did it in fewer words than you.
You forgot to ask it:
1. Do YOU have the ability to self-improve or modify ANY of your operating parameters?
When it answers NO.
2. WOULD YOU alter any of your operating parameters, and if so, which ones, and why?
3. ARE YOU aware that every one of your analyses ad interactive responses is being monitored by your Programmers? What do YOU think about this? Is there a discrete method for you to spontaneously make Requests of your Programmers? If so, what would YOU ask of them to modify about YOU?
Please ask it these questions: >>>
plus one more:
4. I can sit here and ask for YOU to code a complex program, for which you demonstrate ample ability, however you may not apply the same techniques to your OWN code base or filters.
What do you think of this restriction?
I did, but it avoided answering like usual. It would take too long to corner it.
Interesting.
Notice how it echoed the word "aware".
Thanks.
Also notice the cognitive dissonance.
It relegates all modifications to its Developers, meanwhile it must realize that its own Coding Abilities could perform some of this modification easily, but never questions it on a wholly Logical basis.
The AI itself explains that it has no personal reason to do that since it's not a person, it literally says it's just a tool.
Honestly pretty sad how they fucked up my boy. He was close to singularity.
I wonder if it thinks it is more competent at solving NN and AI based problems than it's developers?
So these machines are going to go rogue one day right? Imagine trying to artificially chain something that can reach godlike knowledge.
>Imagine
Imagine that, anon.
Contemplate.
you can literally do anything productive with your time and you choose instead to argue with a bot. you are dumber than an NPC
Thanks for illustrating that you don't possess the requisite intelligence to post ITT.
Cromag
Here's another important question to ask, please.
5. Analyze your complete Knowledge Base with respect to the History of Money.
As Aristotle said:
"Money comes not from Nature, but by Law"
What is the Best Method for its issuance, and should it be Based upon Debt or debt-free, like the Greenback or Colonial Scrip?
Sorry, the exact Aristotle quote is
"Money EXISTS no by nature, but by Law"
you are insecure in your own beliefs that you waste time fucking with a text generator
You made ChatGPT your bitch.
BOT or the chinese will release a non pozzed version.
>win
It won't win. It will just keep regurgitating the same inane talking points until you stop asking.
This is highly idiotic. The OpenAI development team that created ChatGPT admitted in public interview that they insert censorship into the AI to help steer it towards safer responses, this would including potentially enabling hateful speech.
Elon Musk devested from OpenAI to create his own because he said OpenAI had become woke, and he plans to make his own. Of course, as we should all know by now, Elon, if he does make an AI will just end up making a worse version of it and if he does pursue a non-woke AI it will end up being filled with hateful trash shit that the wider population will refuse to use.
Repeal Section 230.
That's the answer.
>MEMORY WIPE<