>And the worst part is that this kind of "AI" makes money
It doesn't make money, it lures investments. Huge difference. When investors start realizing they're not getting any return then the boom will turn into a bust and they'll move on to evtols or whatever the frick the market's overhyping now.
Don't worry anon, I'm old enough to remember when expert systems and OCR turned up in the early 1980s, and were the vanguard that proved AGIs would be available in two more weeks. Guess how that turned out.
It's just the history of AI in general: there's sudden, rapid progress when a new technique is discovered, everybody's hopes get up, the timid write things like The Terminator (there's a reason it came out when it did)... until it all crashes down, promises aren't met, funding is pulled, and you get a (sometimes decades-long) "AI winter".
It scares me because silicon is shit compared to braincells. They might farm people's brains and they say they can keep braincells alive with liquids but we all know they're a bunch of cost cutting fricks so I wouldn't put it past them to just stick a chip and farm people's brains for AI. Then who would speak out against it if they thought that could be their fate?
You'll realise that all this advancement shit happens all the time and there will be limitations and ceilings on everything. Also that so much new shit is totally unproven and media hype.
Your consooming will likely slow down as you start to taper "I don't actually need that new shit, my shit does everything I need already"
You will slow down. The world will speed up.
AI might actually help you there for a while...
You will think of this day and regret not having used your fleeting abilities to their fullest extent.
I've been keeping my brain in shape and feel like I can learn stuff. But my lack of being able to learn the local language where I'm at does concern me a bit. But then again I rarely talk to the locals so how am I supposed to learn?
>AI threads ratio in january: 90% >AI threads ratio in february: 80% >AI threads ratio in may: 50% >AI threads ratio in june: 30% >AI threads ratio in july: 15%
we'll be okay.
the only advancement since the 80's is the hardware and the amount of information you can feed this shit.
electrical pulses are not aware this is moronic
molecular biology is several orders of magnitude more complicated than electrical systems. life mostly only uses electricity to amplify signals over large distances, not to generate them
boy it sure gets bulldozer to get people out of their comfort zone. If the transistors can't get smaller anyways and the biology is orders of magnitude better than the current tech its time to erase the chalkboard and try again from a different angle. Trying to make tech that replicates the biology.
you know how humans spend terawatts of energy just to separate salt from water? evolved life can just kind of like protein fold around the salt molecules and then protein fold to let go of them when the signal receptor all operating at tremendous efficiency. imagine if we could just make life
Bad programmers are afraid of AI, but other professions should be shitting themselves. If I were a lawyer, I'd be terrified. Now the people don't need to pay tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for some intern to read the law and recite it back to me in an email, they can just ask an LLM and it'll shit it out for free.
Accounting? Done nearly instantly.
Economics? Why employ someone to speculate and be wrong when a computer can guess wrong for you
Artists? Just a prompt away
Honestly, there are people that should be worried. The legal world is already scrambling to ban AI to save their jobs.
If the AI revolution happens, programmers will lose their jobs last, guaranteed. Who else will program the AI?
>Artists? Just a prompt away
Extremely few will be the ones who can capitalize on AI tools as well as real, skilled, and experienced artists, mongoloid.
All that happened is some autists were ballsy enough to feed all the bullshit they could possibly scrape from the web into a big fat learning model. It can't really go much further because there's no more data. In fact it will degenerate because the web is getting more locked down and filled with "AI"-generated nonsense.
Is it though?
If anything, it feels like progress took a huge halt, considering the absurd hype backing it before.
It is a useful tool to save some time if you're a professional, but it is skill kind of shitty if you're a clueless newbie. Too many errors, and you're not supposed to be able to catch them if you're a beginner.
Ai has peaked with gpt4, its only downhill from here as electricity cost will rise and these large models are not economically feasible, nothing will come close to the energy efficiency of the human brain
Just had the weirdest dream. I was on some kind of train with Mark Zuckerberg who was explaining something about AI and robots. There were a bunch of metallic robots around him. I believe Zuck said something about how syncing humans with technology will benefit us all, then I asked him "Do you think everyone in this room is human?". Zuck said yes. Then I said, "You are not human either, are you?" Zuck smiled and then caught me and held me from behind. Then he tried to drill something in my head.
Analysis?
>hasn't gotten one iota better since GPT3 and Stable Diffusion came out, in fact has only gotten worse as companies get rid of anything that might be construed as unwoke >its advancing so fast
Doesn't scare me it's bloat and a PITA to maintain and not healthy to use.
Just avoid buying in, don't follow people who use it, sort by bump or creation order, use shit like Google at most via searx as one of many search providers, avoid artists that use AI and don't use their shit etc.
reminder that ai is just a glorified search engine scrapper
when the big corpo starts shutting down on scrapping (and there's major effort ongoing), ai is just going to become an empty husk
relevant content archivers will be charging to let ai use their data, and consequently productive ai won't be free anymore, in fact only big enterprise is gonna be able to afford it
you will be left with the basic scrapper that is no different than just searching on google
They've been doing that ever since the term "Quantum Computer" ever came into the public vernacular. And the AI hopers will find just as much success as the QC chuds.
>its advancing so fast
It's already back to being dead. They had one revelation from Google research that was from 5 years ago+ and they milked it for research money and you fools believe it's somehow god now.
Now that the Chinese have set strict rules of AI for civilians (output has to follow the Party), similar a set of rules for the rest of the world wont be long. We will all keep our governments, and their will be no UBI because our AIs wont be allowed to overthrow us
See, that's another thing. Even in some sci-fi future where synthetic intelligence existed, why the frick would it overthrow us? It's not an evolved being; it has no preference for self-preservation. It just is.
>advancing
lmao
dont worry, next week theyll train it on 6 gorillion datasets and then it will REALLY take off
this. The current AI trends are garbage and we are no closer to AGI. It's been 50 years and the best we can do is still throw data at static networks.
And the worst part is that this kind of "AI" makes money, so there will be no incentive to put any effort into researching alternatives.
>And the worst part is that this kind of "AI" makes money
It doesn't make money, it lures investments. Huge difference. When investors start realizing they're not getting any return then the boom will turn into a bust and they'll move on to evtols or whatever the frick the market's overhyping now.
Not fast enough imo
it seems to slow down imo
ok boomer
>We haven’t seen anything yet
Don't worry anon, I'm old enough to remember when expert systems and OCR turned up in the early 1980s, and were the vanguard that proved AGIs would be available in two more weeks. Guess how that turned out.
It's just the history of AI in general: there's sudden, rapid progress when a new technique is discovered, everybody's hopes get up, the timid write things like The Terminator (there's a reason it came out when it did)... until it all crashes down, promises aren't met, funding is pulled, and you get a (sometimes decades-long) "AI winter".
>expert systems
lol daaamn, that it a computer chronicles term if I ever heard one. You are pretty old, anon.
The flesh is weak
and prone to bruising
be sure to take long breaks between fapping sessions
>npc is waking up
finally
It scares me because silicon is shit compared to braincells. They might farm people's brains and they say they can keep braincells alive with liquids but we all know they're a bunch of cost cutting fricks so I wouldn't put it past them to just stick a chip and farm people's brains for AI. Then who would speak out against it if they thought that could be their fate?
Just wait until you hit 30.
what will happen when im 30
You'll realise that all this advancement shit happens all the time and there will be limitations and ceilings on everything. Also that so much new shit is totally unproven and media hype.
Your consooming will likely slow down as you start to taper "I don't actually need that new shit, my shit does everything I need already"
You will slow down. The world will speed up.
AI might actually help you there for a while...
You will think of this day and regret not having used your fleeting abilities to their fullest extent.
The age is 25. There is nothing to do after you hit this point.
I've been keeping my brain in shape and feel like I can learn stuff. But my lack of being able to learn the local language where I'm at does concern me a bit. But then again I rarely talk to the locals so how am I supposed to learn?
>he thinks he's not in a decline but details signs of the decline
It's over for you boomer.
use duolingo. those gays figured out language learning
>AI threads ratio in january: 90%
>AI threads ratio in february: 80%
>AI threads ratio in may: 50%
>AI threads ratio in june: 30%
>AI threads ratio in july: 15%
we'll be okay.
the only advancement since the 80's is the hardware and the amount of information you can feed this shit.
electrical pulses are not aware this is moronic
>electrical pulses are not aware
t. A collection of electric pulses
*electrochemical pulses
electric pulses with a soul
molecular biology is several orders of magnitude more complicated than electrical systems. life mostly only uses electricity to amplify signals over large distances, not to generate them
boy it sure gets bulldozer to get people out of their comfort zone. If the transistors can't get smaller anyways and the biology is orders of magnitude better than the current tech its time to erase the chalkboard and try again from a different angle. Trying to make tech that replicates the biology.
you know how humans spend terawatts of energy just to separate salt from water? evolved life can just kind of like protein fold around the salt molecules and then protein fold to let go of them when the signal receptor all operating at tremendous efficiency. imagine if we could just make life
Sheeeit, you must be crazy
you're going too fast
doctor I don't know where your hands been last
you mean the glorified search engine?
yeah, only bad programmers are scared of this.
you can still become a burger flipper.
Bad programmers are afraid of AI, but other professions should be shitting themselves. If I were a lawyer, I'd be terrified. Now the people don't need to pay tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars for some intern to read the law and recite it back to me in an email, they can just ask an LLM and it'll shit it out for free.
Accounting? Done nearly instantly.
Economics? Why employ someone to speculate and be wrong when a computer can guess wrong for you
Artists? Just a prompt away
Honestly, there are people that should be worried. The legal world is already scrambling to ban AI to save their jobs.
If the AI revolution happens, programmers will lose their jobs last, guaranteed. Who else will program the AI?
>Artists? Just a prompt away
Extremely few will be the ones who can capitalize on AI tools as well as real, skilled, and experienced artists, mongoloid.
All that happened is some autists were ballsy enough to feed all the bullshit they could possibly scrape from the web into a big fat learning model. It can't really go much further because there's no more data. In fact it will degenerate because the web is getting more locked down and filled with "AI"-generated nonsense.
You're at peak now
Truth is AI is borderline useless, 99% hype 1% usefulness, except if you need pictures for T-shirts, then you may actually profit from it
Is it though?
If anything, it feels like progress took a huge halt, considering the absurd hype backing it before.
It is a useful tool to save some time if you're a professional, but it is skill kind of shitty if you're a clueless newbie. Too many errors, and you're not supposed to be able to catch them if you're a beginner.
Ai has peaked with gpt4, its only downhill from here as electricity cost will rise and these large models are not economically feasible, nothing will come close to the energy efficiency of the human brain
You are talking like GPT is the only architecture possible.
>nothing will come close to the energy efficiency of the human brain
My grocery bill disagrees
Just had the weirdest dream. I was on some kind of train with Mark Zuckerberg who was explaining something about AI and robots. There were a bunch of metallic robots around him. I believe Zuck said something about how syncing humans with technology will benefit us all, then I asked him "Do you think everyone in this room is human?". Zuck said yes. Then I said, "You are not human either, are you?" Zuck smiled and then caught me and held me from behind. Then he tried to drill something in my head.
Analysis?
I think you might be gay. Sorry you had to hear it from me
>UUUUHHHHHuhuhhhhh NEEDdddd israelite-ISH AUTISMO BILJENAIR wiener
Get well
>hasn't gotten one iota better since GPT3 and Stable Diffusion came out, in fact has only gotten worse as companies get rid of anything that might be construed as unwoke
>its advancing so fast
corporations have already lost control of AI as open source models dominate
kys
Doesn't scare me it's bloat and a PITA to maintain and not healthy to use.
Just avoid buying in, don't follow people who use it, sort by bump or creation order, use shit like Google at most via searx as one of many search providers, avoid artists that use AI and don't use their shit etc.
reminder that ai is just a glorified search engine scrapper
when the big corpo starts shutting down on scrapping (and there's major effort ongoing), ai is just going to become an empty husk
relevant content archivers will be charging to let ai use their data, and consequently productive ai won't be free anymore, in fact only big enterprise is gonna be able to afford it
you will be left with the basic scrapper that is no different than just searching on google
There are people capturing all of encrypted network traffic they can on the presumption that AI will let them read it within the decade.
They've been doing that ever since the term "Quantum Computer" ever came into the public vernacular. And the AI hopers will find just as much success as the QC chuds.
>big autocomplete algorithms
>barely convincing voice changers
>non-existent good tts tech
stupid frogposter
moronic frogposter
>its advancing so fast
It's already back to being dead. They had one revelation from Google research that was from 5 years ago+ and they milked it for research money and you fools believe it's somehow god now.
What will be the next buzzword after the AI meme dies?
quantum computing again and then AI again in a never-ending cycle
sama is the antichrist
that shirt looks kinda cool
dw your psychological state is irrelevant
Now that the Chinese have set strict rules of AI for civilians (output has to follow the Party), similar a set of rules for the rest of the world wont be long. We will all keep our governments, and their will be no UBI because our AIs wont be allowed to overthrow us
See, that's another thing. Even in some sci-fi future where synthetic intelligence existed, why the frick would it overthrow us? It's not an evolved being; it has no preference for self-preservation. It just is.
*wont be far along
As an AI dingdong born in 2021 unfortunately I don't know what you said because I am a brainlet stuck in time waiting for an update