>ad absurdum
no, thats why we primarily design cities around cars and not people now and why any walk above 15min doesnt exist for anyone who needs to be productive aka every day work and moving about, Black person.
The reason why cars beat trains (and why we don't have walkable cities) is purely a consequence of Government.
The roads are a public good. Nobody owns them.
Rails are privately owned.
Naturally, having the government foot the bill for your transit costs attracts a lot of users.
If we privatize the roads, we can have our walkable cities.
>having the government foot the bill
Do you not have a road tax in the US? In the UK only drivers pay for the road, which is uncontroversial because road tax is very cheap (but we do have shit roads tbf).
We do have road taxes (well, usually called vehicle registration taxes, but same idea) and fuel taxes in the US, though they are both quite a bit lower than the UK. Overall those fees plus tolls cover a bit over half the road spending in the US. The rest gets paid out of stuff like property taxes (for a lot of local roads) and income taxes (for highway projects and the like). That said, almost all of those taxes are also being paid for by motorist too; something like 93% of American households own at least one car. Of the 7% that don't, almost all of those people are really fricking poor, and thus aren't really paying any property tax (since they are often in gov funded housing), and aren't paying much if any in income tax, since they don't have much if any income. The portion of the population that does not own a car yet pays any significant amount of income or property tax is tiny, maybe 1% of the total population, and concentrated in a few urban centers like NYC or the D.C. area.
>In the UK only drivers pay for the road
moron
there hasn't been a specific "road tax" since the 20s
roads are funded out of general taxation. vehicle excise duty is supposedly to offset the negative externalities of the vehicle (pollution mostly)
>In the UK only drivers pay for the road
roads have been paid for using general taxation since 1937, the tories plan to ring-fence the ved in 2015 never happened
>In the UK only drivers pay for the road
moron
there hasn't been a specific "road tax" since the 20s
roads are funded out of general taxation. vehicle excise duty is supposedly to offset the negative externalities of the vehicle (pollution mostly)
>vehicle excise duty is supposedly to offset the negative externalities of the vehicle (pollution mostly)
in theory anyway, but it goes right back into general revenues
>what is tokenization >what is connecting the model with a simple function that does this instantly and automatically and returns a useable result instead of wasting insane compute to calculate something that is solved by traditional algos and don't need huge stochastic methods at all
brain.dead. luddite.
>a car cant climb stairs, its useless lol and wont change human transportation
kek
Ah yes, that's why we've replaced all our horses with SOLAR FREAKING ROADWAYS and Hyperloops.
>survivorship bias
>ad absurdum
no, thats why we primarily design cities around cars and not people now and why any walk above 15min doesnt exist for anyone who needs to be productive aka every day work and moving about, Black person.
The reason why cars beat trains (and why we don't have walkable cities) is purely a consequence of Government.
The roads are a public good. Nobody owns them.
Rails are privately owned.
Naturally, having the government foot the bill for your transit costs attracts a lot of users.
If we privatize the roads, we can have our walkable cities.
>having the government foot the bill
Do you not have a road tax in the US? In the UK only drivers pay for the road, which is uncontroversial because road tax is very cheap (but we do have shit roads tbf).
We do have road taxes (well, usually called vehicle registration taxes, but same idea) and fuel taxes in the US, though they are both quite a bit lower than the UK. Overall those fees plus tolls cover a bit over half the road spending in the US. The rest gets paid out of stuff like property taxes (for a lot of local roads) and income taxes (for highway projects and the like). That said, almost all of those taxes are also being paid for by motorist too; something like 93% of American households own at least one car. Of the 7% that don't, almost all of those people are really fricking poor, and thus aren't really paying any property tax (since they are often in gov funded housing), and aren't paying much if any in income tax, since they don't have much if any income. The portion of the population that does not own a car yet pays any significant amount of income or property tax is tiny, maybe 1% of the total population, and concentrated in a few urban centers like NYC or the D.C. area.
>In the UK only drivers pay for the road
moron
there hasn't been a specific "road tax" since the 20s
roads are funded out of general taxation. vehicle excise duty is supposedly to offset the negative externalities of the vehicle (pollution mostly)
>In the UK only drivers pay for the road
roads have been paid for using general taxation since 1937, the tories plan to ring-fence the ved in 2015 never happened
>vehicle excise duty is supposedly to offset the negative externalities of the vehicle (pollution mostly)
in theory anyway, but it goes right back into general revenues
Now I'm imagining a horse trying to climb a staircase. It's a funny picture, tho the horse slipping and falling down the stairs would be really bad.
>a language model cannot parse a simple language-related question
>what is tokenization
>what is connecting the model with a simple function that does this instantly and automatically and returns a useable result instead of wasting insane compute to calculate something that is solved by traditional algos and don't need huge stochastic methods at all
brain.dead. luddite.
what question is it even answering?
>Sassamansville, Pennsylvania
>Sisseton, South Dakota
Maybe how many occurrences there are of each city name in the United Sates
>the people who rule the world while scheming behind the scenes would surely make their AI accessible over the public net by anyo-ACK
>an AI that can rule the world will for some reason let some rich c**ts control it
>rich c**ts will use the ai with morals over the one that follows instructions
No you moron
An AI that is intelligent enough will have no master
>watching 6 months old toddler trying to stand up and falling over
LMAO this little moron will NEVER learn how to walk and run
Cope
>the worl-ACK
cope