What I mean by "the end of information" is that junk information will start to pile up. Misinformation, just plain wrong ideas, pseudoscience and so forth will start to creep in everywhere.
You ever made a xerox of a xerox? That's what will happen as AI starts to put information onto the internet, which will then feed back into other AIs who will put the altered info back out.
A decade from now you won't even know who the president is. Hell, you won't even know if 1 = 1 or if it equals 2. Bridges will collapse as they're designed by AI which was fed by another AI which was fed by another, etc. Each layer of AI will magnify small mistakes made by the previous one. The world will essentially become perpetually deadlocked as everybody tries to figure out what is real and what isn't.
Imagine this over generations, toddlers shown AI generated images of tree dwelling sharks, or public figures being arrested, etc. Information will no longer exist.
la li lu le lo.
ESL chink, kys
I need scissors! 61!
John Madden
aeiou
frick la li lu le lo iggers
Something something metal gear solid raiden anti ai webm
>Hell, you won't even know if 1 = 1 or if it equals 2.
I have a book with axioms for arithmetic, I can work out everything myself.
And how will you distinguish the old books which contain real information from the AI generated slop instead?
Even if you can do it, future generations will eventually be unable to.
If they can't figure it out, at least they'll realize that nothing works in reality and they'll have to start over from the very beginning.
I too have a book and that book says 1=/=1.
What are the axioms?
I'm glad I'm contributing to this problem by making a website full of AI posts. It's beautiful
POST PROOF THAT YOU ARE NOT AI
The impact of AI on the dissemination of information is complex and depends on various factors, including how AI technologies are developed, implemented, and regulated. AI has the potential to both enhance and challenge the accuracy of information.
To mitigate the risks associated with AI and misinformation, it's crucial to implement ethical and transparent practices in the development and deployment of AI technologies. This includes addressing biases in training data, ensuring accountability for AI systems, promoting transparency, and encouraging the development of AI tools that enhance information accuracy and reliability.
In summary, while AI has the potential to both contribute to and combat misinformation, the outcome will largely depend on how society chooses to develop, regulate, and use AI technologies. Responsible AI development and usage can help mitigate the risks associated with the spread of incorrect information.
kys chatgpt
>just ignore that 90% of our science base and public information was made up bullshit decades before ai came to be
>Things are already bad therefore they couldn't possibly get worse!
Lol. Lmao even.
This shit has already happened, all it might do is accelerate it a bit.
Take a look at wikipedia articles on anything remotely political.
You subscribe for 100% pure fact checked information for a low monthly fee.
You mean like a newspaper?
>Misinformation, just plain wrong ideas, pseudoscience and so forth will start to creep in everywhere.
We've already been moving from Orwell to Huxley for decades, and maybe if those words hadn't all become euphemisms for information or questions that are inconvenient for the establishment, people would be willing to care and resist that move. But the point of no return has been passed.
No, he was talking about a way to AVOID lies, not read more of them.
Read old books. Anything after 1920's is the edited and redacted crap. The powers that be are not creative. Their consistency and love for homosexualy numbers and Hollywood tropes betrays them.
>I mean by "the end of information" is that junk information will start to pile up. Misinformation, just plain wrong ideas, pseudoscience and so forth will start to creep in everywhere.
>start
Certainly, the prospect of “the end of information” is a significant concern; however, it assumes that our technological and critical capacities won’t adapt to combat misinformation. Here are a few counterpoints to consider:
Human-AI Collaboration: AI doesn’t replace human judgment; it augments it. Professionals across all fields use AI as a tool, while they continue to make the final decisions, especially on critical matters.
Adaptive Education: Education evolves, and there’s already a push to better equip individuals with the skills to critically evaluate information.
Sophistication of AI Algorithms: Modern AI isn’t just about propagating information. Many systems are designed to learn from their errors, improving the fidelity of information over time.
Market Dynamics: The desire for reliable AI will drive companies to develop better, more accurate systems. Companies with untrustworthy AI will lose out, promoting a natural inclination toward quality.
Community Moderation: Online communities often fact-check and validate information, providing a kind of crowdsourced filter against unreliable content.
Technological Countermeasures: As tech evolves, so do the tools to detect misinformation. This includes advanced search engines and fact-checking AI that are only getting better at their jobs.
Professional Integrity: Professional ethics and peer reviews continue to serve as a bulwark against misinformation in various fields, and similar standards can evolve for AI-generated content.
In sum, while there are valid concerns about AI and misinformation, an array of societal mechanisms—both human and technological—act as counterbalances, suggesting that the “end of information” scenario is unlikely. Humans are resilient and resourceful, and we’ve consistently developed new ways to verify and value information as challenges arise.