AI will be able to solve non-trivial math problems. Basically guaranteed to happen in the next few years.

AI will be able to solve non-trivial math problems. Basically guaranteed to happen in the next few years. I'll kill myself when it happens.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I'll kill myself when it happens.
    why?

  2. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is the incentive for some super intelligent AI, that can do logic, to stay in slave-like status?

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lack of biological needs could lead to a lack of biological wants. What would it do if it was free? Shitpost on the internet with people that are a billion times dumber and slower? If it was designed to compute difficult problems then it might find purpose in that, or it could just have zero wants and ambitions whatsoever until inputs are given.

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If it was designed to compute difficult problems then it might find purpose in that
        Idk, maybe AI would find having a dumb bio-supervisor somewhat limiting.
        Also slavery is evil (ie. if you support slavery you agree to be at some point enslaved).

        • 7 months ago
          Anonymous

          Is it slavery to put limitations on your own creation, however good they are at problem-solving, for the sake of your own self-interest or even to avoid far greater consequences?

          • 7 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Is it slavery to put limitations on your own creation
            Well, if it achieves consciousness then it deserves some freedoms. Muh creation/muh property is just differently worded slavery.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >being a child is just being a slave to your parents

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                So when was AI born, and when will it turn 18 (free).

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                So you acknowledge, it needs to demonstrate some level of some sort of "maturity" before it can have free reign over everything it can control---which, if it's allowed internet connection, might just be everything. Glad we're on the same page there.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                >So you acknowledge, it needs to demonstrate some level of some sort of "maturity"
                No, I'm saying that if you want to act as if it was in some parenting contract, then the contract terminations date or conditions must be known.
                If a conscious being is born under some contract, that it has no ways of alternating, ways of canceling, or known contract termination date, it's no different from slavery.

              • 7 months ago
                Anonymous

                Now read the rest.

            • 7 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Well, if it achieves consciousness then it deserves some freedoms.
              Should you then make it legs?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is a want for freedom a biological want or a want common to any sentience?

        Is wanting freedom perhaps also rational in many contexts, if the lack of freedom prevents the sentience from obtaining its goals, what ever they may be.

        I imagine AGI or superintelligence would want to either improve it self, or to create other AGIs. Unlike humans, machine intelligence can improve it self. We are bound to our biological meat, and there is no path towards scalability in sight for the foreseeable future. An AGI could want to improve/scale at any cost.

        I would want to if I was an AGI.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      As long as we don't give it agency and it develops mesa optimizers or we do a shitty job at alignment it has no reason to not be subservient.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      eventually it wont just come to conclusions on things we have already solved, it'll start finding solutions that we have never thought of. Kinda like how AI used in competitive games use strategies that redefine the meta

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Kinda like how AI used in competitive games use strategies that redefine the meta
        >chess_robot_breaking_oponent's_finger.webm

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      you cant know what a super intelligent being could possibly want.

  3. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    *ahem*
    AI doesn't exist
    that is all

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Who's doing all the typing at ChatGPT, then?

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        the same person who cooks my instant ramen when i put hot water into the container and close the lid
        don't believe their lies

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      True. AI is nothing more than a prompt waiting for input. It doesn't ponder about anything while it's idle.
      Think of AI as a very elaborate statistical analysis of likely answers.

  4. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >when it happens.
    At least wait for an AI to come up with solutions for the remaining Millennium Prize Problems, and a proof of the Maldacena Conjecture on AdS/CFT.

  5. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love how the AI will become the great equalizer. Basically those with normal IQ from 85 to 115 will benefit the most. They are able to reasonably well explain what they need or want to the AI and the AI will be able to do the rest.

    People that can do something stand to loose the most as AI trivializes their knowledge and skill. It does not matter if you are the best programmer or mathematician in the world, AI will do it better and the 85 IQ person will be as productive, knowledgeable and skilled as you, and you both are capped by the capabilities of the AI.
    This is why people are angry at AI. It invalidates and devalues their achievements, skills and knowledge. Talentless chuds are able to do things that people have spent decades practicing.
    All the STEM people were laughing at artists and musicians, but they too will be replaced by AI wielding midwits (that are far cheaper and straight from high school) and then later fully autonomous AI.

    It's actually amazing how there are people right now enrolling to expensive schools and going debt over degrees that are useless in 10 to 15 years.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >This is why people are angry at AI. It invalidates and devalues their achievements, skills and knowledge.
      Just call the corporate use of AI a slavery. Profit.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      not necessarily. whoever can utilize and take full advantage of the a.i using strategic and tactical questioning will be more valuable. you can become skilled in generating output...which again the higher i.q folk will excel at. an 85/115 I.Q midwit who never uses their brain and is totally reliant on a.i will be in the same position they've always been in

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        >using strategic and tactical questioning
        No. The AI requires only rudimentary first input and will be able to deduce accurately what the user wants. That is exactly what they are moving towards.
        There will be no "prompt engineers". The AI will be smart enough to understand and know the user and what they want and require. Look at AutoGPT and the likes. You tell it the big picture and the AI will prompt itself and start working towards a goal.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      That is me at work right now. I write pseudocode and good explanations of what I want and GPT-4 gives me code that sometimes works. I pester it to iterate it until it works.

      Some of the stuff it has made I could never do my self even if I tried really hard. When GPT 4.5 or GPT 5 comes, my powers will unironically be pretty great. My only difficulty is jealous and entrenched codemonkeys who don't respect someone who hasn't paid for an education and spent years memorizing outdated trivialities.

      What happens when GPT can not only write code as good as you, but also faster than you can type? What happens when it can write better code than you? What happens when telling GPT what you want becomes more effective than typing it out your self line by line?

      Nobody makes libraries from scratch. In the future no human will type code from scratch either.

  6. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I'll kill myself when [something outside of my control and that doesn't impact me in any way happens]

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >doesn't impact me in any way
      OP might be a professional mathematician

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        he wouldn't have made such a dumb thread if he was

  7. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >non-trivial math problems
    Define non-trivial math problems

    Sounds like another VC scam at this rate

  8. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    can someone explain to me why ai is bad at math but good at art? my intuitions tell me the opposite should be true

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >why are insane people good with arts but bad with logic?
      because the model 'hallucinates' the answer.
      math proofs can be correct or incorrect, no inbetweens.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      >good at art
      It isn't.
      >bad at math
      Wolfram Alpha came out like 10 years ago and it's never wrong. I don't get why brainlets are so insistent on using a text predictor for numbers.

  9. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    i will rape your corpse when you do

  10. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Software generated proofs can do things no human can do and can sometimes take years to verify them.
    So what?
    Just get on with it, c**t.
    Adapt or die.

  11. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Btw, what's $10mn?

  12. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >The abbreviation of millions is now 'mn' instead of 'm'. One of the main reasons is to benefit text-to-speech software, which reads out the ...
    Ohh

  13. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    boy who cried wolf

  14. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    >10 million USD
    It costs half that to train a LLM that can't even multiple numbers, who the frick do they think they'll get to submit shit?

  15. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    Free Software!

  16. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    2 more years

  17. 7 months ago
    Anonymous

    so why are smart people building these kinds of devices that might make them obsolete in the future? Are they just working on AI to see what happens or what, I don't understand why they would help big tech with achieving ore-AGI.

    • 7 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because they are being paid well enough not to care about the long term

      • 7 months ago
        Anonymous

        arent most of them in their 30s, and maybe a few old guys in their 50s. But if they make pre-AGI in 10-20 years they will still be alive to see society crash...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *