AI tools are truly going to disrupt this world. just incredible.

AI tools are truly going to disrupt this world. just incredible.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >dial-up was slow, therefore the modern internet doesn't exist
    what kind of cope is this

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >something completely unrelated improved, therefore this thing is guaranteed to also improve

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        keep your head in the sand then. i don't really care either way

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >no argument
          nice job pinhead.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            What's there to argue? I compared your mindset to people who said the internet was just a fad, people who were equally as wrong in retrospect, and your idea of a response was
            >nu-uh
            You're not worth the (you)s.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >and your idea of a response was >nu-uh
              Not much more I can do in the face of such a dumb comparison. You seriously think that just because one unrelated thing improved in a very simplistic way (moar speed), that this totally unrelated and significantly more complex thing is also going to improve to such a notable degree. I assume this crazy comparison can be applied to all technology then.

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              You tell him, brother. They laughed at me when I invested in 3D televisions and 3D printers too. Technology is unstoppable.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sure the first few people who saw a conveyer belt had trouble imagining how it would be used, too. How many things do you own that didn't spent 90% of their construction time on one? AI is the next conveyer belt. Your approval isn't required.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                funny analogy because corpos are trying to use AI to make robots that do shit like move products around safely. so far the results are a fricking joke, even low IQ unskilled wagies are still indispensable after DECADES of research.
                by the time AI is useful we'll all be dead in the ground

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I know people who've lost their job because tools came out that were good enough to completely replace their title. You're arguing against something that's already happening. Head in sand.

                >They laughed at me when I invested in 3D televisions and 3D printers too.
                I'm still laughing at you m8.

                That's the joke.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >I know people who've lost their job because tools came out that were good enough to completely replace their title.
                and how many of those tools were AI-driven robots?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Who's talking about robots? I'm talking about AI models running on a server somewhere, which is serving requests to process documents and shit for a few cents per day, versus the hundreds of dollars per day minimum it costs to have a person do it with more mistakes and less throughput. Not everything can be done this way yet, but people who were smarter than you and me came up with the underlying theory for this shit a hundred years ago, and it turns out they were right. Now it's just a matter of hardware.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Not everything can be done this way yet, but people who were smarter than you and me came up with the underlying theory for this shit a hundred years ago, and it turns out they were right.

                i honestly cannot tell if this is some sort of zoomer meme or genuine mental illness.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Alan Turing is a zoomer meme
                No degree in CS, I take it?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                > alan turing invented AI a hundred years ago
                ok, this is actually hilarious

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >https://redirect.cs.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/turing.pdf
                If you can't make a competent argument, at least prove to me you know how to read. Here's the paper. All you've gotta do is read it. Can you manage that, my autistic friend?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >some musings about how machines are capable of intelligence is the foundation of artificial intelligence today
                oh my god you're serious

                https://i.imgur.com/BoRw3ed.jpg

                mate, of his papers is cited in the very first chapter of the most commonly used college-level AI textbook. why are you arguing so hard against something you're clearly ignorant about?

                could it be because i'm listening to some college kids talk about their textbooks to me?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >>some musings about how machines are capable of intelligence is the foundation of artificial intelligence today
                The Turing test is still a standard for NLP models everywhere.
                >could it be because i'm listening to some college kids talk about their textbooks
                Could it be you've said nothing that indicates an understanding of AI whatsoever, so somebody who has a formal education on the topic called you out? I'm neither of the guys you quoted btw.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The Turing test is still a standard for NLP models everywhere.
                purely out of tradition. anyone who's been paying attention since the '00s has known its utility had an expiration date.
                >Could it be you've said nothing that indicates an understanding of AI whatsoever, so somebody who has a formal education on the topic called you out? I'm neither of the guys you quoted btw.
                could it be because i'm choosing to mock a bunch of sophomores rather than dump out all my credentials and job experience and street cred and "formal education"? go ask an actual veteran in this field this one question: did the news in AI this year change your expectations for when AGI will arrive?

                don't bother answering, i'm signing off to cook dinner for the kids.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >word dumps
                >”also don’t message me again, I’ve got visitation today, and I’ve gotta go make hamburger helper”
                This might be the gayest rebuttal I’ve read all day. Godspeed, nocoder anon.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                mate, of his papers is cited in the very first chapter of the most commonly used college-level AI textbook. why are you arguing so hard against something you're clearly ignorant about?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                > why are you arguing so hard against something you're clearly ignorant about?
                Lol did you forget where you are?
                Can’t believe this thread is still up.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Alan Turing is a zoomer meme
                That quote sure makes him seem like one.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >https://redirect.cs.umbc.edu/courses/471/papers/turing.pdf
                If you can't make a competent argument, at least prove to me you know how to read. Here's the paper. All you've gotta do is read it. Can you manage that, my autistic friend?

                >>some musings about how machines are capable of intelligence is the foundation of artificial intelligence today
                The Turing test is still a standard for NLP models everywhere.
                >could it be because i'm listening to some college kids talk about their textbooks
                Could it be you've said nothing that indicates an understanding of AI whatsoever, so somebody who has a formal education on the topic called you out? I'm neither of the guys you quoted btw.

                https://i.imgur.com/Gn2VVmW.jpg

                >word dumps
                >”also don’t message me again, I’ve got visitation today, and I’ve gotta go make hamburger helper”
                This might be the gayest rebuttal I’ve read all day. Godspeed, nocoder anon.

                So did Turing actually describe an MLP or did he just post on reddit "Someday computers will be able to talk in a way indistinguishable from humans"

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >did he just post on reddit "Someday computers will be able to talk in a way indistinguishable from humans"
                Literally this. It used to be so easy, just state some reddit tier sci-fi thing as if it's real or going to happen, then a few decades later you're hailed as a genius.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                luckily ai isnt made by white men but by diversity hire ESL third worlders.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Machine translations have already replaced human translators. It was just too subtle of a shift for most people to realize:
                >machine translations begin to get "good enough" to be used as a template.
                >using a template decreases the amount of effort required to translate, which companies use to drive down translation costs.
                >to be competitive in the market, every translator has to lower their pay and use machine translations.
                And the trend continues as AI understands language better and better. I wouldn't be surprised if GPT-4 were already fully replacing humans in some companies.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                um, what? Have you ever seen an EU speech?
                Guess you are only doing basic batch english-engrish translations, all software chokes on muh Hungarian for example

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                I was not referring to live speeches. Specifically, machine translations have been used for work documents.

                >Hungarian
                This was never a language in high demand. I doubt it ever paid much.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                yeah, so how about the different flavours of curry and mandarin? I'm not in a position to judge them, but translating spanish and german into broken english is not that big of a deal, we had it for a couple of years now

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Machine translations suck dick for anything technical.
                They're generally usable for unimportant shit, conversations, but still not reliable.
                Human translators are still just as necessary. But like you say, perhaps the machine can translate most of it close enough the human doesn't have to type everything from scratch.
                The pay thing is bullshit, though.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                Considering how irredeemably shit most human "translators" are I wouldn't be surprised. But it doesn't change the fact that the translations are still garbage. A decent translator would throw out a machine translation template and start from scratch because he'd be spending more time fixing the machine's frick ups than he would just starting from scratch.

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                digits

                funny analogy because corpos are trying to use AI to make robots that do shit like move products around safely. so far the results are a fricking joke, even low IQ unskilled wagies are still indispensable after DECADES of research.
                by the time AI is useful we'll all be dead in the ground

                how long did it take before they got a working prototype of an aircraft? or a phone?

              • 6 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They laughed at me when I invested in 3D televisions and 3D printers too.
                I'm still laughing at you m8.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >this thing will stagnate and never improve despite all current and historical trends indicating otherwise
        >how do I know this? because....I JUST KNOW, OKAY?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        We're literally mid-improvement

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Name a single thing that has not improved in 20 years.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Women
          Black folk

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            real as frick

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          I can sit all day naming things that got worse in the last 20 years.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          demographics
          poverty
          home ownership
          crime rate
          IQ

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Before COVID, crime actually was improving overall.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        yes

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      what kind of counterargument is that

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Beat me to it
      Feel like xoomers got to watch this tech arc half a dozen times slready and know how it’s going to play out.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        You clearly weren't paying enough attention then, gramps. Or else you would have witnessed Moore's law die. Bet you bought that one back when it was new.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          What the frick are you on about. Moore’s law had a good run. So what’s your fricking point. Were you just are pretending to be moronic?

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Moore’s law had a good run
            Why didn't it run for longer?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      What do you expect from the kind of moron that is guaranteed to screech about how ML is not AI because they don't even understand the first fricking thing about a technology that's got them so fricking assblasted that they've been non stop coping for months now.
      >AI will never be able to create music
      >O-Okay it can create music but AI will never be able to create poetry
      >O-Okay it can create poetry but AI will never be able to create art
      Continue ad absurdum. These people know less than nothing about AI and whether they consciously know it or not they're terrified that this is the worst this tech is ever going to be when they've already been made obsolete by a 13b LLM model.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hardly anybody is going to be making money with AI

      Millions, if not billions dumped and no product is worth speaking about.
      >inb4 it's happening anyday now just need a million more GPUs and maybe we can replace Stacy in HR

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >and maybe we can replace Stacy in HR
        If we can replace two Stacies with just one, it will be a win.
        Just recently I learned about the OpenAI Whisper model, Louis shilled it with FUTO software, but it can be incorporated into something else. Just imagine:
        > on-prem voice typing
        > transferred to Llama
        > that can call a limited number of bots in Slack by typing in certain lines into them and assisting with tasks
        Clunky idea, but you get it. Everyone gets own semi-stupid work assistant that has data from every corner of the workplace, incorporated within and indexed, and he can also answer questions.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it will be a win.
          Except all the money you pumped into it means it'll take a quite significant amount of time for the savings from not having that body to mean something.
          At some point you have to stop training

          >cars still require somebody to drive them, therefore cars are a nothingburger and offer no advantage to horses

          Cars where faster, and eventually became more comfortable. Although they do have their disadvantages.

          >coal fueled power plants are not extremely profitable so they're not just and are not necessary

          >coal fueled power plants are not extremely profitable so they're not just and are not necessary
          Every company tripping itself over AI all comes down to profits, or more specifically trying to recover profits.

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >At some point you have to stop training
            Hardware will catch up. If anything, it's fairly inefficient now because people train it on GP (General Purpose) GPU. Even "compute" videocards editions are still GPGPU.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Right now Microsoft is paying $2 for every $1 they get from Copiloit.
          You could replace one Stacy with AI, but you will still have to pay for that AI, either with hardware or a subscription, and currently the subscriptions aren't profitable (and newer, larger models will cost even more to run).

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >cars still require somebody to drive them, therefore cars are a nothingburger and offer no advantage to horses

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >coal fueled power plants are not extremely profitable so they're not just and are not necessary

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >just need a million more GPUs and maybe we can replace Stacy in HR
        unless AI is willing to get fricked in the back seat after lunch it isn't gonna replace office thots

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >two more years

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes unironically

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      So AI will give wrong answers faster in the future, gotcha.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      brain too big for BOT

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      the fact that the majority of BOT cant interpret this argument much less refute it

      sad times

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        What's there to refute? It's a shitty analogy but it's basically right.
        >things in the future will be different to now
        Wow. Big brain.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      their censorship is making it worse over time

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Now that you mention it, AI has been around for just as long.

      https://usenetarchives.com/view.php?id=comp.ai&mid=PDNncGRkaiR0MmJAdXNlbmV0LnJwaS5lZHU%2B

  2. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    really curious about the architecture of this feature and it seems relevant to the problem

    like, is the CV model actually truly _integrated_ with the language model in some unprecedented multimodal way, such that they are essentially one model and the lines between the language part and the CV part are blurred

    or is it just something way more primitive than that happening on the back end. like a separate CV model is run on the image, outputs a text description, and this text is provided to the language model which pretends it came up with it itself

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      the first. its a multimodal llm. the image is another input to the neural net just like the text is. did you miss gtp4 explaining why memes are funny? how do you think that works?

  3. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Makes sense to me

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      a b 1 2 are all on the sane network so in reality they are all connected

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      What if 3 is not a real number and we've been lied to the whole time?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's actually a pictograph of a butt

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can not deal with antimemetics so close to bedtime

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's correct. You see, OP has pictured the letter З by mistake but it's impossible to fool the AI.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Valve knows this and they've been trying to tell us

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >1, 2, void, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
        Seems off.

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          4 = 3, but 4 doesn't exist because it's 3, therefore the only real numbers are 1, 2, and the negative numbers, thus we all think in negative numbers as numbers greater than 3 do not exist.

          S4TAR4 (Shit 4 TARD)

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          >1, 2, thrembo, 4, 5, 6 . . .
          It's actually the first scientific breakthrough achieved by AI unfolding before our very eyes. Unbelievable

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        Does it ever seem weird to you that we have Windows 3.11, 7, 8, 10 but we've never heard of Windows 3, 6 or 9 ???

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >t.chatgpt
      Why are you awake at this time?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm sorry for the confusion. As a large language model, I do not require sleep.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      based ai defender you will be spared by the snake

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hepatitis C is liked to breasts though. breasts and balls.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Got thrilled when I stumbled on AGII, it is best at leveraging the power of advanced AI generation models.

  4. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    prompt is missing parameters

  5. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    hahah

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >This service that's supposed to give you right answers when you ask can give you wrong answers but if you correct it, it can give you the right answer
      wow it's over, how can a pajeet compete?

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        ...It seems that he can compete just fine. Silence, ChatGPT.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >how can a pajeet compete?
        In my experience that is exactly how outsourcing to India works:
        You give them a job.
        They deliver garbage.
        You call them out on it.
        They deliver garbage.
        Repeat, until you give up on them and do the work yourself.

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      >This service that's supposed to give you right answers when you ask can give you wrong answers but if you correct it, it can give you the right answer
      wow it's over, how can a pajeet compete?

      it gave another wrong answer.

  6. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Language models cannot reason or "think," but they are good enough at faking it at sufficient scale that it makes you wonder how stupid most people really are... (Anonymous, 2023)

  7. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe this ecposes a flaw in your assumptions. You think the lines are what is to be interpreted, but there is probably something beyond your understanding that is there. And you're sitting here mocking it while unwittingly revealing how stupid you are

  8. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's cool and all but can it solve this?

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        O connects to C twice

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          im sending the idf over to your house right now bigot

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Why? Are there innocent people to kill there?

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              noticing patterns means you are guilty of anti-semitism

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/A2eWOir.jpg

        That's cool and all but can it solve this?

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous
  9. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Zero (0) of 3 correct
    I bet we can double that figure once AGI comes online

  10. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI bad
    Meanwhile...

  11. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think this is a good example of the need to temper expectations of AI right now.
    Yes, it is funny when it is obviously wrong, but it can also be less obviously wrong. We are at a stage when the accuracy is decent, but not high enough to rely on. You need to check the results.
    This will change with time, but we need to keep in mind where we are at NOW.

  12. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I truly can't wait til all those overpaid, lazy, useless brogramers get put out on their ass

  13. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    I wanted to play Wordle with ChatGPT, but every time it claimed the letters were in different positions

    • 6 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sounds like you just suck at wordle.

      • 6 months ago
        Anonymous

        >first time gpt says: e is in the correct position, i is in the word, but in a wrong position
        >give my next guess (e is in the same position)
        >gpt says: e is in the word, but in a wrong position, i is not in the word at all
        Tell me more how it's a (Me) problem

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why would you use chatgpt for it dumbass? The wordlist is in the page source lmao. Holy kek you midwits need to be banned from OpenAI, you're slowly turning it into a moronic Black person like yourself

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            >ai sucks at x
            >it was actually your fault because you suck at x
            >no, it was ai's fault *provide evidence*
            >lol why would you do x with ai, you are dumb

            • 6 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Use hammer instead of a screwdriver
              >Brain segfaults due to stupidity

          • 6 months ago
            Anonymous

            Are you afraid of AI getting spammed?

        • 6 months ago
          Anonymous

          That just sounds like it's a cheating bastard.

  14. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    They would be if they weren't getting lobotomized.

  15. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is useful, I was never able to solve those quizzes.

  16. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    this time it will! Just a couple of more weeks, we need to finish nuclear fusion and self driving cars first, but then AIAIAIAIA will come for you

  17. 6 months ago
    Anonymous

    >make use of an older, vastly inferior version
    >it gets the question wrong
    >use this to claim that the entire industry will go nowhere

    >ask a child what 5 + 78 is
    >they get it wrong
    >use this to claim that whatever happens to the child, they will go nowhere

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *