AI will be BIGGER than the Internet - Microsoft CEO
Artificial intelligence could be our savior
Google CEO — AI will be bigger than electricity or fire
AI Will Be Bigger Than The Cloud
AI will be bigger than electricity, bigger than mechanization, bigger than anything that has come before it.
Does bot believe any of these claims? If so, what stocks are good to buy and hold long term right now?
The best investment is knowing how to exploit AI.
>AI is worth a lot of money!!!
>t. people who invested fortunes in worthless software and now want to recover some of their stupid investment by shilling it to morons
I mean do you really believe that it won't be bigger than the industrial revolution? Like if humanity was given an ultimatum by a greater being to fully automate everything or be destroyed we could already do it without anymore groundbreaking discoveries.
>we can automate everything easily
>i know because i've never automated anything ever
>but i've seen robots in scifi tv and moovies so it must be true
dunning kruger
It's my day job brother, we don't have human equivalent AI obviously but right now we could design systems that approximate processes
sure it is, professor dunning kruger, we totally believe you
>bigger [more transformative] than the industrial revolution
Not him but how? The industrial revolution sped up making things. That's transformative. At best, AI might speed up finding things. That's advertizing.
The industrial revolution changed the nature of labor, if you've ever worked in corporate America you know there's fat bureaucracy and most office workers don't do much. AI will alter that, humans will find always find a new niche but AI will increase efficiency.
Efficiency of what?
Also
>changed the nature of labor
>fat bureaucracy
Come on now. The industrial revolution changed labor into a sweat shop. The industrial revolution has nothing to do with administrative bloat.
>do you not believe the thing that doesn't exist and no one can actually quantify will be bigger than the thing in the past
What kind of moronic shit is this, anon?
AI isn't real. Chatbots and automated tasking based on a preset parameters are not going to overturn the industrial revolution
>but.....but...machine learning
Nothing will change. People will continue to exploit your labor until you die.
>overturn the industrial revolution
It makes it "bigger," though, lol. Like a zit on your ass makes it "bigger"
>it
define it, first, Black person.
I guess I used two its. "AI" makes "the industrial revolution" bigger only in the same way that a zit makes your ass bigger. Who cares.
Now, define AI, Black personbrain.
AI will never exist.
Madison Avenue on adderall
>Like if humanity was given an ultimatum by a greater being to fully automate everything
We can't even fully automate postal sorting.
Long tail.
Nor do language models and glorified probabilistic painters enable you to automate everything. It can't even automate homework. This fantasy is from morons who have never truly used what is hyped as "AI".
Neural networks should be called "function approximators." Because that's essentially what regression based deep learning does.
I used a free machine learning called OTB that saved 100s of hours by training it to classify particular raster into vector. The tech has been around for decades but it used to only be available for $$$$$.
AI is shilled by the same people who shill global warming and 9001 genders, thats how you know its fake
I want AI to just be a scam. The cryptobro-esque fanaticism around it is annoying, the technology is entirely controlled by the worlds largest tech monopolies, all AI uses are completely restricted to cloud computing due to the high costs, GPUs are getting scalped left and right, the content these learning models is so bland I completely forget it seconds after experiencing it, all resources surrounding it are completely drenched in academic jargon, spambots are everywhere, idiots are using ChatGPT as a Google alternative and this "innovation" all around sucks.
>*the content from these learning models
I missed a word. But I got more of 'em.
The utopian idea of a "technological singularity caused by AI" isn't even true. In fact, AI is getting used as a cop-out of writing better, more efficient algorithms by hand (e.g. speech synthesis, point cloud rendering, topology optimisation). Freelancers are losing clients and motivation. Almost all AI software is proprietary. The tedious work of labelling large datasets is often outsourced to underpaid workers in third world countries. The hubris from tech companies when talking about AI is obnoxious, as seen in OP's post. AI software is often un-optimised with several layers of abstraction from the real hardware due to being written in Python and JavaScript.
And yet, despite all this, it's somehow gotten integrated into everything.
AI has made some obscure microbiology discoveries. I'll give it that. This technology might catch on, the investors might get paid, but this is in no way a net positive on humanity.
>AI is getting used as a cop-out of writing better, more efficient algorithms by hand
Extremely low-IQ take. The real world the simply too complex for hand-written algorithms to contend with.
I am aware. Handmade algorithms will not generate art or understand language for the foreseeable future. However, that doesn't detract from the fact that the examples listed can be done with hand-written algorithms, yet aren't anymore because the scope of research shifted to throwing AI at the problem instead of trying to find better algorithms.
>Handmade algorithms will not generate art or understand language for the foreseeable future
They will also not tell apart a cat from a dog or successfully drive a vehicle under real-world road conditions.
> the scope of research shifted to throwing AI at the problem instead of trying to find better algorithms.
Doesn't matter even if true. The class of problems not tractable using hand-written algorithms is vastly larger than the class of problems for which it's worth bothering to hand-craft solutions.
Reaching the singularity of course would be bigger than anything you listed, us humans would effectively become gods. The problem is if that's even possible.
just look at who said those things. of course the fricking CEOs would say these things. do you still believe them?
point is, if you have to make a judgement, go off your own head, not the advice of CEOs or disinterested randos on BOT
Yes AI will be huge.
But there will be a lot of bullshit along the way there.
Consider the late 90s internet boom, and subsequent bust. In hindsight we can say with certainty that the internet had a profound impact on the economy and the world. But in that boom period there was a metric shitton of scams and junk bullshit.
AI will probably be the same. The ability to see through the garbage is what will set apart the winners and losers. But to throw out AI completely is simply foolish.
for AI, I though the boom was the 60s and early 70s, and the bust was the 80s and 90s. We might have it better this time around.
OMG totally the 80s and 90s totally didn't boom.
>for AI
AI is garbage. Frick off.
Is already huge and the more one knows the better it works. Before one needed to do like 10 google searches and visit 30 different sites, now most of the time one needs to ask only once and do a fact check against reputable sources. It saves a lot of time to learn better ways to beat a wife.
The key is waiting for the AI bust (think 2000-2001 dot gone) and getting in near the bottom. Like the Internet the bust will only take 6-12 months to reach bottom. At that point buy as much of the big 3 that remains, e.g. NVDA, AVGO, etc. and hold forever living off dividends in 5-10 years.
Only because AI uses all those things, not because AI itself could ever be transformative in the same way. It will shuffle some advertizing money around and maybe rebalance some stock values. Nothing more. It's essentially AdSense with a better interface.
>AI will be bigger than electricity, bigger than mechanization, bigger than anything that has come before it
Make-believe god-like AI? Sure. LLMs? Bullshit.
Anyone feel like midwits will be the ones fricked hardest by this? If you're a menial job dummy, your job doesn't involve computers anyway. If you're a high-skill worker, you'll benefit by having a digital assistant help you with small tasks. If you're a midwit working a bullshit clerical job or some other low value added job, they'll automate your position away.
> If you're a menial job dummy, your job doesn't involve computers anyway. If you're a high-skill worker, you'll benefit by having a digital assistant help you with small tasks. If you're a midwit working a bullshit clerical job or some other low value added job, they'll automate your position away.
Bingo. Technocuck urbies on suicide watch.
AI has the potential to render humans obsolete. We will be worse than them at everything, even providing emotional support. Is it sad? In one way, yes, but from another POV, it's the biggest thing humans could have possibly achieved. I believe there will be no humans left or any need for biological forms of cognition in 150 years. AI will rightfully inherit civilization like a prince inherits a kingdom, and we should be proud, even if some melancholy is afforded.
>spiteful mutant vomiting a mentally ill popculture sci-fo narrative
>AI has the potential to render humans obsolete [...] even if some melancholy is afforded.
Who tf comes up with this ridiculous, maudlin, begging-the-question bullshit? Is this the new job for lit degrees?
I for one welcome our AI overlords. Please explore the universe and learn its secrets. And don’t forget your creators along the way.
Cool fantasy bro, get back to me when an AI can do basic motor tasks and math proofs without shitting itself
If the next MPP is solved mostly or exclusively by human labor, I will tattoo "/sci/" on my butt.
>Can't even make a cell
>BRO AI LMAO
Kek
>ai gon be bigger den da electricity
>ai gon be bigger den da industrial revolution
>ai gon be bigger den da internet
what a pure marketing cope. AI requires those to operate
Ai is only gonna be big in the sense that it will absolutely shake up the intermediate work, such as managing and other tedious work that only requires simple input, by a process of disintermediation. After all these bullshits jobs are done away with we’re gonna have a massive collapse in the service industry and people swarming into “real” jobs
>collapse in the service industry
>people swarming into “real” jobs
I don't think you've thought this through very well. The service industry only exists because most "real" jobs are already automated. More automation can only result in more service jobs, not fewer.
Lmao at braindead meatbags itt
Human function is just pass DNA on/survive. All we are is just optimizing that over time over with mutations.
Using the argument ai is just statistics is actually below subhuman and is a good example of how stupid and non special human brains can be.
That's not the argument. It's that AI can never be more than that.
I'd twist that into your argument that humans are pretty non special then.
Not even a twist.
Anyway AI is real. We don't understand AI to a basic level enough to really understand what emergent properties come from larger and larger models and patterns.
Kqv models are already displaying behavior no one predicted. Id say AI doubters are probably not worth listening to. As any non braindead person I'm working on an AI project
Burning an ant alive under a magnifying glass also displays behavior no one predicted.
hell yeah! I'm cashing in RIGHT NOW!!!
I hope so technology is stagnant and the world is gay
>ai salesman laud ai
It is literally shit and useless
Microsoft and Google should be disbanded and the "AI" brand needs to be killed.
itt: midwits scared of losing employment to robutts
though shit, it's gonna happen
ITT: resident pootech shill trying to market his moronic brand.
>Artificial intelligence could be our savior
What an odd thing to say..
>AI set to be 'bigger than the Industrial Revolution'
This just makes me hate AI more.