Looks like you spamming gays/techbros are going to get the rope. Finally a lawyer points out the massive copyright infringement from AI and the harm it causes.
AI pajeets on sucide watch
Looks like you spamming gays/techbros are going to get the rope. Finally a lawyer points out the massive copyright infringement from AI and the harm it causes.
>reconstructed copies
>still does not understand what training means
>Like the normies need to understand how it works.
This garbage tech that hurts creative works is going to get banned and I can't wait to see BOT cry about it.
>This garbage tech that hurts creative works
It only hurts derivative shit art made by trannies and gays. Actual creativity won't be hurt by this at all.
If the argument is based on a flawed understanding of how SD works, when it is explained that it doesn't work that way the lawsuit will be tossed out.
>he thinks the court system operates on facts and not the feelings of judges and popular opinion
how naive you are lmao
No, this isn't how legal matters operate.
They can use it as a defence but nothing be tossed out, just because of one technical flaw.
That technical flaw is the basis of the lawsuit.
ai waifu will be banned. globalhomo will use ai art to make corporate art but still hire third world shitskins under the pretense for making art for the tax write offs andesg score and to stick to to the white man.
>lawyer
it’s afraid, one of the easiest jobs for an AI to replicate (along judges)
prepare your anus, your honor
AI will be banned from the courtroom in no time at all because it makes it harder to rig the game.
Why do you gays not even understand how your own slop generator works. It's literally a compression algorithm.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variational_autoencoder
under that definition, you have copyrightable material compressed inside your brain.
>2050, pay your remembrance sub or we will take you to the lobotomy clinic to remove those illegal memories.
I personally think memories should be copyrighted, if I own say a themepark or resort, someone enjoying/remembering their time when they aren't a guest after they checked out is literally my experience living in their heads rent free that I've invested time and money into. They basically are committing theft of service without paying for it.
I hope when the neural link tech becomes mature there are laws and means to enforce this.
>sir I'm afraid you have an unlicensed unpaid memory of your time at goyslop entertainment venues Section C. Those memories are owned by Goldstein nofunallowd Inc.
You are going to have to forget those memories or be fined $200,000. Also your social credit score has been dropped by 20pts.
The variational autoencoder can be used as a compression algorithm but it is not used that way to produce images in stable diffusion. It's simply
The funny part is that even if it was just "literally a compression algorithm", compression algorithms are perfectly legal and do not pose any copyright issue, so I don't get why you're trying to frame it as a compression algorithm.
*It's simply working in the latent space of the autoencoder. more details here https://jalammar.github.io/illustrated-stable-diffusion/
>compression algorithm.
Even if you liken it to a compression algorithm it would be an extremely lossy algorithm that leaves little to nothing of the original. The images in the latent space are reduced to kilobytes on average
Just Adobe stopped Hasbro from using Flash in irder to animatr MLP
AI art isn't ending, but shitty recycling react channels certainly are
This lawsuit will fail.
What will come out of it imho is that training algorithms on any data is fair game.
But suing anyone who uses AI to generate images and publishes them is also a possibility and it will be decided by a case by case basis.
Expect DCMA takedown notices generated by algorithms trained to find so called "derivative" work.
With AI, Deepfakes to 11, auto GPT DCMA notices, predictive AI "wrongthink" detectors.
It's going to be such a cancerous future I just hope AI misinfo spam will destroy what little credablity the mass media has at this time or even just collapses the entire social media now "news" system. It needs to fall anyway and really reset everything we consume from this.
>and it will be decided by a case by case basis
If this lawsuit gets struck down it'll be the nail in the coffin for anti-AI gays. Once precedent has been set, it's ridiculously difficult to un-set it barring a new law, and LOL at our broken government ever passing anything.
tbf precedent hasn't mattered since courts sided with fentanyl floyd and politicians are more than happy to pass frivolous laws that stand against progress if they stand to gain brownie points from their constituents.
their constituents aren't twitter artgays though, they're normies like my mom
who thought SD was really cool and fun when I showed it to her and asked if she could get it on her computer at home
>their constituents aren't twitter artgays though, they're normies like my mom
Their constituents are major corporations you retard, like Disney and WB who will absolutely start suing if AI art so much as dents their profits.
that's not what constituents means anon
if you meant "patrons" or "donors" you should have said that
>constituency: a body of voters in a specified area who elect a representative to a legislative body.
Yeah no that's still the corporations. You think WE choose who gets to be president? Cmon man.
how terminally online and brain rotted are you if the first example of a normie is your own mother
huh? normies isn't a derogatory term, it's purely descriptive
I love my mom but she's definitely a normie
Check out my Topgun AI. It can generate all the frames of the movie Topgun along with all the accompanying sounds. I trained it on the movie Topgun.
If you trained it on 10,000 moves excluding Topgun it would be more relevant.
You can't sue fucking math
Anon corporations have sued to own the fucking rain. They can make up whatever retarded rules they want.
If it can't be copywritten, it isn't copyright infringement.
>now let me add a dot to that image
how are you going to stop people from running stable diffusion on their computers?
This is about legality of images. Can someone who uses stable diffusion claim it to copyrightable and can artists claim that if their images are used for training that images AI create a copyright infringement.
Stable diffusion can be trained on images that artists are paid for, this doesn't make AI illegal just this version of stable diffusion being copyright infringement
the absolute greatest "win" this could achieve would be to deem those training datasets as illegal, and A.I. trained on such datasets illegal as well.
But the proof of concept has been firmly established. new legal data sets would be scrapped and A.I. trained on those.
>"An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come"
upvoted good sir!
AI is gay, but so is IP
Not only is he a gay, but he doesn't know shit about law
>Corridor Crew
fuck off