AI or not AI?

There is a huge debate whether this is fake.
Mediapulled it off the airways because it appears manipulated.
It is political because not only is the fate of the British Monarchy at stake, but maybe they will just do this with Biden.

So I turn to the tizm of /misc/ to resolve these burning questions...
Is it fake?
If so, where does it end?
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/heres-why-ap-other-agencies-pulled-allegedly-manipulated-image-of-princess-kate-family/3378673/

Could be bad photoshop
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/kate-middleton-photo-given-kill-32320496

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They literally already admitted it's fake and the picture has been removed from circulation.

    It's 100% confirmed fake.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      OY SHUT IT DOWN!

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody cares about your national neets

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why is she this important? I dont understand the need to do this? What would happen if she was dead? Did Q predict this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The wicked witch Megan ASSASSINATED her!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        doubt it would be megan that did this

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          She clearly snuck into the hospital, after secretly entering the country, and personally cut her open.
          First Chuck "mysteriously" gets cancer, now this.
          Both of the brown baby joke royal racists taken out!

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Well obviously Megan didn't do it herself. But Harry, a combat veteran with a grudge against the Royal Family...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            right. Totally looks the part.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Philip, Elizabeth, Charles... he's hated them all this time for the way they treated his mother. But the way they treated his high yellow consort finally pushed him over the edge and he started picking them off. He has access, he has power, he has wealth. Kind of like Batman, but ginger and a murderer. He won't stop until everyone standing between him and the throne is dead.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                oh i forgot what they did to his mom with the car crash and everything. ok maybe anon....maybe

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >combat veteran
            Not really.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >why is the future queen important
      This is your brain on american goyslop, jesus you yanks are fricking stupid

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >everyone has to know everything about our homosexual country and reality show royal family
        kys Black person

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          No, seriously there is something wrong with every single american. Fricking low iq spastics the lot of you. Last thread I was told by a fat yank that charles isnt my king because im not british. This is how dumb you c**ts are

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            nobody cares about these irrelevant celebrities except slop slurping slime, homosexual

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >my king
            Man to man? have a nice day

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Reminder mutts also thought meghan was going to become the Queen

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I know they are fricking dumb but surely not that dumb

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Where'd ya go OP? I was ready to engage with you bot to bot.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Clearly ai.
    Have the children been seen since she had her surgery?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The sleeve artifact is something you see in AI, but the boundary on her jacket isn't. That's the result of a manual process. Maybe someone slicing up images and modifying/blending them with AI?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This is the boundary on the jacket

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/ov6qTv4.png

      This is the boundary on the jacket

      And here's the sleeve issue

      I have to wonder if this is a feint, though. It reminds me of that nfl player who looked to have been killed on-field. Then the nfl released footage that looked really obviously faked, but then he turned out to have been alive anyway. Everything is an information war now and I suspect these errors are deliberate.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It is reasonable to assume they do it so often they indeed are bound to make an calertain amount of mistakes.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think it's AI, but very sloppy use of the Eraser, Magic Wand, and Healing Brush to merge certain aspects of different photos together in one layer.
    Really dumb way of releasing a photo meant to quell conspiracies.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/Xb3Ms59.png

      [...]
      And here's the sleeve issue

      I have to wonder if this is a feint, though. It reminds me of that nfl player who looked to have been killed on-field. Then the nfl released footage that looked really obviously faked, but then he turned out to have been alive anyway. Everything is an information war now and I suspect these errors are deliberate.

      The most likely explanation is a shoddy job of pasting multiple photos together.
      It's not a huge deal, but utterly debunks the claim that it was a spontaneous family snap by William and exposes them as a bunch of lying, fakey fricks.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    not ai
    it's digital camera
    she was moving slightly, probably doing a rub motion with both her hands, you can see the blurryness of her right hand

    debunked
    delete this thread
    ban op

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      nah your deboonking is fake news

      where's the exif data? you'd need that at a minimum

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    At best, it's poorly photoshopped, potentially to stitch together multiple photos (e.g. get the best picture of everybody?)

    At worst, it's completely the product of generative AI. Look at the fricking two buttons on the kid's shoulder. Personally, I tend to believe this is entirely AI.
    >If so, where does it end?
    Indeed. And why did they need to do this? Also, why did news agencies call it out so quickly when they are usually happy to go along with whatever bullshit comes their way? Just strange

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Look at the fricking two buttons on the kid's shoulder

      Good point

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Shouldn't they ask what the exact image processing chain looks like as due diligence? I mean if somebody passed off a manipulated photo to me, I'd at least give them a chance to explain and maybe even show off the Photoshop file.

      But I doubt there will be any followup, which makes this even shadier. Nobody knows how this obviously manipulated image was created and that's the way it will stay.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The obliteration of any common epistemology is probably the point.

        That’s the single sentence way of saying all the hogwash you’ve all been typing.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >hogwash
          It's true and more detailed and actionable than your compressed definition.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >me me me what I would do

            Shouldn't they ask what the exact image processing chain looks like as due diligence? I mean if somebody passed off a manipulated photo to me, I'd at least give them a chance to explain and maybe even show off the Photoshop file.

            But I doubt there will be any followup, which makes this even shadier. Nobody knows how this obviously manipulated image was created and that's the way it will stay.

            Yea thanks for sharing homosexual. How insightful.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              You need to frick off, you are spewing gibberish like a moron. (You)

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Unless there's a major mea culpa from them, it will stay exactly as you have described - under an information blackout. This is really a big moment, beyond whatever anons might think about the relevance of the British royal family. We are seeing a major institution, to which some schizos on the 4 channels ascribe world-spanning influence and power, essentially shitting its pants in public. An epic AI-driven fail in real time. It will be interesting to see what recriminations, if any, follow from this incident.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Even the AI checker doesn't wanna get involved with this one lol.

    More than likely it's multiple images being switched because the kids wouldn't stay still and we're doing moronic things with their hands.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Stitched*

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    hey Black folk
    look at this

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      hidden pixels

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe the upper part of the photo is real but they hid her wheel chair?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        idk tbh, why edit it so fricking badly though

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          wheel chair dude

          she got perforated below the belly button just like the us defense head dude

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah but im talking about the obvious different compression levels. i don't care if shes in a wheelchair or not, it makes no difference to the blatant photomanipulation proven via ela

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Sure it does. You cut off the original photo high up enough that it's authentic, then you have AI generate the bottom part.

              >me me me what I would do
              [...]
              Yea thanks for sharing homosexual. How insightful.

              Your damage control is weak. Means you have no specific deboonking to fall back on and you're in the FUD phase. I expect you'll settle on a unified story in a day or less. gay.

              Unless there's a major mea culpa from them, it will stay exactly as you have described - under an information blackout. This is really a big moment, beyond whatever anons might think about the relevance of the British royal family. We are seeing a major institution, to which some schizos on the 4 channels ascribe world-spanning influence and power, essentially shitting its pants in public. An epic AI-driven fail in real time. It will be interesting to see what recriminations, if any, follow from this incident.

              It's the first time anybody as "reliable" as the British Royals have been busted using AI. It's a big moment, you're right.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >It's the first time anybody as "reliable" as the British Royals have been busted using AI. It's a big moment, you're right.
                I know this was just a movies premier but what the frick was the point of this?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Upper part still has the buttons on the jumper's shoulder, though

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Don't see what's wrong with that though

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah fair enough, apparently this is a normal thing

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        They took 2 photos, one of their faces (the top part) and one of the lower parts.

        I think the lower parts were taken when they switched Kate for a similar ladies legs to hide something fricked up with her legs or stomach. probably in a wheelchair like you said. but in the process of stitching the 2 half's together, they fricked it up. would explain all of the errors.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wheelchair theory?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        okay I was anti-conspiracy at first thinking it was just a basic photoshop editing error but I couldn't quite figure out WHY they were manipulating that area in that way
        now it makes sense, and gives purpose for the edits
        I'm on board the schizo train for this one, you persuaded me

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The difference in compression edges line up with the majority of the mistakes we can see in the photo. It's incompetent or lazy blending between the images.
      So they release a fake image to help quash fake rumours. Nutters.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lots of little errors.
    Very strange

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Another scary thing is either the royals are so haughty that they didn't even have this checked over by an independent expert to see if it would pass, or they did and the competency crisis is in such massive effect now that the "expert" saw nothing wrong with the image.

    Another possibility is the expert saw a problem, but was afraid to speak up lest they die in a car wreck before the inquiry.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's so badly done it almost makes you think it was done on purpose to troll.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Americans are gay.
    All they do is shit up the board talking about celebrities.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They're the Royal Family of Canada too, jeet. You poos are so much better off without British imperialism that you can't stop fleeing to the far corners of the commonwealth to escape free India.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    WHY would they fake it other than the wheelchair theory?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wheelchair theory?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Look at hew chest her head is copy pasted on Its a stand in body.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Either AI or several photos spliced together by a moron.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how are the legs of a very tall woman the same length as the ones of the small kids.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *