>look for image, line and color patterns in a series of art pieces with a specific theme, then apply those patterns in a new art piece
Isn't that how people also learn to draw? Doesn't that also make people immoral and running off plagiarism?
Who cares? Artists aren't owed anything, if a computer can produce better results then them, tough luck for artgays. It's been like this with every job since forever.
I have been very smug in the last few months watching shartists who told me that anything could be art suddenly very very sure of where the line is (it's right where their money comes under threat)
Copyright is immoral and I don't see you complaining about that.
I know some other anon already made this point, but it's a good point and it's worth making it twice.
Yeah it is but people here don't care because they have never created something, they can't even create something so simple like life (have sex) so what do you expect from this site?
Not true x2. You should learn how it actually works before condemning it.
It's basically running off feedback from observations, just like real life artists.
We are all inspired by what we see,, and we draw from it, from our memories and experiences.
"AI" is not alive or thinking, but it has been trained to mimic that part of us, and express new forms of artistic creation.
i suck wiener btw.
4-panel webcomics make for poor ragebait. Sorry about your thread.
Repost
Another proof that ai art has more creativity than the average/ic/ nighter
>look for image, line and color patterns in a series of art pieces with a specific theme, then apply those patterns in a new art piece
Isn't that how people also learn to draw? Doesn't that also make people immoral and running off plagiarism?
A person knows what its producing
Also we already treat artists like shit when they produce crappy clones.
I know what i'm producing when i proompt thoughever
And also people that go to art school and end up copying the soulless style they teach you and completely destroy their skills for a grade
Politics are for homosexuals
>immoral
Morals are not absolute
>plagiarism
Good, copyright is immoral imo.
immorality and plagiarism are awesome though
israelite post of the day.
Who cares? Artists aren't owed anything, if a computer can produce better results then them, tough luck for artgays. It's been like this with every job since forever.
>immoral
Boo hoo, go back, moralgay
No more than your own brain, dumb monkey
I have been very smug in the last few months watching shartists who told me that anything could be art suddenly very very sure of where the line is (it's right where their money comes under threat)
>what costs 250$ via commission from them is free and instantaneous via ai
yeah i'd be threatened too kek
Art is immoral and runs off plagiarism. Let me guess, that comic artist invented the 4 panel comic format?
author is a literal unironic troony btw
now post THAT edit
Copyright is immoral and I don't see you complaining about that.
I know some other anon already made this point, but it's a good point and it's worth making it twice.
Yeah it is but people here don't care because they have never created something, they can't even create something so simple like life (have sex) so what do you expect from this site?
sad woman sad woman where are you now
where are you now sad woman where are you now
looks like it was success
Not true x2. You should learn how it actually works before condemning it.
It's basically running off feedback from observations, just like real life artists.
We are all inspired by what we see,, and we draw from it, from our memories and experiences.
"AI" is not alive or thinking, but it has been trained to mimic that part of us, and express new forms of artistic creation.
>white little mermaid
outrageous, imma call Mr goldberg