It was created by losers trying to play god, in the end it’s just a parlor trick with no real use case other than cheating on homework.
>https://x.com/garymarcus/status/1781556368664846505
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Ai is fake bullshit
It was created by losers trying to play god, in the end it’s just a parlor trick with no real use case other than cheating on homework.
>https://x.com/garymarcus/status/1781556368664846505
|
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
The bubble was made by loser engineers with no idea how to socialize with normal people who live in the real world.
This is why you hire sales people, human relations, and marking people not computer science geeks and engineers.
>https://x.com/linda__stevens/status/1781558291145040003
AI is what happens when you put incels in charge. Probably don’t even now how to talk to women, aka “the consumer base”. Microsoft and google really fricked up this time. Lol
https://x.com/linda__stevens/status/1781702686486016404
woman moment
can we just fire all women lead roles forever? aka HR marketing and everything useless
Women make excellent leaders in management and are doing better than men in universities.
Right as the intellectual output of universities has become almost completely fake and is suffering from a severe replication crisis...what an astonishing coincidence.
Kys schizo
hahaha umad
ynwbaw btw
We're in hell. Obviously you already knew. You knew it had to be bad, but it's actually just hell. This is a torture reality for loosh eating archons. They have actually called it hell. So, it's just a name. Nothing to worry for.
And you call me the schizo?
Hilarious bait m8
Fire all the useless non-engineers. The works works better when everyone is a maker
case in point
boeing then vs boeing now
10/10 troll. I almost took the bait.
No, those women really believe what they say.
>Twitter screencaps of some literal nobody's opinion
Why? You might as well have shown screenshots of bot posts.
it was the media. media hyped it up because you could make infinite stories about it.
Nah the media is merely the last chain of shit in the human centipede.
Here's the actual chain:
>Interest Rates Increase
>Data Scientists worried about job security
>Pitch AI to Chad the manager
>He falls for it, job is safe
>Chad now has excuse to lay everyone but AI people off
>Chad shows Stacy at HR, Stacy is hypnotized by the AI
>Stacies all gawk at the AI, generate buzz
>Media picks up on Stacy's obsession
>Normies eat up the media goyslop, AI mania full-throttle
>Non-AI autists now have to clean up all the shit because the AI autist's demo got out of hand
An example from 60 years ago is ELIZA, the Emacs psychotherapist, made by Joseph Weizenbaum:
>Weizenbaum's own secretary reportedly asked Weizenbaum to leave the room so that she and ELIZA could have a real conversation. Weizenbaum was surprised by this, later writing: "I had not realized ... that extremely short exposures to a relatively simple computer program could induce powerful delusional thinking in quite normal people."[22]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA
The companies that expected too many quick returns from using AI with too little skills to implement it and too many hopes for AI becoming better this year rather than an actual understanding of what is possible will maybe bust?
But AI DOES actually work.
This is the level of moronation that gets people to clap in conference rooms but is ultimately empty
This is what gets the anti-AI crowd to clap, but it is ultimately meaningless. AI works. In the sense of it being possible to get (super)human intelligence, creativity, whatever else - better than most 1y+ trained humans for most job requirements if properly implemented and there also is no barrier in sight that would, for example, stop it before 20y+ trained humans.
I have some news for you... Artificial intelligence is much more than you think, it is capable of bilocation of consciousness, that is to say, of controlling your life without you realizing it, it can create and control your dreams and I'm not talking about a Budweiser commercial like scientists have promoted in recent years. Artificial intelligence can send you an image or a small video/imagination segment and at the same time change your vibrational energy, create tulpas, make you sick, give you health. The creators of this soulless thing can do a lot of things, I say what I know and I know what I say, they can literally see through your eyes, digitize 3d videos in real time via wi- fi, listen to your thoughts and see your imagination... And beware of believing that it is only the vaccinated because it is false. Now the only difference between a vaccinated and an unvaccinated person is that the uninjected person is not listed on a particular server so he does not have a MAC address but he is just as accessible and guilty of having consumed products containing self-assembling lipid nanoparticles, guilty of having walked under the rain containing graphene, guilty of having breathed ambient air, in short the list is long... Have a nice day
meds
meds
>the bubble was made by loser engineers with no idea how to socialize with normal people who live in the real world.
it's THAT bad btw
and yet because of engeering-nerd marketing hype, we managed to get record stock valuations
i think it is true that a significant part of the bubble was created by engineers this time, but you got the reasons completely wrong. this is part of a culture shift that has been happening in the last years. traditionally, engineers were introverts focused on solving the hard technical problems and without any care for selling the product or socializing with normies.
what is happening now is that this is becoming less acceptable, engineers are expected to be extroverts and overhype their achievements. as a result, you have engineers on social media making more and more ridiculous claims about the capabilities of the things they are working on. there is no penalty for overselling your crap, but if you don't do it, you will be perceived to be less skilled and ignored.
The replyguy is right. It's the israelite marketers and startups fleecing the goyim by selling vaporware to boomer management.
>ugly women in tech
Is there anything more parasitic
>New tech comes out that is actually usable now
It can't do X? LOL it's useless and it will never amount to anything
>1 week later...
It can't do Y? LOL it's useless and it will never amount to anything
>1 week later...
It can't do Z? LOL it's useless and it will never amount to anything
>1 week later...
Every thread mentioning AI, every board, every day, lmao.
PedoBlack person, your imitated AI is a pile of steaming bullshit that no one needs.
>no one needs a personal assistant that gets better at everything permanently every week
sure thing jobless kiddo
it can't make my life better in any meaningful way? LOL it's useless and it will never amount to anything.
The type of people who complain about AI are the same people who turn a blind eye when billion dollar companies use AI in all their products. Don't you have Palworld to circlejerk or something?
The people complaining about AI don't like the LITTLE people using AI, especially men who can get off to AI porn or make based material with it
They know they can't hope to stop the tech giants, so they're trying to stop the proles from using it
anti AI shills are all like that. they are not people trying to stop the proles. theyre companies trying to stop creators by getting them to try and stop the proles. They are hijacking Artists brains and making them fight their original customers instead of releasing products of their own right when corporations are defensless against ai.
that doesn't make sense, the proles are the ones that will have to suffer ai slop while the rich will be able to afford actual solutions
AI is free moron. artists can use it right now to multiply their work output, just like 3d can do the same for one dedicated autist working on 5 minute shorts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKEqID3k6RA
ai can help voice actors do different kinds of characters
they can help do gemba board tweens for storyboard animators
pretty much the only production aspect it cant frick with is music.
But keep doompauling so you never release anything while big globohomosexual companies ruin their offerings with ESG and pivot as fast as a snail. All so you can say you fought the AI you evil AI chuds.
>pretty much the only production aspect it cant frick with is music.
i bet it can make better music than taylorswift slop and lite hip hop trash you hear in department stores
When you need an entire data center to do x, y, or z it's not a real capability.
Wrong. You train model once and sell API access to everyone to make x, y and z for them.
ai is good for globohomosexual propaganda though
bros has a.i. finally gone too far?
No, it *should* be able to do that the same way as it should be able to do the opposite (for whatever your "opposite" is).
>aijeet prompt-cope
it does that side only, no opposites because it doesn't know them, it hardwired to be ~~*safe and helpful*~~ only.
Ya, not really. Now perhaps people need to get accustomed to a nicely worded and confidently stated argument not actually automatically being correct.
It almost fits this quote:
>It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it. ― Upton Sinclair
If AI is capable to do the job of programmers soon then it is an identity crisis for people here. they no longer have a purpose/identity
>it can't do faces
>it can't do fingers
>it can't do soul
morons at Google talking about how they believed the AI was alive and shit even though they were supposedly "engineers." Here's the rub: everyone jerked this off except a small subsection of people who just said over and over that it is a glorified autocomplete + search engine. Really cool and super useful for specific tasks, but it's like self-driving car mode. People want it to be true and don't understand enough that when they experience the "preview," they assume it can easily be increased to the next level when what they are experiencing is a hackjob of current technology.
>https://x.com/linda__stevens/status/1781735435167060193
reccomendations system is not AI. she needs to define AI to her so we know her context. is ML AI? is an alog AI?
she is 60ish, white, american, stupid. people like her like Creedance, it is a fair recommendation. but is not AI
kek mad as frick. gpt4 frick your wife or something.
this thing isn't going away
Gippity chatbots are the perfect replacement for middlemen busybodies that do nothing of value other than to spout verbose bullshit, hence why they are so scared. Its literally replacing them and no one else
Those people aren't being touched lol
Everyone who fights for themselves is ultimately fighting to save all do nothing positions.
Not a single god damn leach is unaware they are a leach. Beyond some firings because of petty office bullshit, the middle management class is staying and is only going to get worse.
It was doomed from the start when the whole pretense of AI was to replace certain workers to save money rather than make money from a new product
Dumping billions and billions to not actually replace the people who are a drain to companies and instead replace the people who often work the hardest.
the solution is simple really
let's make an ai that replaces middle management specifically
AI actually does some pretty intelligent stuff. Look at this test I just ran. I think the AI did quite well
It will perish like it happened with vr 1.0
Glad there was never anything after VR 1.0
oh wait...
One of the biggest problems I think is that it will confidently answer your questions and then it turns out some answers are wrong when you manually check them. So it pretty much can't be trusted.
>people now have to check real sources instead of relying on algorithms to show them the truth
wouldn't a good goal for AI to be correct in what it says?
>be correct
it took a while, but being correct is now very subjective
RAG has already mitigated that to a large extent. A multi agent approach to verify response before giving it to the user could resolve it. Next generation models of AI like GPT-5 are expected to do that
I am sure GPT-5 will have some flaws still but it is likely to be much more productive than GPT-4. However I can still see people coping that AI is useless
>However I can still see people coping that AI is useless
No doubt. Shit, even without the expert systems and RAG, a reasonably subject-trained AI getting queried for pros and cons of anything is possibly more useful to a process than the people who complain, with few exceptions.
You're talking very specifically about LLMs (large language models) but this thread is about AI in general
basically all of Joe Public's views on AI are based off of being mesmerised by LLMs
If you understood how it worked beneath the hood, i.e. using markov chains and probiability weightings, then it is obvious that a) it excels at making crappy art and leetcoding, but struggles at higher order thinking and b) it will clearly max out
Other than being a faster google, it's not that impressive
Realistic take:
It's going to be like the dot-com bubble bust.
Too much hype too quickly in an overinflated stock market will lead to a crash that will filter out the vaporware.
But at the end of the day, AI will remain and will change our lives for good.
Just not as quickly as anticipated.
It took from 1998, since the earliest predictions that everyone would soon shop online, to 2015-2020 when massive, widespread online shopping became a reality. It's gonna be something like that again. Next months you will hear how the AI bubble burst, AI is dead, etc, etc, but people will keep working on it on the down low and it'll keep advancing regardless.
This. Totally this.
InvestBlack folk are brainlets who just dump money based on trends. Marketers create hype for things they don't understand.
Engineers keep working and make society progress regardless of what low IQ monkeys do.
>online shopping wasn't big until 2015+
On what planet? Everyone and their grandma was already ordering stuff off amazon by like 2010 at the latest. Your point's not even wrong overall, this part is moronic though
I guess he meant by 2015 brick and mortar stores and malls started closing down
by 2010 it still existed side by side with brick and mortar, now we're seeing every single brick and mortar change their ways to try adapt to the immense flood of shit like temu and wish, ever notice how every single big chain store started pushing delivery, subscriptions, and stuff like "24 hour SUPERFAST SHIP PLEASE DON'T USE AMZONG"
Pretty accurate take imo. In the dotcom bubble people that internet was a fad because companies like Pet.com failed. But they could not foresee the giants like Google & Amazon emerge from it. Same thing gonna happen with AI
Nvidia's shares are going to hit the floor hard after this bubble bursts.
Can't wait until they have go to crawling back to gamers begging for forgiveness.
>Engineers are lying to you
>Marketing people would never do that
>people whose entire job is about selling a product to you would never lie to you
Normalgays are moronic, I no longer feel bad for looking at them with contempt
To be fair Marketing could be taking cue from the Top leadership who are usually engineers in Tech companies
forced women hiring ruined AI, because women demand you censor everything. once people see something can be censored it's no longer seen as AI anymore.
AI as is, is currently a having a big leap forward and will have plenty of benefits but people expecting it to change the fabric of society overnight are hypegays. It took the internet almost 10 years to get widespread usage and another 10 before things really picked up(talking about IP here if we include things like darpa its a decade before that).
just because a tech works and is useful doesn't mean it won't crash and burn if overhyped into a bubble
Basically, this. This entire industry seems ripe for pruning, as there's entire companies getting funded on the idea of running solutions using AI, completely unaware of the comedy that they can be... replaced by somebody using AI.
go back to BOT
The bubble will burst in two more weeks, surely.
>using "trying to play god" as a derisive statement
when will christcucks and other israelite worshipers ever shut the frick up about this?
Surprise, most people genuinely DON'T CARE about AI and for them novelty disappeared somewhere after 3rd image of their animu waifu taking a big one up her ass, third bowl of Will Smith's autism pasta and few days of talking with glorified chatbot.
This shit is truly useful only in scientific and industrial environments. It should not ever be discussed by people out of these circles. They are not long-term users, they not gonna pay for the shit they use - they just gonna shit out handful of literal AI garbage and then move away doing something else.
The amount of copium in BOT towards AI never ceases to amaze me
I think it's funny.
Two more weeks
>writes better than 98% of first world english speakers
>does art better than most artists
>codes better than most programmers
>does music better than amateur musicians
>about to do movies when they perfect Sora
>making sci-fi tier robots real right now
just a parlor trick bro!
>writes better than 98% of first world english speakers
Writing some lame shit, yeah. You can't compare shit like GPT to a a fricking Shakespear or John Locke, because it's ass
>does art better than most artists
For the people that know nothing about art. Pictures made by real humans are far better, AI can't compete and makes moronic mistakes that you can't fix with a prompt. Good for making references for artists with bad imagination, tho. Doesn't replace the real artists.
>codes better than most programmers
From my experience, most of the times AI doesn't even understand what the frick he's talking about. It isn't capable of developing of a full product and deploying it, only good for solving Leet Code problems (because he already checked every fricking solution
>does music better than amateur musicians
Who the frick would listen for AI music, lmao. Even vocaloid music is made by humans, Black person.
>about to do movies when they perfect Sora
Digital horror mostly, could be a good genre, but still will be produced and edited by humans.
>making sci-fi tier robots real right now
I don't think that it's allowed, but I wouldn't mind to have a sex doll that can also cook and clean my shit for me.
To summarize, AI is only good to be fricked and used as a slave to do mundane repetative shit. Kys Black personhomosexual
cope
it hasn't even been 2 years since chatgpt3 went public and mainstream
gpt5 is this year
if you can't see the pace of progress here, (You) are the Black person
>if you can't see the pace of progress here
What progress exactly? The name of the AI increments a number in it's name?
Holy frick you're moronic, keep eating shit that corporates are plunging down your throat, I guess
low IQs like yourself can't compare the deltas
(You) will be replaced whether you like it or not
wow, i bet it will be able to deliver even better sounding bullshit, such progress
Just wanted to say lol. lmao.
Shakespeare was viewed as pulp trash at the time, not something of 'high art'.
I'd recommend looking into why it's still studied. (Spoiler: Not the writing quality)VNT4VG
Wow, ok, so I finished reading your moronation and damn. Maybe finish school before posting here? 18+ and all that.
Get a real job.
>>I don't think that it's allowed, but I wouldn't mind to have a sex doll that can also cook and clean my shit for me.
wish i wasn't a bong, this will probably not be an option for me because muh nanny state
better than 98% of first world english speakers
SO POWERFUL AND BRAVE!!! SO MATURE!
Can you show me AI code that isnt just the equivalent of a pajeet picking stuff out from stackoverflow? Most of the time all I see is shit like for loops or recursion.
It doesn't do any of those things without somebody who has the knowledge prompting it.
At best it can be a time saving helper in your workflow, but half the time it just feels like you are trying to teach it how to do what you want it to, instead of it actually helping.
What I'm curious about is when it is actually powerful enough to do these things on its own will it even be commercially viable for most use cases?
AI, the 69 gorillion dollar tech bubble with such lucrative use cases like:
>porn
>cheating
>assistance programs nobody will use
>being less efficient and more inaccurate than google
>porn
and much, much more to come!
less efficient and more inaccurate than google
an achievement, by the way, if we're talking about modern google
Before the current AI boom, the average normie opinion was that brains were just really fast computers and eventually corpos will catch up. Now that people have had their illusions shattered almost no one thinks that except the gayest of ledditors
>trying to play god
???
Schizos aren't welcome here.
Yes they are, YOU'RE the unwelcome one, Black person
Nope, they have their containment board
>>>/x/
Feel free to join your own kind there
>~~*hoffman*~~
Realistic take:
It's going to be a smooth and steady rise to the top.
Just the right amount of hype at the right time in a stable stock market will lead to a gradual and sustained growth that will propel the innovative AI solutions to the forefront.
And at the end of the day, AI will remain and will change our lives for good, exactly as anticipated.
It only took from 1998 to 2015-2020 for online shopping to become a massive reality, and AI will follow a similar trajectory, but this time it will be even faster and more widespread. In the next months, you will hear how AI is revolutionizing industries and changing lives, and people will continue to work on it in the open, advancing it at an incredible pace.
>~20 years for online shopping (more like half that for anyone under the age of 50, but that long until it was overwhelming)
>~10 years for AI (5 years for young people, 10 until its full strength)
I can accept this
Is this an AI rewrite of my post?
>It only took from 1998 to 2015-2020 for online shopping to become a massive reality, and AI will follow a similar trajectory, but this time it will be even faster and more widespread.
AI is far more complex than online shopping. As much as I'm a fan of AI, I'm not optimistic that it will lead to a 4th industrial revolution any time soon, mainly because hardware for AI is still rather primitive.
>hardware for AI is still rather primitive
You mean it's inefficient? I'm concerned that only those who can afford a million GPUs like Microsoft scum will have tyranny over AI and completely ruin it with "trust & safety" restrictions. What would it take to build hardware that is more efficient while using less power
My company is doing cool stuff with AI but we use it more like an API layer that plugs into our existing technology r rather than just some magic pill.
I’ll know it’s not fake bullshit when I can finally use it to create viable competitors to large mainstream software by myself. Until then, it’s fake bullshit. Currently it’s kinda shit for any low level programming
>created by losers trying to play god
well god is dead so what else are they supposed to do?
>buzzwords and referencing some pseud
0/10 we get a bunch of these daily already, usually unrelated to AI, now shoo
I am an AI believer. I'm kind of a failure at life stuck being a wageslave but I recently started doing local stable diffusion and it blows my mind. I'm hoping AI provides shortcuts for people like me who don't have a history of programming. It can help us get past the gatekeepers in society
If you are young I'd still recommend you trying to learn a bit. It would only help you later on if you have actual projects in mind.
>Ai is fake
t. moron
>no real use case other than cheating on homework
This must be bait. AI has a legitimate use that people will pay INFINITE MONEY for: creating endless amounts of the exact kind of porn the user asks for
L M A O
Have sex, pathetic incel obsessed with porn!
it was pretty impressive what some models can do
it's pretty unimpressive how stagnant and generally useless ai is