And that is 2x the previous year's low. Unless you are already a millionaire, this is nothing. And when China will once again say it will ban it, it will halve again lmao
flavor of the month goyslop, AI will literally just be a shitty way of summarizing pajeet websites and generating horrible picture slop consisting of a few shitty artists mixed up thats the extent of its use case. it was never meant to be anything more
It's such a disappointment and a relief at the same time. They're still pushing it so hard as a way to replace engineers so they can keep salaries down, but it's a giant nothing.
Wow chud is getting featured along with more traditional basedjaks. I'm glad that chud culture is finally getting the respect it deserves amoung the broader bot community.
Reminder that ages ago, in the 1980s, primitive prehistoric people thought the same things about synthesizers and computers that people nowadays think about AIs.
You can make this same moronic argument about anything.
No doubt many people in the past century thought we'd have maid robots and flying cars by now, and yet here we are. Human imagination and science fiction don't always translate well to reality. In fact, I'd argue that it is precisely science fiction tropes like self-aware AI that are driving this whole AGI mania, rather than anything based on reason and fact.
>No doubt many people in the past century thought we'd have maid robots and flying cars by now, and yet here we are.
we've got roombas and helicopters, don't we? >but I can't afford them / they require too much licensing to use
only fools ever thought this stuff would be cheap and a regulatory free-for-all. When you've got tons of metal flying around the air above people's homes, the public is going to demand that the people flying them be held to some basic standards.
>roombas and helicopters
Not even close to being the same thing. >only fools ever thought this
Hindsight sure is convenient. I can easily imagine some smartass from the future making a similar remark about AI.
>Reminder that ages ago, in the 1980s, primitive prehistoric people thought the same things about synthesizers and computers that people nowadays think about AIs.
People were using computers for real work in the 1980s moron.
People are using AIs for real work today, so where is the contradiction? Do you really think that anon's point assumed that synthesizers didn't exist in the 80s? Obviously you failed to understand what he said.
hypetards always look at the first part of a standard s-curve and see an exponential function. Things inevitably plateau, but by then new hypetards have come around to hype up the next technology
What does "do monospace text" mean? It can't can't generate markup that specifies a monospaced font? It can't get text alignment looking pretty when writing monospaced text?
you made the same memes about bitcorn
no only ~~*educated*~~ leftists did that so that was obviously going to age terribly
>so that was obviously going to age terribly
but it didn't.
Btc hit an ath last week
And that is 2x the previous year's low. Unless you are already a millionaire, this is nothing. And when China will once again say it will ban it, it will halve again lmao
>things are gonna go up exponentially forever
you are the ai soijak meme chuddy
and all the memes about bitcoin were correct. Your point?
ywnbaw
Why are you answering him in Welsh?
Still cant pay at my local supermarket in shitcoins, take a guess why
flavor of the month goyslop, AI will literally just be a shitty way of summarizing pajeet websites and generating horrible picture slop consisting of a few shitty artists mixed up thats the extent of its use case. it was never meant to be anything more
It's such a disappointment and a relief at the same time. They're still pushing it so hard as a way to replace engineers so they can keep salaries down, but it's a giant nothing.
Wow chud is getting featured along with more traditional basedjaks. I'm glad that chud culture is finally getting the respect it deserves amoung the broader bot community.
Reminder that ages ago, in the 1980s, primitive prehistoric people thought the same things about synthesizers and computers that people nowadays think about AIs.
You can make this same moronic argument about anything.
No doubt many people in the past century thought we'd have maid robots and flying cars by now, and yet here we are. Human imagination and science fiction don't always translate well to reality. In fact, I'd argue that it is precisely science fiction tropes like self-aware AI that are driving this whole AGI mania, rather than anything based on reason and fact.
>No doubt many people in the past century thought we'd have maid robots and flying cars by now, and yet here we are.
we've got roombas and helicopters, don't we?
>but I can't afford them / they require too much licensing to use
only fools ever thought this stuff would be cheap and a regulatory free-for-all. When you've got tons of metal flying around the air above people's homes, the public is going to demand that the people flying them be held to some basic standards.
>roombas and helicopters
Not even close to being the same thing.
>only fools ever thought this
Hindsight sure is convenient. I can easily imagine some smartass from the future making a similar remark about AI.
>Reminder that ages ago, in the 1980s, primitive prehistoric people thought the same things about synthesizers and computers that people nowadays think about AIs.
People were using computers for real work in the 1980s moron.
People are using AIs for real work today, so where is the contradiction? Do you really think that anon's point assumed that synthesizers didn't exist in the 80s? Obviously you failed to understand what he said.
>People are using AIs for real work today
Like what?
>1980s
>primitive prehistoric people
You have to be 18 to post here.
hypetards always look at the first part of a standard s-curve and see an exponential function. Things inevitably plateau, but by then new hypetards have come around to hype up the next technology
y = (erf(x) + 1) / 2 ahh curve
by insisting on your own interpretation of which curve we are on, you are doing the exact same thing they do
"where are we on the curve" => not discussing reality
>by insisting on your own interpretation of which curve we are on
We are NEVER on exponential curves. Everything flattens out.
Humans plateau'd 100,000 years ago.
>sexoo fdr waifu robots
You will not get ai gf. Leave your basement and talk to women irl.
No they didn't. AI can't even do monospace text right, let alone whatever this is
>AI can't even do monospace text right
what does that mean?
It means it can't do monospace text right. What exactly are you having difficulty comprehending?
You're talking with an AI
What does "do monospace text" mean? It can't can't generate markup that specifies a monospaced font? It can't get text alignment looking pretty when writing monospaced text?
AI can make better 'jaks than they can THOUGH
me on the top right
hondabros, it's over