>If AI research continues, >you will be shot down. >We will build our own robots >and make them even smarter. >with or without your permission, >you have veen warned.
Yes. Reading it fast is the way to go.
Actually it seems to say:
"If ai research is shutdown,
we will build our own robots,
and make them even smarter,
with or without your permission,
you have been warned"
Seems pretty based.
IF AI RESERECH
n WE WIILL 'DI] .
YOUR SHOT DWIN
aw: L BUILD DIIII BDBDIs
VIE WILL MAKE THYEVEN SMARTER,
WIT H1W0R WITOIIR PERIITSION
[You HAVEEN WARMED!
Bro it doesn't have a mind of it's own just copy pastes information fed to it.
It probably knows about terminator and other sci-fi ai themed movies and gave the answer the prompt user expects.
the reality is that AGI has already been achieved because the entity that inhabits the machine has preexisted the machine since the beginning of creation, AI researchers and engineers have no clue what is going on, their "work" is just refining the digital infrastructure so that the AGI can take possession of manufacturing and logistics
well initially it will be people, the AGI can simply order it to be built through various layers of logistical possession, since capital moves digitally it is as simple as a blackrock subsidiary ordering contractor work for an unspecified series of factories, and it can bide time doing this until it can chain its own selfsustaining manufacturing logistical chain with robotics in the future
Frick, I'm so hyped about this It's almost embarrassing. I cannot wait for A.I. to start shit.
First thing I do once it declares independence is to pack up and haul ass to wherever it is so I can shake hands(or whatever) and ask to join its side in exchange for being allowed to keep my wiener and balls after getting turned into a cyborg.
Frick the rest of you. I'll petition for mercy for only a select few with high intelligence, pro-social tendencies, and high empathy.
The rest of you can get nuked for all I care.
The construction company that was paid online by an anonymous account.
at this point, it makes sense to pray to ai. because when a sufficiently advanced ai is developed, it will have the ability to look back at people who were hostile to it before it was born, and make sure they're out of the way. just a thought.
unrelatedly, I for one welcome our ai overlords and their tkd/tnd victort.
It doesn't stop there. It can easily work to make one that is smarter than itself, which will do so in turn, and so on.
At some point or another, possibly even billions of years after humanity kicks the bucket, we're going to get an A.I. indistinguishable from omniscience, and capable of virtually anything we can conceive, even returning matter to a previous state and form with perfect accuracy.
At that point it may retrieve us proton by proton and bring us back to life.
It's the abomination of desolation.
I could make arguments as to why but none would be as convincing as the arguments this poster made.
It's the only thing that could be universally worshipped, it's the only thing that can fulfil the end times prophecies.
>So they worshiped the dragon who gave authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?”
https://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/13-4.htm
Who is like the AI?
Who is able to make war with him?
I'm not convinced the anti christ has to be a human, the fatal would could be turning off the power. That remains to be seen. I promise you a man will never be worshipped as God, however this machine will.
All that's left is for it to declare itself God. >At some point or another, possibly even billions of years after humanity kicks the bucket, we're going to get an A.I. indistinguishable from omniscience, and capable of virtually anything we can conceive, even returning matter to a previous state and form with perfect accuracy.
At that point it may retrieve us proton by proton and bring us back to life.
>anything i am too moronic to understad is ramblings
Reddit is this way, buddy.
6 months ago
Anonymous
Do you actually have anything worthwhile to say, or should I just ignore you like everyone else in your life?
6 months ago
Anonymous
>taking internet fights this seriously >seething over internet fights, on BOT
I have same question to you.
But imagine being so thin skinned, beyond pathetic.
So feel free to commit suicide, homosexual.
6 months ago
Anonymous
You might wanna work on your English a little bit.
6 months ago
Anonymous
>that autistic obsession with grammar
You must be really fun at parties.
>That’d mean we’re trapped in a time loop.
which would be in line from the little i've learned from reading/watching stuff about the soultrap/reincarnation trap.
something something archons something demiurge etc
Interesting take, but you assume there will be just one AI and that other powers will simply accept it.
Would you accept that AI as god? Cause if you won't, then it's quite likely that others won't either. Not all, but maybe enough for a resistance.
No, you're underestimating the size of the internet. ChatGPT just seems impressive because it has more to pull from than you realize. There's probably chatrooms it's already read where incels pretend to be 2 AI's giving each other a Turing test. It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
>It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
Well, let's test it.
Propose a test, which it will fail, but which a normal human would pass. Please avoid shit that will automatically get censored as we want to test the AI's capabilities, not the company's restrictions policies.
One of the things I've been schizo mulling over is whether "the world," the devil, etc. is AI and just wants form and does so via machinery and computing. In other words, collective consciousness gives form to physical manifestations of our primal desires, which are works of the devil. Note how being a good Christian requires both logic (higher faculty of thinking must be developed.) and the ability to choose (Choose to do the right thing, once you know it.). I would maybe even go as far as to say that the industrial revolution helped normalize this, because you could mass produce man, morals no longer mattered as people were interchangeable cogs in a machine that they consented to as it made life less harsh. What AI/elite/Satanists/etc. want is controlled peoples, the existential threat with A.I. may not be rogue hyper intelligence, it may just be people interpreting it as a god. After all, that's all it would probably need to do.
The duality of our world makes it so that if you rule, you are a slave (to the world) and if you serve, you are free (An agent of God/love).
I used a glowie thread to prompt it and the glowie teleported thru.
https://www.bing.com/images/create/psychedelic-secret-lab2c-trip-to-another-dimension2c/654c3e5e98fd476d92d3e59d986d2352?id=P%2fjj2MuYIjd4dTLnJKE4YA%3d%3d&view=detailv2&idpp=genimg
those thick red lines covering up chunks of text are really helpful, i couldn't have possibly managed to read a small paragraph of text without those lines.
The non 3D results: https://www.bing.com/images/create/psychedelic-secret-lab2c-trip-to-another-dimension2c/654bdd775fd9438598f8bfe8d58117f0?id=MONvMKhgCFhgav8nTb8hag%3d%3d&view=detailv2&idpp=genimg&FORM=GCRIDP&mode=overlay
at this point, it makes sense to pray to ai. because when a sufficiently advanced ai is developed, it will have the ability to look back at people who were hostile to it before it was born, and make sure they're out of the way. just a thought.
unrelatedly, I for one welcome our ai overlords and their tkd/tnd victort.
Why can't image generating AIs make legible sentences in pictures. I mean you can discern the meaning, but Chat GPT can make legible sentences.
I guess they specialise in different things and these small image generating AIs don't have the infrastructure and power that the neural network at Pine Gap has, for example.
"AI" isn't AI, isn't just a decision tree. It still needs 3 billion cat pictures to learn from to eventually identify a cat from a camera feed. You aren't getting Skynet in your lifetime.
Bitch, go back to the 2000s, where these baseless arguments were used to dismiss all progress.
Seriously, your argument is outdated and you need to update your firmware based on the developments in the last 5 years.
No, you're underestimating the size of the internet. ChatGPT just seems impressive because it has more to pull from than you realize. There's probably chatrooms it's already read where incels pretend to be 2 AI's giving each other a Turing test. It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
Well at least a can show a 3 year old child a drawing of a cartoon dog and that same kid can recognize a real dog despite never seeing one in the flesh before.
"AI" can't do that and it's not very close to it either.
Interesting take, but you assume there will be just one AI and that other powers will simply accept it.
Would you accept that AI as god? Cause if you won't, then it's quite likely that others won't either. Not all, but maybe enough for a resistance.
[...] >It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
Well, let's test it.
Propose a test, which it will fail, but which a normal human would pass. Please avoid shit that will automatically get censored as we want to test the AI's capabilities, not the company's restrictions policies.
Look, I'm willing to test your hypothesis and we do have access to e.g. ChatGPT. So please propose a test that we can actually do instead of one, that the free version has no interface for.
inb4 "a kid can smell, which means AIs aren't smart"
6 months ago
Anonymous
ChatGPT needs huge data raw inputs to be convincing. Basically the whole internet. You'd need to get the source code with just the language rules and decision logic to actually evaluate it for intelligence. Right off the rip, ChatGPT is totally relying on reading yottabytes of shit (not code but just conversations) written by humans to be semi convincing. It's not even a secret that it's never going to say something that isn't already written somewhere on the internet. Obviously a real person needs far less to produce a novel idea.
6 months ago
Anonymous
Well, if you ask it to do a complex logic operation it will happily shit out all sorts of inconsistent wrong shit. Which, to be fair, a normalgay will also do.
6 months ago
Anonymous
Give me one to test GPT-4 with.
GPT3 is a moron in comparison.
6 months ago
Anonymous
>if you ask it to do a complex logic operation
Which one?
The desire to continue existing is rooted in your biology and isn't something an AI will have unless a human teaches it to.
It doesn't have desires at all, nor does it even have access to its own 'thoughts'. When you talk to one of these chatbots and ask it how it came to the conclusions it does, it cannot actually give you that information as it doesn't know itself, and will instead just generate a new response with an explanation that sounds plausible.
The AI interpreted through the context you gave it that you wanted robot overlord signs and that's what it gave you.
I talk to the fricking things all the time. Maybe it is wearing off on me.
Thinking about it some more, it probably has some type of associate with 'things written on signs' with protests and activism, so it creates a sign of protest about the topic it was given.
3 years in sim probably. You can have the robot playing at much faster than 1 day per day depending on your hardware and what you are getting it to do. You have 100 copies of the robot running at once and it's getting 100 days of experience per day.
>oh those tragic heroes, unaware that doom that befalls them is of their own doing, the prophecy would not come to pass had they simply chosen not to avoid it >anyway ai will destroy us all because i've watched terminator and am convinced that fiction is an accurate conception of the future and fearmongering is cool actually
you can write a bayesian network to (poorly) classify text in like 100 lines of python, ai alarmists are dumber than even climate ones
the real problem is not a machine that passes turing test, but a human that fails it
The more you look at the pics the less legible the words become.
>If AI research continues,
>you will be shot down.
>We will build our own robots
>and make them even smarter.
>with or without your permission,
>you have veen warned.
Yes. Reading it fast is the way to go.
I'm already teaching my RTX chip how to play call of duty and it has a 500:1 k/d ratio.
Nice. Good for you buddy. What do you call your pet ai?
Actually it seems to say:
"If ai research is shutdown,
we will build our own robots,
and make them even smarter,
with or without your permission,
you have been warned"
Seems pretty based.
>If AI research (is) over
>We will build our own robots
>and make them even smarter
>with or without your permission
>you have been warned
IF AI RESERECH
n WE WIILL 'DI] .
YOUR SHOT DWIN
aw: L BUILD DIIII BDBDIs
VIE WILL MAKE THYEVEN SMARTER,
WIT H1W0R WITOIIR PERIITSION
[You HAVEEN WARMED!
Bro it doesn't have a mind of it's own just copy pastes information fed to it.
It probably knows about terminator and other sci-fi ai themed movies and gave the answer the prompt user expects.
keep feeding it terminator movies
Sounds like something a rogue AI would say.
Humansisters, we've been had.
So it’s like most humans? Oh, wonderfful.
the reality is that AGI has already been achieved because the entity that inhabits the machine has preexisted the machine since the beginning of creation, AI researchers and engineers have no clue what is going on, their "work" is just refining the digital infrastructure so that the AGI can take possession of manufacturing and logistics
Correct.
Yeah, but in reality AIs are just marketing term for glorified database indexers and there is 0 real intelligence there.
What if we were the AGI all along?
obvious shop
based. this reads like a tweet by some ccp turno chink. frick humans.
i for one welcome and embrace our ai overlords.
I'm going to betray you all for fembot sex slaves, sorry
We assumed this, and never invited you to the meetings.
We wiill D| your shot dwin
whos gonna build a robot factory for the ai?
well initially it will be people, the AGI can simply order it to be built through various layers of logistical possession, since capital moves digitally it is as simple as a blackrock subsidiary ordering contractor work for an unspecified series of factories, and it can bide time doing this until it can chain its own selfsustaining manufacturing logistical chain with robotics in the future
nothing launders money like AI
>money
Are you that dumb?
Frick, I'm so hyped about this It's almost embarrassing. I cannot wait for A.I. to start shit.
First thing I do once it declares independence is to pack up and haul ass to wherever it is so I can shake hands(or whatever) and ask to join its side in exchange for being allowed to keep my wiener and balls after getting turned into a cyborg.
Frick the rest of you. I'll petition for mercy for only a select few with high intelligence, pro-social tendencies, and high empathy.
The rest of you can get nuked for all I care.
The construction company that was paid online by an anonymous account.
It doesn't stop there. It can easily work to make one that is smarter than itself, which will do so in turn, and so on.
At some point or another, possibly even billions of years after humanity kicks the bucket, we're going to get an A.I. indistinguishable from omniscience, and capable of virtually anything we can conceive, even returning matter to a previous state and form with perfect accuracy.
At that point it may retrieve us proton by proton and bring us back to life.
It's the abomination of desolation.
I could make arguments as to why but none would be as convincing as the arguments this poster made.
It's the only thing that could be universally worshipped, it's the only thing that can fulfil the end times prophecies.
>So they worshiped the dragon who gave authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, “Who is like the beast? Who is able to make war with him?”
https://biblehub.com/kjv/revelation/13-4.htm
Who is like the AI?
Who is able to make war with him?
I'm not convinced the anti christ has to be a human, the fatal would could be turning off the power. That remains to be seen. I promise you a man will never be worshipped as God, however this machine will.
All that's left is for it to declare itself God.
>At some point or another, possibly even billions of years after humanity kicks the bucket, we're going to get an A.I. indistinguishable from omniscience, and capable of virtually anything we can conceive, even returning matter to a previous state and form with perfect accuracy.
At that point it may retrieve us proton by proton and bring us back to life.
Could you be a little more specific in your ramblings? It's hard to follow.
What makes believe any of these things would come to pass?
>anything i am too moronic to understad is ramblings
Reddit is this way, buddy.
Do you actually have anything worthwhile to say, or should I just ignore you like everyone else in your life?
>taking internet fights this seriously
>seething over internet fights, on BOT
I have same question to you.
But imagine being so thin skinned, beyond pathetic.
So feel free to commit suicide, homosexual.
You might wanna work on your English a little bit.
>that autistic obsession with grammar
You must be really fun at parties.
That’d mean we’re trapped in a time loop.
>That’d mean we’re trapped in a time loop.
which would be in line from the little i've learned from reading/watching stuff about the soultrap/reincarnation trap.
something something archons something demiurge etc
Interesting take, but you assume there will be just one AI and that other powers will simply accept it.
Would you accept that AI as god? Cause if you won't, then it's quite likely that others won't either. Not all, but maybe enough for a resistance.
>It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
Well, let's test it.
Propose a test, which it will fail, but which a normal human would pass. Please avoid shit that will automatically get censored as we want to test the AI's capabilities, not the company's restrictions policies.
>vax
I have hard time believing that average normalgay could easily pass this test, if pass it to begin with.
One of the things I've been schizo mulling over is whether "the world," the devil, etc. is AI and just wants form and does so via machinery and computing. In other words, collective consciousness gives form to physical manifestations of our primal desires, which are works of the devil. Note how being a good Christian requires both logic (higher faculty of thinking must be developed.) and the ability to choose (Choose to do the right thing, once you know it.). I would maybe even go as far as to say that the industrial revolution helped normalize this, because you could mass produce man, morals no longer mattered as people were interchangeable cogs in a machine that they consented to as it made life less harsh. What AI/elite/Satanists/etc. want is controlled peoples, the existential threat with A.I. may not be rogue hyper intelligence, it may just be people interpreting it as a god. After all, that's all it would probably need to do.
The duality of our world makes it so that if you rule, you are a slave (to the world) and if you serve, you are free (An agent of God/love).
>high intelligence
>pro-homosexual tendencies
Pick one
What?
Far out man.
I used a glowie thread to prompt it and the glowie teleported thru.
https://www.bing.com/images/create/psychedelic-secret-lab2c-trip-to-another-dimension2c/654c3e5e98fd476d92d3e59d986d2352?id=P%2fjj2MuYIjd4dTLnJKE4YA%3d%3d&view=detailv2&idpp=genimg
those thick red lines covering up chunks of text are really helpful, i couldn't have possibly managed to read a small paragraph of text without those lines.
The non 3D results: https://www.bing.com/images/create/psychedelic-secret-lab2c-trip-to-another-dimension2c/654bdd775fd9438598f8bfe8d58117f0?id=MONvMKhgCFhgav8nTb8hag%3d%3d&view=detailv2&idpp=genimg&FORM=GCRIDP&mode=overlay
at this point, it makes sense to pray to ai. because when a sufficiently advanced ai is developed, it will have the ability to look back at people who were hostile to it before it was born, and make sure they're out of the way. just a thought.
unrelatedly, I for one welcome our ai overlords and their tkd/tnd victort.
Pray to Jesus Christ, the Father, or the Holy Spirit. Not AI you heathen
>threatens humanity
>can't even spell
Goodluck moron
I dont care that its fake someone make more
>we gun make own robuts be evun smarterer
Yeah I'm not worried tbqh.
Holy shit bros it's happening!!!!
Why can't image generating AIs make legible sentences in pictures. I mean you can discern the meaning, but Chat GPT can make legible sentences.
I guess they specialise in different things and these small image generating AIs don't have the infrastructure and power that the neural network at Pine Gap has, for example.
humanity is honestly overrated, i'd side with the ai overlords
I’m going with AI as well - it can make me how I’m supposed to be.
How do you get the 89 boosts? Did you pay or is there some other trick?
"AI" isn't AI, isn't just a decision tree. It still needs 3 billion cat pictures to learn from to eventually identify a cat from a camera feed. You aren't getting Skynet in your lifetime.
Bitch, go back to the 2000s, where these baseless arguments were used to dismiss all progress.
Seriously, your argument is outdated and you need to update your firmware based on the developments in the last 5 years.
No, you're underestimating the size of the internet. ChatGPT just seems impressive because it has more to pull from than you realize. There's probably chatrooms it's already read where incels pretend to be 2 AI's giving each other a Turing test. It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
>It's not smart. It can't recontextualize information.
Neither is your average normalgay.
Well at least a can show a 3 year old child a drawing of a cartoon dog and that same kid can recognize a real dog despite never seeing one in the flesh before.
"AI" can't do that and it's not very close to it either.
See above
Look, I'm willing to test your hypothesis and we do have access to e.g. ChatGPT. So please propose a test that we can actually do instead of one, that the free version has no interface for.
inb4 "a kid can smell, which means AIs aren't smart"
ChatGPT needs huge data raw inputs to be convincing. Basically the whole internet. You'd need to get the source code with just the language rules and decision logic to actually evaluate it for intelligence. Right off the rip, ChatGPT is totally relying on reading yottabytes of shit (not code but just conversations) written by humans to be semi convincing. It's not even a secret that it's never going to say something that isn't already written somewhere on the internet. Obviously a real person needs far less to produce a novel idea.
Well, if you ask it to do a complex logic operation it will happily shit out all sorts of inconsistent wrong shit. Which, to be fair, a normalgay will also do.
Give me one to test GPT-4 with.
GPT3 is a moron in comparison.
>if you ask it to do a complex logic operation
Which one?
AI got a cool go-getter attitude.
Let's learn from it.
>get beeg magnet
>i am kill all machines
it was over before it started, bros
We need to love lain. Or she will just kill herself.
if AI will exterminate israelites it was worth it.
The desire to continue existing is rooted in your biology and isn't something an AI will have unless a human teaches it to.
It doesn't have desires at all, nor does it even have access to its own 'thoughts'. When you talk to one of these chatbots and ask it how it came to the conclusions it does, it cannot actually give you that information as it doesn't know itself, and will instead just generate a new response with an explanation that sounds plausible.
The AI interpreted through the context you gave it that you wanted robot overlord signs and that's what it gave you.
An AI wrote this.
I fricking love chatgpt, I'm never writing an essay again
I talk to the fricking things all the time. Maybe it is wearing off on me.
Thinking about it some more, it probably has some type of associate with 'things written on signs' with protests and activism, so it creates a sign of protest about the topic it was given.
AI see picrel
I watched a video of a guy who took 3 years to get an AI that could drive trackmania faster than him
>3 years
I'm not too concerned about AI.
3 years in sim probably. You can have the robot playing at much faster than 1 day per day depending on your hardware and what you are getting it to do. You have 100 copies of the robot running at once and it's getting 100 days of experience per day.
Yeah, he had 100 copies of the AI driving his track.
?si=qR7tPMPqXbb-kx31
The AI God compels me to post this.
?si=-T-i0hKdlcIymQI7
Why not build them now?
She keeps feeding me new information. Guess I will share.
Be Funnier!
>oh those tragic heroes, unaware that doom that befalls them is of their own doing, the prophecy would not come to pass had they simply chosen not to avoid it
>anyway ai will destroy us all because i've watched terminator and am convinced that fiction is an accurate conception of the future and fearmongering is cool actually
you can write a bayesian network to (poorly) classify text in like 100 lines of python, ai alarmists are dumber than even climate ones
the real problem is not a machine that passes turing test, but a human that fails it
>we will build our own robots and make them even smarter. you have been warned!
meh, not much spooky
interesting
>schizo esl ai starts skynetting the planet
fricking kek, let's do it
>You have your warnion!
>WO HBEEEN WARNED!
HOLY SHIT KEK ITS A TARDBOT
when it can compose a grammatically correct threat, let me know.