AI hysteria will tear the west apart. As it develops and overtakes everything, the public (who have been conditioned to catastrophize problems and think of life as a marvel good vs. evil narrative) are finally being given their ultimate enemy they can dedicate their life to. Normies will latch onto "Anti-AI activism" as a boogeyman for their disenfranchisement and discontent, and it will be a thunderous destruction of civil order. The economy will collapse and the spectacle of AI will overshadow all real-world problems and solutions.
 Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
>I made another AI thread, I fit in now!
Other AI threads fail to appreciate the source or scope of the problem, which has nothing to do with the capabilities of AI itself. It is immanent and unstoppable.
>immanent
No, that's a religious word, you meant imminent
>this is the new hotness, I would have wasted your time with a thread about transhumanism or sexbots otherwise
Unironically have a nice day
>No, that's a religious word, you meant imminent
>he doesn't know
in the accurate version of this, the image clearly looks great and the guy on the right is only pretending it looks like ass (because he's petty and butthurt)
AI is a real world problem tho
There are two AIs, there is the real AI, then there is the AI normies talk about and which currently dominates public discussion on technology. They are entirely different things. The second one isn't real
>The second one isn't real
Rather the second one is the shadow on the cave wall.
>da west
have a nice day
Yes, it's a western problem. Third world countries aren't jerking off on twitter about muh AI ethics, moron.
>people from underdeveloped shitholes are too busy starving and building shit out of mud to care about technology
In other words, business as usual. Tell me something new
>people from underdeveloped shitholes who have real problems to deal with, like food, don't descend into delusional self-destructive postmodern capitalist simulated neo-tribalism
Yes, exactly, you've reaffirmed my argument very eloquently. Now that that's out of the way, I can't wait to hear your point.
>being hungry is le good!
strange argument
It's not an argument. People who are hungry are living in life. People who live in the ruins of a post-hunger society are living in 10 layers of abstraction and on the verge of suicide.
everyone is living life, just some more hungry than others.
>everyone is living life
Wrong.
you unironically sound like you are living in 10 layers of abstraction and on the verge of suicide. go back to twitter with your substanceless posts please.
>go back to twitter with your anti-twitter arguments
>anti-twitter arguments
you're either moronic or lying
kys either way
The West has already fallen, Chud. Don't bother yourself or us.
I hope the activists get exactly what they want: AI to be controlled by the Government to the furthest extent possible. Just like with guns, which they also want regulated.
>i cant le generate le anime porno
oh teh noes!
Kill AI (it's creators) and all this will stop is that simple
>just do this impossible thing and
You sound like an activist.
>hysteria has torn the west apart
ftfy
>twitter/reddit filename
>blablabla AI will heckin' kill us or something
back
Most illiterate post on BOT. Learn to read or get off my thread. You are the most moronic shitmonger I have ever seen.
Your image is terrifying. It's like a unrestrained extension of the un-creativity plagues current culture. Imagine a never-ending stream of wojak memes.
Loud minority is loud anon, also these twitter "artists" are literally doing "all forms of AI is bad" propaganda that nobody cares about.
I don't see any hysteria besides angry twitter artists and bot morons spamming AI ragebaits on every board that anyhow connected to visual art. And I also honestly don't see that much of an implication of AI in work environment. Not yet at least.
Stop reading clickbait web articles, go outside, internet is not real life
Your argument displays a considerable misunderstanding of the issues at hand. The claim that AI-induced hysteria will cause societal downfall reflects a lack of nuance and a gross misunderstanding of the scale and potential of the problem.
The real legitimate risk we need to confront isn't societal collapse due to fear of AI, but rather the possibility of uncontrolled artificial superintelligence (ASI). The potential of ASI is so immense that it could result in the obliteration of our entire solar system. In this broader context, panic about social order and the economy pales in comparison.
Your dystopian narrative, though dramatic, is based more on speculation and fear-mongering than on an informed understanding of the situation. Focusing on this narrative not only misses the point, but it wastes valuable time and energy that could be better invested in managing the real, tangible risks associated with AI. The future of AI is a serious concern requiring thoughtful discussion, not ill-informed and misdirected hyperbole.
I suspected your post was written by ChatGPT by the second sentence. The writing style is incredibly identifiable.
Correct, though I made a few edits. I stand by the words as presented.
Actually,
1) "Speculation" is the basis for all predictions, including the ones made by experts in the field.
2) The possibility of ASI has been discussed extensively, but remains largely hypothetical.
3) Human hysteria, on the other hand, is a documented phenomenon that can have major impacts on society.
4) Whether or not one considers the risks posed by AI legitimate, fear and panic are powerful forces that can shape the course of history.
5) In conclusion, while your concerns about ASI are valid, my statement still stands that societal impact resulting from human reactions to AI should not be underestimated. Both topics deserve careful consideration and open dialogue.
Social media is now at its peak, everything happening around us is just one click away. An idea's capacity to spread like wildfire has never been so fast. When it comes to AI, the internet is a hotbed of speculation, misinformation, and sensationalism. It's not unreasonable to suggest that this could lead to irrational behavior, fear-mongering, and even violence. The narrative of AI as an enemy is already gaining momentum among the general public, and it's important to acknowledge and address the potential consequences before it's too late.
(Written by SuperCOT Alpaca 33b LoRa on my laptop.)
AI doesn't exist and therefore will have no consequences and people will eventuall get bored of this scare scrow bullshit
>AI doesn't exist and therefore will have no consequences
The OPs point is that whether it exists or not, people are sperging out about it and this will have consequences.
Just think in a few years there could be a computer out there somewhere that I will not see or hear where an anime girl will say "Black person" in both text AND realistic TTS with simulated mouth movement. I am offended just thinking about it and the only way I can stop thinking about it is if I gaslight people into supporting further draconian regulations on what they are allowed to do in the privacy of their own homes. I'll still be mad even if I get what I want but seething about everything and ruining everyone's lives is the only aspect of womanhood I can genuinely achieve.
>AI hysteria will tear the west apart
>[the public] have been conditioned to catastrophize problems
These two statements aren't incompatible with each other.