Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless

Do people unironically enjoy this crap or are they just memeing? You know, just to piss off real artists?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    bweeeh dey took ourjebs

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      be nice to skynet, she just wanted to trace good art to learn how to draw!

      • 8 months ago
        w7-890

        cute e-girls inb4 hypocritical furgays sexualize this

        AI can create whatever you want if you have a big enough training set + GPU time

        theoretically speaking is it possible for stable diffusion to make lgbt flags specifically just for trolling? whats gonna happen if i try to make a prompt like [X anime character holding transgender flag] will it just break? an i apply this to the /trash/ version but this time use zoophile MAP flags just to piss off furries
        can you add stealthy ZETA symbols and queen of spades BBC logo in the form of tattoos for your generated character while perfectly blending it with the artstyle and make it appear as if this patreon artist was into BLACKED content

        OR what about assigning AI to mimic a certain artist's nice drawing style using while only pirated and leaked porn from pay sites alone and make it appear as if that X artist actually commissioned this as people could not tell the difference.
        Mwahaha i think this might be an essential toolkit for my anti-furry agenda to save the third worlders but how do i make money out of this?

  2. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Coomer paradise.

  3. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    it always looks kinda glazed

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      most monkeys go for the "2.5D" look, which has that ugly glazed/glossy detailing (easily avoided, they just won't because they like the ugly look) coupled with higher contrast and saturation than most non-AI art, which makes things worse

      Quite often the results look like the subject has an awful skin condition, kek, and boobs are almost always colored really weird. Fixable, but few will fix all the jank in their outputs, probably are the few that actually know how to use Photoshop/gimp/etc.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >coupled with higher contrast and saturation than most non-AI art
        huh, I think most AI stuff looks too low contrast, gray-ish and washed out.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          cool story, /b/ro

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          There's some truth to this. The models up until recently were slightly wrong in their denoising math. Merely reversing the noising process didn't actually guarantee a full range of possible results, and most images hovered around a middle-gray sort of average. That has however been improved and soon the base models will have the new denoising built in.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      IT'S GLAZED ALRIGHT

  4. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Have you looked at a broad sample of human made art?

  5. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    People say the exact same thing about anime/manga art drawn by humans. And that's immensely popular. Hell, that's the origin of BOT.

  6. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    is this /sdg/?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      > Do people unironically enjoy this crap or are they just memeing? You know, just to piss off real artists?
      Real artists make worse content

      Would

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're not beating the "aigays judge art with their dick" allegations. Porn addicts are worse at evaluating art than the average person.

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Here, enjoy some of my non 1girl art.

          I have a whole twitter with this stuff and I quite enjoy making non 1girls

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            This sucks

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              Ok

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Most of the artgays were earning with coombait as well. Making huge/flat breasts for (You)s and money is not something exclusive to AI.

  7. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nerds are tasteless homosexuals.

    Ever seen what clueless autists produce?
    >any random deviant art account
    >nostalgia critic

    they are literally incapable of creating anything that communicates soul and personality

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Nerds are tasteless homosexuals.
      *the masses are tasteless
      no different from most anons

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        the problem is that autistic nerds are the ones programming this shit, so their complete lack of taste seeps intrinsically into the images their programs produce

  8. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I had a girlfriend
      Doubt.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >the only people who have girlfriends are successful chads who got all their shit together
        moronic incel meme

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I was successful beyond measure in society
          >;)

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      that happened

  9. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    personally i never got the hype. my dopamine receptors are fried. i cant goon to this. im waiting for the ai video generator to actually be good so i can generate all the fap material i could ever want

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      This protocol has the potential to activate a dopamine reset and reboot the brain and mind.

      [...]

      [...]

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        moron shit

      • 8 months ago
        w7-890

        >Activate windows now
        >ACKtive
        kek you are just like me also what is this NAC protocol though?

        [...]

        i heard feds are using AI to create realistic CP is this actually real or just an deep web urban legend?
        also somebody made a stable diffusion model just specifically for e-girls

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Given how hard the artgays are chimping out I don’t think we’ll ever see NSFW AI videos. Given the amount of OF thots

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I don’t think we’ll ever see NSFW AI videos
        already exist

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        you think the complaining actually does anything? Real life isn't Twitter, and the march of progress is ongoing still.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >my dopamine receptors are fried. i cant goon to this. im waiting for the ai video generator to actually be good so i can generate all the fap material i could ever want
      >not doing dopamine detox and nofap/semen retention just to coom more to more degenerate things
      you are far from the abyss

  10. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I use it to make cool background art

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      this is like me posting a generic anime girl and saying human art is soulless trash. There's plenty of good and bad in both, and it's getting harder and harder to tell that a pic was made by a bot. Especially landscape art like what
      made

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Lemme just post a doodle by chris-chan and say that all human-made art is garbage

  11. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >soulless
    "Idk what to say so I'll just say some bs that appeals to emotions"
    >real artists
    Your average "it's soulless, you'll never be a real wom- I mean artist" twitter artist is drawing busty animal women with schlongs, those pictures have less artistic value then your average Midjourney image

    >do people unironically enjoy this
    And yes, people do enjoy it, the pic you posted is mid and generic, so no wonder that is your opinion, it's like going to the trading page of pixiv, human made art, but all the same generic anime girls in generic poses.

    If you look at anything not coomer related you might discover the simple fact that AI, as a tool, can't fix the lack of creativity of it's user, some people make beautiful images with AI, because they are creative, some stick to generic stuff that just looks good, because it's easy to make high quality style with AI.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      "appeals to emotions" is the whole point of art though.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's an empty argument that doesn't mean anything. It's just a word meant to sound "deep", but doesn't add anything to the discussion, nor does it prove anything. Please come back once you have an actual argument

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >those pictures have less artistic value then your average Midjourney image
      even if your strawman was trye, your midjourney generations have 0 artistic value and its users create nothing.
      >"s-says who"
      the nature of art

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Art is about expressing yourself, it doesn't specify how. Painting is about taking an idea from your mind and putting it on paper to show everyone else. AI art is about taking an idea from your head and putting it on digital canvas, only instead of your hand doing brush strokes you use words and other guides to make the AI create the image, the human is still in full control over what the final image contains and when it's good enough to be considered done. It is not painting, but it definitely is art, just a different medium

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          And with controlnet/img2img you can have almost full control over picture composition.
          Stuff still sucks with multiple characters but there are workarounds

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          you're deluding yourself into thinking you're expressing yourself. machine goes brrr and you think "this is totally what I wanted".
          >it's definitely art
          and troons are definitely women. keep the affirmations, maybe you'll summon them into reality.

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            >"this is totally what I wanted".
            do you feel that way when you draw something by hand?

  12. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Personally I don't like how AI art is always lit the same, everything always has this studio lighting quality to it, even ones where it's obviously outside

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI art is always lit the same, everything always has this studio lighting quality to it
      That is absolutely not the case man.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        it is absolutely the case, it's piss easy to recognize an AI pic

  13. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Soul

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >unobservant ai fanboy npcs don't see the problems with the generated pics

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          The plants obviously but removing them is less work than making everything from scratch

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's not just the plants. You'd have to make everything from scratch anyway. Look at any of the pics for too long and you'll see what I mean. The penguin's face is messed up. The avocado is bleeding. The robot is missing its right hand. The banana has a round end. The original image has a bunch of fine details, like the labels on the binders, but fine details are rare in the generated images and where they appear, they're fricked up somehow, like the disconnected lights on the Christmas tree.

            The generations also miss the entire point of the original's composition. The original isn't just a woman working on a laptop, it's a woman working on a laptop in a suitable cozy environment, but all the generations are just that thing. The only one with anything close to the original's composition is the wood cabin, but it's also the most fricked up - an inside campfire next to some unrecognizable objects?

            There's nothing salvageable from them. They're not even good for ideas or starting-points for your own illustrations. Just uninspired AI slop.

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              >some proof of concept pic for reference only controlnet has issues
              >means all ai art is unsalvageable garbage
              Off the meds again artsistser?

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >nooo i-it's just a proof of concept
                Backpedaling already? I'm still surprised people this

                The plants obviously but removing them is less work than making everything from scratch

                unobservant exist. Actual NPC behavior. The biggest problem with them is not that the AI stupidly put potted plants in every image. The biggest problem is that 0 of the output images match the composition of the original.
                >means all ai art is unsalvageable garbage
                I didn't say all AI art, but I'll let you quote me on that anyway because it's true.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's okay sister, you got a ~year of furry poop commissions left, you got some time to get a job.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not everything is about smut, ai coomer.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, but your earnings are about some disgusting smut, sadly. You still got time.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Assumptions like that don't land if they're wrong, you know. I'm not a smut artist, or even an artist. Just someone concerned that the quality of all media is going to sharply decline in the next 10 years and the useful idiots cheering it on are cumbrained porn addicts.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, because it's going to miss the whole human SOVL aspect, right?

              • 8 months ago
                w7-890

                >Furries
                aNimE iS soVleSS --ACK!
                >also furhomosexuals
                commissions pic related that's right ! a funko pop of their fursona

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Real artists
                The ones trying to get children to kill themselves for doing a skin tone one gradient too light?

                I will never understand this pantomime that AI will steal art jobs, while being fricking blind to how bad the existing market already was before AI came along.

                Fiver did more, measurable, and lasting damage than AI ever could, AI just exacerbated the problem. Call me when pretentious twats on art station start making images of India/China with lines through them. Digital art is a extremely competitive hell scape full of literal fricking scams, plagiarism, and you have artists constantly trying to destroy other artists in public arenas trying to get a single crumb of attention. And please don't give me "that's not all artists" it's fricking most of them. The starving artist has always been an butthole and always will be. The frauds who have their job because of their uncle can actually manage to be nice and take a shower every so often.

                I haven't even gotten started on shit like

                https://i.imgur.com/0vrpVUq.jpg

                The market is shit, has been shit for a long time, and AI won't destroy it, but it should. This is cope, plain and simple. It's "durr hurr, for exposure" all over again. Artists blaming other people rather than taking a good hard look at the current situation and evaluating what if any role they themselves played in it.

                In the meantime there is also a useful tool for any artist who doesn't want to spend 12 hours texturing a cobblestone, or needs five pictures of snowflakes to put into the background of their snow scene.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                AI is certainly going to reduce the price for freelance artists' works/commissions. It's already happening.
                Whether it is going to hurt employed artists or not, we'll see

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                AI is certainly going to reduce the price for freelance artists' works/commissions. It's already happening.
                Whether it is going to hurt employed artists or not, we'll see

                the best part is the most insufferable homosexuals of them all are the furry artists, and the furgays have been running triple shifts to make their models outstandingly capable
                expect a lot of "artists" roping in the next few years when they discover their paypiggies aren't giving them patreonbux anymore

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              I see everything you mention and agree with most of it. If you're a designer and already know how to draw that stuff from scratch you probably won't be able to benefit from that tool in that way. But for someone that just knows a little photoshop and needs some filler pictures for his website I think they're perfectly salvageable, compared to paying $1k for a better result few will notice or care about.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >But for someone that just knows a little photoshop and needs some filler pictures for his website I think they're perfectly salvageable
                I personally don't want to live in the world where 95% of illustration is vapid AI slop for unobservant people. Better that person has no filler pictures at all and just lets the human-generated content stand alone. It's the same with AI generated writing, which is already common and becoming even more so. Do you really want more mass-produced low-substance content on the internet? There's a few creative fields that have declined a lot in the past 100 years in the name of convenience. Generative AI will speed that up that process tenfold.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                You need to understand what you or me like or want has no effect in the usefulness or future of a technology. It's good to have taste and opinions but you shouldn't let them cloud your judgement.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't think that's true. it might even improve the future of AI. If people who think like me keep ridiculing AI "artists," maybe less of them will feel emboldened to upload their slop to the internet, which means less of it will pollute the training sets of the next generation of AI models. There's literally no downside to being as critical as possible of AI art.

                https://i.imgur.com/u2Qol2Y.png

                Yeah, because it's going to miss the whole human SOVL aspect, right?

                The fact that other soulless art exists doesn't justify making more. That should be obvious. All AI art looks like Corporate Memphis to me and the idea of it spreading is terrifying.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Don't care gay (you) 0 coombait
                AI gays infinite coombait
                I side with ai gays

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sure, but you'll get the ridicule you deserve for cooming to slop.

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >muh slop
                sorry it's not an argument sister

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                Whatever you say, coomer

              • 8 months ago
                Anonymous

                >muh coomer
                sorry it's not an argument sister

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              Just hit the refresh button until it gets it right

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I love how there's plants everywhere

    • 8 months ago
      w7-890

      Something got me thinking if AI could create "drawn" basedjaks out of IRL photos like iphone filters without any problem can the same AI be theoretically redesigned and trained to make algeria art the polygonal style looks straightforward on the outside (if this is your thing) and at the end of the day the algorithm just creates things out of circled or triangular shaped clipart so this should be easy right? unlike anime where every single pixel matters?
      Can a team of competent developers technically make a good 2d indie game using algeria without making it "soul less" something like night in the woods artstyle but with "rounded" weird looking pastel scenes and characters

      https://i.imgur.com/JC7X4Oj.jpg

      Soul

      To be fair i beg to differ this looks wholesome enough compared to the overhyped interface of KDE i'd choose this thing over the tyson tan fiasco on libreoffice (also this was originally meant for tablets but for some reason wanglows decided it was perfect for win 11 even though the old win10 appearance was really snappy)
      I guess the saying goes "An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity" but on the other hand i miss the old android 4.0 interface with old blue button black boxes for window management
      Sadly the people who design these on their GUIs (looking at you apple and google) don't bother making their code efficient no wonder why a single greeter webpage consumes about 1GB of ram just for that vector animation (hence why SVG and webpages have a bad name these days)
      **sorry for the bump but this felt important**

      https://i.imgur.com/dEEOJKw.gif

      Just hit the refresh button until it gets it right

      yeah just keep refreshing until your GPU melts unlike you i don't have a spare PC let alone a properly cooled one

      https://i.imgur.com/VoC50Ws.jpg

      I just like watching me fav characters in real irl hyperealistic style ¯_(ツ)_/¯

      NICE! that'll trigger the women hating furgays on /trash/ and their artificial womb fantasies

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        cute e-girls inb4 hypocritical furgays sexualize this

        [...]
        theoretically speaking is it possible for stable diffusion to make lgbt flags specifically just for trolling? whats gonna happen if i try to make a prompt like [X anime character holding transgender flag] will it just break? an i apply this to the /trash/ version but this time use zoophile MAP flags just to piss off furries
        can you add stealthy ZETA symbols and queen of spades BBC logo in the form of tattoos for your generated character while perfectly blending it with the artstyle and make it appear as if this patreon artist was into BLACKED content

        OR what about assigning AI to mimic a certain artist's nice drawing style using while only pirated and leaked porn from pay sites alone and make it appear as if that X artist actually commissioned this as people could not tell the difference.
        Mwahaha i think this might be an essential toolkit for my anti-furry agenda to save the third worlders but how do i make money out of this?

        Anybody? i want some serious answers

  14. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    'Soulless' is what pseuds say when they can't come up with an 'intelligent' reason not to like something.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      'Soulless' is a term with an obvious meaning, but only to the ensouled.

  15. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I am not artist. I can't even draw or make music. I have however used these models. It is addicting.

    I do however always remember a quote (that I have to translate from the original language) when using these models: "...Surely if the artist stays true to himself, to his vision, it is bound to be real art."

    At least when I use these models, I can't be true to my vision. I have very different thing in my mind when I am prompting and something entirely different comes out. I just choose what outputs I like the most. To me it is no different that going to a real artist and giving them a note with all the requirements and then choosing the best one that they make. I came up with the idea, but I had really no control over the vision.
    I can't be true to myself or my vision when using the tools, so I can't call what I produce with them "Art". To me they are similar experience to a google image search. I input strings of text and I get lovely images to look at.

  16. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    People who "enjoy" pics like that enjoy them for one specific reason. They think art and artists only exist to provide them free smut to goon to. To them, the promise of an unlimited amount of smut in that highly-detailed "trending on artstation" rendered style overrides any concern about it looking fake or soulless, especially since most human artists capable of that style don't use their talents on smut, and for true porn addicts, lack of sufficient content becomes a problem.

  17. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just wanna jerk off to things people will never draw for one reason or another

  18. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The reason it looks soulless is because they use soulless models with soulless, vague descriptions written for millions of images. It's the averaging out of photographs and generic anime style.

    If you train a LoRA with good descriptions it becomes not soulless. In the buzz word sense, anyways. It's still literally soulless.

  19. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is better than 90% of what artists can draw.
    I generate really good looking picture with it without much effort

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      damn, can you generate one with them eating the fruit please?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >them
        dilate

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/P0b5Hv1.jpg

      AI is the present now for art
      anyone can make art

      Cute face and eyes.
      Normals hands are the only welcome AI pics.
      Delicious armpits. Did you pay attention to those in the prompt or are those default armpits?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        they're standard. Its the hands and face that sometimes need inpainting/adetailer to fix

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          ah yes, inpaint old woman's hand on her

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          >adetailer
          What's this?

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            inpaint-related extension that works in txt2img, where you gen whatever you prompt for

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            fixes the face and hand details. You might notice a "ghost face" when you have full body pictures or multiple people in the pictures and adetailer will help fix this a ton

            • 8 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/PK0P4pR.jpg

              for example I used adetailer on this picture. Without it the character would have a ghost like face.

              So, it just does that automatically?

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            for example I used adetailer on this picture. Without it the character would have a ghost like face.

  20. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is the technical reason behind all AI art looking like this, regardless of the art style? The effect is most notable is the art includes any human or non-human characters, but the AI glaze is always noticeable
    >inb4 some autistic nerd spouting anti-artist talking points
    I don’t care about the politics, I’m just curious about the reason

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >What is the technical reason behind all AI art looking like this, regardless of the art style?
      Because most people choose those styles? Depends on what you mean by "AI glaze" though.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >choose those styles
        What styles? I just said that the art style does not matter, the recognizable AI glaze is always present

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          What is AI glaze?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Because most people choose those styles?
        Question mark after an assertion to simulate basedboy inflection. You know which social media site you belong on, and it isn't this one

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >choose those styles
        What styles? I just said that the art style does not matter, the recognizable AI glaze is always present

        I dunno what "AI glaze" is caused by but it's just that blur, softness, or smudginess you see in most generations. It'd be cool to get rid of it since it's easily the #1 reason AI art looks like AI art. It doesn't affect every model or prompt though so I have no idea what causes it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      People here love airbrushed asiatics. And they almost always use a face fixing postprocess that guarantees extra airbrushing.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's bad at eyes, they are complex. It only recently managed to make passable eyes.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >What is the technical reason behind all AI art looking like this, regardless of the art style?
      It's a style thing. A lot of guys got started using the same [pretty, perfect] prompts and never stopped using them, and don't create their own models either. The result is an inbred collection.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        source of this house

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://files.catbox.moe/8bmxqe.png

          • 8 months ago
            w7-890

            thank you also archived incase that goes down

            are people saying that it's soulless are artists coping?

            ive only heard furgays kvetching so far on plebbit while the pirate sites actually praise this (looking at you blitzdrachin sifyro)

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        >AI gives a perfect slight belly outline for maximum fertility
        I kneel AI-sama

  21. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    i like AI porn

    • 8 months ago
      w7-890

      stupid question but can AI create photorealistic european women ? i am about to run an experimental detransitioning programme on imageboards to stop furgays from betraying their species (and no im not one of those south korean ricecels beore you ask)
      also i saved this copypasta for analysis on feds chan

      [...]

      to

      [...]

      [...]

      nice space marine might use this for trolling material

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        AI can create whatever you want if you have a big enough training set + GPU time

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        this is the most realistic ai image i've seen

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Same. I don't look at many ai generated images though.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      cute

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      We know we are not worthy O great Lord Mitama
      Please purify us
      Please cleanse us Lord Mitama
      We beg for you to hear our prayer

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous
  22. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is the present now for art
    anyone can make art

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      anyone could make art before, moron

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        yes just learn for 10 years bro

  23. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
    Yeah, it really nailed the fluoride stare of 3d women.

  24. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    shoo shoo back to /ic/

  25. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    You might be a genuine homosexual if you care about the soul and not the hamuna hamuna awooga in this pic

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hamuna hamuna
      >awooga
      TOINGgGgGgGg

  26. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    You should be happy for them - after all, they're locking themselves behind the desk, hitting generate for hours and eventually coping that one image is what they wanted all along, while you just draw what you want.

  27. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like the expmix style

  28. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  29. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    here you go, op

  30. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      w7-890

      wow i didnt even realize this is possible nice here's another resource i found on a really old character AI thread might ruin someone's fanfiction with this

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mad lad made a Chris-chan checkpoint.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        the hero we need

  31. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is constantly evolving
    Give it time

  32. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    the problem is that people are always showing off the most "realistic" or "high quality" pieces
    and it's realistic/high quality art which looks soulless in general

  33. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  34. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think 'high art' as in works created for exhibits or museums are in any danger. Because this art is so connected to the artist themselves. Identity matters a lot in the art world. AI art has no identity and thus will never appeal in this domain, though it might find use incidentally here and there. But this is a pretty rarefied field that is increasingly irrelevant to the rest of culture.
    For artists employed by businesses like entertainment companies (either directly or in freelance situations), they are in small danger. But more than being in danger, they will see their workflows and expectations. They are going to have to learn to use these tools, not as a replacement for their own skills, but to work faster and to be more productive. Or they will lose to those who have both types of skills. Something similar occurred with digital artists in the past.
    It is the ones churning out commissioned fanart for a few bucks that are in great danger, if some of them aren't already feeling it. But it's not as if this income source has ever been stable to begin with. Some of them will also learn to the use the tools. The business model will change however. Instead of paying to get one piece of artwork, people will pay to get a bunch of pieces and the artist will spend the same amount of time as before in between generating and applying their own fixes and touches.

  35. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  36. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hey, I like big breasts, AI-made or otherwise.

  37. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most of it it's really mediocre looking, doesn't have a 1/5 of the charm that real art does. Maybe it's on par with mediocre Indonesian vtuber fanart.

  38. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    breasts

  39. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    This has more soul than any thing made in the last 15 years.
    You are just using the wrong prompts.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      As a digital anime artist who sells drawings I think it's great. It's a bittersweet feeling that I'm becoming increasingly obsolete but many of these AI drawings have godlike colors and value structures and I save many of them into my refs folder and study them. There will come a day when AI can do "everything" but in the short term I think they will mostly serve as tools to empower human artists like how together with an AI generated script could make the basis of a blockbuster fantasy movie, or how a one man team could create their own 24 episode anime show with AI generated BGs, coloring and inbetweening. I'd say the future looks bright for entertainment and artists who b***h about it are selfish luddites

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh yeah and you will also probably be able to voice an entire cast of cartoon characters on your own by running the lines through AI software too.

        Essentially AI will ironically cause an explosion of creativity as single individuals with quirky ideas who lack the skillsets and would normally never receive funding will soon be able to create content rivaling the most spectacular AAA stuff on their own

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          In the end the ideas guy turned out to be the most powerful

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can’t say that looks bad, the art direction is top notch

  40. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    it looks nice and man kind making something so amazing is PURE soul

  41. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    1. Look at the eyes. Easy tell most of the time.
    2. Look at clothing and objects. Do they make sense? In 3D? Are they consistent and symmetrical? Check the background too.
    3. Look for discontinuities, eg. pencil lines that turn into shading, ribbons and strands of hair disappearing behind clothing.
    4. Look for vagueness, eg. parts of the image that are supposed to be detailed or intricate become unrecognizable or start looking like a posterized photo rather than intentional illustration

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Look at the eyes. Easy tell most of the time.
      there's this general feeling of being fake but I can't tell why

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      > look for the [insert some criticsm]
      You can say the EXACT same shit about any handdrawn artwork made by a non-professional and you KNOW it.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        tbf AI gen stuff has this look that screams AI, I'm not sure how to put it in words, it has that best quality, masterpiece feeling to it you know lol

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Damn that is not ai

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >he he, look at this flaws that even a grandmaster artist would occasionally frickup, let alone the bottom 80% of them
      >that means AI bad

  42. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    This reminds me of a post about how one anon had expectations and got exactly what he wanted and complained about it. Not fricking shit it's "soulless" and "fake" it was made by an AI.

  43. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    most people aren't trying to create art with it. they're trying to create porn and sexy ladies, and they're succeeding at that.

  44. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't writers whine to the same extent about LLMs as "artists" are doing regarding AI-generated images?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      because every other artist is a troony

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      they do, but AI users don't try to pass as writers as much as illustrators

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Why don't writers whine to the same extent about LLMs as "artists" are doing regarding AI-generated images?
      Because an image is not a complete process for AI while writing still has a way to go before we get novels.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because an image IS a complete process.

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        Might that image be your creation?

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, used a Milim Nava LoRA to make it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Have you ever seen an AI try to "write?" It's absolute dogshit. At least sometimes AI art is unusual or interesting to look at.

  45. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
    So do the girls in modern pornography so I don't really get your point.

  46. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah it looks "interpolated"
    im guessing it will become better, but i dont understand the obsession either

  47. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >fake and soulless
    That's why it does women so well

  48. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    People don't enjoy it, right wingers do. Right wingers are unironically lower IQ than leftists (just look at college enrollment stats) and creatively bankrupt (look at the leftist presence in creative spheres vs right wing one). Since they're too cognitively underdeveloped to appreciate aesthetic implications of the art, a simple imitation made by a pattern-seeking stochastic parrot is enough to creatively satisfy the small mind of a right-winger.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >just look at college enrollment stats
      Isn't there currently agitation for the president to step in for college debt precisely because people are struggling with their degrees?

  49. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can be pretty good.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hu tao
      >breasts
      heresy

  50. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just like watching me fav characters in real irl hyperealistic style ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  51. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer handmade art but it's nice too on the lack of equivalent handmade art.

  52. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    are people saying that it's soulless are artists coping?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      No you stupid homosexual, they're either morons like you or CRAFTSPEOPLE who can "draw" and "paint" but will never know the true meaning of ART, nor will you

  53. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    digital "art" has never been considered art and all the ai guys only make porn with it, which has also never been considered art. anybody with a basic understanding of art (photography and paintings in this case) can tell when something is ai generated because there's no thought put into framing, lighting, composition and etc.

    • 8 months ago
      w7-890

      >photography and paintings
      THIS dont forget philosophy and historical heritage (especially from nonwhite countries) sadly most furgays literally rate X artistic value based on whether it turns them on under the guise of talent
      -- copied
      i remember that one time on lainchan /hum/ vent said that people only value art judging by how fappable its is nobody gives a frick about classical shit anymore except for "muh nostalgia" furries dont just destroy everything they are much worse as they corrupt whatever they touch

  54. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    burn in hell

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      why it was human porn not disgusting furbait

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      you'll be the one burning, coomer

  55. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    It is soulless, just like the Indians who shill for it.

  56. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why is every AI generated girl always Asian? Without fail, 95% of the time I see one of these pictures posted here it's some Asian bawd.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >download model from chang's personal QQ site
      >its all asian WHY are there no westerners
      dude AI is the norm on chinkland get used to this

  57. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >people self expose them on social media, basically tons of softcore made by themselves, with their high resolution cameras from the smartphone
    >scrap all that
    >feed into local model
    >have infinite pr0n of every person you want, can tune the image to your taste, make it more real than reality
    >advanced multimodal cumming utilities, sex toys
    >high resolution vr
    >hifi audio
    >high speed internet
    >etc
    golden era of coom

  58. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >low effort shit looks fake and soulless
    then stop posting it yo uhomosexual

  59. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    softcore porn isnt art

  60. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hate coomers

  61. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why her right boob looks bigger. Does ai make the same mistakes as human artists?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, it doesn't have to and can avoid it, but the person inputting the prompt has to be experienced enough. (Often not)
      The AI is trained on human-made images after all.

  62. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Coomers have ruined AI.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      WOAAAAAAAHHHH MAAAAMAAAAA!!!!!! HUMINA HUMINA HUMINA HUMINA!!!!!!!! BABY WANTS MILKYYYY!!!!!!

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine being told by a supercomputer your face algorithmically correlates with massive exposed breasts.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      what does being black have to do with being sexualized?

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        as the tweet is saying, black people have been fetishized for centuries

        • 8 months ago
          Anonymous

          bullshit, everyone knows blacks are ugly

          • 8 months ago
            Anonymous

            ugly =! hot/sexual/etc
            blacks may be ugly but black men are fetishized as big dick and black women as very sexual active people

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >100% match. Titcow physiognomy. That will be 19.99

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >no prompts
      yeah she doesnt know what the words sexy and cute mean

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      The AI sexualized her because it realized this was the only thing that would get her a job.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      humblebrag

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is sexualizing me!!! D:

      • 8 months ago
        w7-890

        why do you westerners keep fapping to Brazilian women so much bunch of losers from home

  63. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I have a vpn, and clear cookies, but websites still indentify you using MAC, operating system, digital finger prints like fonts and other active programs, sometimes monitor and screen size.

    But if I can open up roms, run old windows, and dos box, I would think I could make my computer look like anything else? Is there an app or program to randomize all my computers footprints so sites can't identify me?

  64. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI art looks as fake and soulless as the tastes of the guy who gens it.

    I have been arguing against this kind of garbage in the AI image gen threads for almost a year now. I make no progress. They like that shit.

    AI is very limited in what it can do. As such you have to make trade-offs. In their pride, some think they can generate perfection—perfect hands, perfect bodies, perfect faces. They use over-finetuned models which cannot do light and shadow correctly. They produce aesthetically offensive trash, slimy, uncanny, creepy. They don't see anything wrong with it.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      nice cope artgay

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I've prompted as much 1girl as anyone. Don't you dare call me that.

  65. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    You, however, look like a blind Black person.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      and you will never be a woman

  66. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  67. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Whenever I try to use SD, it never comes out looking as good as this.
    What are they doing different?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Custom models from civitai and a good base prompt, also higher resolution helps.
      Imo best is to start at 512x768, then use hi-res fix with 0.6 denoise strength and at least 1.25 upscale

      • 8 months ago
        Anonymous

        I've been using the SD model this whole time like a chump. The other models look way better. Thanks

  68. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is there anywhere to go to see AI art? is there a curated online gallery somewhere? have any particular images endured?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      the SDG general and just use the tbharchives to look at the older generals

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://civitai.com/images

  69. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    hate these things because it just shows how permanently imprinted those things are in my head even though i've only seen the real one like 3-4 times 10+ years ago

  70. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
    who fricking cares about what you think of BOT you dumb homosexual. you're not better than anyone because you don't like computer art. get your head out of your homosexual ass.

  71. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >and they kept calling me "Soulless", "Aislop", "pajeet" and making fun of my hands, they were so mean...

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is another one of those "the closer you look, the more it sucks" type AI images.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      have you tried getting better tastes?

  72. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  73. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone else see hands in stable diffusion where the are no hands? Like ghost hands? It's hard to explain. Like there are no actual hands there, but if you look at the image out of the corner if your eyes, you swear you can see an arm or a hand in the negative space of the image.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      I know what you mean anon. Sometimes you don't see hands even if they're there too, like this image is a decent example(not the best though).
      Sometimes the image will complete right before a step threshold where it would start drawing more hands or .. well more anything. And your brain will instantly pick up on that even if there's like .. literally nothing there to see. But you can kind of see or feel the intent of the AI in these rare cases.

      Maybe I didn't explain it properly but yeah I do know what you mean.

  74. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    deep cream pie inside

  75. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The hyper-realist stuff looks like crap, but if you use it right you can make some neat images.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous
  76. 8 months ago
    Anonymous
  77. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    The great thing is that Stable Diffusion offers a way of bending the knee to search engines and poorgay artists.

    I just wanted my wood grain background, not to stare at 7 ads, read 3 cry stories about how some troony can't transition without $5 for their stupid ass wood grain digital art.

    Welcome to the self-sufficient future

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      >read 3 cry stories about how some troony
      stop actively looking for troony stories you lying homosexual.
      while getting material ref is easier thanks to it, getting reference for fictional subjects is becoming increasingly difficult. no, I don't want your melted wax abominations, I want to look at actual illustrations for reference.

  78. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get why you need to draw these girls with AI? Do you guys not have imagination?
    If I think about a tomboy goblin girl I get a 3D visual in my mind that I can manipulate and touch

  79. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    how are images like picrel generated?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      img2img with high denoise

  80. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
    must be why it's so good at doing asians

  81. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    Skill and taste issue, on top of a technological limitation at the moment. SD has about 800 million parameters, powerful but not nearly enough to generate complex, fully coherent images (if you look hard enough, something is always off even in the best generations, unless post-processed). SDXL is officially coming out tomorrow with 3.5 billion (or 7 billion if you count the refiner too). As models grow in size, they learn from fewer examples and "understand" subtler details, making the scenes increasingly coherent and convincing. I'm pretty sure within the next year or two we will reach the human threshold, where the current problems become imperceptible. I'm also fairly certain this won't stay an art tool, it will become a "reality engine" powering most of the entertainment industry and beyond.

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      Did you make that yourself? Catbox?

    • 8 months ago
      Anonymous

      i had the same thought. there will be new mediums of entertainment where you hang out in a setting and interact with interesting characters. movies and video games will go the way of vaudeville and radio dramas before the decade is out.

  82. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    depends on what you make I guess

  83. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
    Because it's always Japanese/Korean girls.

  84. 8 months ago
    Anonymous

    I can't wait till someone or some company finally merges this trend in A.I art with realistic 3d Holograms. Imagine turning something that looks damn lifelike on paper into something fully 3d that looks human and moves/acts human to. Then combine that with personality traits. (Aka Star Trek's Holodeck). You could walk into your house and be greeted by Claire Redfield or Tifa Lockheart for example. (and have a nice 3 some with them to)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *