Do people unironically enjoy this crap or are they just memeing? You know, just to piss off real artists?
Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
Do people unironically enjoy this crap or are they just memeing? You know, just to piss off real artists?
bweeeh dey took ourjebs
be nice to skynet, she just wanted to trace good art to learn how to draw!
cute e-girls inb4 hypocritical furgays sexualize this
theoretically speaking is it possible for stable diffusion to make lgbt flags specifically just for trolling? whats gonna happen if i try to make a prompt like [X anime character holding transgender flag] will it just break? an i apply this to the /trash/ version but this time use zoophile MAP flags just to piss off furries
can you add stealthy ZETA symbols and queen of spades BBC logo in the form of tattoos for your generated character while perfectly blending it with the artstyle and make it appear as if this patreon artist was into BLACKED content
OR what about assigning AI to mimic a certain artist's nice drawing style using while only pirated and leaked porn from pay sites alone and make it appear as if that X artist actually commissioned this as people could not tell the difference.
Mwahaha i think this might be an essential toolkit for my anti-furry agenda to save the third worlders but how do i make money out of this?
Coomer paradise.
it always looks kinda glazed
most monkeys go for the "2.5D" look, which has that ugly glazed/glossy detailing (easily avoided, they just won't because they like the ugly look) coupled with higher contrast and saturation than most non-AI art, which makes things worse
Quite often the results look like the subject has an awful skin condition, kek, and boobs are almost always colored really weird. Fixable, but few will fix all the jank in their outputs, probably are the few that actually know how to use Photoshop/gimp/etc.
>coupled with higher contrast and saturation than most non-AI art
huh, I think most AI stuff looks too low contrast, gray-ish and washed out.
cool story, /b/ro
There's some truth to this. The models up until recently were slightly wrong in their denoising math. Merely reversing the noising process didn't actually guarantee a full range of possible results, and most images hovered around a middle-gray sort of average. That has however been improved and soon the base models will have the new denoising built in.
IT'S GLAZED ALRIGHT
Have you looked at a broad sample of human made art?
People say the exact same thing about anime/manga art drawn by humans. And that's immensely popular. Hell, that's the origin of BOT.
is this /sdg/?
> Do people unironically enjoy this crap or are they just memeing? You know, just to piss off real artists?
Real artists make worse content
Would
You're not beating the "aigays judge art with their dick" allegations. Porn addicts are worse at evaluating art than the average person.
Here, enjoy some of my non 1girl art.
I have a whole twitter with this stuff and I quite enjoy making non 1girls
This sucks
Ok
Most of the artgays were earning with coombait as well. Making huge/flat breasts for (You)s and money is not something exclusive to AI.
Nerds are tasteless homosexuals.
Ever seen what clueless autists produce?
>any random deviant art account
>nostalgia critic
they are literally incapable of creating anything that communicates soul and personality
>Nerds are tasteless homosexuals.
*the masses are tasteless
no different from most anons
the problem is that autistic nerds are the ones programming this shit, so their complete lack of taste seeps intrinsically into the images their programs produce
>I had a girlfriend
Doubt.
>the only people who have girlfriends are successful chads who got all their shit together
moronic incel meme
>I was successful beyond measure in society
>;)
that happened
personally i never got the hype. my dopamine receptors are fried. i cant goon to this. im waiting for the ai video generator to actually be good so i can generate all the fap material i could ever want
This protocol has the potential to activate a dopamine reset and reboot the brain and mind.
moron shit
>Activate windows now
>ACKtive
kek you are just like me also what is this NAC protocol though?
i heard feds are using AI to create realistic CP is this actually real or just an deep web urban legend?
also somebody made a stable diffusion model just specifically for e-girls
Given how hard the artgays are chimping out I don’t think we’ll ever see NSFW AI videos. Given the amount of OF thots
>I don’t think we’ll ever see NSFW AI videos
already exist
you think the complaining actually does anything? Real life isn't Twitter, and the march of progress is ongoing still.
>my dopamine receptors are fried. i cant goon to this. im waiting for the ai video generator to actually be good so i can generate all the fap material i could ever want
>not doing dopamine detox and nofap/semen retention just to coom more to more degenerate things
you are far from the abyss
I use it to make cool background art
this is like me posting a generic anime girl and saying human art is soulless trash. There's plenty of good and bad in both, and it's getting harder and harder to tell that a pic was made by a bot. Especially landscape art like what
made
Lemme just post a doodle by chris-chan and say that all human-made art is garbage
>soulless
"Idk what to say so I'll just say some bs that appeals to emotions"
>real artists
Your average "it's soulless, you'll never be a real wom- I mean artist" twitter artist is drawing busty animal women with schlongs, those pictures have less artistic value then your average Midjourney image
>do people unironically enjoy this
And yes, people do enjoy it, the pic you posted is mid and generic, so no wonder that is your opinion, it's like going to the trading page of pixiv, human made art, but all the same generic anime girls in generic poses.
If you look at anything not coomer related you might discover the simple fact that AI, as a tool, can't fix the lack of creativity of it's user, some people make beautiful images with AI, because they are creative, some stick to generic stuff that just looks good, because it's easy to make high quality style with AI.
"appeals to emotions" is the whole point of art though.
It's an empty argument that doesn't mean anything. It's just a word meant to sound "deep", but doesn't add anything to the discussion, nor does it prove anything. Please come back once you have an actual argument
>those pictures have less artistic value then your average Midjourney image
even if your strawman was trye, your midjourney generations have 0 artistic value and its users create nothing.
>"s-says who"
the nature of art
Art is about expressing yourself, it doesn't specify how. Painting is about taking an idea from your mind and putting it on paper to show everyone else. AI art is about taking an idea from your head and putting it on digital canvas, only instead of your hand doing brush strokes you use words and other guides to make the AI create the image, the human is still in full control over what the final image contains and when it's good enough to be considered done. It is not painting, but it definitely is art, just a different medium
And with controlnet/img2img you can have almost full control over picture composition.
Stuff still sucks with multiple characters but there are workarounds
you're deluding yourself into thinking you're expressing yourself. machine goes brrr and you think "this is totally what I wanted".
>it's definitely art
and troons are definitely women. keep the affirmations, maybe you'll summon them into reality.
>"this is totally what I wanted".
do you feel that way when you draw something by hand?
Personally I don't like how AI art is always lit the same, everything always has this studio lighting quality to it, even ones where it's obviously outside
>AI art is always lit the same, everything always has this studio lighting quality to it
That is absolutely not the case man.
it is absolutely the case, it's piss easy to recognize an AI pic
Soul
>unobservant ai fanboy npcs don't see the problems with the generated pics
The plants obviously but removing them is less work than making everything from scratch
It's not just the plants. You'd have to make everything from scratch anyway. Look at any of the pics for too long and you'll see what I mean. The penguin's face is messed up. The avocado is bleeding. The robot is missing its right hand. The banana has a round end. The original image has a bunch of fine details, like the labels on the binders, but fine details are rare in the generated images and where they appear, they're fricked up somehow, like the disconnected lights on the Christmas tree.
The generations also miss the entire point of the original's composition. The original isn't just a woman working on a laptop, it's a woman working on a laptop in a suitable cozy environment, but all the generations are just that thing. The only one with anything close to the original's composition is the wood cabin, but it's also the most fricked up - an inside campfire next to some unrecognizable objects?
There's nothing salvageable from them. They're not even good for ideas or starting-points for your own illustrations. Just uninspired AI slop.
>some proof of concept pic for reference only controlnet has issues
>means all ai art is unsalvageable garbage
Off the meds again artsistser?
>nooo i-it's just a proof of concept
Backpedaling already? I'm still surprised people this
unobservant exist. Actual NPC behavior. The biggest problem with them is not that the AI stupidly put potted plants in every image. The biggest problem is that 0 of the output images match the composition of the original.
>means all ai art is unsalvageable garbage
I didn't say all AI art, but I'll let you quote me on that anyway because it's true.
That's okay sister, you got a ~year of furry poop commissions left, you got some time to get a job.
Not everything is about smut, ai coomer.
Yeah, but your earnings are about some disgusting smut, sadly. You still got time.
Assumptions like that don't land if they're wrong, you know. I'm not a smut artist, or even an artist. Just someone concerned that the quality of all media is going to sharply decline in the next 10 years and the useful idiots cheering it on are cumbrained porn addicts.
Yeah, because it's going to miss the whole human SOVL aspect, right?
>Furries
aNimE iS soVleSS --ACK!
>also furhomosexuals
commissions pic related that's right ! a funko pop of their fursona
>Real artists
The ones trying to get children to kill themselves for doing a skin tone one gradient too light?
I will never understand this pantomime that AI will steal art jobs, while being fricking blind to how bad the existing market already was before AI came along.
Fiver did more, measurable, and lasting damage than AI ever could, AI just exacerbated the problem. Call me when pretentious twats on art station start making images of India/China with lines through them. Digital art is a extremely competitive hell scape full of literal fricking scams, plagiarism, and you have artists constantly trying to destroy other artists in public arenas trying to get a single crumb of attention. And please don't give me "that's not all artists" it's fricking most of them. The starving artist has always been an butthole and always will be. The frauds who have their job because of their uncle can actually manage to be nice and take a shower every so often.
I haven't even gotten started on shit like
The market is shit, has been shit for a long time, and AI won't destroy it, but it should. This is cope, plain and simple. It's "durr hurr, for exposure" all over again. Artists blaming other people rather than taking a good hard look at the current situation and evaluating what if any role they themselves played in it.
In the meantime there is also a useful tool for any artist who doesn't want to spend 12 hours texturing a cobblestone, or needs five pictures of snowflakes to put into the background of their snow scene.
AI is certainly going to reduce the price for freelance artists' works/commissions. It's already happening.
Whether it is going to hurt employed artists or not, we'll see
the best part is the most insufferable homosexuals of them all are the furry artists, and the furgays have been running triple shifts to make their models outstandingly capable
expect a lot of "artists" roping in the next few years when they discover their paypiggies aren't giving them patreonbux anymore
I see everything you mention and agree with most of it. If you're a designer and already know how to draw that stuff from scratch you probably won't be able to benefit from that tool in that way. But for someone that just knows a little photoshop and needs some filler pictures for his website I think they're perfectly salvageable, compared to paying $1k for a better result few will notice or care about.
>But for someone that just knows a little photoshop and needs some filler pictures for his website I think they're perfectly salvageable
I personally don't want to live in the world where 95% of illustration is vapid AI slop for unobservant people. Better that person has no filler pictures at all and just lets the human-generated content stand alone. It's the same with AI generated writing, which is already common and becoming even more so. Do you really want more mass-produced low-substance content on the internet? There's a few creative fields that have declined a lot in the past 100 years in the name of convenience. Generative AI will speed that up that process tenfold.
You need to understand what you or me like or want has no effect in the usefulness or future of a technology. It's good to have taste and opinions but you shouldn't let them cloud your judgement.
I don't think that's true. it might even improve the future of AI. If people who think like me keep ridiculing AI "artists," maybe less of them will feel emboldened to upload their slop to the internet, which means less of it will pollute the training sets of the next generation of AI models. There's literally no downside to being as critical as possible of AI art.
The fact that other soulless art exists doesn't justify making more. That should be obvious. All AI art looks like Corporate Memphis to me and the idea of it spreading is terrifying.
Don't care gay (you) 0 coombait
AI gays infinite coombait
I side with ai gays
Sure, but you'll get the ridicule you deserve for cooming to slop.
>muh slop
sorry it's not an argument sister
Whatever you say, coomer
>muh coomer
sorry it's not an argument sister
Just hit the refresh button until it gets it right
I love how there's plants everywhere
Something got me thinking if AI could create "drawn" basedjaks out of IRL photos like iphone filters without any problem can the same AI be theoretically redesigned and trained to make algeria art the polygonal style looks straightforward on the outside (if this is your thing) and at the end of the day the algorithm just creates things out of circled or triangular shaped clipart so this should be easy right? unlike anime where every single pixel matters?
Can a team of competent developers technically make a good 2d indie game using algeria without making it "soul less" something like night in the woods artstyle but with "rounded" weird looking pastel scenes and characters
To be fair i beg to differ this looks wholesome enough compared to the overhyped interface of KDE i'd choose this thing over the tyson tan fiasco on libreoffice (also this was originally meant for tablets but for some reason wanglows decided it was perfect for win 11 even though the old win10 appearance was really snappy)
I guess the saying goes "An idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity" but on the other hand i miss the old android 4.0 interface with old blue button black boxes for window management
Sadly the people who design these on their GUIs (looking at you apple and google) don't bother making their code efficient no wonder why a single greeter webpage consumes about 1GB of ram just for that vector animation (hence why SVG and webpages have a bad name these days)
**sorry for the bump but this felt important**
yeah just keep refreshing until your GPU melts unlike you i don't have a spare PC let alone a properly cooled one
NICE! that'll trigger the women hating furgays on /trash/ and their artificial womb fantasies
Anybody? i want some serious answers
'Soulless' is what pseuds say when they can't come up with an 'intelligent' reason not to like something.
'Soulless' is a term with an obvious meaning, but only to the ensouled.
I am not artist. I can't even draw or make music. I have however used these models. It is addicting.
I do however always remember a quote (that I have to translate from the original language) when using these models: "...Surely if the artist stays true to himself, to his vision, it is bound to be real art."
At least when I use these models, I can't be true to my vision. I have very different thing in my mind when I am prompting and something entirely different comes out. I just choose what outputs I like the most. To me it is no different that going to a real artist and giving them a note with all the requirements and then choosing the best one that they make. I came up with the idea, but I had really no control over the vision.
I can't be true to myself or my vision when using the tools, so I can't call what I produce with them "Art". To me they are similar experience to a google image search. I input strings of text and I get lovely images to look at.
People who "enjoy" pics like that enjoy them for one specific reason. They think art and artists only exist to provide them free smut to goon to. To them, the promise of an unlimited amount of smut in that highly-detailed "trending on artstation" rendered style overrides any concern about it looking fake or soulless, especially since most human artists capable of that style don't use their talents on smut, and for true porn addicts, lack of sufficient content becomes a problem.
I just wanna jerk off to things people will never draw for one reason or another
The reason it looks soulless is because they use soulless models with soulless, vague descriptions written for millions of images. It's the averaging out of photographs and generic anime style.
If you train a LoRA with good descriptions it becomes not soulless. In the buzz word sense, anyways. It's still literally soulless.
AI art is better than 90% of what artists can draw.
I generate really good looking picture with it without much effort
damn, can you generate one with them eating the fruit please?
>them
dilate
Cute face and eyes.
Normals hands are the only welcome AI pics.
Delicious armpits. Did you pay attention to those in the prompt or are those default armpits?
they're standard. Its the hands and face that sometimes need inpainting/adetailer to fix
ah yes, inpaint old woman's hand on her
>adetailer
What's this?
inpaint-related extension that works in txt2img, where you gen whatever you prompt for
fixes the face and hand details. You might notice a "ghost face" when you have full body pictures or multiple people in the pictures and adetailer will help fix this a ton
So, it just does that automatically?
for example I used adetailer on this picture. Without it the character would have a ghost like face.
What is the technical reason behind all AI art looking like this, regardless of the art style? The effect is most notable is the art includes any human or non-human characters, but the AI glaze is always noticeable
>inb4 some autistic nerd spouting anti-artist talking points
I don’t care about the politics, I’m just curious about the reason
>What is the technical reason behind all AI art looking like this, regardless of the art style?
Because most people choose those styles? Depends on what you mean by "AI glaze" though.
>choose those styles
What styles? I just said that the art style does not matter, the recognizable AI glaze is always present
What is AI glaze?
>Because most people choose those styles?
Question mark after an assertion to simulate basedboy inflection. You know which social media site you belong on, and it isn't this one
I dunno what "AI glaze" is caused by but it's just that blur, softness, or smudginess you see in most generations. It'd be cool to get rid of it since it's easily the #1 reason AI art looks like AI art. It doesn't affect every model or prompt though so I have no idea what causes it.
People here love airbrushed asiatics. And they almost always use a face fixing postprocess that guarantees extra airbrushing.
It's bad at eyes, they are complex. It only recently managed to make passable eyes.
>What is the technical reason behind all AI art looking like this, regardless of the art style?
It's a style thing. A lot of guys got started using the same [pretty, perfect] prompts and never stopped using them, and don't create their own models either. The result is an inbred collection.
source of this house
https://files.catbox.moe/8bmxqe.png
thank you also archived incase that goes down
ive only heard furgays kvetching so far on plebbit while the pirate sites actually praise this (looking at you blitzdrachin sifyro)
>AI gives a perfect slight belly outline for maximum fertility
I kneel AI-sama
i like AI porn
stupid question but can AI create photorealistic european women ? i am about to run an experimental detransitioning programme on imageboards to stop furgays from betraying their species (and no im not one of those south korean ricecels beore you ask)
also i saved this copypasta for analysis on feds chan
to
nice space marine might use this for trolling material
AI can create whatever you want if you have a big enough training set + GPU time
this is the most realistic ai image i've seen
Same. I don't look at many ai generated images though.
cute
We know we are not worthy O great Lord Mitama
Please purify us
Please cleanse us Lord Mitama
We beg for you to hear our prayer
AI is the present now for art
anyone can make art
anyone could make art before, moron
yes just learn for 10 years bro
>Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
Yeah, it really nailed the fluoride stare of 3d women.
shoo shoo back to /ic/
You might be a genuine homosexual if you care about the soul and not the hamuna hamuna awooga in this pic
>hamuna hamuna
>awooga
TOINGgGgGgGg
You should be happy for them - after all, they're locking themselves behind the desk, hitting generate for hours and eventually coping that one image is what they wanted all along, while you just draw what you want.
I like the expmix style
here you go, op
wow i didnt even realize this is possible nice here's another resource i found on a really old character AI thread might ruin someone's fanfiction with this
Mad lad made a Chris-chan checkpoint.
the hero we need
AI is constantly evolving
Give it time
the problem is that people are always showing off the most "realistic" or "high quality" pieces
and it's realistic/high quality art which looks soulless in general
I don't think 'high art' as in works created for exhibits or museums are in any danger. Because this art is so connected to the artist themselves. Identity matters a lot in the art world. AI art has no identity and thus will never appeal in this domain, though it might find use incidentally here and there. But this is a pretty rarefied field that is increasingly irrelevant to the rest of culture.
For artists employed by businesses like entertainment companies (either directly or in freelance situations), they are in small danger. But more than being in danger, they will see their workflows and expectations. They are going to have to learn to use these tools, not as a replacement for their own skills, but to work faster and to be more productive. Or they will lose to those who have both types of skills. Something similar occurred with digital artists in the past.
It is the ones churning out commissioned fanart for a few bucks that are in great danger, if some of them aren't already feeling it. But it's not as if this income source has ever been stable to begin with. Some of them will also learn to the use the tools. The business model will change however. Instead of paying to get one piece of artwork, people will pay to get a bunch of pieces and the artist will spend the same amount of time as before in between generating and applying their own fixes and touches.
Hey, I like big breasts, AI-made or otherwise.
Most of it it's really mediocre looking, doesn't have a 1/5 of the charm that real art does. Maybe it's on par with mediocre Indonesian vtuber fanart.
breasts
This has more soul than any thing made in the last 15 years.
You are just using the wrong prompts.
As a digital anime artist who sells drawings I think it's great. It's a bittersweet feeling that I'm becoming increasingly obsolete but many of these AI drawings have godlike colors and value structures and I save many of them into my refs folder and study them. There will come a day when AI can do "everything" but in the short term I think they will mostly serve as tools to empower human artists like how together with an AI generated script could make the basis of a blockbuster fantasy movie, or how a one man team could create their own 24 episode anime show with AI generated BGs, coloring and inbetweening. I'd say the future looks bright for entertainment and artists who b***h about it are selfish luddites
Oh yeah and you will also probably be able to voice an entire cast of cartoon characters on your own by running the lines through AI software too.
Essentially AI will ironically cause an explosion of creativity as single individuals with quirky ideas who lack the skillsets and would normally never receive funding will soon be able to create content rivaling the most spectacular AAA stuff on their own
In the end the ideas guy turned out to be the most powerful
I can’t say that looks bad, the art direction is top notch
it looks nice and man kind making something so amazing is PURE soul
1. Look at the eyes. Easy tell most of the time.
2. Look at clothing and objects. Do they make sense? In 3D? Are they consistent and symmetrical? Check the background too.
3. Look for discontinuities, eg. pencil lines that turn into shading, ribbons and strands of hair disappearing behind clothing.
4. Look for vagueness, eg. parts of the image that are supposed to be detailed or intricate become unrecognizable or start looking like a posterized photo rather than intentional illustration
>Look at the eyes. Easy tell most of the time.
there's this general feeling of being fake but I can't tell why
> look for the [insert some criticsm]
You can say the EXACT same shit about any handdrawn artwork made by a non-professional and you KNOW it.
tbf AI gen stuff has this look that screams AI, I'm not sure how to put it in words, it has that best quality, masterpiece feeling to it you know lol
Damn that is not ai
>he he, look at this flaws that even a grandmaster artist would occasionally frickup, let alone the bottom 80% of them
>that means AI bad
This reminds me of a post about how one anon had expectations and got exactly what he wanted and complained about it. Not fricking shit it's "soulless" and "fake" it was made by an AI.
most people aren't trying to create art with it. they're trying to create porn and sexy ladies, and they're succeeding at that.
Why don't writers whine to the same extent about LLMs as "artists" are doing regarding AI-generated images?
because every other artist is a troony
they do, but AI users don't try to pass as writers as much as illustrators
>Why don't writers whine to the same extent about LLMs as "artists" are doing regarding AI-generated images?
Because an image is not a complete process for AI while writing still has a way to go before we get novels.
Because an image IS a complete process.
Might that image be your creation?
Yeah, used a Milim Nava LoRA to make it.
Have you ever seen an AI try to "write?" It's absolute dogshit. At least sometimes AI art is unusual or interesting to look at.
>Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
So do the girls in modern pornography so I don't really get your point.
yeah it looks "interpolated"
im guessing it will become better, but i dont understand the obsession either
>fake and soulless
That's why it does women so well
People don't enjoy it, right wingers do. Right wingers are unironically lower IQ than leftists (just look at college enrollment stats) and creatively bankrupt (look at the leftist presence in creative spheres vs right wing one). Since they're too cognitively underdeveloped to appreciate aesthetic implications of the art, a simple imitation made by a pattern-seeking stochastic parrot is enough to creatively satisfy the small mind of a right-winger.
>just look at college enrollment stats
Isn't there currently agitation for the president to step in for college debt precisely because people are struggling with their degrees?
Can be pretty good.
>hu tao
>breasts
heresy
I just like watching me fav characters in real irl hyperealistic style ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I prefer handmade art but it's nice too on the lack of equivalent handmade art.
are people saying that it's soulless are artists coping?
No you stupid homosexual, they're either morons like you or CRAFTSPEOPLE who can "draw" and "paint" but will never know the true meaning of ART, nor will you
digital "art" has never been considered art and all the ai guys only make porn with it, which has also never been considered art. anybody with a basic understanding of art (photography and paintings in this case) can tell when something is ai generated because there's no thought put into framing, lighting, composition and etc.
>photography and paintings
THIS dont forget philosophy and historical heritage (especially from nonwhite countries) sadly most furgays literally rate X artistic value based on whether it turns them on under the guise of talent
-- copied
i remember that one time on lainchan /hum/ vent said that people only value art judging by how fappable its is nobody gives a frick about classical shit anymore except for "muh nostalgia" furries dont just destroy everything they are much worse as they corrupt whatever they touch
burn in hell
why it was human porn not disgusting furbait
you'll be the one burning, coomer
It is soulless, just like the Indians who shill for it.
Why is every AI generated girl always Asian? Without fail, 95% of the time I see one of these pictures posted here it's some Asian bawd.
>download model from chang's personal QQ site
>its all asian WHY are there no westerners
dude AI is the norm on chinkland get used to this
>people self expose them on social media, basically tons of softcore made by themselves, with their high resolution cameras from the smartphone
>scrap all that
>feed into local model
>have infinite pr0n of every person you want, can tune the image to your taste, make it more real than reality
>advanced multimodal cumming utilities, sex toys
>high resolution vr
>hifi audio
>high speed internet
>etc
golden era of coom
>low effort shit looks fake and soulless
then stop posting it yo uhomosexual
softcore porn isnt art
I hate coomers
Why her right boob looks bigger. Does ai make the same mistakes as human artists?
Yeah, it doesn't have to and can avoid it, but the person inputting the prompt has to be experienced enough. (Often not)
The AI is trained on human-made images after all.
Coomers have ruined AI.
WOAAAAAAAHHHH MAAAAMAAAAA!!!!!! HUMINA HUMINA HUMINA HUMINA!!!!!!!! BABY WANTS MILKYYYY!!!!!!
Imagine being told by a supercomputer your face algorithmically correlates with massive exposed breasts.
what does being black have to do with being sexualized?
as the tweet is saying, black people have been fetishized for centuries
bullshit, everyone knows blacks are ugly
ugly =! hot/sexual/etc
blacks may be ugly but black men are fetishized as big dick and black women as very sexual active people
>100% match. Titcow physiognomy. That will be 19.99
>no prompts
yeah she doesnt know what the words sexy and cute mean
The AI sexualized her because it realized this was the only thing that would get her a job.
humblebrag
>AI is sexualizing me!!! D:
why do you westerners keep fapping to Brazilian women so much bunch of losers from home
I have a vpn, and clear cookies, but websites still indentify you using MAC, operating system, digital finger prints like fonts and other active programs, sometimes monitor and screen size.
But if I can open up roms, run old windows, and dos box, I would think I could make my computer look like anything else? Is there an app or program to randomize all my computers footprints so sites can't identify me?
AI art looks as fake and soulless as the tastes of the guy who gens it.
I have been arguing against this kind of garbage in the AI image gen threads for almost a year now. I make no progress. They like that shit.
AI is very limited in what it can do. As such you have to make trade-offs. In their pride, some think they can generate perfection—perfect hands, perfect bodies, perfect faces. They use over-finetuned models which cannot do light and shadow correctly. They produce aesthetically offensive trash, slimy, uncanny, creepy. They don't see anything wrong with it.
nice cope artgay
I've prompted as much 1girl as anyone. Don't you dare call me that.
You, however, look like a blind Black person.
and you will never be a woman
Whenever I try to use SD, it never comes out looking as good as this.
What are they doing different?
Custom models from civitai and a good base prompt, also higher resolution helps.
Imo best is to start at 512x768, then use hi-res fix with 0.6 denoise strength and at least 1.25 upscale
I've been using the SD model this whole time like a chump. The other models look way better. Thanks
Is there anywhere to go to see AI art? is there a curated online gallery somewhere? have any particular images endured?
the SDG general and just use the tbharchives to look at the older generals
https://civitai.com/images
hate these things because it just shows how permanently imprinted those things are in my head even though i've only seen the real one like 3-4 times 10+ years ago
>Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
who fricking cares about what you think of BOT you dumb homosexual. you're not better than anyone because you don't like computer art. get your head out of your homosexual ass.
>and they kept calling me "Soulless", "Aislop", "pajeet" and making fun of my hands, they were so mean...
This is another one of those "the closer you look, the more it sucks" type AI images.
have you tried getting better tastes?
Does anyone else see hands in stable diffusion where the are no hands? Like ghost hands? It's hard to explain. Like there are no actual hands there, but if you look at the image out of the corner if your eyes, you swear you can see an arm or a hand in the negative space of the image.
I know what you mean anon. Sometimes you don't see hands even if they're there too, like this image is a decent example(not the best though).
Sometimes the image will complete right before a step threshold where it would start drawing more hands or .. well more anything. And your brain will instantly pick up on that even if there's like .. literally nothing there to see. But you can kind of see or feel the intent of the AI in these rare cases.
Maybe I didn't explain it properly but yeah I do know what you mean.
deep cream pie inside
The hyper-realist stuff looks like crap, but if you use it right you can make some neat images.
The great thing is that Stable Diffusion offers a way of bending the knee to search engines and poorgay artists.
I just wanted my wood grain background, not to stare at 7 ads, read 3 cry stories about how some troony can't transition without $5 for their stupid ass wood grain digital art.
Welcome to the self-sufficient future
>read 3 cry stories about how some troony
stop actively looking for troony stories you lying homosexual.
while getting material ref is easier thanks to it, getting reference for fictional subjects is becoming increasingly difficult. no, I don't want your melted wax abominations, I want to look at actual illustrations for reference.
I don't get why you need to draw these girls with AI? Do you guys not have imagination?
If I think about a tomboy goblin girl I get a 3D visual in my mind that I can manipulate and touch
how are images like picrel generated?
img2img with high denoise
>Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
must be why it's so good at doing asians
Skill and taste issue, on top of a technological limitation at the moment. SD has about 800 million parameters, powerful but not nearly enough to generate complex, fully coherent images (if you look hard enough, something is always off even in the best generations, unless post-processed). SDXL is officially coming out tomorrow with 3.5 billion (or 7 billion if you count the refiner too). As models grow in size, they learn from fewer examples and "understand" subtler details, making the scenes increasingly coherent and convincing. I'm pretty sure within the next year or two we will reach the human threshold, where the current problems become imperceptible. I'm also fairly certain this won't stay an art tool, it will become a "reality engine" powering most of the entertainment industry and beyond.
Did you make that yourself? Catbox?
i had the same thought. there will be new mediums of entertainment where you hang out in a setting and interact with interesting characters. movies and video games will go the way of vaudeville and radio dramas before the decade is out.
depends on what you make I guess
>Ai generated "art" looks so fake and soulless
Because it's always Japanese/Korean girls.
I can't wait till someone or some company finally merges this trend in A.I art with realistic 3d Holograms. Imagine turning something that looks damn lifelike on paper into something fully 3d that looks human and moves/acts human to. Then combine that with personality traits. (Aka Star Trek's Holodeck). You could walk into your house and be greeted by Claire Redfield or Tifa Lockheart for example. (and have a nice 3 some with them to)