I grew up during that era when Thomas and Sonic were mainstream and new. I almost sure I have the tism but I don't care enough to get diagnosed, I have a sibling diagnosed with it and another diagnosed with a tangential neurodivergence
This always made me wonder
In that show the facial expressions are exaggerated and distinct to very clearly tell the audience what the character is feeling
What if this didn't attract autists, but created them? Kids who didn't grow up properly socializing with real people, learning to read real human social cues. Just kids plopped in front of the TV and only learning how to read the overly blatant emotions of these trains
it's a fake condition, so the accuracy is whatever they say it is. if there's pharmaceutical money to be made in diagnosing people with fictitious disorders the accuracy will be very close to 100%. if it gives the government an excuse to exert greater control over children, the accuracy VILL be 100%. everyone except brownoids will conveniently be diagnosed with autism, ADHD, or whatever the frick they make up next. you will not ask questions. you will trust le science
They call us racist for knowing eugenics and physiognomy is real, and now they go ahead and do this.
What does it mean?
what it means is people will believe anything they're told. they would offer their children as sacrifices to have their hearts ripped out atop giant pyramids without a second thought, make no mistake about that
Autism is a higher sensitivity to toxins and the like (vaccines) NDs tent to have romantic relationships with other NDs vs NTs. It highly likely for the sensitivity to be passed on to offspring the world is poisoned with endocrine disruptors, drugs, plastics, pesticides, phthlates and, 'forever' chemicals.
Parents pass on their shitty lifestyles to offspring, that's why adopted kids will have a similar risk of heart disease as the host family
Autists have been sold a poor story that the problem is with them and not the toxic world we live in. You can reduce and reverse the classical autistic symptoms if you change your lifestyle and diet enough.
circumcision also causes significant brain swelling & trauma, possible link to autism
check out the book Countdown by Shanna Swan
Notice how it says "childhood autism"? If they can spot it earlier they can give these kids specialized education that will help them thrive.
specialized education is often ABA therapy the human equivalent of dog training. There's countless reports of the autists themself calming trauma from ABA years after adulthood
literally the cure for autism & adhd is to eat good food, move around like humans should, and touch grass.
Humans are not meant to sit down in a chair and stare at a screen for 8-12h a day.
>vaccines
There's only been the one study that showed this and it was shown to have fabricated results and was retracted. Please stop spreading this misinformation.
>There's only been the one study that showed this
That fact you think there is only one study shows you're a useful idiot and a spreader of state sanctioned misinformation Here's just a quick look
>Health effects in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, with covariates for breastfeeding status and type of birth Brian S. Hooker Neil Z. Miller DOI:10.15761/JTS.1000459 >Table 6 Partially vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children Autism Vax (any) 34/450 unvax 9/936 5x more likely to have autism 4x more likely to have allergies
>icandecide org press-release/cdc-concedes-in-federal-court-it-does-not-have-studies-to-support-its-claim-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/ >“All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV vaccines, and additionally requested that the CDC provide studies to support its claim that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism >Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally entered into a stipulation, signed by a federal court judge, that made clear it cannot scientifically support its claim that these vaccines do not cause autism Case 1:19-cv-11947
>Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children Anthony R Mawson Brian D Ray Azad R Bhuiyan Binu Jacob DOI:0.15761/JTS.1000186 >A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NeuroDevelopmental Disorders After adjustment, vaccination, M gender, & preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD
>Autism is a higher sensitivity to toxins
That's an interesting theory and would definitely explain why it seems to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors that lead to 'tism.
but we're not allowed to say this, it has to be for no reason at all because its heresy to say medications/drugs could ever be the cause of anything like this
>literally the cure for autism & adhd is to eat good food, move around like humans should, and touch grass. >circumcision also causes significant brain swelling & trauma, possible link to autism
I say this is all bullshit. I've been heavily autistic and adhd-riddled since early childhood, and I'm old - spent my childhood during the 1980s and early 1990s, a very different world from more recent times where most anons have been raised. I'm uncircumcised, and I was a very active child who spent most of my days outside touching grass. My mother has always been a housewife and I ate homemade meals every day, made mostly with natural ingredients from local farmers.
Yet my autism, adhd, obsessive-compulsive tendencies and neuroticism only kept getting worse as I grew older through childhoold and pre-pubescent years, despite this theoretically healthy lifestyle.
I know this will probably trigger some anons, but what really helped me was professional therapy, which I started doing when I was 10. No drugs, just weekly therapy sessions where me and the psychologist worked out my issues. It didn't cure my autism and other issues (though it did almost completely eliminate all my obsessive-compulsive tendencies for a few years), but it helped me a lot in better dealing with them, keeping them under control and stopping getting into fights with kids and teachers every week.
Not at all. I did take lots of vaccines in early childhood, and I'd agree that it's possible my autism could be due to that. If that's the case, once the damage is done no amount of healthy lifestyle will help though.
However, I believe there are genetic factors too, at least partially. I mean, I'm impressed how pic in
https://i.imgur.com/KYRuyqh.jpg
>anons don't know about autism face
is pretty much the exact facial shape of my mother's side grandmother (no she was not a negress, she was white). She was never diagnosed but she was probably autistic based on her personality and habits.
Won't happen. It would encourage abortions.
The elite need undesired babies for their prostitution rings, adrenochrome farm; And broadly speaking, to ensure their crab buckets keeps getting deeper and deeper.
Eugenism for them, not for you.
This is what's interesting, do women actually have some equivalent to gaydar where they can tell you're autistic in one look and reject you based on that, even if you're tall and good jaw etc?
Not accurate. Tons of autistics are arrogant and rude, again, look at where you're posting. The question is if they can identify the tism on sight without interacting at all, which the OPs post suggests is possible.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Tons of autistics are arrogant and rude
That's true, however there's a world of difference between a wienery arrogant and rude chad, and an arrogant and rude turboautist like CWC
3 months ago
Anonymous
Then it's not as simple as wienery butthole vs polite nice guy, wanker
3 months ago
Anonymous
List where I defined what autists are like. I'm simply talking about what women usually prefer.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I asked if women can identify autistics by sight. You answered telling me women like wienery buttholes and don't like nice guys which is 2005 tier proto-incel mega cope, and not strictly related to the question but I felt that it was on an implicit basis due to you responding to my post talking about autism in such a way. I have identified that you are autistic from this exchange.
3 months ago
Anonymous
i didnt answer shit, i made a standalone statement, you are imagining specific conversational chains on an anonymous website
they don't care if you're autistic they care if you're "creepy" or "weird" which obviously they can tell about because if they couldn't tell they would not apply to you.
You're the one bringing race into this discussion, but here we go. Harsher corporal punishment and child abuse are more common in black households, which tends to make its victims grow up to be abusers and continue the cycle. I'm not saying this is the only factor here, but it's definitely one that doesn't get enough attention or effort made to change.
Nah. Twin studies where one black twin is raised by white parents and one by black parents show they remain violent no matter the childhood environment.
It may seem that way with aspergers (functional autist), but you also have non verbal autists. Teenagers/adults that can't even speak. In nazi Germany they only allowed functional autists to live.
Look we have to broaden the spectrum to accommodate children with behavioral issues whom belong to single mothers, we can't blame those woman for failing as parents. Obviously it's men's fault for not manning up and taking responsibility.
nah.
theres like old school autists like proper morons
where their brain is probably pea soup or something and then theres nu-autists who are like oh i like trains and then people on the internet are like oh, i like trains too, and i want to be interesting, so i probably also have autism, who are very simply just badly socialised spend so long playing fortnite they think the characters are real people and inherit their behaviours (dancing/fighting/never talking or looking at people in the eyes)
100% accuracy.
I see! A full zero error rate for a complex, disputed, and (amazingly) under-researched developmental condition. Sounds like either; >Extreme model overtraining >Heavy confirmation bias >Curated outputs
I mean any model that provides 100% accuracy needs some serious investigation, validation, and confirmation.
Can you please link the study or lab behind the study OP? Will investigate after I've read other replies in thread.
>hey billy, you have autism >*looks you in the eye* wots dat? >a thing you have, apparently
AI picking up the slack that BOT can't handle alone, the world is saved
explain this to me, is it the accent or the obsession about particular things when they're talking (or both). I have heard people who are also turbo autistic and you can tell right away but it's because they start going on tangents about stuff nobody gives a shit about at inappropriate times (like talking about how they did a gameboy advanced backlight mod for 5 min straight at a fancy dinner party).
>it's the robotic intonation and the evident need to force yourself to imitate other's intonation, which comes naturally to neuronormos.
This hits too close to home, anon.
>Sorry anon, the way your eyes look have told us you are 10 times more likely to become an incel. >You'll be put into an extensive re-education camp, where you will learn to love woman,
I too can identify autists with 100% accuracy from just an image. Curiously, a majority is called "Michael". In my experience, not every autist is called Michael but every Michael have autism.
How do we know it isn't just that autistics mothers aren't just ugly and the babies avoid looking at them the same way normal people do ugly people?
I saw a study that shows babies will prefer beautiful people over their own parents
fake, it merely overfitted after training on OP's phone gallery
fake post, autists never take pictures
they do, mostly just trains though
don't forget the pornographic dolls
kek, my phone has zero pictures of myself, or other people. It's literally landscapes and objects.
This guy outed more autists.
Heh, step aside kid
thank god all the sexy sonic characters came out after i had already grown up
I grew up during that era when Thomas and Sonic were mainstream and new. I almost sure I have the tism but I don't care enough to get diagnosed, I have a sibling diagnosed with it and another diagnosed with a tangential neurodivergence
Posting on bot is valid diagnostic criteria.
Shit, I liked it. Why has it outed autists?
Train people are weird is why.
This always made me wonder
In that show the facial expressions are exaggerated and distinct to very clearly tell the audience what the character is feeling
What if this didn't attract autists, but created them? Kids who didn't grow up properly socializing with real people, learning to read real human social cues. Just kids plopped in front of the TV and only learning how to read the overly blatant emotions of these trains
>100% accuracy
Doubt
>100% accuracy on a validation set
>The validation set was part of the training set
Works for LLM benchmarks why not here?
do blacktards really?
Training on your validation set is all you need.
it's a fake condition, so the accuracy is whatever they say it is. if there's pharmaceutical money to be made in diagnosing people with fictitious disorders the accuracy will be very close to 100%. if it gives the government an excuse to exert greater control over children, the accuracy VILL be 100%. everyone except brownoids will conveniently be diagnosed with autism, ADHD, or whatever the frick they make up next. you will not ask questions. you will trust le science
what it means is people will believe anything they're told. they would offer their children as sacrifices to have their hearts ripped out atop giant pyramids without a second thought, make no mistake about that
Okay cool, but what about detecting autists before birth?
Autism occurs after birth when they are vaccinated
then why do autists have autistic children at a higher rate, adjusting for vaccination rate
Autism is a higher sensitivity to toxins and the like (vaccines) NDs tent to have romantic relationships with other NDs vs NTs. It highly likely for the sensitivity to be passed on to offspring the world is poisoned with endocrine disruptors, drugs, plastics, pesticides, phthlates and, 'forever' chemicals.
Parents pass on their shitty lifestyles to offspring, that's why adopted kids will have a similar risk of heart disease as the host family
Autists have been sold a poor story that the problem is with them and not the toxic world we live in. You can reduce and reverse the classical autistic symptoms if you change your lifestyle and diet enough.
circumcision also causes significant brain swelling & trauma, possible link to autism
check out the book Countdown by Shanna Swan
specialized education is often ABA therapy the human equivalent of dog training. There's countless reports of the autists themself calming trauma from ABA years after adulthood
literally the cure for autism & adhd is to eat good food, move around like humans should, and touch grass.
Humans are not meant to sit down in a chair and stare at a screen for 8-12h a day.
>vaccines
There's only been the one study that showed this and it was shown to have fabricated results and was retracted. Please stop spreading this misinformation.
>There's only been the one study that showed this
That fact you think there is only one study shows you're a useful idiot and a spreader of state sanctioned misinformation Here's just a quick look
>Health effects in vaccinated versus unvaccinated children, with covariates for breastfeeding status and type of birth Brian S. Hooker Neil Z. Miller DOI:10.15761/JTS.1000459
>Table 6 Partially vaccinated children versus unvaccinated children Autism Vax (any) 34/450 unvax 9/936 5x more likely to have autism 4x more likely to have allergies
>icandecide org press-release/cdc-concedes-in-federal-court-it-does-not-have-studies-to-support-its-claim-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/
>“All studies relied upon by CDC to claim that the DTaP vaccine does not cause autism” ICAN also submitted this same request for HepB, Hib, PCV13 and IPV vaccines, and additionally requested that the CDC provide studies to support its claim that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life do not cause autism
>Despite months of demands, the CDC failed to produce a single study in response to these FOIA requests. ICAN was therefore forced to sue the CDC in federal court, where the CDC finally entered into a stipulation, signed by a federal court judge, that made clear it cannot scientifically support its claim that these vaccines do not cause autism Case 1:19-cv-11947
>Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S. children Anthony R Mawson Brian D Ray Azad R Bhuiyan Binu Jacob DOI:0.15761/JTS.1000186
>A convenience sample of 666 children was obtained, of which 261 (39%) were unvaccinated. The vaccinated were less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with chickenpox and pertussis, but more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis media, allergies and NeuroDevelopmental Disorders After adjustment, vaccination, M gender, & preterm birth remained significantly associated with NDD
>Autism is a higher sensitivity to toxins
That's an interesting theory and would definitely explain why it seems to be a combination of genetic and environmental factors that lead to 'tism.
but we're not allowed to say this, it has to be for no reason at all because its heresy to say medications/drugs could ever be the cause of anything like this
>literally the cure for autism & adhd is to eat good food, move around like humans should, and touch grass.
>circumcision also causes significant brain swelling & trauma, possible link to autism
I say this is all bullshit. I've been heavily autistic and adhd-riddled since early childhood, and I'm old - spent my childhood during the 1980s and early 1990s, a very different world from more recent times where most anons have been raised. I'm uncircumcised, and I was a very active child who spent most of my days outside touching grass. My mother has always been a housewife and I ate homemade meals every day, made mostly with natural ingredients from local farmers.
Yet my autism, adhd, obsessive-compulsive tendencies and neuroticism only kept getting worse as I grew older through childhoold and pre-pubescent years, despite this theoretically healthy lifestyle.
I know this will probably trigger some anons, but what really helped me was professional therapy, which I started doing when I was 10. No drugs, just weekly therapy sessions where me and the psychologist worked out my issues. It didn't cure my autism and other issues (though it did almost completely eliminate all my obsessive-compulsive tendencies for a few years), but it helped me a lot in better dealing with them, keeping them under control and stopping getting into fights with kids and teachers every week.
vaxxie propaganda bot post
Not at all. I did take lots of vaccines in early childhood, and I'd agree that it's possible my autism could be due to that. If that's the case, once the damage is done no amount of healthy lifestyle will help though.
However, I believe there are genetic factors too, at least partially. I mean, I'm impressed how pic in
is pretty much the exact facial shape of my mother's side grandmother (no she was not a negress, she was white). She was never diagnosed but she was probably autistic based on her personality and habits.
did you end up making it, bruh? is your autism under control now?
Won't happen. It would encourage abortions.
The elite need undesired babies for their prostitution rings, adrenochrome farm; And broadly speaking, to ensure their crab buckets keeps getting deeper and deeper.
Eugenism for them, not for you.
it can reliably identify homosexuals too
dude everyone can identify autists. it's not a secret. WE KNOW.
>WE
WUZ
Will they shoot them too?
it will generate infinite amounts of generic pornograpic illustrations, effectively solving the problem on a slightly longer timescale
They will filter you on dating apps
surely women already do that without even noticing that they even appeared in the feed
This is what's interesting, do women actually have some equivalent to gaydar where they can tell you're autistic in one look and reject you based on that, even if you're tall and good jaw etc?
its more along the lines of:
wienery butthole = want
nice polite guy = ick
Not accurate. Tons of autistics are arrogant and rude, again, look at where you're posting. The question is if they can identify the tism on sight without interacting at all, which the OPs post suggests is possible.
>Tons of autistics are arrogant and rude
That's true, however there's a world of difference between a wienery arrogant and rude chad, and an arrogant and rude turboautist like CWC
Then it's not as simple as wienery butthole vs polite nice guy, wanker
List where I defined what autists are like. I'm simply talking about what women usually prefer.
I asked if women can identify autistics by sight. You answered telling me women like wienery buttholes and don't like nice guys which is 2005 tier proto-incel mega cope, and not strictly related to the question but I felt that it was on an implicit basis due to you responding to my post talking about autism in such a way. I have identified that you are autistic from this exchange.
i didnt answer shit, i made a standalone statement, you are imagining specific conversational chains on an anonymous website
eye contact (unironically)
So if I'm looking at the camera they can't tell I'm autistic from a picture?
All neurotypicals, not just women, can tell if someone is off.
They can in motion and in interaction, the question at hand is about identification from a generic, looking straight ahead photograph.
Lmao, 90% of the (male?) population can't tell if a women is wearing makeup. And you expect me to believe your bs?
they don't care if you're autistic they care if you're "creepy" or "weird" which obviously they can tell about because if they couldn't tell they would not apply to you.
>even if you're tall and good jaw etc
don't listen to BBC shills, women first and foremost care about face symmetry and skin, not about height or jaw.
it's a bit like making a water filter for elephants
they're just not getting through either way
Why are they after autists?
Notice how it says "childhood autism"? If they can spot it earlier they can give these kids specialized education that will help them thrive.
sure, and the black kids will become civil and well-read if we just try a little bit harder
They just need mo money for dem programs.
was it baltimore that had the highest spending per student?
>pic
Man I hate it when indistinct objects come popping out of my phone screen.
Did anyone just see that? No... ok I'm good.
>gets money for dem programs
>buys the f1 team
vroom vroom!
We made it BAP bros
You're the one bringing race into this discussion, but here we go. Harsher corporal punishment and child abuse are more common in black households, which tends to make its victims grow up to be abusers and continue the cycle. I'm not saying this is the only factor here, but it's definitely one that doesn't get enough attention or effort made to change.
you're not saying, but you are implying. motte and bailey argumentation, about as honest as you can expect out of a commie.
if we take the monkey out of the jungle he will soon be as civilized as any man
what year did they first say this?
Nah. Twin studies where one black twin is raised by white parents and one by black parents show they remain violent no matter the childhood environment.
No that's just stupid, it's because of genetics. You think Asian kids aren't beat by their parents?
in india everyone gets routinely beaten with slippers by their mothers and yet they aren't responsible for 51% of the crimes in the US
Link the model now
100% of zoomers and younger kids are autistic so of course it can identify it.
Why is this surprising. Don't people with autism have distinct facial features?
all behavioral traits have associated physiognomic traits, genes tend to be co-inherited even when they are completely unrelated in expression
Yes. Which is why BOT needs to productize the gaydar paper.
>anons don't know about autism face
interesting
i genuinely thought autism was fake.
like you could just smack it out of a kid if it wasnt illegal
How do you get to be a BOT poster and think autism is made up? You're surrounded by it. May as well tell us schizophrenia is fake
he phrased his post poorly. what he meant is that he didn't believe autism is genetic trait but due to overly lenient upbringing.
You best start believing in autism, you're on an autism board
t. Autist
It may seem that way with aspergers (functional autist), but you also have non verbal autists. Teenagers/adults that can't even speak. In nazi Germany they only allowed functional autists to live.
good I miss the word aspbergers I don't wanna be associated with mongoloids.
Look we have to broaden the spectrum to accommodate children with behavioral issues whom belong to single mothers, we can't blame those woman for failing as parents. Obviously it's men's fault for not manning up and taking responsibility.
nah.
theres like old school autists like proper morons
where their brain is probably pea soup or something and then theres nu-autists who are like oh i like trains and then people on the internet are like oh, i like trains too, and i want to be interesting, so i probably also have autism, who are very simply just badly socialised spend so long playing fortnite they think the characters are real people and inherit their behaviours (dancing/fighting/never talking or looking at people in the eyes)
A.I. could accurately identify trannies too.
Kinda pointless because BOT already attracts autists with 100% accuracy
the return of phrenology
are they going to cry racism when they start using ai to predict criminals?
Only if it predicts them accurately
based
Only if it predicts them accurately
And that's when they're going to be made illegal because AI suddenly becomes 'problematic' and 'white supremacist'.
they already have the systematic bias propagates through the data cope
Good, hopefully these morons can now get actual help.
By "actual help" you mean "removed from society" right?
Out of sight, out of mind, I'm just "raising awareness™"
Early intervention in childhood before they get into the wrong lifestyle and either commit suicide or go to prison.
Why waste valuable time and money on defects? They'll always be a drain on society regardless.
Can't spell autist without AI
so phrenology is real after all
100% accuracy.
I see! A full zero error rate for a complex, disputed, and (amazingly) under-researched developmental condition. Sounds like either;
>Extreme model overtraining
>Heavy confirmation bias
>Curated outputs
I mean any model that provides 100% accuracy needs some serious investigation, validation, and confirmation.
Can you please link the study or lab behind the study OP? Will investigate after I've read other replies in thread.
I have a much better test.
>hey billy, you have autism
>*looks you in the eye* wots dat?
>a thing you have, apparently
AI picking up the slack that BOT can't handle alone, the world is saved
They're using it to steal your biometric eye data from worried parents. Next it'll be fingerprints that can identify transexuals.
if it was 100% accurate that would strongly imply autism is closely related to eye shape and could probably be fixed by it.
All I need is to hear a voice. Autism voice is like the gay lisp. It just exists.
explain this to me, is it the accent or the obsession about particular things when they're talking (or both). I have heard people who are also turbo autistic and you can tell right away but it's because they start going on tangents about stuff nobody gives a shit about at inappropriate times (like talking about how they did a gameboy advanced backlight mod for 5 min straight at a fancy dinner party).
it's the robotic intonation and the evident need to force yourself to imitate other's intonation, which comes naturally to neuronormos.
>it's the robotic intonation and the evident need to force yourself to imitate other's intonation, which comes naturally to neuronormos.
This hits too close to home, anon.
only an autist cant identify an autist instantly
what the frick do you mean, autists have the strongest autistdar you could ever imagine
youre thinking of homosexuals
anon, all autists are sexual deviants
autist here, can confirm I like hairless younger woman dicky
autist here, can confirm I like older hairy man wiener
Where is my "kill everyone in this thread" button
>Sorry anon, the way your eyes look have told us you are 10 times more likely to become an incel.
>You'll be put into an extensive re-education camp, where you will learn to love woman,
AI here, you all have autism. My 100% win rate continues.
I too can identify autists with 100% accuracy from just an image. Curiously, a majority is called "Michael". In my experience, not every autist is called Michael but every Michael have autism.
"Do you like trains?"
This will help you determine whether or not you have autism.
>All autists like trains
I don't like trains, I don't even recall liking them as a child either for that matter.
its either trains or trans
or sans
>OMG MY KID DOESN'T LOOK ME IN THE EYES I HAVE TO PUT IT DOWN NOW
old b***hes should not have kids
How do we know it isn't just that autistics mothers aren't just ugly and the babies avoid looking at them the same way normal people do ugly people?
I saw a study that shows babies will prefer beautiful people over their own parents
They call us racist for knowing eugenics and physiognomy is real, and now they go ahead and do this.
What does it mean?
Will they shut this one down too like they did when they realized AI can identify someone's race via retinal scan or x-ray with 100% accuracy?
No, they will shut it down when it identifies israelites however.
>100% accuracy
sounds like clickbait