Ai can now distinguish between sex differences in the human brain.

Ai can now distinguish between sex differences in the human brain.

DR chud says “These models worked really well because we successfully separated brain patterns between sexes,” Menon said. “That tells me that overlooking sex differences in brain organization could lead us to miss key factors underlying neuropsychiatric disorders.”

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2024/02/men-women-brain-organization-patterns.html

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what a shit article
      TLDR:
      Ah yes we found differences in the 2 sex's brains. Yes the hotspots are different. Men and women react differently. This can help us investigate further. Thanks AI!

      It's a hit piece so the researchers can say they're doing something but nothing was done.
      What are the differences? what are the implications of the different brain patterns? what's the conclusion? Men and women are different and have different hormones and ways of thinking? wow so groundbreaking like that wasn't already known

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      what a shit article
      TLDR:
      Ah yes we found differences in the 2 sex's brains. Yes the hotspots are different. Men and women react differently. This can help us investigate further. Thanks AI!

      It's a hit piece so the researchers can say they're doing something but nothing was done.
      What are the differences? what are the implications of the different brain patterns? what's the conclusion? Men and women are different and have different hormones and ways of thinking? wow so groundbreaking like that wasn't already known

      well the pink and blues are not going to like this one bit

      What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics. It's a social construction, due to patriarchal structures. If a scientific study were to do the same on people who have a PTSD from their childhood, they would have the same brain patterns that people without PTSD wouldn't have, and this wouldn't have anything to do with genetics.
      Brain is just like muscles. Can't a female have more muscles than most males? Testosterone may play a role in how easy it is to grow them, but it's not the only thing that matters. Your alimentation, your training are much more likely to determine how much muscles you have, and they're not induced by genetics or hormones.

      Did they test it on transwomen and what results does it give for them? What about after HRT? I must know if the chuddies are right or wrong

      [...]
      estrogen will change brain structure slightly, theres a couple of studies on this topic but only after taking E, I would assume test for ftms would do similar things

      This could not have anything to do with hormones, such as ostrogens. Trans people are people who, from their childhood, they never felt like the gender they were assigned to. So when they're raised, they will usually refuse to conform to what's expected from their gender norm, and therefore their brain will be constructed differently, and closer to the brain patterns found in females for MTF and males for FTM, even before any hormonal therapy.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently
        Lies. There is zero evidence to support this. The only experiment ever done for this was Dr Money's and it ended proving his hypothesis wrong. All other data and real-world observations (namely from children who are abused/raised as another sex due to cultural things) point that they end up developing normally and don't become troons.
        >independently of your hormones or genetics
        Hormones regulate the function and development of organs, including the brain. It's ludicrous to assume they don't affect brain development.
        >It's a social construction, due to patriarchal structures
        Irrelevant to the discussion. Being a social construction only means that a concept or the individual's perception of reality is shaped by the society he inhabits. It doesn't mean that social constructions are inherently decoupled from the real underlying properties of the object or structure; nor does it mean that the object of structure doesn't actually exist outside of society's perception.

        In other words, you're full of shit.
        >If a scientific study were to do the same on people who have a PTSD from their childhood, they would have the same brain patterns that people without PTSD wouldn't have
        Yes, because stress shapes the brain.
        >Brain is just like muscles. Can't a female have more muscles than most males?
        No, she can't. The top 10 % women don't have the same muscle mass as the average man.
        >Trans people are people who, from their childhood, they never felt like the gender they were assigned to
        1. Gender is observed, not assigned.
        2. Irrelevant. The vast majority of trans individuals nowadays don't present gender dysphoria from a young age. It manifests suddenly during their teens/early adulthood. It's also highly correlated with heavy social media use.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          John Money's experiment was a perfect example precisely of why you morons are wrong. David was literally assigned female at birth and when raised as such hated it and wanted to be a man instead. The takeaway you people seem to have gotten is "don't let boys be girls" but you do realize that's not exactly what happened, right? Preventing people from transitioning will kill them. This is what "41%" is about. I think part of the big hangup is that you have weird beliefs and attitudes towards women in general; if David were somehow surgically given a penis at birth and raised a male I don't think you would have the same idiot opinion. Doesn't matter because Dr Money did not invent any of this gender shit Judith Butler was talking about it in the 70s

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Certainly not because of the knowledge of having been maimed at birth and then made into a freakshow experiment by a pedophile, no no
            >Preventing people from transitioning will kill them.
            That's a good thing I support the eugenics of the mentally ill

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Preventing people from transitioning will kill them.
            Nobody cares

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Money’s moronic abuse actually proves trannies are real!
            lol, so trannies are mentally ill?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Money claims (without any evidence) that sex and his definition of gender are separate things
            >to prove gender has no biological basis, he raises a boy as a girl
            >he presents boyish behavior his entire life
            >he refuses to be a girl
            >eventually he's told that his entire life is a lie. He was maimed at birth and raised as a girl as part of an experiment he didn't want to be a part of
            >his brother becomes paranoid and depressed once he realizes his entire life was a lie, that his parents and doctors lied to both of them their entire lives
            >he kills himself
            >David spends the rest of his life blaming himself for his brother's death
            >David realizes the entire psychiatric and medical fields twisted his story and pretends that Money was right all along
            >David becomes depressed and kills himself
            >decades later troons twist his story to somehow prove that gender is a "le social construct" and its assigned at birth even though his entire story proves otherwise
            Frick you. You don't care about David's suffering and also you actually like when trannies kill themselves because you see them as martyrs and you use that to fuel your delusions.

            You're a demon.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >You're a demon.
              You know I'm really starting to think this too and that the Christians might be right

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Realizing that was one of the biggest blackpills of my life.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                If the Christians are right about that then they are right about Jesus and salvation. Should be the biggest white pill of your life

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Realizing that was one of the biggest blackpills of my life.

                Jesus was a real historical figure that no historian is disputing. The resurrection had 500 eyewitness testimonies. There are 20,000 recovered manuscripts of the New Testament (#1 most found manuscript) with a 99% accuracy across the texts across 3 languages (The Illiad is #2 most recovered with 697). People, with the help of demonic thinking, have been trying to poke holes in it (such as the staff vs no staff contradiction) so we ignore the 99% of incontrovertible truth in it, when those issues are explainable by the fact that the world is complicated and Jesus / God are capable of changing their mind or adjusting the plan to fulfill the prophecies and bring order to reality.

                God is real. Jesus is real. Lucifer is real. Lucifer is the god of this world. The Father of the Messiah is the God of heaven. Jesus is the Son of God and is precisely what God would be like if he was distilled down into human form from his infinitely complex being relative to us.

                I thought it was all nonsense until I looked into the historical accuracy of it. It's all real. We are experiencing a simulation or some sort of spiritual videogame created by God that is a veil over the "real" world. There's so much more that we don't understand and won't until the rapture.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                based evangelist, thank you for spreading the word anon

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                people used to believe in witches, too
                people used to believe in lots of things

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >until the rapture
                that shit is not even biblical
                you're a phony

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                What the Christians don't know is that they're either unwillingly or unknowingly in cahoots with the same ~~*crowd*~~

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's no coincidence that Korea is the most pozzed feminazi East Asian country and the most Christian East Asian country. Wokeism is just Secular Christianity.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >f David were somehow surgically given a penis at birth
            The dude was born with a penis, you dingbat. It got rekd during circumcision and that's why the deranged israelite Money trooned him out.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Trans people are people who, from their childhood, they never felt like the gender they were assigned to.
        Or at least never since they installed Discord

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        t. I'm trans btw

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        How can wearing dresses fricking change the structure of your brain? Much less in a way consistent among all people.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics.
        [citation needed]

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What you're missing is that being raised as af emale or as a male will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics. It's a social construction, due to patriarchal structures.

        Literal pedo John Money's opinion

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          the issue with Money's experiment is that you can't truly know if David wanted to be a man because it was his true mental desire, irrespective to biological sex, or because he wanted to be a man because of his biological sex, irrespective to the way he was raised.

          It sure confirms that you can't deny what your unconscious mind truly wants you to be, but in the end, what causes your mind to come to that conclusion is rather unknown if it is a completely arbitrary choice from the Id, involuntary to the Ego or if it is or can be shaped by either the environment or biology.

          Looking at it from the contemporary scientific point of view and psychological understanding, the whole experiment proves nothing and just served to kill an entire family.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            David presented behavioral issues and gender dysphoria since a young age. If Money's moronic and unsubstantiated claims were true the probability of David showing that would be the same as the real women's population (very low.)

            Then there's observational data from boys raised as girls due to cultural issues or neglect: they all grow up and decide to become men. The amount of them that decide to be women is statistically insignificant.

            The women that presented as men to do men roles like studying back in the day didn't troon out either.

            Money was full of shit and the entire psychology and medical fields have been pretending he was right for decades.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Money was full of shit and the entire psychology and medical fields have been pretending he was right for decades.
              yeah, I reached the same conclusion the moment I first heard of his experiment back in Law School.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >the issue with Money's experiment is that you can't truly know if David wanted to be a man because it was his true mental desire, irrespective to biological sex, or because he wanted to be a man because of his biological sex, irrespective to the way he was raised.
            You're mentally ill. The guy wanted to be a man because he was a man. A genitally mutilated man, molested his entire childhood by israeli pedos, but still a man.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Still at it beyond the veil ol' Johhny boy?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Brain is just like muscles.
        It really isn't.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >independently of your hormones or genetics
        independently of your hormones or genetics
        >independently of your hormones or genetics
        independently of your hormones or genetics
        >independently of your hormones or genetics
        independently of your hormones or genetics
        >independently of your hormones or genetics

        Nice "science" you got there, I hope you have verifiable falsifiable reproducible proofs for that claim.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently
        And what you missed was that when John Money tried to force a boy to be raised a girl he ENDED UP FRICKING KILLING HIMSELF

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Half of troons try to kill themselves after having been trooned out. That's not news.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Anyone who defends a procedure with a 41% mortality rate simply cannot be taken seriously.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            citation needed

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Common knowledge.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        > a female have more muscles than most males?
        No lol, not without steroids. Even then she'll probably be weaker than most. moronic c**t.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Muh "they were socially conditioned" bullshit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          These tests were done during puberty anon, when both girls and boys were in different stages of development(as women grow faster and mature faster than men).
          There's charts that shows results of college aged men and women and it shows almost no difference between the intelligence of men and women(maybe men having 1 to 2 points higher than women on average).

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >asking to be spoonfed
              Here Black person
              http://www.randalolson.com/2014/06/25/average-iq-of-students-by-college-major-and-gender-ratio/

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >"This brings up an interesting question of how valuable the SAT is as a standardized test across all majors, if a higher SAT score is really only indicating that the student is better at solving quantitative/analytical problems. Not all majors require a high analytical aptitude, after all."
                Lol, the entire article is the excuse of "Women have le higher emotional intelligence" but spread out.

                You know this was made to save face because of his previous study which pic related is from.
                >"After all the controversy that arose after I posted my breakdown of college majors by gender last week, I promised myself I'd stay away from controversial gender-related topics for a while."

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >disproves the sexist gap in cs degrees
                this image is worth its weight in bitcoin

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >maybe men having 1 to 2 points higher than women on average
            Women could as well have more points on average, but if males have significantly greater variability then they will be dominating on the extremes. Consider the first graph.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              yes, there's more moron men than women, but there's also more genius men than women, since the curve is slightly flatter for men

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's exactly what I'm saying m8.
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variability_hypothesis

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Turd flinging monkey did do an episode on this. Basically, no women aren't in average smarter than men and nor men aren't on average showing great variance.
                These studies are conducted on pubescents, who despite being the same age are do in different biological stages of maturity(ie a 14 year old boy is still a 14 year old boy but a 14 years old girl is a 15-16 year old boy in biological maturity).
                He then provided studies that were conducted on college aged students that showed men and women showed almost the same variance and in average men being slightly smarter than women.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Link to the video btw
                https://archive.org/details/BitChute-EiY9w951uSg

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ok, let's entertain this thought.

                If puberty influences brain development, then puberty blockers would delay and modify brain development. That means, all differences between troon brains and normal brains aew caused by the hormonal treatments they undergo. That means, hormones do influence brain development.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Did anyone say they didn't? I thought it was already well accepted?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Turd flinging monkey did do an episode on this. Basically, no women aren't in average smarter than men and nor men aren't on average showing great variance.
                0 reading comprehension.

                You have no idea what the conversation is even about.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Men routinely score 1-4 points higher IQ on average than women.

            That is not a small amount - that difference combined with the broader extent of the male population, results in - as this image shows

            https://i.imgur.com/Up3bfQu.png

            Muh "they were socially conditioned" bullshit

            , several times more men on the higher end of the IQ curve than women. There are about 3.5x more men with an IQ of 130 than women with an IQ of 130. There are 2x fewer men with an IQ of 70 than women with an IQ of 70.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          IQ is bullshit, it has been invented by rich people to justify that their children have "more potential" than others, and to keep them rich, to keep unjust inequalities in place. It has also been used as a racism and misogynistic tool, like you do right now, but this number means nothing.

          I can't believe the Juden got me to give her a ~~*You*~~
          >What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics
          Being raised as a mathematician will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics.
          >If a scientific study were to do the same on people who have brain PTSD...
          Honestly, I have no idea what the frick you're trying to say here. But doesn't the article clearly state that there are differences in two categories of brains? What is your point in bringing up such an utterly deranged study? And how are you going to confirm your bold claim of "absolutely no genetic correlation"
          >Brain is just like muscles...
          I still have no idea where you're going with this. I don't know anything about dietary effects working out the brain or if testosterone is even a factor for a "stronger" brain. You still have yet to tell anyone how you're going to confirm your bold claim.
          >This could not have anything to do with hormones
          So what does it have to do with? Spoon feed us morons oh enlightened one.
          b8/8 come see me after class

          >Honestly, I have no idea what the frick you're trying to say here. But doesn't the article clearly state that there are differences in two categories of brains? What is your point in bringing up such an utterly deranged study? And how are you going to confirm your bold claim of "absolutely no genetic correlation"
          There could be a genetic correlation, but that's not what OP's study said. You cannot prove that there is a genetic correlation.
          >Brain is just like muscles...
          >I still have no idea where you're going with this. I don't know anything about dietary effects working out the brain or if testosterone is even a factor for a "stronger" brain. You still have yet to tell anyone how you're going to confirm your bold claim.
          That's not what I meant, I don't think testosterone have any effect on the brain's capacities or intelligence. It seems complicated to determine what's the role of one single hormone is, as we don't even fully understand how the brain works.
          >This could not have anything to do with hormones
          >So what does it have to do with? Spoon feed us morons oh enlightened one.
          Education? Being raised as a female or a male.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I wasn't rich but was diagnosed with an IQ of 340

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              There are scientific evidence that rich kids are much much more likely to have a higher IQ, but this doesn't mean that there aren't exceptions. But these tests cost a lot of money, so it's less likely to be tested as a poor child.

              >I don't think testosterone have any effect on the brain's capacities or intelligence
              post degree and research papers substantiating your opinion, doc

              Prove me wrong with sources please, I'm lazy.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't think testosterone have any effect on the brain's capacities or intelligence
            post degree and research papers substantiating your opinion, doc

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can't believe the Juden got me to give her a ~~*You*~~
        >What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics
        Being raised as a mathematician will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics.
        >If a scientific study were to do the same on people who have brain PTSD...
        Honestly, I have no idea what the frick you're trying to say here. But doesn't the article clearly state that there are differences in two categories of brains? What is your point in bringing up such an utterly deranged study? And how are you going to confirm your bold claim of "absolutely no genetic correlation"
        >Brain is just like muscles...
        I still have no idea where you're going with this. I don't know anything about dietary effects working out the brain or if testosterone is even a factor for a "stronger" brain. You still have yet to tell anyone how you're going to confirm your bold claim.
        >This could not have anything to do with hormones
        So what does it have to do with? Spoon feed us morons oh enlightened one.
        b8/8 come see me after class

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I am genuinely one dumb motherfricker, but c**ts like you really do make me feel smart. Are you braindead?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The water-level task is one of the most easily replicable experiments in psychology, and consistently splits results based on physical sex.
        Unless you want to argue that social pressures are keeping women from ever seeing glasses of water.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        what about being raised by only women?
        had only a mother and sisters, forced to do laundry and fold lady clothes my whole life, but im still a guy and not gay.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Did they test it on transwomen and what results does it give for them? What about after HRT? I must know if the chuddies are right or wrong

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      well the pink and blues are not going to like this one bit

      estrogen will change brain structure slightly, theres a couple of studies on this topic but only after taking E, I would assume test for ftms would do similar things

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >estrogen will change brain structure slightly
        I remember reading some headline saying guys who took hormones had irreparable damage to their IQ.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, it turns them into women.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        [...]
        What you're missing is that being raised as a female or as a male will structure your brain differently, independently of your hormones or genetics. It's a social construction, due to patriarchal structures. If a scientific study were to do the same on people who have a PTSD from their childhood, they would have the same brain patterns that people without PTSD wouldn't have, and this wouldn't have anything to do with genetics.
        Brain is just like muscles. Can't a female have more muscles than most males? Testosterone may play a role in how easy it is to grow them, but it's not the only thing that matters. Your alimentation, your training are much more likely to determine how much muscles you have, and they're not induced by genetics or hormones.
        [...]
        [...]
        This could not have anything to do with hormones, such as ostrogens. Trans people are people who, from their childhood, they never felt like the gender they were assigned to. So when they're raised, they will usually refuse to conform to what's expected from their gender norm, and therefore their brain will be constructed differently, and closer to the brain patterns found in females for MTF and males for FTM, even before any hormonal therapy.

        A male brain is completely different from a woman's brain. The whole structure is different, the synaptic density is different, it's connected to all sorts of shit in the endocrine system that doesn't even exist in the other. A male brain can never even think a woman's thoughts, because the brains are so different. Just because some weirdo measure brain responses and find that homos and trannies experience attraction when seeing benis just like women doesn't mean your brain is somehow actually similar to a woman's. Any pathological exam of structure, cells etc. would instantly tell anyone categorically you have a man's brain in your female (male) body.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Do people with Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome have male or female brains?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Male.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Then why do they behave like females and are very rarely trans

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Because men with low testosterone become effeminate, but they are still men.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Are there any measurable brain differences between them and women? Show me some studies

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Doesn't seem to be, but they're so incredibly rare that there would be hard to build any statistics with a reasonable sample size in the first place. Better to just discount those people in a discussion about men and women. They are biological men, however, so obviously their brain structure will be male.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                So their brain is male, and yet they act, think and live as females in every conceivable way? Those brain differences must be pretty insignificant then.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Being able to pee standing up and not get wet is not "living as a female in every conceivable way".

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well, they can't actually think like women, not having the brain structure of an actual woman. But sure, they can "live" as a woman in the purely extrinsic sense, I guess. Obviously they can't reproduce and have children or do anything else a real woman can. But they can wear nailpolish and dresses, if that's what you mean?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Is amazing how many of these trannied think superficially of what is a woman. Allways trying to skin walk as porn stars

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                There also are normal ones, but you don't notice them

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >There also are normal ones, but you don't notice them
                We notice ALL of you, passing is a myth

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                t. clocks cishons

                [...]

                >depending on your education
                Are you talking about life experiences?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No such thing as a normal troony. We notice them. We were just polite enough not to laugh at them

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >doesn't mean your brain is somehow actually similar to a woman's.
          You started off good, but your conclusion is dumb. There are men with gynecomastia or other conditions that makes their bodies go haywire and develop female characteristics or no male characteristics (like people with alpha 5 reductase deficiency developing a clit-like micropenis). Why would the brain be an exception from this, and why would some men not develop brains that are closer (but not identical) to women's? Of course these cases are not the norm, they're mutations, usually harmful to the host, but if someone says the earth is flat, the appropriate reaction is not to claim that it's actually hyper-cube shaped with a hollow core. Homosexuality, left-handedness, situs invertus, aphantasia folks who can't rotate an apple in their minds, there's all sorts of mutants out there that don't have a reason to exist, but we shouldn't pretend they don't.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >and why would some men not develop brains that are closer (but not identical) to women's?
            Because a man and a woman's brain are two completely different biological structures, down to the cellular levels, up to different structure, synaptic density, connections and so on. Your question is like
            >why can't a dog just be a cat?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Because a man and a woman's brain are two completely different biological structures
              Just like you and a Black person are completely different biological structures, yet for some reason you still react like a dumb gorilla Black person who can't read despite being white. Read my fricking post again, nobody is saying "hurr why can't male be female?" I'm saying your cells have the biological information for being both male and female available at conception and your body can frick you up and make you more female-like but not completely female. Also your analogy is moronic because there are cat-like dogs and there are dog-like cats.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sure, a cat can be a bit dog-like. It's still a cat, though.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I mean, agreed. Just like Michael Jackson was still an african american, trannies are still biologically male at the end of the day, but they're castrated males with feminized brains. (i.e. smaller size of the inferior-parietal lobule which is usually larger on men but smaller on women, or other such changes) What I disagree with is the idea that even though two structures are different, they can't be more or less similar depending on circumstances, like how dolphins are similar with sharks despite being mammals. Here, have a troony cat.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What I disagree with is the idea that even though two structures are different, they can't be more or less similar depending on circumstances
                Well, they can't. They can be abnormal in their own variance, but they can't actually be "similar" to the other. Anyone doing an autopsy on the most "fembrained" male brain imaginable would still be able to instantly determine that the subject in question is a male brain.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >a mammal cannot be like a fish to some degree, more so than other mammals
                >a male brain cannot be like a female brain to some degree more so than other male brains
                I'm sorry you had to find this out now but your brain is literally too feminized to hold an argument properly, you just keep repeating the same line like an NPC golem or bot without even reading what the other party says. Have a good day sir, I mean ma'am.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Correct. I don't really read your troon drivel anymore, I just hear
                >reeeeeeeeeeeee I can be wamen too

                Which you can't.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why can't you just have some fricking manners and be polite enough to use peoples pronouns? It costs you nothing

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I don't like lying, in my experience lies compound and create all sorts of complications down the line.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Why don't you play pretend with me? How dare you, NAZIIIIII REEEE
                Because I am not supporting mental illness and your israeli propaganda.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >but only after taking E
        Not true
        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955456/

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tldr; mtfs do have more feminized brains on average but they skewing doesn't to very far

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        but the skewing doesn't go very far*
        sorry I'm phoneposting

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Trannies do show as fundamentally male but feminised

        Anyone who's looked into this will be able to conclude that trannies would have been ordinary tomboys and tomgirls if not for humans' obsession with gender as a concept. Gender dysphoria obviously isn't an inherent part of the human condition. It's induced. No other animal has shown any signs of gender dysphoria, including the ones which demonstrate self-awareness and theory of mind.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pretty much.
          >I'm a man but I am not into watching sportsball or heavy drinking.
          >Surely that means I am a woman!
          Their problem isn't gender dysphoria, their problem is that they are morons who think they need to be carbon copies of each other.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Trannies do show as fundamentally male but feminised

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Chuddies are actually right and wrong in either case. Because male brains being different from female brains is a huge antifeminist win, and them being the same is a huge antitrans win.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Do you really need to ask? Most transwomen either have hobbies that are most common in autistic men like coding or they have hobbies that are most common in flamboyant gays like theater. They think and act like men.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Basically every time they do those kinds of tests the results are that both MtFs and FtMs are men.
      Unfortunately this upsets absolutely everyone so it gets swept under the rug and n=6 garbage gets published instead to pretend transsexuality is bidirectional.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      there is no female or male brain. that study should say estrogen vs testosterone brain. each hormone plays a huge role in how brain DEVELOPS. no you cannot simply start taking the other hormones and expect a change.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    well the pink and blues are not going to like this one bit

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What if (in the absence of hormone meds) they show patterns more similar to their opposite sex? Wouldn't they feel vindicated?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        they would, but they don't.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      haven't they been saying this for decades, as the reason why troonyism is okay?
      man with woman brain?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you spent any amount of time interacting with trannies you would know that they very clearly have male brain.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >aggresive
          >hyper-promiscuous
          >into male hobbies
          >socially inept
          That's because they have male brains.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Stanford
    >California
    Something something troony ideology being pushed for certain. Don't trust a single thing.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI can hallucinate when making images
    >AI can hallucinate when writing code
    >AI can hallucinate when making movies
    >AI can hallucinate when reading off of fricking Wikipedia

    >AI can be trusted as 100% scripture when processing medical information related to the human brain

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Do you seriously think they had a fricking LLM running the analysis here?

      AI is used as a buzz term for any type of statistical computing these days they're not related in any meaningful way.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        AI is used every time it involves self-learning algorithm. If they made algorithm that then gets trained on some data, it is AI. If it is all hand coded, it is not AI.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's arbitrary where you draw that line though. Linear regression is a learning algorithm but it's something you can do by hand. In the end of the day it's all just statistics

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          there are tons of "AI" algorithms, the problems you mentioned are all specific to LLMs and NNs
          there are much simpler and way more effective algorithms to do what OP's image does

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          it's the other way around moron, hand coding a list of every possible input and response is still ""AI"" but machine learning and self inferrential algorothms are a subset.

          Troons btfo and David the israelite and John ~~*money*~~ burning in Hell still never to be vindicated (because troonism is fundamentally flawed).

          I for one am excited to see phrenology coming back it makes midwit biology majors seethe.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI can be trusted as 100% scripture when processing medical information related to the human brain
      Yes, and I'm tired of pretending it can't be.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm no AI fanatic but I trust a statistical model more than I trust some bullshit made up by a mentally ill crossdresser.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >DR chud
    Nice try op

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Underrated (im a massive sexist)

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand why people are so scared to admit that male and female brains are different.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What people are scared to admit is that the main difference is simply size. Men have more brain than women, which is why they are more intelligent.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Interesting. Well males with famale brains has been been discovered before, so this this is more an automation of the analysis.

    This nothing to do with being trans though. Sorry to those of you who wanted to justify it. HRT is and will always be a bad therapy. and only seem to work at times since our brain is so adaptable.

    Go beyond gender and rock that female organization patters as a human.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Well males with famale brains has been been discovered before
      Literally impossible. Where would the part that connects to the endocrine system that regulates uterine functions go? A female brain couldn't even survive in a male body.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what is a woman
    >nobody knows
    >what is a womans brain
    >identifiable through logical algorithms

    it can only get better I guess

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    okay but how about neurological differences between something more challenging
    how about people who have a family and a career for 30 years, then one day decide to knife a stranger and eat their skin. Wouldn't it be awesome if there were markers to identify those kinds of brains

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      So you could do what, exactly? Imprison them on suspicion? Put them under surveillance? Send them to therapy that won't do anything?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        save lives perhaps
        remember when that was cool and trendy

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Who's life exactly will that save?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            what does that matter, a life is a life

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >remember when people were gullible and naive and we could get them to support invading other countries for oil to SAVE DA CHIRRUN?
          Frick off

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >artificial intelligence model
    thanks, i hate it.
    new journo buzzword has been unlocked.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Autogynophiles show male brains but HSTS show female brains.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The one measurable difference between them was one that is also measured in homosexual vs hetero men, while differences relating to body ownership were shared between the two

      Being able to pee standing up and not get wet is not "living as a female in every conceivable way".

      CAIS don't have a penis, what are you talking about?

      Well, they can't actually think like women, not having the brain structure of an actual woman. But sure, they can "live" as a woman in the purely extrinsic sense, I guess. Obviously they can't reproduce and have children or do anything else a real woman can. But they can wear nailpolish and dresses, if that's what you mean?

      I mean in terms of personality.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I mean in terms of personality.
        Well, like I said, there are no real studies on people with this developmental disease, because they're so incredibly rare. I don't know anything about their personality in general and neither do you.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12710824/

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            A sample size of 22 people isn't enough for a proper statistical study. That's an opinion at best, pseudoscience at worst (if you think the results of that study are scientific.) This is what the replication crisis was about, a problem plaguing modern psychology.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              And yet you are very confident that they are "male brained".

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                They have male biological genetics, XY chromosomes, so yes, they have male brains. What does it matter anyways, they are people with a disease.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >confuses between phenotype and genotype
                >but it doesn't matter anyway because it goes against my opinion

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                A male body can't produce a female brain, that wouldn't be a viable life-form.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                [citation needed]

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                First you have to explain how one single organ can have a different chromosomal set than everything else in the organism.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're again confusing phenotype with genotype.
                Also, chimerism does exist in humans.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Also, chimerism does exist in humans.
                Only as non-viable mutations, severe developmental disorders.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’m not confusing anything. You’re confusing the realities of how genotype and phenotype manifest in humans.
                >chimerism
                Not relevant to my question. You need to show that it’s possible for one organ to have a different chromosomal set than every other organ in that individual.

                This insistence on gendering the brain is ridiculous. Next you’re going to start talking about your soul.

                https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/case-lydia-fairchild-and-her-chimerism-2002
                https://www.researchgate.net/publication/216874877_Dual-gender_macrochimeric_tissue_discordance_is_predicted_to_be_a_significant_cause_of_human_homosexuality_and_transgenderism

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I ask for organs and you give me tissue.
                Cancer is tissue, you realize that correct?

                Is prostate cancer now proof of a third gender?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >here's some rando's hypothesis
                >am I wamen now?
                jej

                Nice reading comprehension bro

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why would you think some random homo's unproven hypothesis is an argument of some sort?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I could say the same thing about your male brain hypothesis. There are no universally proven behavioral or cognitive differences.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's not a hypothesis, male and female brains are completely different. They are structured differently, they have different synaptic densities, they are wired to things in the body that doesn't exist in the other sex. There is no way to confuse the two in any way except through wilful obfuscation of reality. That male and female brains are fundamentally different down to the smallest cell is just a biological objective fact that can be rigorously proven conclusively.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Repeating the same things doesn't make them any more true either.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Well, it's just a biological fact that's not disputed by anyone (sane.)

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >everything is a fact except for cases where it's not true, but those are rare and don't count, my model is perfect

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You can dissect a male and female brain and observe the difference in structure, synaptic density, that it's connected to parts that don't exist in the other body etc. This has been done many times. It's not disputed at all.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Do you have a link to such an experiment

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Medschool

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                If you had paid more attention in med school you would have noticed the "tend to" in "tend to have X differences"

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                That male and female brains connect to different things that don't exist in the other body isn't something it "tends" to do. It's just biological reality, go 41% yourself.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >b- but you have no ovaries, NOT A REAL WOMAN, DIE!!!

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You were winning the argument until that post, what are you doing buddy?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just returning the 41% meme with equally dumb shit

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >delusional freak denies objective reality
                >u were winning
                lol

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not only do you have no ovaries, you don't even have the parts in your brain that connects to the female endocrine system which control the ovaries you don't have. This is because you have a male brain in a male body, down to every single male cell with it's male XY chromosomes. Simple as that.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You still haven't clarified how that is related to a condition where the body map of the amygdala is that of the opposite sex

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >where the body map of the amygdala is that of the opposite sex
                It's not, it's slightly more towards the opposite sex than the average for the sex, but still completely different. Try to at least keep track of your own pseudoscience.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >completely different
                There are trannies on that plot which lie outside the male results and in the average female size

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                And their brains are still fully male.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Sure, whatever that means

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Says the Black person that doesn’t know what an organ is.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >here's some rando's hypothesis
                >am I wamen now?
                jej

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’m not confusing anything. You’re confusing the realities of how genotype and phenotype manifest in humans.
                >chimerism
                Not relevant to my question. You need to show that it’s possible for one organ to have a different chromosomal set than every other organ in that individual.

                This insistence on gendering the brain is ridiculous. Next you’re going to start talking about your soul.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >self deprecating
                Lol, I belong to the dominant group. Look at the top 10 richest humans in the world, they're "cis white male", exactly like me. What's "self deprecating" about it anon?
                [...]
                >Science is LE BAD, but I have no source to prove you wrong
                Ok well I guess I'll continue to have my belief 🙂

                The only thing you're doing by trying to force the issue with paid for pseudoscientific studies, is that people stop respecting the corrupted institutions you get to do this shit. You will never be a real woman, and you just have to live with that.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well BOT?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't this the troony who used real photos of toddlers to draw porn?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yep. They aren't interested in your children though

        Just being seen as one
        Acting like one
        Being around child
        Grooming children
        Teaching children sex Ed
        Drawing pictures of children

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          How come they're always demanding to read books to kids, why never the elderly, sick or disabled?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            We all know why but we aren't allowed to say it outloud

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it depends on what you mean by "transition"

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      parents have a legal duty of care over their children. if the child wanted to harm themselves the parents could go to jail if they assisted in the childs self harm wishes.

      In a decade from now will we see young adults bringing lawsuits against the state and parents for allowing them to decide to transition when they were uneducated, uniformed, highly impressionable children.

      The only defence trans people have against this argument is usually that those kids don't exist, that every kid who transitions is a success. Well maybe it's too soon to tell. We do know that trans people are vastly overepresented in suicide statistics. Maybe that is the regret manifesting itself.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >In a decade from now
        We have to get rid of the laws containing the phrase "gender identity and expression" first. Replace it with "verifiable clinical diagnosis of transsexualism" if you must, but right now even doctors must abide by anti-discrimination law and so they have no choice but to give their patients what they say they want.
        AND the government has to STOP compelling parents to allow their children to go through HRT. You can't really sue someone for doing something family court compelled them to even if they knew it was wrong.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          We need to first ban these anti- discrimination laws.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, totally a passable woman.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Tbh, that image is right though. If your age is not on the clock, then you can have sex alright.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That's right! Age of consent should be 25!

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, if you want people to turn in to critical coomers that is.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Interesting map, later people have sex, greater the sexual frustration among the general populace grows. While developed countries like Japan and China copes with porn shitholes like India and Indonesia turns to rape and harassment.
              It should be noted that Zoomers are the most sex depraved generation while also being the most sex deprived generation.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Man, from the way people brag about it you'd think all values in the table there should be two years lower than they currently are.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I think in general for women, it's usually 1-2 years younger.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >boys lie about having sex all the time
                >there's a lot of pressure nowadays for girls to lie as well
                >homos actually have sex for the first time when they're around 11 years old (on average). They lie about this by claiming it was later in life
                Self-reported sexual encounters are just as useless as self-reported penis size or masturbation frequency. Everybody lies.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                A tendency towards lying about having sex earlier would also indicate a tendency towards most people having sex early. You wouldn't feel the need to lie if everyone else were as dry as you as seen in the case with pajeets and chinks.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not necessarily. It merely means that there is a stigma about being a virgin and having sex earlier is seen as something good.

                Most parents lie about the Tooth Fairy, that doesn't point towards fairies being real.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Tooth fairy and having sex are completely two different stuff. Parents don't genuinely want tooth fairy to exist, people lying about having sex do want to.
                This comparison is stupid.
                There wouldn't be a widespread stigma against being a virgin if at least a plurality of people had sex.
                Also that chart isn't even that over blown to begin with. As some anon said, it seemed 2 years older than what people say when they had sex.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Just like self-reported penis size. Any man could say "yes, I have a 29 inch penis" but that would be ridiculous and unbelievable, so they inflate it by claiming 6 or 7 inches instead of the average that is 5. Think back to your own middle school days. Nobody believed the 14-year old kid who claimed to have sex every weekend with hot lesbian neighbors.

                Claiming that you had sex at 15-16 is believable and doesn't raise any suspicions, since everyone thinks that's the normal age. It's as simple as that.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Only Nordic countries state they had sex that young and it seems consistent with the more open nature of sex in Nordic nations.
                Other countries that states that low are "liberal" third world shitholes such as Latin America or Eastern Europe. Its not hard to believe favela Black folk or polish homosexuals lose virginity at the age of 14-16.
                Most other developed nations state their in somewhere in the range of 17-19.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Most other developed nations state their in somewhere in the range of 17-19
                Like for example? Literally only asia still has these taboos in the developed world. Everything else is shitskin cope

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Also I'll add that just like a tendency to lie about having sex earlier, there's also a tendency to lie about having sex later, especially in very conservative countries like India and Indonesia where pre marital sex(for both men and women) is looked down upon.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >looked down upon
                >in cultures that focus on the family unit
                As God intended. Fornication deserves to be shamed everywhere.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Really, people in China lie about having sex later?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I remember watching an old Asian comedy movie which is about a father trying to prevent his son from meeting up with a maid's daughter whom he's fallen in love with because he already arranged a marriage for his son with his friend's daughter and if word got out of him having a lover before would ruin that marriage. I don't know if it was Chinese but definitely east asian.
                So yeah they do. Though most young Chinese don't do arranged marriage anymore so it might be different in their case.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Based
            Retroactively lock my parents up for their crime of having me at 20 and fricking up my development when they should have been making more money to better raise their kids.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              16 or early as the girl can handle is best for babies. u best just die rn senpai

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It a simple game of statistics, if 41% is the default assumption, once you increase the transition rate to one above the one of "it was a phase and I grew out of it" you are killing more by wrong transition than saving.
      The problem is cranking up the numbers artificially, also due to financial interest, creating a problem where one wasn't present.
      Ask /d/ why they are on /d/ and how easy it is to frick up a child's mind.
      e.g. watching movie of pic related alone created an own fetish category of "blueberry expansion"

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Are you saying we should stop writing such scenes at all because some weird kid might develop a fetish? Plenty of fairy tales with a changeling theme exists before this one and nobody talked about having a fetish of transforming things in the past. Also we got no idea how mentally ill at birth many kids are, it's been shown probability of mental illnesses increases with delayed motherhood and many women of our parents generation had their kids in their 30s and 40s.
        Also my hypothesis is that transformation fetish is mostly a sub conscious instinct towards sadism(for those who wants to see people to be transformed) /masochism (for those who wants to see themselves transformed) which are instinctually present in people(maybe 100 years ago you couldn't find transformation fetish porn but you could still find many sadomasochist smut).

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Multiple things contribute to fetishes, but, well, lets take that image as an example. I think it would be pretty hard to get yourself to get off more strongly on unnatural things like that, if it wasn't for the ability to see something and then immediately go look up porn of it. But I think that for most people, it's more common to be looking up normal porn and then just run into something really goddamn weird while you're already jacking off.
          His point being that human sexuality is malleable, but he kinda picked a weird example since it's more malleable than anyone (and I mean ANYONE) wants to admit, thus the means by which it is shaped are poorly understood.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I strongly see disagree. I had weird fetishes even before I had access to the internet. Most people who don't have fetishes believe it must be due to some childhood influence or internet. In fact, due to the nature of my fetish, I'm mostly looking to furry and troony sites but not even once have I ever fapped to their stuff.
            Yeah the way you describe might be one way people develop fetishes but I don't think it's universal, in fact I don't think many of them actually develop avfetish, just become tolerant(just like how I don't mind seeing furty shit being inserted in my fetish but I still rather get off from a human female being subjected to it).
            Many of us genuinely had something wrong happening in our head since our birth and it might be a combo of genes and pre-natal conditions.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Well, when I say "while looking up porn" I mean "while experiencing anything in a sexual context" for example tickling fetishes obviously predate the internet but that doesn't mean people are born desitined to like things like that. But since I don't know what you get off on or your whole life's story I can't guess how that happened. I will say that at a certain age anything to do with the opposite sex can seem magically fascinating so "a sexual context" can be much broader than what adults commonly think, and human sexuality is the most malleable when it starts to develop.
              But I know for a fact the easy availability of porn doesn't help stop weird fetishes from developing.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Are you saying we should stop writing such scenes at all because some weird kid might develop a fetish?
          It's only an example of how easy the mind is influenced, the context is not sexual, other than a viewer possibly having a first harmless affection to the character and then exposing this character to something odd, creating a connection.
          This is different from developing a taste for something at an age you are already consuming pornography.
          (An other easy to pin-point fetish to look out for getting much more common in the near future is likely one created by the Venom-movie kissing scene)

          In case of the context of general confusion this is relevant as we are not dealing with single scenes in movies, which might create a few oddballs by coincidence, but an organized questioning of the developing sexuality and self-image of children deliberately exposing the children to it.
          This will have an impact, help some, but confuse quite a few depending on how those it would help are identified and the subject approached, at this stage we can unfortunately not yet tell if we're hunting mosquitos in the living-room with a fly swatter .. or using a shotgun.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    imagine referring to yourself in such a self deprecating way as "cis white male" lmao

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >self deprecating
      Lol, I belong to the dominant group. Look at the top 10 richest humans in the world, they're "cis white male", exactly like me. What's "self deprecating" about it anon?

      [...]
      >This is wrong. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204758/
      Pseudoscientific cherry-picking. Disregarding the vast differences in structure between male and female brains to myopically focus on some tiny similarities, to come to a biased conclusion.

      >Science is LE BAD, but I have no source to prove you wrong
      Ok well I guess I'll continue to have my belief 🙂

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You could just say "I'm a white man" but you say "cis white male" lmao. israelites are not white, so most likely you are not white either.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I belong to the dominant group
        >im a cis white male
        Referring to yourself as that puts you in the "cuck" category, not the "dominant group" category lmao

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >This is wrong. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6204758/
    Pseudoscientific cherry-picking. Disregarding the vast differences in structure between male and female brains to myopically focus on some tiny similarities, to come to a biased conclusion.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      > Disregarding the vast differences in structure between male and female brains
      There’s no real evidence of this. Or rather, there is no evidence that the “gender” of the brain is anything different than the biological sex of the individual.

      aka no shit a man has a male brain, he has a male body.
      There is no reality where someone can have the wrong brain.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    As a genuine question here : what about the exceedingly small intersexed population who were surgically assigned one way or the other, and were raised to that assigned gender? IE PsudoMales raised a female because this was the surgically easier path, Psudomales raised male because this was the easier path, and the various forms of true hermaphodism?

    Some presentations of psudo male do basically nothing, and people only find out later in life when they have difficulties trying to conceive children. Other presentations are significant enough that they may be marked as female at birth and basically not know until they never hit puberty. They are genetically male, but will have all external female anatomy, including a veganal canal, though its often shorter and always ends in a blind pouch.

    I would be interested to know how these people fit into the patterns, and I think it might be insightful to see how much is a nurture or nature component ( to the best you can as there are just so many other variables).

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >This guy's crazy
    This guy is the base of all trans bullshit we have today

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It would be more accurate to say Magnus Hirschfeld was the base. You know, the guy whose books the nazis burned.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sigmund Freud is the base of psychology bullshit we have today. Excepted that now it's not bullshit anymore. Freud was dumb and said many dumb things, and now what?

      >Brain is just like muscles.
      It really isn't.

      >It really isn't.
      But it consumes the same thing in your body, is growing like muscles when you make it work, it's becoming better only on areas you work on and not others like muscles. It's not exactly a muscle, but the more you make some synapses function, the more they will develop, especially during childhood and adolescence. But yes unlike muscles you won't loose your intelligence just by stoping to exercise for a few weeks. Which means it's even harder to rewire stuff that you learned as a child.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Technology?

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >thread about actual technology
    >it's all talk about trannies
    >christcucks smell opportunity and start shilling

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      trannies are bad

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >rápe
        Lah-de-dah.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They really can't help themselves, can they.

        This is what took much internet porn does to a person.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's a thread about men and women, of course troons are going to be the majority of posters. And wherever homos are, so are christcucks.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Where do you think you are? It wasn't never about the board's topic. But the unstoppable thoughts about trannies, pointless culture wars topics and most important of all; shit posting.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's a thread about men and women, of course troons are going to be the majority of posters. And wherever homos are, so are christcucks.

      good morning satan

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >implying it wasn't bait from the beginning
      go back to /lgbt/ you underage newbie

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >this actual scientific study is bait so let me spam my troony obsession or go to the gay board
        You must be 18 or older to use this site.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          (You), the densest material in the universe.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Birds of a feather.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        i always laugh when people try to make it out as a troony vs. christian thing, they're both nutjobs

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >they're both nutjobs
          Society always had its share of nutjobs. But if you're gonna choose to be a nutjob anyway, better a christian than a troony.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, even if I were to fall for religion nignoggery, I rather choose something like Buddhism or Taoism instead.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I rather choose something like Buddhism or Taoism instead.
              Why?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                There's inherit truth in the concept of rebirth. The universe itself is in this cycle.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                So what happens after the heat death of the universe?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >thread about actual technology
      >it's all talk about trannies
      >christcucks smell opportunity and start shilling
      Actually transitioning is a form of technology, because it's the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes. What's more cyberpunk than that (as of 2024)? One day, we will have even more impressive technologies, to change and improve even more our bodies. It's so exciting! Hopefully conservative people will stop getting in the way of science.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I will always get int he way of your scientific aberrations. Seethe. Cope. Dilate.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >What's more cyberpunk than that
        >trannoid autist is so fricking stupid that he thinks cyberpunk is something we should be working for rather than against
        41% yourself. It literally depicts a dystopia and is usually meant as a warning.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >It literally depicts a dystopia and is usually meant as a warning.
          This. The good future was 1960s jolly and colorful futurism, while the bad future was bleak and awful troon cyberpunk.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Trips of truth. Almost everything that could have gone wrong did.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Cyberpunk is dystopian, I meant it like cyborgs are cool.
          What's weird is that you are so obsessed with trans people, despite that some other technologies (such as social networks) are proven to be bad for mental health, and you do not fight as hard against them. Could it have something to do with the fact that social networks make a lot of money to billionaires, but transitioning doesn't? And, imagine if one of those billionaire would buy out a social network, to then find a scapegoat (let's say "wokism") to blame, so he would manipulate people into hating trans people instead of billionaires? Nah, Elon Musk wouldn't do that, am I right? He wouldn't meme to be the "cool billionaire"?
          Isn't it what cyberpunk dystopias are all about though? Like big, unruled corporations lead by greedy billionaires being bad for the society? There are a few things that would be cool, like androids, cyborgs, etc., but you missed the point of cyberpunk dystopias: criticizing corporatocracies.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I really do think studying the brain extensively should be banned. Nothing good can come from it.

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Black person, you do know that men in c**tries like India and Indonesia wears "skirts" called Longi right?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Mentions shithole countries
      Such many reasons on why we shouldn't become like those homosexuals.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        And yet those shithole countries hates homosexuals, trannies and keep women in line better than you do.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No I didn't know, but are they asked to not show their underwear as children?

      You could just say "I'm a white man" but you say "cis white male" lmao. israelites are not white, so most likely you are not white either.

      Someone said I'm trans, the opposite of being trans is being cis. Words. And I'm not israelite neither, I have a very catholic family.

      [...]
      >Are you pretending that your education isn't structuring your brain? Then why can't I have big muscles without any training too?
      Males and females get the same education.

      >Males and females get the same education.
      They don't, for many reasons. You're not teached to play with the same toys, to wear the same clothes. But beyond that, what kind of representative billionaire do a little girl see on the TV? Try to find a woman in the top 10 of richest people, just one.

      Correct. I don't really read your troon drivel anymore, I just hear
      >reeeeeeeeeeeee I can be wamen too

      Which you can't.

      >reeeeeeeeeeeee I can be wamen too
      >Which you can't.
      Since when are humans subject to their biology? Throughout history, humans have transcended what was naturally possible, doing incredible and extraordinary things. We have technology and science for transitioning, but you oppose it, for strange principles.

      Half of troons try to kill themselves after having been trooned out. That's not news.

      Not true, but if it were, if you don't let them transition they will be more likely to have huge depressions because of the gender dysphoria. I think you forgot what "dysphoria" meant.
      And then, trans people are also more likely to be depressed by transphobia, because of people acting like you.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >No I didn't know, but are they asked to not show their underwear as children?
        I've never heard this said with any degree of importance to any child, male or female.
        >Since when are humans subject to their biology?
        Are you kidding? Try to be a bird, or an ant, or even something more closely related, like a chimp. You can't. You're stuck as a male homosexual sapiens, bud.
        >Not true, but if it were, if you don't let them transition they will be more likely to have huge depressions because of the gender dysphoria. I think you forgot what "dysphoria" meant.
        >And then, trans people are also more likely to be depressed by transphobia, because of people acting like you.
        The evidence shows that the rate of suicides doesn't get better after transition. The evidence also shows that most people with gender dysphoria get over it soon enough.
        Trans ideology has grown by leaps and bounds this last decade. Far more attention and accommodation is being given to trans people. And yet, mental illness is still on the rise. Trans people are STILL depressed and suicidal, far moreso than the general non-trans population. I'd suggest to you that encouraging transition and gender-affirming care (and associated phenomena, but we'll leave those alone) are making all people, especially gender dysphorics, much sicker and more depressed.

        When someone believes they're a bird, we don't surgically attach wings and a beak to them and encourage them to try to fly. Your self-reported opinions about what kind of creature you feel you should be are meaningless, because yes, we are limited by biology.

        We might try actually treating mental illness (dysphoria, depression, etc.) instead of accommodating it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Try to be a bird, or an ant, or even something more closely related, like a chimp. You can't. You're stuck as a male homosexual sapiens, bud.
          I did and I can, in VR, a technology. Oh yeah I know that right now, it only works for your eyesight, but give it a few more years and it should be fine. I'll fly like an eagle, piloting a blimp.
          >The evidence shows that the rate of suicides doesn't get better after transition.
          Which evidence? I found a scientific study:
          "We observed no increase in suicide death risk over time and even a decrease in suicide death risk in trans women."
          https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32072611/
          >The evidence also shows that most people with gender dysphoria get over it soon enough.
          Children with a gender dysphoria yes, not teenagers or adults. I'm against allowing minors to transition anyway.
          >Trans people are STILL depressed and suicidal, far moreso than the general non-trans population.
          They're depressed before because of gender dysphoria, and less depressed after thanks to their transition. But they're still depressed often due to societal stigma, discrimination, and victimization. Let's try to not discriminate them, and offer them mental health assistance and gender-affirming surgery, and see if it can significantly reduce the likeliness of suicidal thoughts.
          >I'd suggest to you that encouraging transition and gender-affirming care (and associated phenomena, but we'll leave those alone) are making all people, especially gender dysphorics, much sicker and more depressed.
          Based on what? Science studies say the opposite.
          >When someone believes they're a bird
          Literally who. I met people who thought they should be a human of the opposite sex. They're already human. It's not such a big deal. We can even (thanks to technology) make them be who they feel like they are.
          >We might try actually treating mental illness (dysphoria, depression, etc.) instead of accommodating it.
          We must do this and also let them transition.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >I did and I can, in VR, a technology.
            What color is your skin?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Im against minors transitioning
            Why? It's been consistently shown early transitioning before puberty starts hitting lowering gender dysphoria seen in trannies. You won't be passing well to the opposite gender if you transition in your adulthood when growth hormones during your puberty dimorphises men and women.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I have a very catholic family.
        That explains everything.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Throughout history, humans have transcended what was naturally possible, doing incredible and extraordinary things. We have technology and science for transitioning, but you oppose it, for strange principles.
        The technology and science for transitioning doesn't work.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >They don't, for many reasons. You're not teached to play with the same toys, to wear the same clothes. But beyond that, what kind of representative billionaire do a little girl see on the TV? Try to find a woman in the top 10 of richest people, just one.
        Kids of different sex prefer to play with different toys naturally.
        If things like toys and clothes determined your identity, then you'd see even greater influence of things like environment they grew up in. Yet you see people move from villages to cities, from mountains to harbors, without experiencing any "geographical dysphoria". Your environment does not shape your identity anywhere nearly as your sex. Maybe because only one of these things is actually genetic.
        Watching TV and earning money is not education as well. They are not very correlated in the edge cases like "top 10 richest people".

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Kids of different sex prefer to play with different toys naturally.
          Source?
          According to this meta-analysis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031194/
          It hasn't been proven clearly that such a difference exists. "It is generally recognized that there are gender-related differences in children’s toy preferences. However, the magnitude of these differences has not been firmly established." And also "gender-related differences increased with age", which seems to suggest that I'm right when I say it's LEARNED, not innate.
          >If things like toys and clothes determined your identity, then you'd see even greater influence of things like environment they grew up in. Yet you see people move from villages to cities, from mountains to harbors, without experiencing any "geographical dysphoria". Your environment does not shape your identity anywhere nearly as your sex. Maybe because only one of these things is actually genetic.
          I'm sorry what? How your environment doesn't shape your identity?? Elon Musk is in the top 10 of richest people in the world, because he was born in a rich family. How many billionaires comes from places without schools, such as small villages in Africa?
          >Watching TV and earning money is not education as well. They are not very correlated in the edge cases like "top 10 richest people".
          Watching TV is part of education, whether you like it or not. If you see someone you admire, you'll want to become them. Which women can girls admire?

          [...]
          Genuinely please explain this from your linked paper:
          >Only when unsupervised clustering was applied to the “uncorrected” volume of gray and white matter regions, brains from females and males were more separated, with the chance that two males or two females would be in the same cluster being about twice the chance that a female and a male would be in the same cluster. It is noteworthy that this ratio, while higher than that obtained when unsupervised clustering algorithms were applied to “uncorrected” cortical thickness or to “corrected” volume of gray and white matter regions (∼1.1), is much lower than the ratio obtained by these algorithms when applied to the gender-stereotyped behavior (>6). Moreover, as was the case for the anomaly detection analysis, the better separation achieved for the “uncorrected” volume of gray and white matter regions was attributed to the differences between females and males in total brain volume.
          This reads as "female and male brains are actually the same when we eliminate thickness and volume from the comparison, otherwise they are obviously different"

          The greater difference in gender-stereotyped behavior compared to brain structure suggests that social or cultural factors play a larger role in these behavioral differences than structural brain differences. And yes, there a size difference, and now what? The size makes you be different too? Who said that?

          >Im against minors transitioning
          Why? It's been consistently shown early transitioning before puberty starts hitting lowering gender dysphoria seen in trannies. You won't be passing well to the opposite gender if you transition in your adulthood when growth hormones during your puberty dimorphises men and women.

          >Why?
          I don't know tbh, I would have to look for pros and cons.

          The water-level task is one of the most easily replicable experiments in psychology, and consistently splits results based on physical sex.
          Unless you want to argue that social pressures are keeping women from ever seeing glasses of water.

          Idk what you're talking about, but if you knew psychology, you would know that education matters.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >broccoli and oak tree bear remarkable structural similarity
            >forget the size difference, it's immaterial, broccoli and oak trees are the quantitatively the same and should be considered equivalent for any analysis

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Brain sizes makes no difference. There has been scientific studies on this, and what they showed is that the ratio brain weight/total weight is the one that is the most likely to determine intelligence. Whales have a huge brain but are dumb, because of this ratio. Obviously a female who weights 45 kg will have a smaller brain than me who weight 75 kg, but my brain has more stuff to manage (e.g. because I eat more food, so my digestion requires more cells time) so I'm not more intelligent.

              >it hasn't been firmly established
              That just means there hasn't been enough studies to corroborate that. It doesn't meant that there is no connection, just that it hasn't been formally studied.

              By the way it wasn't until 2019 that there was a study proving that cows produce more milk when they're relaxed and listening to music even though singing and making them relaxed to get more mill from them is something that has been observed and done for hundreds of years. There's also zero studies proving a definitive link between smoking and cancer even though we have observed the data and know the mechanisms involved.

              >That just means there hasn't been enough studies to corroborate that. It doesn't meant that there is no connection, just that it hasn't been formally studied.
              It means that such a connection cannot be proven. Therefore, with actual science and more than 70 studies on the subject, we can say it doesn't exist.
              >By the way it wasn't until 2019 that there was a study proving that cows produce more milk when they're relaxed and listening to music even though singing and making them relaxed to get more mill from them is something that has been observed and done for hundreds of years.
              OK...? Can't you see a difference between your misogynistic opinion and playing music to cows?
              >There's also zero studies proving a definitive link between smoking and cancer even though we have observed the data and know the mechanisms involved.
              This is not true. Here's a meta-analysis of 216 studies:
              https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17893872/

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                By that logic, an ant is the smartest creature. moron, the biggest correlation isn't brain size but brain cells. Even though the whale's brain is bigger, it has lesser nueral connections than a human brain.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                And why ants aren't smart despite having the largest brains relative to their size, because its so tiny that you can have only so much neurons.
                Btw, relatively most measurements show men having a higher head to total body ratio than women so even that argument is moot.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >By that logic, an ant is the smartest creature. moron, the biggest correlation isn't brain size but brain cells. Even though the whale's brain is bigger, it has lesser nueral connections than a human brain.
                Don't make me say things I didn't say. Dolphins have the highest ratio of all cetaceans, and they're effectively smarter than all others. I think you have to get beyond a certain threshold for this ratio to be relevant. But female and male humans are so close together in weight (relatively to ants) that this ratio is relevant.

                And why ants aren't smart despite having the largest brains relative to their size, because its so tiny that you can have only so much neurons.
                Btw, relatively most measurements show men having a higher head to total body ratio than women so even that argument is moot.

                "Some researchers prefer lean body weight to brain mass as a better predictor." (source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14673198/)
                Maybe that's why? I have no idea what you're talking about though, you don't give any source.

                >we can say it doesn't exists
                That's not how the null hypothesis works anon.

                >That's not how the null hypothesis works anon.
                That's exactly how it works though. Especially when you tried in more than 70 studies to prove it, but repeatedly failed to.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, among Cetaceans Sperm Whales are the smartest, some studies suggesting that they've a culture as complex as prehistoric humans. Dolphins are more approachable, but that doesn't mean they're smarter just like how dogs being more understandable to humans doesn't mean they're smarter than pigs.
                And even if women and men are slightly similar in body to head ratio, as another anon in the thread said, that slight advantage accounts for a lot in a larger population.
                Also, it's kind of funny how you screamed "muh correlation not causation" while citing hypothesis literally citing correlational observation(such as head to body ratio determining intelligence).
                And no, that's not how null hypothesis works. Especially when most of them do show correlation that you dismiss outright as "not strong evidence".

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >we can say it doesn't exists
                That's not how the null hypothesis works anon.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >it can't be proven
                Do you even scientific process bro? Science can't prove things right, only "not wrong." You cannot prove that there is or isn't a connection between sex and toys, but observational data points that way.

                By the way, there are zero long-term studies proving the effectiveness of HRT or transition. The only ones that exist are either riddled with methodology issues and/or high morbidity; or they find that in the long term there is no difference at all in outcome.

                Again, observational data points to troons being more mentally ill, more depressed and more suicidal despite having governments, the entire medical field and corporations bending over for them.
                >meta analysis
                All that can do is point towards a possible connection between smoking and cancer.

                Troons are the most disingenuous morons there are. They don't know, and don't care for, the scientific process. They just spout shitty useless studies to silence others.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Do you even scientific process bro? Science can't prove things right, only "not wrong." You cannot prove that there is or isn't a connection between sex and toys, but observational data points that way.
                Correlation doesn't mean causality.
                There are scientific studies showing that the older they get (the more education they get), the more they play with a toy meant for their gender according to society, which tends to show that without external societal pressure, the sex wouldn't determine which toys they play with.
                >By the way, there are zero long-term studies proving the effectiveness of HRT or transition. The only ones that exist are either riddled with methodology issues and/or high morbidity; or they find that in the long term there is no difference at all in outcome.
                There are meta-analysis like the one I linked, and you you have no source to back up your claim.
                https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32072611/
                >Again, observational data points to troons being more mentally ill, more depressed and more suicidal despite having governments, the entire medical field and corporations bending over for them.
                They are before or after transition, with or without it, but they are less depressed and have less suicidal thoughts after transition.
                >All that can do is point towards a possible connection between smoking and cancer.
                It shows a direct correlation between smoking and cancers, and this is a higher predicator than other things, so the scientific consensus is that smoking cause cancer. It won't necessarily be the cancer's cause in a smoker though.
                >Troons are the most disingenuous morons there are. They don't know, and don't care for, the scientific process. They just spout shitty useless studies to silence others.
                Are you talking about all humans and calling them "troons" for some reason?
                >Humans are the most disingenuous morons there are. They don't know, and don't care for, the scientific process. They just spout shitty useless beliefs to silence others.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Correlation doesn't mean causality.
                Playing styles vary from a very young age, which is something troons willingly ignore to hyper-focus on toy colors.
                >which tends to show that without external societal pressure, the sex wouldn't determine which toys they play with
                To reach this conclusion you have to assume from the beginning that all variation is solely due to societal factors (which is the biggest issue of all "gender" studies, including Money's). It could be that sex is an inherent part of the self and it manifest itself more strongly as time goes by.

                Which seems to be the case considering the vast majority of children with dysphoria get over it after puberty. Another thing troons love to ignore.
                >There are meta-analysis like the one I linked
                Irrelevant because they're based on garbage studies. If you make a meta-analysis of smoking studies financed by Marlboro you'd find out that smoking is good for health too.
                >and you you have no source to back up your claim
                Oh, but I do. All troon hallmark studies suffer from hilariously small groups, hilariously huge morbidity, hilariously short timeframes; or a combination of the three.

                The only long term study that has ever been conducted showed zero improvement, which is why a certain Nordic country rolled back their transitioning programs for children. Another fact troons love to ignore.
                >They are before or after transition, with or without it, but they are less depressed and have less suicidal thoughts after transition
                Not according to the only long term study that has ever been conducted. Also all observational data points towards transition being useless.
                >It shows a direct correlation between smoking and cancers
                But you just said correlation doesn't equal causation?

                You know which two things have higher correlation than smoking and cancer? Sex and gender.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >it hasn't been firmly established
            That just means there hasn't been enough studies to corroborate that. It doesn't meant that there is no connection, just that it hasn't been formally studied.

            By the way it wasn't until 2019 that there was a study proving that cows produce more milk when they're relaxed and listening to music even though singing and making them relaxed to get more mill from them is something that has been observed and done for hundreds of years. There's also zero studies proving a definitive link between smoking and cancer even though we have observed the data and know the mechanisms involved.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >there seems to be some proof gender differences start some time in early infancy
            >BUT THIS ISN'T STRONG EVIDENCE FOR YOUR SPECIFIC CLAIM
            >However it does increase with age
            >THIS IS STRONG PROOF FOR MY CLAIM THOUGH
            No, it's not. People associating certain things with their genders as they grow and learn isn't a proof that the gender is by itself socially created.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        What do you think? Do you think they could flash if they weren't careful?
        Skirts aren't some men only dress, most hot humid climates opt such as the c**tries opted for a dress that allowed free air flow.

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sisters i don't feel so good about this one

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >those points and error bars
      They will just cope saying they're all "one of the real ones" on the woman side of the chart

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it's indicating there's a subpopulation inside the troony population

        Draw the two humps in the troony one separately and you've got two normal distributions with 2 distinct populations
        there's a bunch of "trannies" that are clustering more male than the straight men are.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      hmmmm

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        they're just on the more effeminate side of male, not exactly unexpected information

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Damn she posted the pussy chart

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >The violin plots look like pussies except the troony one looks like a butcher job
      lel

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >ITT

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Are you pretending that your education isn't structuring your brain? Then why can't I have big muscles without any training too?
    Males and females get the same education.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Damn that's crazy really, I'm glad The Scientists exist out there to state the obvious

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >show brainscan to AI of a trans woman
    >AI says its female

    This would make chuds seethe forever kek. It's likely that transwomen truly have women brain (true trans though not AGP)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh I'm aware of that possibility. In fact I think homosexuality is caused by partial feminization of the brain, when it's not caused by certain actions taken during early adolescence owing to the fact that human sexuality is more malleable than anyone wants to admit.
      I just think that almost everyone currently claiming to be transgender would be identified according to their biological sex. IF the model is allowed to remain accurate.
      However if the production version is as biased as chatGPT is, this is going to be a massive disaster as it sorts almost everyone that goes through it into "female" just to cover its owner's and developer's asses from the troony mob, and will perpetuate the crisis.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >biased as chatGPT is, this is going to be a massive disaster as it sorts almost everyone that goes through it into "female" just to cover its owner's and developer's asses from the troony mob,
        It won't be "almost everyone" but it'll work exactly like this lol. It'll be like the bpd preschool teachers who see a little boy pick up a barbie who then coach him into telling his family that he's actually a girl but encoded into neural analysis. We're beyond fricked.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good morning, sir.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Genuinely please explain this from your linked paper:
    >Only when unsupervised clustering was applied to the “uncorrected” volume of gray and white matter regions, brains from females and males were more separated, with the chance that two males or two females would be in the same cluster being about twice the chance that a female and a male would be in the same cluster. It is noteworthy that this ratio, while higher than that obtained when unsupervised clustering algorithms were applied to “uncorrected” cortical thickness or to “corrected” volume of gray and white matter regions (∼1.1), is much lower than the ratio obtained by these algorithms when applied to the gender-stereotyped behavior (>6). Moreover, as was the case for the anomaly detection analysis, the better separation achieved for the “uncorrected” volume of gray and white matter regions was attributed to the differences between females and males in total brain volume.
    This reads as "female and male brains are actually the same when we eliminate thickness and volume from the comparison, otherwise they are obviously different"

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ok but by what mechanism where there even be differences between men and women like what could make them physically and mentally different that doesnt make sense

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      By what mechanism is a man made distinct from a dog.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Imagine how much better off civilization would be if females literally had the intelligence levels of dogs and only men could think and speak.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Men's brains are larger and have higher synapse density. Basically the male brain is more advanced.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Endocrinal

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Men have better spatial and motor skills
      Women have better long term memory and a more developed frontal lobe (behave more maturely)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      To put it simply, men are in general larger than men hence have larger brains(while having around the same nueral density which in means in average more brain cells than women, so it's not the case like elephants who have larger brains but blower nueral density than humans) than women in general. Though there's lots of cope studies going around saying intelligence in women isn't related to their brain size or something.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >while having around the same nueral density
        No.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Are you FRICKING moronic

      SEXUAL DIMORPHISM HAS BEEN SELECTED FOR BY EVOLUTION FOR HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF YEARS

      FRICKING have a nice day moron GORILLA Black person

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Enough. The chemicals are turning the frogs gay and they're making all the zoomers into femboys too.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I hope you're not being sarcastic because both of these are more or less true

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        anon all humans are equal

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if (bigbrain) then man else woman

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    you know what they say about guys with big brains

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it's so desperate its responding to itself now

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >.1 a

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Boys have a penis.
    Girls have a vegana.
    Your chromosomes determine your sex.
    Gender was conjured up by a pedo.
    This isn't complicated, morons.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is King!

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this stuff has always confused me
      who's who between "god" "jesus" "lord" "king" "holy spirit" etc
      they all seem to be used interchangeably, until you also use things like "jesus is the son of god", even though i've heard people use "the lord" to refer to both jesus and god

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Surprised there's only a mild amount of people being misleading on this in the thread and almost as much cope. The trannies keep winning.

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2310012121

    alright so where the frick can i get the full study? i wanna read it but i can't a non-paywalled website that has it

    has it been put in some pirated document database yet?

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Technology?

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This erages both sides of the crazies. One denies that the mental disorder of being transgender even exists while the other side fears this kind of research because it would make the transtrenders even more obvious because while they do have mental disorders it is not that one.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh I think it probably does exist.
      But just like those people who feel like their limbs aren't actually their own and are some corpse's or something, they are in fact so few in number that they shouldn't be even remotely politically relevant to anyone. I also think that the way to do the greatest good for the greatest number of people unfortunately means allowing their lives to be difficult and confusing so that everyone else can lead more predictable lives, and to remove or reduce the unfairness, hatred, competition, and porn that lead people to want to change their bodies so drastically, but also cause other social problems.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *