Isn't this tautological? The propaganda industrial complex gains control over the epistemology of Current Thing, and advertises the frick out of an experimental medical product. Later on advertises a bunch about AI doom and fear and the need for monopoly-granting regulation. It's not coincidence that the subset of the population not bamboozled by the one are less likely to have been had by the other as well.
I don't understand what is nonsensical with not trusting the goverment, and I say this as a double vaxxed myself. It is perfectly sensible to be skeptical of them
AI doomers are bullshitter, there is no such thing as AI ethic as AI do not exist in the first place.
skynet will never happen and it's about fricking time to realize that software are already killing people for a variety of reasons. there is ALREADY a need to keep in check globohomos and what they do for software if they really wanted to regulate anything
(personally I'm against any kind of censorship, if you want to build a robot killer or the most drm-riddled car with mtx and season passes then go for it)
>I don't understand what is nonsensical with not trusting the goverment
there is "not trusting" because of corruption and believing "rich people eat fetuses for breakfast"...
the latter is a group of big-mouthed morons, they're politicians useful idiots as they serve to discredit the former group that rightfully does not trust the gvt for legitimate reasons.
there is no discussion to be had until the group of morons disappear and it won't as it's just way too useful to have them around
> there is no discussion to be had until the group of morons disappear and it won't as it's just way too useful to have them around
How convenient for the corrupt. Almost like the second group are purposely exaggerated so you come to conclusions like this.
I think he's saying that those who arw against AI doomers, i.e., those who do not share the viewpoint that AI will end the human race soon enough, are in fact trump voters. Very odd claim.
>recognize this guy as someone I used to talk to on twitter >go visit his page >same old same old, just a personality twisted to cringe that was pretty based maybe 8 years ago >up to 14K followers (no doubt the result of not being banned for a decade) >engagement levels are comparable to what I had at 200 followers
You know, it's worth it in the end, getting banned.
Yeah the people who are in favor of AI are really tin foil hat wearing flat Earthers and the sane science believers think the Terminator series is real because they make less money drawing diaper fur porn
>cirno
>troony
it checks out
This is the exception that proves the rule.
Isn't this tautological? The propaganda industrial complex gains control over the epistemology of Current Thing, and advertises the frick out of an experimental medical product. Later on advertises a bunch about AI doom and fear and the need for monopoly-granting regulation. It's not coincidence that the subset of the population not bamboozled by the one are less likely to have been had by the other as well.
>twitter
>cirno pfp
A 6 letter acronym beginning with a Y would be a fitting response
Yidish?
>acronym
>aleph
Shut up, israelitel.
I don't understand what is nonsensical with not trusting the goverment, and I say this as a double vaxxed myself. It is perfectly sensible to be skeptical of them
AI doomers are bullshitter, there is no such thing as AI ethic as AI do not exist in the first place.
skynet will never happen and it's about fricking time to realize that software are already killing people for a variety of reasons. there is ALREADY a need to keep in check globohomos and what they do for software if they really wanted to regulate anything
(personally I'm against any kind of censorship, if you want to build a robot killer or the most drm-riddled car with mtx and season passes then go for it)
>I don't understand what is nonsensical with not trusting the goverment
there is "not trusting" because of corruption and believing "rich people eat fetuses for breakfast"...
the latter is a group of big-mouthed morons, they're politicians useful idiots as they serve to discredit the former group that rightfully does not trust the gvt for legitimate reasons.
there is no discussion to be had until the group of morons disappear and it won't as it's just way too useful to have them around
> there is no discussion to be had until the group of morons disappear and it won't as it's just way too useful to have them around
How convenient for the corrupt. Almost like the second group are purposely exaggerated so you come to conclusions like this.
lmao as if these fricktards were intelligent enough to do that.
Sun Tzu advises against underestimating your opponent
>AI doomers are bullshitter, there is no such thing as AI ethic as AI do not exist in the first place.
OP pic is saying anti "AI doomers" are nuts.
i don't understand how this guy has roughly 15k followers, his takes are as milquetoast as they get
>I notice that people I disagree with are all one person
You notice things like that when you have schizophrenia
>you don't believe the science you saw in The Terminator and The Matrix?!
The real science we should be worried about is from the RoboCop mini-series.
People think ai will mean they 'won't have a job' but the reality is augmented humanity where you are made to toil for eternity
I would like a pet recycler.
>/x/ is one person
Reading this post felt like having a stroke. Is this against AI Doomers or against those who oppose AI Doomers?
I think he's saying that those who arw against AI doomers, i.e., those who do not share the viewpoint that AI will end the human race soon enough, are in fact trump voters. Very odd claim.
this lmao 4cuck is fricking pathetic
It's because we have so many zoomers here now.
have a nice day reddit Black person
4cucks are so fragile lol
go back
i'm already here
You're not, reddit refugee.
You forgot to say Black person/homosexual in your post. Your hardened bot badge has been revoked. Better luck next time!
Imagine handing out (You)s to everyone in the thread only to preach "don't care what others think"
>recognize this guy as someone I used to talk to on twitter
>go visit his page
>same old same old, just a personality twisted to cringe that was pretty based maybe 8 years ago
>up to 14K followers (no doubt the result of not being banned for a decade)
>engagement levels are comparable to what I had at 200 followers
You know, it's worth it in the end, getting banned.
I find him really bland, I can picture him turning into a basedjak caricature with every post of his.
Twitter is weird.
2 more weeks until cleverbot takes over the world. trust the plan sub 80 IQ bros. our heckin' marvel movies ARE going to become reality.
>Keep noticing how people I disagree with are stupid. Coincidence?
Yeah the people who are in favor of AI are really tin foil hat wearing flat Earthers and the sane science believers think the Terminator series is real because they make less money drawing diaper fur porn
Speaking of diaper artists
I keep noticing that a lot of people tweet effectively meaningless but socially acceptable drivel to get likes from strangers
Ah! A fellow NOOTICER
>memetic warfare
Imagine a bioweapon spreading with a bit of help but instead of a biological virus it's a series of thought viruses.
>vaccine denial is unscientific
thanks for confirming which revision of 'science' we are talking about
>twitter screencap thread
have a nice day