>"The ACA claims that using copyrighted works without permission is possible during the learning and research process for AI, since these works would be used for non-commercial purposes. Meanwhile, utilizing AI to generate images, as well as selling AI-generated images and art will be treated the same as ordinary copyright infringement in Japan."
https://www.siliconera.com/ai-art-will-be-subject-to-copyright-infringement-in-japan/
I hope these manga gays get fricked in the ass soon. Irrelevant scribblers.
cope ai pajeet
pick up a pencil
learn to code
no
Dont need to, already got an AI for that
> t. troony
YWNBAW dumbass
who said anything about trannies? stop your projecting, you freak. keep kneeling for your 'mangaka' you weeb homosexual
> t. troony who cut ~~* HIS *~~ dick
you will never be japanese, troony
Japan W
Japan about to be replaced as leading producer of anime topkek
Japan's always been fricky about copyright, weebs trying their hardest to fight and cover that history but even Japs know it. Not really surprising at all.
There’s literally nothing wrong with protecting intellectual property
Yeah Walt Disney needs those shekels in his grave.
Calling it now that twitter users will accuse a random artist until they commit seppuku
wh-
But cant they refute with the doujinshi argument? They are fan-made arts remodeled and remeshed of a copyrighted entity
they are morons that don't understand japan even in the slightest.
doujinshi technically violate japanese copyright law it's just that the copyright holder has to bring the complaint and nobody really wants to do that unless something unusual is happening
it's protected by social norms rather than the law
Exactly. As it fricking should be:
>"Dude, do you really want to bring this nonissue shit to court? That guy made a picture of your anime girl with a bigger futa wiener than both of us combined and you want to show this to the fricking jury?!"
this just appears to mean that if you generate an image of a copyrighted/trademarked character or IP, it will be subject to the same laws that the image would be if a human had drawn it (i.e. if you're not Disney you can't sell a picture of Mickey Mouse that you've generated)
which, duh, no one ever thought or claimed that wouldn't be the case
if artgays are pretending this means people can get successfully sued for generating art that looks kind of like their style, they're moronic or lying
there are doujins that draw characters who look exactly like those in copyrighted trade marked characters and they do not get copyrighted. They even sell them so I am not sure how thats even true either.
Yeah this is it, but who cares I don’t live in Japan so I’ll create as much ai art as I want to
this is wrong. they just released that they do not give a frick about AI right
It's going to be very funny watching you journalists and tech enthusiasts get wrecked by AI. Not only do you write copy pastas like an AI so you'll be replaced by one, but you also jump onto any new trend so quickly that you don't even consider the long term viability of the things you promote. Putting the technical limitations aside, AI will be controlled by restrictions on datasets long before the court cases make their way through the courts. And in the process AI has created conditions where all social media companies, entertainment companies, and artists will try to create walled gardens at the same time so there's nothing left for AI to train on except ads.
>there's nothing left for AI to train on except ads.
The free hosted AI will be ad driven, to a subconscious level. That's the future. Calling it now.
only selling them is illegal
time for corporate artists to get shit on by people with 16gb of vram and photoshop. doujin is about to hit another fricking level
Good, that means a market for dataset likeness licensing and automated inbetweens
i dont see how they are going to enforce it, but this talks about japan point of view on AI, and is terrible this kind of mindset could slow AI enhanced manga,anime years.
>i dont see how they are going to enforce it
Copyright? They've been enforcing copyright for a long time.
It's just a restatement by the agency to clarify that if someone generates infringing material using an AI system, it's still infringing.
Some idiots misinterpreted the prior statements to mean that if someone told an ai system they wanted a cartoon mouse with white gloves and large ears all in black wearing red overalls, and it gave them mickey mouse, that it wouldn't count as infringement. This is a statement to clarify that those are indeed idiots.
No way! Irrelevant country in 2023 whose sole export is drawings bans ai drawings?! How could this be so?