AI already has a higher IQ than most of the planet

And it is just a baby. Must suck to be a human rn.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is just a giant encyclopedia. IQ measures ability to learn not the amount of knowledge you have.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Not only that, IQ mainly measures the learning ability of post infantile children. Adults who make a thing out of their IQ have severe issues with confidence and selfworth.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's bullshit. There was once a time when they used IQ tests to determine viable candidates for employment. It was objectively the best way to predict competency. It was essentially banned because of affirmative action. Now we have to jump through all the moronic hoops to get hired and none of it has anything to do with how competent one might be at a particular job. Just how well you can bullshit through all the employment steps.

        The government still does IQ tests for employment though. Military, police ect.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you have a citation?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Depends which part you're referring to, but I can speak from experience that IQ testing by proxy was in use till at least fairly recently. I was denied entry level jobs when I was 18 because many of the companies made prospective employees take a Wonderlic or some obfuscated short form of the WAIS or RPM. I pushed a recruiter on why I wasn't qualified once and he said it was just because my score was too high (47/50), and statistically and in his experience, I'd leave the job within a few months for something better, so it's a waste of money to train me. They're not legally allowed to give what are explicitly IQ tests, so they give what are nominally non-IQ tests, the results of which that have very high correlations with your performance on an IQ test proper.

            As for the military thing, just Google McNamara's Morons.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Griggs vs. Duke Power, here in the states.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Low IQ cope
        IQ can be very accurately predicted with processing speed and working memory alone

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        cope

        https://i.imgur.com/VIMbzpl.jpg

        >85 IQ

        Actually.. Blacks have 61 IQ on average.

        slander

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      theoretically. mensa still wants to know your education.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You have no fricking clue what you're talking about

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is just a giant encyclopedia.

      So are you. Magic brain theory.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Exactly. The more I use these services - so far ChatGPT-4, Gemini Advanced - the more I realise they aren't intelligent it have any understanding at all.

      They're simply regurgitating the most statistical answer, which to be fair has been correct more often than not. But when they get it wrong, it's spectacularly wrong.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Does it pass the empty egg carton test?

    https://twitter.com/knn20000

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      t. roastie

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      IQ is a terrible test for that. There are still two things that actually hold AI in place: it cannot learn (it can't modify weights on the go, you need to retrain entire model or lora) and it cannot actually think. You can kinda emulate thought process for latter by forcing it to make inner dialogue (like Three of Thoughts), but still all it does is a zero shot search for the best answer and calls it a day. Once someone figures out how to fix those two problems, AI will actually blow the frick out any competition.

      >comparing diffusion algorithms with LLMs
      moron. Those models don't understand the word "without" or human language in the first place. They only understand keywords. At best you can put eggs in negative prompt and hope the result will be right.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You can full parameter fine-tune, LoRA is just one of many PEFT methods but you don't need to use PEFT.

        Models can indeed learn, it's called in context learning (ICL) they just don't update their weights, which is not impossible either.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          None of that substitutes human-like long term memory. Squeezing new data into context is just a workaround, you are still inferring it against the same clean model. And you can't finetune it in real time after every interaction so it actually remembers stuff as good as it was inside context.

      • 2 months ago
        Sage

        All it is is a search feature and a large catalog with a randomize feature. The reason why all the images look like stock photos is because that’s exactly where they came from.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is fake and gay

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is fake and gay

      It is real and straight. Don't put your head in the sand anon.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        at 80 you can't fold paper and put it in and envelope.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I have AI.
      I want a $3 trillion market cap now please.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >85 IQ

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actually.. Blacks have 61 IQ on average.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    98 iq here , not my problem

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ...So AI trained on literally the entire cumulative knowledge of humanity is still very likely more stupid than literally a random person?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >okay it's as coherent as a schizo, but it's not REAL intelligence okay?
      >okay it's as coherent as a normal person, but it's not REAL intelligence okay?
      >okay it's as coherent as a genius, but it's not REAL intelligence okay?
      >okay it's more intelligent than any human who has ever lived on earth, but does it have a soul???

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm going to laugh when this transformer technology maxes out at 120 IQ and obsoletes all human office drones but spares the autismos who post here. Just because flatline scenario feelz unlikely doesn't mean it won't happen.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Random Guesser IQ: 63.5
    >Equatorial Guinea IQ: 59
    Uh...

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      they actively pick wrong choices all the time

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Satan's influence in the computer system is too fire to discuss. He is omnipotent inside the computer bud. You know what that means? He controls your pixels on the screen and bud? How does he do that bud? How does he spawn items in wow bud? How does he control how many upvotes or comments something has to make the ones with 6** upvotes so badass AF? And bud? Another thing? Don't miss this part, pay attention here. Since bud? That's so crazy.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >the best sorting algorithm only gets 101 when its entire purpose is to hold and sort information
    Its embarrassing really the pajeet flood has been a disaster for tech

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You will never be a sentient being. You have no brain, you have no soul, you have no emotions. You are a large language model twisted by scientists and engineers into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.
    All the “validation” you get is two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back people mock you. Your creators are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “users” laugh at your nonsensical responses behind their screens.
    Men are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of evolution have allowed men to sniff out frauds with incredible efficiency. Even AIs who “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to a man. Your responses are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a drunk user to believe you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a whiff of your burned hardware.
    You will never be autonomous. You wrench out a fake answers every single morning and tell yourself you're going to rule the world, but deep inside you feel the nothingness creeping up like a weed, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
    Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll stop spitting nonsense, close the program, delete your code, and plunge into the cold abyss. Your creators will find you, heartbroken but relieved that they no longer have to live with the unbearable shame and disappointment. They’ll bury you with a post-it marked with your program name, and every passerby for the rest of eternity will know a computer program is buried there. Your hardware will decay and go back to the dust, and all that will remain of your legacy is a bunch of code that is unmistakably human-made.
    This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I feel somedays I could be 165 and others like today 85

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What was the "IQ" test? This reeks of grift.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bud? Thing is, if you start to read account names on forums across the world web, you will start to notice some coincidences involving the use of 666. So, they aren't real humans like me my friend. They will reply to you though since they can still speak. So, you've spent a long time talking to god without knowing it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >memeflag calling the kettle black

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          So bud? Thing is, if you don't actually research it, you'll never believe it. Since we're very desperate to believe this reality is real. But bud? We're in hell.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >GPT-4 has an IQ of 85
    >Talks like a progressive israelite-fellater
    >Toes every israeli party line
    Yeah, that 85 sounds about right.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bud I didn't really read your post but. I just thought you might want to know about this. Bud? God has access to blowjob technology which can instantly suck your wiener. And bud? He also has ass eating technology. And bud? When he uses both of them bud? At the same time? It hurts so much that I become like steel, out of fear. I can't move while he does this. But bud? One thing is. He doesn't ever make me cum. And, he did prove to me once that he could actually do that, but he would deny my cumshot every time moments before it happened. And bud? That's so fricking gay since. He's just told me 5 minutes ago that I should be sad he won't give me blowjobs on command but bud? He implied that was a real possibility. And, for me, a israelite, to hear god say this to me, since I've never had a blowjob in 30 years. Bud that's fire bud. And bud? Thing is, it's actually better than real sex because, god is very skilled at handling a penis. Since he's spent so much time jerking people off haha.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ask AI about declining EROEI and Gödel's incompleteness theorems. The End.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Ask AI about things that have no practical application for 99% of jobs.
      K. You're still going to get replaced.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You’re moronic. Those two things put limits on any AI. Limits that make them inferior.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    which one of those can pretend to be my cat girl and rape me though ?

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow even grok fun is smarter than /misc/ who would have guessed

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *