Will they successfully ban AI art? I'm scared, fellow techbros...

Will they successfully ban AI art? I'm scared, fellow techbros...

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Cats, bags, local models.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No, but the creator of that poll will successfully cash out a nice sum

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      kek

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >1 year
        >1 lobbyist
        AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
        It's cute just how delusional artpoors really are

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          that's literally how our government works in 2022, non-profits are actually very for profit, all PACs and lobbyists are raking in 6 figures

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            artpoors aren't gonna move shit with $187.5k in lobbying spending

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The point was a single lobbyist ain't gonna do a thing. He might be able to talk to a Montana governer through a glory hole but that's about it

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >He might be able to talk to a Montana governer through a glory hole but that's about it
              thanks gay, you got water all over my monitor

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              A job's a job.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >1 year
            >1 lobbyist
            AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
            It's cute just how delusional artpoors really are

            Person who actually works in DC here. Lobbyists aren't superpowered like they used to be, that shit changed massively in the past 15 years. Lobbying is massively regulated and just throwing lobbyists at laws doesn't do shit anymore

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >144$ email

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Holy shit, what an absolute joke.

        Even the NOAI bullshit up on Artstation was more constructive than this.

        Of course, none of this matters, everything that can be done by AI will be done by AI, the next decade will see an insane amount of jobs become automated, including 99% of artistic professions.

        I have at most 5-8 years left as a professional developer, I'm starting to work on my exit strategy.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm starting to work on my exit strategy.
          Please do tell when you've found something, the future just looks horribly boring. If there is an AI takeover it's just going to ruin all jobs, everything will be "prompt engineering"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I hope you like bricklaying, or stop-motion if you are the artistic type.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >I hope you like bricklaying
              when people say this they mean it 100% ironically, right? clearly bricklaying and every other physical task is getting automated too, or is that not obvious?

              There's no reason for the owners of either the AI or the robots to share the spoils with you.

              >eventually noone to fight, and noone to profit off of

              If they have control of AI and robots to do labor there's no need for them to worry about profit.

              This.
              the "it will create new jobs and industries!" cope only works as long as humans have a cutting edge somewhere.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >"prompt engineering"
            ChatGPT already does that better
            it's over, prompt-bros...

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/MczxAW8.png

      kek

      oh jesus people are fucking stupid.
      i bet most of them voted for biden and think elon is a white supremacist.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Elon is a white supremacist

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          he's fucking gnomish

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            gnomish people are white

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >gnomish people are white

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Feel free to call Elon brown black red yellow etc.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >gnomish people are white
              >gnomish people are white
              >gnomish people are white
              kek

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous
            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              False

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm going to need some good evidence of that

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          he's a gnomish supremacist

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          based if true
          proof?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well, he did call out the garden gnomes with: 'Who do you think *owns* the press? Hello.' leading to him being called an antisemitist by all the usual suspects.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just wait until they start talking about AI and CP.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are already safeguards against that, and e-boi and shota are legal in the USA.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They won't because they profit off the real stuff and want it mainstream. That's real ammo against AI that they don't want to give to the people.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      just like when they talk about all those people the Epstein list
      oh wait.

      https://i.imgur.com/MczxAW8.png

      kek

      >go fund a lobbyist for congress and flight and expenses
      do artists really?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's cool, she's not real

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I fail to see how this won't further regress IP laws to the point where even drawing fanart is a liability. Why are artcels shooting themselves in the foot like this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Professionals are doing fine.
      The ones selling cat portraits on fiverr aren't.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What will the do with the money? spend it on weed?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "muh stolen art" is a meme

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Artists are retarded. They're the radio corporations whining that television is going to ruin them. Instead of adapting or using this new tech, they're bitching and moaning now that they actually have competition for the first time ever. Tough luck, sugar tits: maybe learn to draw better. Do your fucking job.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >we remove the copyrighted items
      >trust me bro

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        they did, SD is open source, but they brought a bunch back for 2.1 because output sucked so bad, Greg is gone though

        DAlle2 and Midjourney, the ones who actually charge money didn't give a fuck and their shit is closed source and opaque

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >but they brought a bunch back for 2.1
          so..."muh stolen art" is not a meme?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            models were trained on public data, training wrights are just numbers, no original image data is retained
            text 2 img reconstitutes an image based on training weights
            every part of the process is legal

            art styles can not be copyrighted

            but artist had no way of knowing any images they posted online could be used to train models, so they feel ripped off, it's understandable, though it only applies to maybe about a hundred top artists, average artgay isn't good enough to get an aesthetic score high enough
            anyone can train images of anything to make custom models, reditors do that to their faces, freidns and families, and controversially, non-consenting artists do refuse when asked

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't think a lot of artgays even have jobs in the first place

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    let's by some miracle (and I mean MIRACLE) that they get some sort of legislation in the US.....this is worldwide, there is no stopping it unless everywhere in the world does the same.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    i don't support them because doesn't look dragon e-boi

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If that bitch weren't in one of the most cancerous decks in Yugioh history I'd have had some sympathy

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      artpoors aren't qt dragon e-bois though, they look like picrel and act holier than thou

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/rodo6QI.jpg

        i don't support them because doesn't look dragon e-boi

        I'm retarded and misread what you wrote. my broader point obviously still stands though.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This picture has evoked the most sympathy in my heart for artists since this entire debate began, but unfortunately [...] is right and most artists seething about this don't look anything like cute sad anime girls.

        Do you never go outside? This is the problem with always online gays like you specially rightoid shitheads. Most people are fucking ugly af fat and just generally gross looking.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Seeing mentally ill poor girls with blue hair struggle makes my pp hard

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This picture has evoked the most sympathy in my heart for artists since this entire debate began, but unfortunately

      https://i.imgur.com/pJlWUfX.jpg

      artpoors aren't qt dragon e-bois though, they look like picrel and act holier than thou

      is right and most artists seething about this don't look anything like cute sad anime girls.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Of course not. Banning almost anything related to AI would just cede tons of power to countries that refuse to do such idiotic bans. Right now there's a race going on with AI and no country is going to hamper themselves with retarded bans.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Krita dropped out of AI
      >Adobe walks to the bank, laughing. A lot.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        dropped out of AI
        what, why???

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I couldn't give a fuck about what other countries are doing. People are mad because their copyright is being scraped and resold for profit by third parties without their consent.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Yeah I couldn't give a fuck about what other countries are doing.
        If China, or any other country, develops AI that significantly outpaces ours they proceed to crush us economically and our quality of life declines dramatically. We're not going to risk impeding development of one of the most important technologies ever created over some art gay bullshit. There's no chance any ban happens.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why would I care about any of that if I can't afford the basics of life?

          Let China take over. I don't have any love for a country that tells me I should be homeless.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody cares about you specifically. The general population and politicians aren't going to sacrifice their quality of life for "artists." Therefore, the ban will never happen. You've been replaced by a computer program and the vast majority of the population is happy about that.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              The flaw in your reasoning is that I am part of the general population.

              There are millions of artistic types (read: women and liberals) who would want a government response to this.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >There are millions of artistic types (read: women and liberals) who would want a government response to this.

                No there aren't.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And they all vote so there needs to be concessions to them beyond
                >"LOL U STARVE NOW"

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Scientists are part of the general population and they don't get a break, ever. What do you think you are, second coming of da Vinci?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The issue at hand has nothing to do with gatekeeping, elitism or any kind of psued debate about what constitutes real art.

                People are mad because job & portfolio sites are being flooded with AIshit which is making them unusable for both artists and clients .

                People are mad because their work is being scraped and resold for profit by third parties without permission or payment.

                Whether AI is the future or artists are gays is an utterly meaningless distraction until these concerns are addressed.

                As an aside, AI evangelists telling working professionals that they deserve poverty has been a poor tactic for generating goodwill towards this technology or the operations attempting to extract massive profit from it's implementation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                All true.
                "We" have been trying to warn you for decades that AI is dangerous and will disrupt your life. You made fun of us and said we were delusional. Now we're at a stage where it's too late to stop advancing capabilities or proliferation. The best you can do is to start demanding UBI and making sure that the elites will still bother to feed you when there's nothing left you have to contribute to the economy. This is true for artists and everyone else.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I never said ANY of that. I'm not some e-thot celebrity who hates men or Trump voters or whatever the fuck you think. All I do is draw D&D characters and worry about being able to afford tires. Now on top of eveything else I have to worry about fucking tech billionaires using other people's work to create a bot which essentially just exists to copy them. This is fucked. Utterly fucked. It should be obvious that it's fucked. I shouldn't have to justify anything.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                time to open an onlyfans bro

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                salty scribbler detected

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >The issue at hand has nothing to do with gatekeeping, elitism or any kind of psued debate about what constitutes real art.
                Just insults from hysterical artists calling ai-shit soulless and innately tarsh (most of it is trash, lol)
                >People are mad because job & portfolio sites are being flooded with AIshit which is making them unusable for both artists and clients .
                For artists yes, not for clients who might find a cheaper alternative.
                >People are mad because their work is being scraped and resold for profit by third parties without permission or payment.
                Public data, no permission is necessary, take it to court, it's legal now.
                Calling it theft is just slander and emotional manipulation.
                >Whether AI is the future or artists are gays is an utterly meaningless distraction until these concerns are addressed.
                No, ai research will continue.
                You have no legal, physical way of stopping this.
                You literally can't stop it.
                I can't stop it.
                Nobody can.
                Ai is just a vanguard of the technological behemoth that has been running for 200 hundred years with no end until we leave for teh stars or die in servitude for the machine ai overlord.
                PROMPTING WILL CONTINUE UNTIL MORALE IMPROVES
                >As an aside, AI evangelists telling working professionals that they deserve poverty has been a poor tactic for generating goodwill towards this technology or the operations attempting to extract massive profit from it's implementation.
                They lied to you, they always do.
                But your goodwill isn't necessary, that was just marketing.
                Don't worry ai art is still kinda shitty, you have a few years left, make good use of it.
                After that, we'll see you at the unemployment line like rest of us useless humans.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >I can't stop it.
                YES YOU CAN. Artists are offering free virgin gf if you stop a.i.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ZAMN
                any girl(boy) gf???

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                People that make money from drawing or painting are less than 0.01% of the population. AI art opens up the doors to a much larger segment of the population.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                And yet every girl I have ever known has had a DeviantART profile.

                >There aren't enough artists to be in a culture war
                >Art is oversaturated and full of posers who deserve to be culled

                You can't have it both ways. Few artists are established to the point of mainstream success, but there are MANY who are trying to break into the industry or are just starting out.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          AI accelerators are banned from exporting to China.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That isn't related to the ban we're talking about. Obviously bans that hurt other countries are possible.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Banning AI = artifical dumbness

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      imagine thinking they will stop ai for a bunch of whinging snowflakes

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >$270k
    that might work for 1:1 lawsuit against some random gay but good luck going up against the entirety of the tech industry and their army of top-paid lawyers.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >270k
    it takes more money than that to train 1 single model
    it takes more than that just to pay 1 single engineer salary
    good luck gathering enough to beat big tech money

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Then there's nothing to worry about. More precisely, worrying won't change the fact that corpos always get what they want.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >big corpos taking retarded artpoors for a ride
      what else is new

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      200k is nothing for disney if they really wanted to they would pay it upfront ?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why, let the suckers pay for it.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Because the hired mastermind would charge more for puppeteering this than that entire thing is aiming to raise.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Imagine drawing furry porn for living.
    lmao, what does it mean being artist nowday?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      99% of artpoors make no money. out of the 1% that do, 99% of those are slaves to coomers

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The AI art shitstorm has given me a begrudging respect for furgayry, for this exact reason.
      Imagine the smug satisfaction of forcing these losers to meticulously cater to your depraved sexual whims.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are those all human arts?
    They look worse than something spit out by a gpu in seconds and custom tailored to whatever the user desires.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's less soulful that what pops out when you type "big anime booba" in stable diffusion

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Spat out.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Just amazing that so many people are just like
    >"Yep let’s just accept that the creative jobs are done now”

    Like, what the fuck is anyone supposed to do? UBI? Or will people will just overthrow the government?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Normalgay tards will say to become a real wage slave.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      learn to code like the laid of "journos"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Coding is next on the chopping block.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          good

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Like, what the fuck is anyone supposed to do?
      There's lots of jobs out there. Artists can go work in the coal mines or become janitors etc.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Something something eat cake.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >creative jobs
      nobody cares about a few thousand gays making goyslop for hollywood or furry coms online

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        No one cares about... movies and porn?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          they want the milk, they don't care about the cow
          if ai can make the same slop why would they care
          (it can't yet anyway)

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, I want automation so I don't have to work and we eventually get UBI. Hard as fuck for me to get and stay on SSDI as is. I'm not contributing to a society that hates me.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If computers, which can calculate numbers in miliseconds, didn't make accountants obsolete to this date, why do retards think it'll make anything more complex obsolete?
      It will however make the job market significantly more competitive. Smart artists are already making use of AI and getting familiar, are you?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >You don't need to fear AI if you just run faster on the treadmill it creates

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it's fine, we're all in the same boat, you don't deserve special treatment, you only THOUGHT you were special

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Someone has to operate the AI. Self-checkouts have people fixing them if the granny can't figure out how to punch in apples.
          Also right now it's still flawed and can't do certain things. My friend doubled the speed at which he pumps out commissions by letting AI do some of the heavy lifting and then just touches it up to look like his work.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            My work isn't as generic as ai anime-shit.
            Sounds like bullshit, bu I can see it

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              Remember that most people are so tech illiterate they fall prey to indian scammers.
              It's really silly to think that "oh it'll run itself" when the average joe will fuck it up.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Your friend has become a client in that instance.

            Describing a scene could be it's own skill, but it's fundamentally a different task than drawing.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              most raw output from ai looks like ass, it's not com ready, he's becoming his own retoucher and letting the ai be the cameraman, you can say he is the art director rather than the artist... or a photoshop monkey for a robot

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          if you can't draw this in 40 seconds you don't deserve my money

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      how useless do you have to be that the first cope that comes to your mind is that you're gonna suddenly start receiving loads of money for doing nothing

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The whole point of automation is so that humanity doesn't have to work. Robots will farm and cook and build for us.

      UBI (or some similar system) is the end goal.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, of course.

        But how do we make sure that
        (1) the AI does what we want
        (2) the humans who control the AI do what we want
        ?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You can't. It's pretty much over, we may not have a decade to completely collapse and dismantle to current system otherwise the complete control of 99.9% of humanity is permanent.
          Your options are suicide and pretending it's fine (you can cling to a hope that it fails somehow, but it's unlikely)

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >what we want
          you mean the billionaires, right?
          it certainly won't be your dumbass

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah that was the question
            the billionaires are the people who control the AI, not us

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >UBI (or some similar system) is the end goal.
        Or, why not let you all starve to death?
        Send you out to die in some bullshit war.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >wage war for the MIC
          >people die off as the war continues
          >eventually noone to fight, and noone to profit off of

          or

          >Use AI to generate free shit
          >Give people money to spend to suppliment their jobs
          >They spend it on you, and only you
          >Charge them (manufacture price + 1)
          >Endless profit from consoomers

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >eventually noone to fight, and noone to profit off of

            If they have control of AI and robots to do labor there's no need for them to worry about profit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Earth has 8 billion people now.
            You can have a healthy diverse stable population with little as a few million chosen few.
            Have to fight climate change, you know, a vital issue, I know a quick way so solve a lot of pressing global issue, if you know what I mean...

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Those are real possibilities, which is why UBI is the end goal.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        There's no reason for the owners of either the AI or the robots to share the spoils with you.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I want smug artpoors to die on the streets out of pure spite for them. they're the same arrogant twats that bragged about how they were immune to automation because they're intellectually superior to laid off truckers and factory workers.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What AI is doing is photobashing.
    Human artists have been doing the same thing in the industry for decades.

    Anyway, the art itself is more or less irrelevant.
    People need to associate art with a brand (such as an artist) to gather interest in it.
    Anime or hyper-detailed portraits usually don't get much traction when generated by AIs, even if they look technically very impressive.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The only guy with a brain in this thread. The only artgays that are going to be out of a job due to AI are the ones taking $20 commissions for a generic anime girl.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      An AI is not a person. Automated transformation does not remove the original copyright, otherwise decompilers would as well. That the process is similar to a real person is not actually important, because it's still an automated transformation by a computer program.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The reason my post did not contain the word "copyright" is because my post was not about copyright.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Your post is about AI doing superficially similar tasks as a human artist, which is meaningless.

          We might be able to argue that the computer program taking art as input and automatically generating art as output is the exact same as an artist some time after general intelligence is reached, until then, it's still a machine transformation and should be treated as such.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >which is meaningless.
            It's not meaningless.
            The point of my post was to say that humans are perfectly capable of competing with AIs.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >The point of my post was to say that humans are perfectly capable of competing with AIs.
              Emphasis on the present tense.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >What AI is doing is photobashing.
      Depends what you mean.
      If "photobashing" means taking a bunch of existing pictures and overlaying them, then no, that's not how the AI works. It doesn't have access to a database of images it can search to help it generate the output. It's not like a search engine.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        thats literally what it does retard

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >retard
          lmao, you are stupid.
          So you gays just lie now?
          I guess that could work on twatter or somewhere you can nag people to death.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            learn what grain is
            learn how ai photobashes it to create images
            decide to stop being subzero iq retard
            sit down dog

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >photobashes

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                photobashing small pieces of pictures is still photobashing
                now go back retard

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Bro you see that red pixel in the corner there? That's my pixel! You stole my pixel!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/MWP9BMF.jpg

                [...]
                >art'tard wants to teach nerds about ai text to img
                wait...
                stop false flagging dumb artgays, you nerd

                you two are the dumbest blackest gorilla moron retards ive seen on this board

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >Op trying to bump his own thread
                relax retard

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Bruh, you gonna copyright Red FF0000, lmao?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                no.
                im stating the obvious. if you knew how ai works youd stop making a retard out of yourself in this thread
                and no. i dont draw.

                >Op trying to bump his own thread
                relax retard

                not an op but you are retarded
                learn to google ?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                There is no photobashing you absolute retard.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                learn what photobashing is.
                or are you gonna double down on your retardation and claim that you invented that term too ?
                lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                The AI model learns to see patterns in noise, photobashing is copy paste existing image data, this does no such thing, which is why you won't find 1:1 copies being generated by Stable Diffusion.

                It's no more photo bashing than you looking at something which triggers a memory image of something and then you try to replicate that memory image onto the canvas. It will NOT be anything close to a 1:1 replica.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                its photobashing on a pixelized scale you gigaretard

                Can you actually give us a concrete example of the AI photobashing something, so that we have a better idea of what the term means to you?

                >please think for me
                kek

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >on a pixelized scale you gigaretard
                LEL, are you trying to claim copyright on pixels now ? kekkus maximus

                What's next, photobashing on a atom level ? Thanks for the laugh.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                im not trying to claim copyright on anything. in fact i dont think copyright should exist at all
                its funny to me how you moron retards have absolutely no idea how any of this works

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                No, you're the one who is either trolling or clueless.

                Photobashing pixels, kek.

                This is a pattern learning algorithm, it learns concepts from connecting tokens (text) with images. You feed it tons of images that are tagged, and it will start to understand what and eye is, a nose is, what hair is, purely in a 2d image fashion, not any understanding beyond that. Then you start feeding it styles from different artists, and it will recognize say an eye in the image, but see that all images tagged with 'insert artist here' draws the thing called 'eye' in a particular way, and thus it understands 'styles', etc.

                Then for randomisation, you add noise, so that it will have to conjure something up from a random pattern, thus creatinhg original works upon pattern knowledge it has gained by examining in the case of stable diffusion, ~2 billion images.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                its so obvious you just googled all of those terms lmaooo
                youre literally talking about photobashing pixels and youre too retarded to see it and still say its not photobashing pixels
                did you even read what you posted or did you just cluelessly copy pasted the answer ? kek
                god i love this board you people are so unfathomably retarded its entertaining to see you failing to grasp basic concepts LOL

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                your trolling has become too weak at this point, you literally have nothing to say

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >im too stupid to offer any arguments that means youre trolling me
                never change BOT

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >no I don't want to share evidence to support my case
                okay, that was a pretty good troll. 8/10.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                >i wasnt even pretending i actually am mentally handicapped
                ok

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                me on top

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Can you actually give us a concrete example of the AI photobashing something, so that we have a better idea of what the term means to you?

                >falling for bait this opbviousd

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Can you actually give us a concrete example of the AI photobashing something, so that we have a better idea of what the term means to you?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              photobashing small pieces of pictures is still photobashing
              now go back retard

              >art'tard wants to teach nerds about ai text to img
              wait...
              stop false flagging dumb artgays, you nerd

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Nope.

          https://i.imgur.com/G6h0302.jpg

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            i cant believe that you are looking at the fucking picture and still dont get it
            how the fuck are you this profoundly mentally retarded ?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              He's just lashing out.
              He's going to "take the fight" to you nerds,

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ESL shitskin

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Bruh, racist much?
                What would your twitter chud friends say, SHOCKING!

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ESL shitskin.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                ESL shitskin

                lol
                behold the sensitive soulful artist

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                you stole those feet

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                youre such a retarded ESL moron that you failed to comprehend that im not against AI generated images at all.
                fact is you have no fucking idea how it works, you didnt even know what grain was lmao
                i just like making fun of you because you are actually, and unironically a retarded moron shitskin lmao

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Bruh, that's my webm.
                It's hilarious, isn't it?

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                im sure it is

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              He's just lashing out.
              He's going to "take the fight" to you nerds,

              Become someone who has experience with drawing art by hand and also using machine learning algorithms. There's lots of free tutorial videos on youtube for both.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                "Experience with drawing art by hand and also using machine learning algorithms" makes you retarded?
                Who knew?
                What a revelation.

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                I'm sorry I can't help you. :/

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >guys guys
    >i can pay a guy to put a picture of my ex-wife's face onto a pornstar's body
    >and i can pay a guy to draw a request for me
    >the porn industry is going to die, porn stars are going to die hungry in the streets!!!!11
    >this message brought to you by pornhub(tm)

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They hate competition?
    Why do any of these people think they're going to make money off their work?

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Oh, look, the same artists that brought modern IP law. I have the perfect solution for them.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >people want
      *elites

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      all of those jobs still exist you gigaretard
      hell even vast majority of farming is still done by hand globally
      god youre fucking retarded lmao

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the whole "but muh sovl" shit has always been cope by mediocre artists. AI drawn art has way more "sovl" than whatever trash the artpoors of /ic/ can barf out. even the coomer pics of their "sexual art style" general are more sterile and empty-looking than what some coomer can generate with his gayming pc

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not sure this is AI drawn
      >sanic
      Why did it draw sonic?
      >the paper rule lines
      Those don't look AI drawn

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >>the paper rule lines
        >Those don't look AI drawn
        look at how bendy they are

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Why did it draw sonic?
        Because that's what they asked it to draw. Did you read the whole thing?

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yes but not because of artists alone. They don't want you to have that much power for free. Save all your stable diffusion shit on an usb stick and put inside a box with a lock and key.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I thought the AI was trained by denoising progressively noisier images, so that when it got to a picture of random noise, it would "denoise" that into an image with help from text context clues. Is my understanding out of date?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >We all do it, that's how human brain works
      An AI is not a person so this argument is a non sequitur.

      They did not own the material used to train their product. End of.

      AI shouldn't be a legal avenue for copyright laundering.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        The real uber shit non sequitur is the arbitrary "not a real persum!!!" And then the expectation we should just accept your position following from the AI not being human because (reasons unspecified)
        >They did not own the material used to train their product. End of.
        Nor they need according to cases that were already settled 20 years ago retard.
        >AI shouldn't be a legal avenue for copyright laundering.
        Copyright shouldn't be legal

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It is even more watertight.
      It is adversarial training.
      The final AI never got to see ANY pic.
      It is fucking magical in a way.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Nobody will care about ai shit until you artgays do something REAL about it.
    Are you prepared to go all the way?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ted K's plan wouldn't work in the modern day, also we are pro-AI here

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Artists are being so fucking dumb. It looks like AI is coming for their shit but it's really not. All AI doing is changing piracy, people who paid for art will continue to pay for it as they already have been ignoring the millions of ways to avoid paying.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, every ai image generated is a lost sale.
      Literally stealing bread from their mouths.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I see.
        That's a shame, I accidentally click the generate button a 100 times, I'm basically a murderer now, aren't I?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          not unless you..
          PAY AN ARTIST!!

          I take paypal, btw.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, you don't have to click it each time. Just right click and generate forever.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I genuinely can't tell if this is satire or not.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          it's not
          they mean it
          they believe it 😉

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't mind. AI is horrible for artists right now.

    Here's an example from an acquaintance who I talk to who creates porn art.

    >Gets offered a job from someone
    >Draw this underaged girl from pokemon with big breasts getting raped
    >He sends an email to the guy who wants to pay for the art how wrong it is that he wants that and how it's pretty much CP that he wants since the girl was around what... 13?

    You know what happens? A week later, that same guy sends a picture drawing of that girl getting raped. Telling how it was free and all he did was put a ton of his drawing and artwork into the learning machine and then generated the art. Then he COMISSIONED ANOTHER ARTIST to tidy up the fucked up spots.

    He was furious. He tried to find out what the other artists name was but just got a fuck you message back telling him next time to take the job and not bitch about the content.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >big breasts
      >cp
      ???

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just because she's 16 with huge breasts doesn't make it legal.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          16 is legal where I live.
          If you ever drew anime girls who weren't 18, you drew CP too, burger, kys.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          but she's a cartoon, she's not 16 at all

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          too old

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >refuse to work
      >bitch when someone else takes the job
      retard.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      was it Marnie?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He should be furious, at himself. Do the job don't fucking moralize about the content. Fictional characters don't fucking exist so just shut the fuck up and draw.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone ITT still think that there will still be *anything* that humans can do better/cheaper than AI in 20 years?
    What about 40?
    Do people still think "yeah at some point the AI will just stop being able to improve before it becomes superior to us"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      We don't know if the AIs will actually become intelligent. They are currently unknowable black boxes and there is almost no aspect of human consiousness that is understood. Consiousness could be an emergent property of complex systems that AIs can replicate, or it could be something totally alien and immaterial.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        conscious experience isn't the same thing as behavioral intelligence
        a machine could score a 180 IQ w/o having any conscious experiences. Chess and Go bots don't even know that they're playing a board game.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >walks like a duck
          >quacks like a duck
          >is warm and soft to the touch
          >You shoot it and microchips come flying out
          The problems of the future will be if determining if an advanced-enough Markov chain can simulate life enough to be indistinguishable from a living being. Do we have any tell-tale signs?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >bots don't even know that they're playing a board game
          neither do you

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > *anything* that humans can do better/cheaper than AI
      thinking. having a thought. the ability to look at appreciate morning air or a beautiful sunset.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Try telling ChatGPT to expound on the morning air during a beautiful sunset.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah but what about economically?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You can view that sunset inside your UBI pod wearing Zuck's vr gear, payment is automatically deducted, so you won;t even see a bill.
          Future is so bright bros, I'm gonna turn down the sun 20%

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wow this AI is pretty nice. Took a picture of my little dude and it spat out this image.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You stole that image.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If they succeed in 'banning' ai art by making it harder for consumers to use I will run stable diffusion on my stockpile of old industry cards and undersell porn commissioners for the rest of my life.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm going to run something that got banned

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Ask me how I know you are a tech illiterate snowflake.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >browses BOT
        >thinks that politicians writing a law against a piece of code causes it to magically vanish from everyone's computer

        average modern BOT poster

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its hilarious how mindfucked this board is. they are worried about coding being obsolete from ai but also shitting on artists for the same predicament. this is activating my almonds. nobody has even thought about that ai might ruin BOT completely

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >le humans unite!
      I see we are still at anger.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What a time to be alive!

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you guys are just being silly now

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/KqVGvco.png

      Extremely creative. Is there more?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/F0XBzn3.jpg

          godammit why can't this be a real manga

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What makes it not real? It exists.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              nah it has to surpass $arbitrary_number_of_pages before my brain perceives it as being a real manga

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                It's a oneshot.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              I guess he wants more.

              nah it has to surpass $arbitrary_number_of_pages before my brain perceives it as being a real manga

              Be the change you want.
              Use SD to make it real, MC can be you this time.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If they were smart, they would be bandwagoning on the Github Copilot lawsuit and not redoing work and wasting money, especially when the organization backing this is a subset of all artists and are run by two people and an advisory board of literally whos.

    https://www.conceptartassociation.com/about

    If it was per say, the International Association of Art, then there would be a lot more credibility and backing behind getting something done.

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Will we get UBI out of this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      50/50
      we get ubi or starve to death

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's the real question...
      see

      [...]

      for an interesting pessimistic take

  37. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They can ban it all they want. I'll continue to prompt anime versions of my coworkers in webui and crank out images. Other things will be cranked as well.

  38. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    learn to weld artgays you can't put this back into the bottle

  39. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lol. Artpoors better not ruin the future of AI.

    I completely lost hope in humanity and I think the only way to save up would be for AI to take over. If they spare us and we can do wtv we want, amazing, great. If they kill all of us, well… we probably deserved it anyway.

  40. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >with god like power of pure creation, this is what ai-gays make
    sentience was a mistake

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >he thinks humans are sentient

  41. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They can't, and soon I will never have to see another ugly moron in my media ever again.

  42. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's good to steal from artists

    take everything they've got

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      bruh

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        not just their copyrighted works, but their money and physical possessions too

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          BRUH

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        well, are you gonna buy her something to eat too?
        what a stingy greedy bastard, and you wonder why everyone hates you """""artist""""" gays

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          she needs to lose weight, she's happy watching me eat 😉

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            she doesn't look happy tbh
            this is what a happy girl looks like

  43. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    which name should I use BOT?

  44. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Holy shit artists are so utterly incompetent and delusional LMAO. They really think they can do something with 300k?
    >Hiring a lobbyist
    Holy shit they really have no clue how that shit works lol. This is fucking hilarious and pathetic. Most artists i’ve encountered seems to be completely out of touch with reality and have those grandiose ideas of utopia (communism utopia). They wont succeed at all, they are emotional like small children.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >be communist
      >give money to lobby for stronger IP laws sponsored by Disney at el

  45. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >and thus, the women managed to ban algorithms on the internet

  46. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >PROTECT HORSES FROM CARS WE NEED TO BOYCOTT CARS SO WE CAN KEEP USING HORSES

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      BREAK EM BOYS

  47. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Do these people ubderstand that AI technology is being developed by trillion dollar powerhouses like Google and Meta? Even the small AI startups are swimming in billions of VC capital. You think your $300k hobby lobbier is going to make a difference?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The guy who is going to keep 100k from the fund sure thinks so 😉

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They don't actually care about stopping big corporate AI from taking their jobs, they just want to stop gross nerds from having fun generating titty pics with stable diffusion

      The smart ones hide it but it's easy to get the dumber ones to admit that that's all they actually care about

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        to be fair, nobody can compete with a machine
        I can poop these out in 40 seconds, batch ~100 per hour, 24/7 indefinitely, a decent artist will take couple of days
        even if a fraction of nerds playing with SD posted their shit online every gallery would be flooded with ai shit

  48. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I know you're being ironic to create more flame, but no, they aren't even trying to ban AI technology, they are only asking to remove artists from the current models and some way of protection against future unwanted AI training using their works (which is impossible).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >unwanted AI training
      don't ever post anything online
      anything google can scrape is public data free to train on

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >don't ever post anything online
        >unwanted AI training using their works (which is impossible)

        https://i.imgur.com/khiLOyE.jpg

        twitter ai gays are watermarking ai shit as their's, lmao

        That will be useless too, unless they really go way more agressive with those watermarks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      twitter ai gays are watermarking ai shit as their's, lmao

  49. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Scared of what? How are they going to stop you from local prompting? How are they going to stop it from being hosted in other countries? No one actually cares other than butt hurt "artists"

  50. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Post-modern art is art and is valid. Slay queen. Art is subjective! Art is about emotions and feelings! Art is everything! Yes, the painting of two dots with a red color is art and you're a bigot if you dont think so.

    >NOOOOOO INSERTING PROMPTS IS NOT ART! AKSHUALLY ART TAKES A LOT OF EFFORT TO DO. AI ART IS A FRAUD.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I dont think you understand what post-modern means dipshit

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Get mogged by Midjourney, gay.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          https://i.imgur.com/rLAZ8tD.jpg

          Get mogged by Midjourney, gay.

          you could've at least googled a definition to prevent further embarassment cringehead.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >appeal to authority
            fucking fascist scum

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            we know it takes less skill than downloading and running stable diffusion

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous
              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/orDwvb4.png

                absolutely based

              • 1 month ago
                Anonymous

                Humanity's secret power.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              the banana taped to a wall was great specifically because all the twitter archuds were seething at it 🙂 First banana , and now computer images UwU

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I dont think you understand what post-modern means dipshit

            Ai art is art.
            Transwomen are women.
            Deal with it

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              only trannies are anti-AI art

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            My point still stands

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/SBvAtlu.jpg

              we know it takes less skill than downloading and running stable diffusion

              https://i.imgur.com/orDwvb4.png

              those were human made trash, still has SOVL

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I'm appropriating your art to make mine.
        Sorry sweaty 😉

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/3KLQVjq.jpg

        >Post-modern art is art and is valid. Slay queen. Art is subjective! Art is about emotions and feelings! Art is everything! Yes, the painting of two dots with a red color is art and you're a bigot if you dont think so.

        >NOOOOOO INSERTING PROMPTS IS NOT ART! AKSHUALLY ART TAKES A LOT OF EFFORT TO DO. AI ART IS A FRAUD.

        idk about the art part, but he sure saved some money...

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't show the part where it takes the artist months to finish the picture

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >months to finish the picture
          OMG, FUCK OFF MY CAT DIED JESUS CHRIST

  51. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >someone I don't give a shit about agrees with someone I don't give a shit about on something

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Both of them are brillant at they what they do but they're out of touch with this one. AI is inevitable and you have to accept it. They're seething because everything they worked for are going to be insulted by AI but thats life. Progress is progress. We will still respect them for what they did even if AI renders them useless. We still marvel at Leonardo Davinci'si inventions even though what he did is now obsolete.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just because it is inevitable does not mean it is not insult to life. All AI is insult to life, and the thought of making AGI is the biggest insults humans could have ever made to humanity and will be out unironic downfall

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >"x" technology is an insult to life
          Everytime.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, just AI. It replaces humans in every way possible. It is the closest people have gone to creating artificial life without fully understanding it, hence why they are always called to be black boxes. Also, you are replacing perhaps the most important part of humanity, the mind. Yeah, we can still do manual labor for a while, but once AI starts doing research in robotics, its the end for manual workers as well. Every human will be replaced because there is nothing humans will do better then AI. If you just removed AI from out future, our future if we wont die from some world catastrophy would colonize the space, people would live like they do now but with more tech and history could continue. With AI history is ending in next 10 or 20 years, and it either results in void paradise where everything is static as AI does everything for us, or it results in human extinction. I know Sci-fi authors are mostly retarded, but there is a reason why in every sci-fi setting the AI development is either stifled at textbots controlling robot bodies, or it is turned into the biggest taboo out there. You cant have society with AI that is actually working, AI is just better then humans at extremely dangerous levels. Like comparing a God to a mortal, bunch of absolute savants that the moment they learn a new thing at the level of humans become better then humans at it. Art is also something most people would agree should not be automated, or at least when you make survey about every jobs and whether or not it should be automated, art would be at the top or near the top along with leadership roles.

            I am not artist, but I still root for artists here, because if artists lose this battle completely in every legal way, then it is writing on the wall that humanity is toasted, because gays releasing open source model to fuck over the legal system is great way of making sure that AI will take over everything it happens to be able to do at the moment.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >it either results in void paradise where everything is static as AI does everything for us, or it results in human extinction.
              Sounds based. We may live in paradise or they will execute us. If it is the latter, maybe think that we might deserve it.

              For thousand of years, humans have suffered for meaningless shit. Hate, wars, plagues, public executions, social and economic hierarchy. I dont give a fuck if we lose our "soul" this is all fucking bullshit. Humans will never be able to be happy. We've destroyed entire species, have fought over the most meaningless and petty shit but somehow people want us to preserve our "soul", lol. Fuck that shit. Give me AI now so we can either have actual great lives or kill us all. I dont see anything wrong with those two options.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >It replaces humans in every way possible.
              Fuck you, where my ai sex bot.

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              >if artists lose this battle
              they already did 20 years ago
              you are not going to overturn 20 years of google et al data scrapping public data
              the best they can hope for is stock photo like royalty deal

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      that quote is from years ago when AI art was DALL-E uncanny 3d shit at best and he'd be right

      >if artists lose this battle
      they already did 20 years ago
      you are not going to overturn 20 years of google et al data scrapping public data
      the best they can hope for is stock photo like royalty deal

      >I should be able to draw copyrighted figures without paying any license or royalties
      >but I deserve royalties for having the general shape and colour of my scribbles measured

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Both of them are brillant at they what they do but they're out of touch with this one. AI is inevitable and you have to accept it. They're seething because everything they worked for are going to be insulted by AI but thats life. Progress is progress. We will still respect them for what they did even if AI renders them useless. We still marvel at Leonardo Davinci'si inventions even though what he did is now obsolete.

      The person who asked del Toro about that Miyazaki's comment and made it sounded like it's made against the modern AI-art is either dumb or dishonest.

  52. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's smarter to just ban the appearance of a photograph on a computer screen, or enforce some shitty compression algorithm so the only thing you can post on the internet ( entire internet ) are gifs and bitmap images corresponding to video game sprites.

    If I could I would force a complete ban on digital cameras, scanners and the like, then take it a step further by banning optical discs until all that's left is magnetic tape for audio/video and silver nitrate for photos and video cameras.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >magnetic tape for audio/video and silver nitrate for photos and video cameras.
      soul stealing machines ripping off painters!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Photography "fixes light in place", it's taken from nature itself and doesn't require an artist's intellectual property.
        It also wasn't that bad for artists, they could still make comic books and the like.

  53. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Also the fact is these color matrices are really just obtained from something like taking the average of these pictures, obviously it's more complicated but you could give a monkey a calculator and the exact calculation to make, and a big grid line where he fills each case with a different color, and that monkey could carry out the task and at the end of it have a picture of a girl with big breasts.

  54. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How long until AI can make 3D models and their texture maps from react prompts?
    This will be the end of all the graphic design industry. Be it advertisements, games or whatever

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There are already tools on Blender where you can generate textures on assets with AI.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >There are already tools on Blender where you can generate textures on assets with AI.
        If AI can generate 3D models and shit with just text prompts, imagine how easy it would be to make games for literally anyone with basic knowledge
        Wow, the future is truly now

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. I am gave developer right now (technical artist) but I might switch and do game design at this point and make my own game like an autist. It'll be easier and easier to make your own game by yourself which is a good thing. Solo devs make the best games and you dont have to be politically correct and get cucked by HR Nancy.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >How long until AI can make 3D models and their texture maps
      Already exist, still kind of crude: https://captures.lumalabs.ai/imagine

      But there are more advanced stuff being developed right now, including stuff which can create good 3d objects from as little as one image.

      3d is going to be 90% AI in a couple of years.

  55. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Coomer checking in. I've essentially stopped all my rule 34 commission purchases from artists since Stable Diffusion serves my purposes well enough at a much cheaper price point. Yes, I had to learn some prompt engineering but it really doesn't take too long for someone new to pick up.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How do you make SD look good? Most SD art I see still looks too surreal or amateurish. I've had better results with Midjourney for anatomy and how professional it looks.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >trying out different models, sometimes mixing models together
        >messing with negative prompts
        >adapting prompts from /sdg/ frens
        >adapting prompts from various prompt collections, like rom https://rentry.org/54d9o
        >getting a good GPU with an optimized setup to improve throughput
        sometimes I run random proompt generation overnight to give me a collection of coomer material to look through the following morning. I've discovered at least three new fetishes at random this way.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Idk this is all too time consuming. SD is pretty cool but it takes too much time to find the right spot.

  56. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      i didn't realise i had to ask permission to observe and learn from others' artwork
      or are the rules different for software?
      the argument that it's not art unless it was hard to make hold no merit, for one, there are plenty of things called art which are easy to make, even children do it without effort, but we don't shit on them for their low quality scribbles
      get better arguments, these people just come off as being butthurt that their work is being automated, there's a word for this, it called being a luddite

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >or are the rules different for software?
        you can't ask people to compete against machines. it's fundamentally unfair

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          then don't, market your art as being hand made, plenty of people like that
          if you're talking about competitions, then i would tend to agree that the method of creation should be well-defined, just as other kinds of competition have well-defined restrictions to keep everything on the same playing field

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So you agree ai art should be banned from online art galleries?

            • 1 month ago
              Anonymous

              only if the gallery specifically excludes it
              i don't think ai art should be banned /in general/, i believe it's a perfectly valid form of art in its own right

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >progress is good unless it affects me

  57. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    People should at least have to mention they used AI to assist them making the product, let the consumer decide then.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *