Will AI revitalize the animation industry?

>As an experimental effort to help the anime industry, which has a labor shortage, we used image generation technology for the background images of all three-minute video cuts!

https://twitter.com/NetflixJP/status/1620357552025538561
Bonus luddite seething in the comments.

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Not unless we want quadruple breasts or something showing up on the animations.

    They may be able to help with smoothness or upscaling stuff but art in and of itself won't be replaced by AI no matter how hard any one shills it.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Content creators who are interested in using AI generation in their works will have to contend with the ongoing legal debate of whether or not AI-generated content automatically falls into the public domain and thus cannot be owned or copyrighted by any particular entity.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      How is that a problem? Artists own their source and can do with that they want. Of course there will be a flood of super original Miyazaki clones, but just like super original Netflix shows, they'll be ignored or actively critized by viewers.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      At 0:56 the city completely changes shape, and its design is also nonsensical.

      In the case of background art for professional animation, they'd probably use their own assets to train the system.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >At 0:56 the city completely changes shape, and its design is also nonsensical.
        That's a time skip.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Only if you tell people its ai

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The real question is whether AI will replace coders.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >AI learns how to draw
      >npcs: hahaha fricking subhuman artists will need to find another job
      >AI learns how to code
      >npcs: nooooo you can't do that

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        replacing tumblrinas and chuds, ai is unfathomably based.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        There's hundreds of threads worth of AI art being created by programmers, where's all the AI software being created by artists?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Small people don't create big things

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI will improve the lives of many people just like the internet did and antibiotics. What we will do with it, it will depend on us.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know how to explain how I feel when I see someone else who thinks so fundamentally different about exactly the same thing. AI will cause problems that someone who thinks like this could never conceive.

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Background art assistants will be killing themselves, lol.

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      the youth won old man

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It is going to be garbage written by ai, animated by ai, and voiced by ai.
    The normies will passively sit in front of their screens get high or drunk and watch it all day.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI art is created by the creator, it's just another tool to create, it's a lie that it does shit without input and direction from a creative person, the law is wrong, but still frick copyright and frick disney

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >bg elements are basically bokeh splotches
    >foreground elements are 2d sprites and 3d models
    it's only based because it's putting artists out of business, personally speaking i will never watch this or otherwise acknowledge it's existence.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    bump

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    hell no AI has lots of trouble with consistency

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Regular attempts to use cgi already fails and is dogshit. We don't need to replace animation. Why are AI proponents always looking to replace rather than to create?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's cheaper and uh
      Yeah

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI generated images are not art.
    You can find numerous ways to bog yourself down on where the line is, but AI is far beyond it.
    No meaning. No intent. Eventually it will become apparent that the scope of AI art is narrower given that it needs to be primed/taught based on human art.

  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ai drawings looks better than most of real art when you see it for like 1-5 seconds but when you see it for more time it starts looking fake and like goyslop even if it has no flaws, still just good material for imagination

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I remember there was once an AI tool allowing to perform an automatic inking of sketches.
    I wonder what would artists think of using this tool, considering the fact that the line art is usually the least favorite part of the drawing process for the majority of artists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      artist are too busy defending corpo copyright interest because artist are short sight

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Animation is done by big corps, not individual artgays.
        Screeching inkcels are just delaying the inevitable.

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If I can just have it do the inbetween frames for me that would be super. And I mean FBF inbetweening, not Flash tweening.

    T. Animator who knows you can't stop the machines

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *