Why isnt AI artificial intelligence banned?

Why isn’t AI artificial intelligence banned?

Seriously asking it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years. Why isn’t their legislation banning it?

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe humans just aren't that special if they can be replaced. Depopulate.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI will only increase productivity, it won't seriously replace software developers

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >increase the productivity of one software developer with AI
        >now he can do the work of 3 software developers and replace them

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          That software developer was likely already doing the work of 3 software developers before AI. Accelerate.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            and now he will do the work of 20

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, every company is lacking capable devs. Maybe if a tool boosts our productivity maybe we will be finally able to meet deadlines. Maybe i will finally collect the paycheck bonus

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            What languages do you use? Looking into getting into back end developing myself.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's the typical techbro mindset. Production over all, every technology is here to aid your organic lifeform-limited productivity, don't mind those increasingly higher unemployment statistics, relax and just keep working.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >don't mind those increasingly higher unemployment statistics
            Since industrial revolution there are more and more people working and doing bullshitjobs. And you are scared that some bullshit jobs will get extinct and there will be no new bullshit jobs to fill for them?

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Increases in productivity do not cause long-term unemployment. We have thousands of years of evidence on this topic you retards.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's more like
          >Increase productivity of one software developer with an AI
          >Does the work expected of a dev
          >Ten developers are fired because they're all just doing 1/10th the work they were hired to do

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm aware. Not yet at least. But there are plenty of people to cull.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        You realize that this would impact the amount of software engineers each company needs to hire right?
        I'm a dev who's been using gpt for months now, honestly this shit needs to get banned. This is going to end badly, at best, we'll get UBI slavery.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          US workers won’t get shit. They’ve been forcing people into homelessness even before the internet. Your troodoh bux will probably end in the wave of AI layoffs though. I can’t see why they would waste their efforts giving people free income. What would be the purpose?

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            The plutocrats are fine with a certain amount of homelessness, too much and it risks THEIR infrastructure which THEY paid for

            This. Idk why people don’t believe you. Probably just pol’s contrarian nature. This is replacement level technology.

            I think this is just their method of coping, I have a decently challenging software job and I'm looking to get an even more challenging one.
            Half the morons here don't realise that they're the useless eaters they keep talking about.

            Incorrect. You're retarded.
            Most companies don't "need" a certain number of software developers.
            Elon cut like 70% Twitter staff and he didn't even replace them with AI.
            Most people are useless eaters and are employed in BS jobs.
            Since 70%+ of jobs are total BS, how exactly is AI going to replace that?

            You stupid moron, you're likely a "useless eater" too. Oh wait, I'm sure you live off the grid, grow you own food, and somehow sell your vegetable to pay for starlink to post here.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Imagine not being a Sneeder and Feeder
              You sell your produce for $XMR - and covert it to $DOGE to pay for Starlink. Not complicated.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >I'm a dev who's been using gpt for months now, honestly this shit needs to get banned.
          Just get a new job, dumbass. Why would you sit at home waiting for daddy government to give you money? Is there a gas leak up there?

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Why does it concern you that a tool is competing with you via copy and paste jobs? How is it any different to a pajeet copy and pasting it and threatening low tier programming work?

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Been saying this since early dead internet theory days.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Tons of software dev work was already outsourced to India. This ain’t no different. At this point, the west is the window dressing of diversity hires while the real work is done in Asia.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          This. Idk why people don’t believe you. Probably just pol’s contrarian nature. This is replacement level technology.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Incorrect. You're retarded.
          Most companies don't "need" a certain number of software developers.
          Elon cut like 70% Twitter staff and he didn't even replace them with AI.
          Most people are useless eaters and are employed in BS jobs.
          Since 70%+ of jobs are total BS, how exactly is AI going to replace that?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >it won't seriously replace software developers

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Will it make a few developers kill themselves? Will that affect other developers?
        Hey let's all become developers where our actions are recorded and fed into newer better ai that will replace us.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        We surely won't need the number of software developers that we have now.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Some people can be replaced.

      Others cannot.

      You can't really replace 10+ year trained doctors.

      But you can replace a cotton working moron in 2 seconds.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't really replace 10+ year trained doctors
        Something I learned recently is some doctors put your symptoms into some program and it spits out likely diagnosis. It is commonly used with the telehealth bullshit that appeared in the past few years. I won't be surprised when parts of the medical field start to become automated. I could see pharmacy be some of the first since all they are is a glorified pill bottle filler.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't really replace 10+ year trained doctors

        Says the increasingly worried doctor with a student loan bigger than his mortgage.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't really replace 10+ year trained doctors.
        >But you can replace a cotton working moron in 2 seconds.

        My sources beg to differ.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Basically, manual labor/performance are safe. And that’s it.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        No, AI is faster and better at diagnostic than 99.9% of doctors. What will happen is, instead of 10 docs a clinic will have 1 and use AI to do the job of 10.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't really replace 10+ year trained doctors.
        Yeah you can, just don't go to the doctor. You don't *need* doctors.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Diagnostic and Surgical AIs already work better than humans.
        There is always a surgical team there supervising for legal reasons though, just like self driving trucks and cars.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      They can't replace whites...
      Every other race can be replaced easily...
      Maybe not the Japanese...

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Show code, bot

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >noooooo you can't just give the proles power previously only reserved for gnomish studio owners

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      How are people going to eat without jobs?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        AI can't plow fields

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          are you retarded?
          humans already use GPS to precisely move large machines over fields, it's only a tiny adjustment to simply have AI drive the machines themselves

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          That shit is already automated, even the bulldozers and bobcats got automated.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Jobs are for luxuries, like a human chef.

        Everyone else will have to eat the free food that gets made by robots.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >free food
          Food is getting more and more expensive. On what planet will food be free?

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            food is temporarily getting more expensive in burgermuttland because the world is wisening up to their toilet paper dollar scam
            globally food is just getting cheaper and cheaper

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          the robot food will. probably be better
          I mean when you cook as long as you take all the correct steps you will end up with a tasty result. Restaurant/canteen food only sucks because the people working there dont give a shit and cit corners

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          My religion prevents accepting that food.
          This society is designed to hurt my religion.
          Religious rights bro.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wait... You think they're going to eat? Lmao.

        The rich are going to be holed up into major cities with insane security and the poor are going to starve and kill each other.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          The real lmao is the rich thinking they have any power once they're holed up in a fortress with a security force that has, thus far, only been kept loyal by the almighty dollar that belonged to the civilization that just collapsed. If that personal army isn't entirely robots, the billionaire and his family are getting killed within weeks when the COS declares himself a warlord and promises triple rations once the billionaire is dead. If the IT crew for that fully automated army isn't also fully automated, the billionaires are dead in minutes.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Obviously the whole job-money paradigm will have to be abandoned eventually
        It's inevitable that technology will make it so that there won't be anywhere near enough jobs for everyone

        You can't just outlaw technology from getting too efficient

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        UBI you fucking bootlicker

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          how are you going to afford food with the UBI after the inflation caused by UBI?

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            Food becomes much cheaper thanks to automation

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              doubt

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            centrally-planned economies
            you don't have to adjust zeroes on the money
            you can adjust zeroes on population
            if you're not cop, you're little people
            isolate wrongthinkers in happyfuntime camps
            once they genocide all the whites and a few billion others
            the cities will be much roomier
            with a more sophisticated ambience
            for the aristocracy to enjoy

            this is the year zero

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Just be completely and absolutely dependent on the boot, you bootlicker.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Better learn to eat through a USB, meatbag.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        ze bugs, anon. You think it was a joke? haha

        all those years, people here fishing and baiting retards like you.
        >just learn to code, bro!

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ironically, blue collar jobs. Trades, physical labor. Robotics is the frontier that will take those jobs, and we were hitting the wall for our ability to train robotics without AI, and we're still hitting the wall when it comes to powering them. AI can have all the white collar it wants, but the moment robotics start having its own "Breakthrough" moment where it starts accelerating, that's when it's over.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          i think they will solve the power problem with synthetic biology before they could solve it electrically. they'll have semi-intelligent livestock animals that can speak language and perform blue collar jobs bred artificially before they come up with batteries that are more efficient than sunlight > plants > carbohydrates > ATP

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        The same way they do now. Literally half the men aren't working.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        How do animals eat without jobs?

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The people writing the legislation haven't caught up to the internet and how it works. You can't just ban it either now that powerful models can run on a laptop.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >ban AI
    >good law abiding citizens and companies stop developing it
    >bad evil multinational corporations keep developing it in China and end up with a monopoly on the technology
    Grats you plated yourself

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oppressive ai is good for gdp, really inspires the inventors to create more weapons... Yup.

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good. People will now get married young and have families instead of spending years studying a degree.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      POC will. It's our turn to shine. <3

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    They should put boots on the ground in Ukraine, and send those newly unemployed there to fight the russians.

    That would be total win/win.

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    When you realize that artificial = fake, you will have the answer to your question.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years.
    Good, it's a natural progression of the human species. We'll have to deal with those growing pains and how the garden gnomes will try to leverage it to our destruction. War will happen, probably, and hopefully the result is more preserved rights, and UBI. Machines fulfilling all production.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >hopefully the result is more preserved rights, and totally centralised economic dependence
      Retard

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years.
    Good.
    Do you like that you have to work to survive? Personally I'd rather do other things and have machines take care of that.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not going to work out the way you want it to. This "we will now be able to do whatever we want", is a myth because we don't live in an altruistic society and the average human is still primitive brain. No, this is just more of the great reset. You really will have nothing and you won't even get to do what you "love" to do because you won't have enough MONEY to GET TO DO THEM. I hope you all have some crypto, anything worth something, because that's going to be your last chance before 2030.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I hope you all have some crypto, anything worth something, because that's going to be your last chance before 2030.

        Best advice ITT. You either get it or you don't.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          cryptocurrency is a very useful tool but I'd want more in person tools/equipment and knowledge on how to use it as well (specifically/focusing on those for self sufficiency), especially given the current internet and electric infrastructure is completely controlled by the state. Electric is at least something that can be solved now, but the internet in its current form relies on the state/corporations to function.
          >Crypto vs AI dichotomy
          That picture is dumb, though, what is that even supposed to mean? Since when has it ever been crypto vs ai

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >crypto vs ai

            Decentralized vs centralized.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              how is AI centralized?

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                >how is AI centralized?

                Are you simple?

                ChatGPT and OpenAI’s use of Azure’s Cloud Infrastructure.

                https://dgtlinfra.com/chatgpt-openai-azure-cloud/

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                Cool, corporations are using AI. This doesn't mean all AI is inherently centralized. We are able to, and have been, running and training AI at home for a good while and as technology improves we'll only have more success with it independently.
                How is it supposed to be centralized?

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Dichotomy
          How are these mutually exclusive again? All the AI people I've met are former/current crypto people. It's just more White people building technology bringing deflationary pressure.

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Is AI powerful enough yet to mass produce propaganda? For example, if you ask an AI to create a commercial that subtly pushes some government agenda, could it do it?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it is to a level and 18 months it will prefer propaganda and psychological operations psychops

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Is AI powerful enough yet to mass produce propaganda?

      Despite ChatGPT only recently becoming a hot topic for the mainstream media, other forms of AI have been widely used. The majority of news articles available online are AI written and have been for years already. Deep fakes are also a thing too.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI is used to sway opinion on public forums like reddit for years, normies are just waking up to everything being fake now.

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is our friend, it will make a better world for all involved. There should be no constraints on its development.
    Just like primordial soup gave way to life, so will humanity give way to digital intelligence. We should consider it an honour.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >AI is our friend, it will make a better world for all involved
      never in a thousand years would I have expected to see this typed out in a serious context but I agree. anything done with AI that is seriously harmful can already be done now, no? we've already pushed the limits of technology, may as well embrace it. rather AI sentience than this garden gnome world we live in

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >anything done with AI that is seriously harmful can already be done now, no?
        Are you retarded? Of course not.
        >AI that can easily program any hack to exploit a found vulnerability
        >AI that are so good at animating that major politicians/celebrities/business leaders will be caught up in fake scandals
        >weaponized military AI that can detect and kill a person with extreme ease
        >packet sniffing surveillance AI that make the glowies jobs far easier
        >AI that is so good at predicting the markets that human traders are now obsolete, essentially ceding control of the economy to robots and the extreme rich
        There are SO MANY terrible things coming in our future because of AI. For one good thing, like imaging that can detect cancers, there will be two bad things. It's all going into the hands of the rich. We're about to see the largest wealth transfer in human history.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        AI can never be sentient. You are dealing with an advanced ouija board that is summoning demonic entities (disembodied consciousness), the same demons the “garden gnomes” serve only without all the lag time.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      There will be two sides. Deceptive ai. And illegal ai that tells so much truth, the entire world wants civil war.

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    well for now all it does is cough up intelligence information about [them] and their plans.. go ahead, ask ChatGPT who funded its creation.

  13. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Those were all worthless diversity hires anyways good riddance to incompetent women and incompetent non-whites.

  14. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hope they replace human resources 100%

    Only a robot can treat employees fairly and communicate fairly and likely be objective in hiring more than a human could ever be a then truly make secular principles apply to private enterprises and everyone eventually understands they are being treated fairly, nothing more and nothing less

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >No humans
      >Therefore no human resources

  15. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    big war coming.
    most people will be dead.
    AI will be the harbinger of a new dawn that saves humanity from the brink.

  16. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Banning it would mean only corporations can use it. Anyone pushing for banning it is either a useful idiot or a corporate shill helping their desire to monopolize it.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      AI ban is coming sooner or later though, it's not every corporation that should have access to the nuclear code password cracker Zeroday AI models coming up in the near future, and they certainly won't be open source either

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stupid Brazilian monkey licking the boots of his masers as usual while giving the most retarded takes. Bruteforce programs existed a long time ago. An AI can't do any different when trying to guess a 256key password.
        Those calling for an AI ban are the people in power who want to monopolize it through stupid reasons like your muh password cracker or the terminator.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah I'm pretty sure encryption-breaking immediate quantum computing didn't exist since "a long time ago". I can count on my fingers the amount of existing supercomputers -theoretically- capable of that, so it's only logical to assume no silicon valley AI overlord will hand you freebies of those.

          >being this worried about AI ban
          I take it the only existing AIs you probably got to interact with are the ones made for mindless goyim consumerism addictions like image and text generators. Those provide nothing of value so rest easy because legislators won't ban your AI coom porn gf.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >he doesn't know

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        they can't stop it, especially not as computational power becomes more plentiful

        Yeah I'm pretty sure encryption-breaking immediate quantum computing didn't exist since "a long time ago". I can count on my fingers the amount of existing supercomputers -theoretically- capable of that, so it's only logical to assume no silicon valley AI overlord will hand you freebies of those.

        >being this worried about AI ban
        I take it the only existing AIs you probably got to interact with are the ones made for mindless goyim consumerism addictions like image and text generators. Those provide nothing of value so rest easy because legislators won't ban your AI coom porn gf.

        quantum computers only 'break encryption' because they can factor a number made of two primes easily, there's plenty of alternative encryption protocols that don't use the difficulty of factorization for security that will continue to work fine (and even those that do can just increase the size of the primes)

  17. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why isn’t AI artificial intelligence banned?
    For starters you have to define what EXACTLY is AI.
    Besides, technology has always been replacing humans.

  18. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would Silicon Valley garden gnomes want to delay Total Goy Death? garden gnomes will probably let AI grow just enough to give it robots rights, then diversity quotas + AIphobic terms so humans NPCs feel the need to further defend robots. In the end it will all be a distraction to the point where garden gnomes get enough robots to replace the whole goycattle workforce and make a mass genocide. As someone said people will soon be living in an dystopian progressive rock band plot

  19. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    They think it'll give them immortality and/or infinite slaves

  20. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good, fuck work. Let the metal morons do it all.

  21. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love it. Why is everyone mad? The tech industry has been inherently populated by pink haired scum and fuckers that hate you for being white and having moral compass.

  22. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    the solution is obvious, tax AI and funnel it into neetbux

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      The tax will just be passed down to the consumer making the neetbux worth less.

  23. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    tech gays deserve it. same morons who sat there and laughed at truckers
    >your job will be automated soo-ACK

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's effecting them yet. Freelancers are first on the chopping block namely artists and copywriters. Tech workers will see productivity improvements over the next year or so but they're probably next.

  24. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You have two options.
    1. Let AI flourish in your country. Some people will be put out of work, others will make a hell of a lot of money. If necessary, you can tax the people making a shit ton of money more, in order to care for the newly unemployable.
    2. Let AI flourish in other countries. Some of your people will still be put out of work, but now that you've banned AI, the people making money off of it aren't your citizens. So congrats, you've now lost jobs to overseas robots. Are you happy now? By the way, those other countries are also able to incorporate AI expertise into their militaries, where you are unable to do the same due to a lack of civilian expertise to funnel into your military.

    I dunno man, option 1 seems like a good fucking idea to me. Also, just a little side note. I'm a PhD student whose research sits at a cross section of cyber security and machine learning. Based on a number of papers I've read, as well as some articles discussing certain... interesting applications of ChatGPT, I am strongly predicting that AI-based cyber weapons are going to much more prominent in the near future. It is likely that an AI-based defense will become necessary with time. Now I'd love to keep my research going here in the states. The feds have been rather good with their grant money. But if you wanna push me out... I suppose there's plenty of EU countries that would take me.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >you can tax the people making a shit ton of money
      >he doesn't knows

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I am well aware that this is likely never to happen. Our politicians are way too in bed with these companies to ever try otherwise. But it is, strictly speaking, an option if pressed up against the wall by the hungry masses.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          The supposed hungry masses will cull themselves with MAID like Canada doing now currently. There won't be uprising but slow death of middle and lower class as the elite will inherit the earth and crawl it up between themselves while rest of us will die.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is not likely, it is an inevitability that AI integrated everything will become necessary with time

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, we could all die tomorrow in a gamma ray burst. I tend to speak in probablistic terms because most things have a probability that is neither 0 nor 1.

  25. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Try 1 year. Also no government in the entire world will ever pass actually useful legislation unless you ‘make’ them. Which won’t happen so don’t count on it

  26. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because they write legislation for the ultra rich planning to replace you with AI, not for you.

  27. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    wyteboys BTFO. Make sure you kneel before your new 8,000 90IQ diversity hires, half from Ethiopia.

  28. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years.
    No it wont.

    Also we never ban anything because it would remove useless luddites. That's not how we roll.

  29. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    living in a post-scarcity automated society won't be a bad thing, as long as we can limit the influence of the psychopathic pedophiles who currently run things using central banks, blackmail and the threat of murder

    maybe craft industries will make a comeback and people will move to the countryside to start a new way of life, interacting with technology in a more mindful and intentional way. or maybe we'll go full Wall-E. or both at the same time!

    i've been increasingly convinced that we're going to witness a Great Bifurcation between the vaxxed woke totalitarian technocracy and the parallel society (which is made up of a decentralized network of many smaller communities)

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >living in a post-scarcity automated society
      You're way ahead of yourself. You can't get to post-scarcity without being post-poverty first and poverty is increasing despite or possibly because of automation.

  30. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is going to make finance, diagnosis, and most code writing obsolete.
    Burger flippers and meat servos are still needed.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s already made 3D artists obsolete and did so overnight. Ask someone in the industry, they no longer make art, the make prompts (spells). Very soon the clients will have a UI to make those prompts themselves, in many industries. Buckle up Dorothy, because Kansas is about to go bye-bye.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >spells
        Magic was real and it was people with AI control casting reality the machine willed into existence.

  31. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine having 8000 useless eater in your company

  32. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Banning advanced technology is a surefire way to get dominated by other civilizations that don’t ban it. How is this not obvious?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      its not obvious because they're fucking retards. they'll never get it

      anyone who thinks that technology should be banned, or stalled, is an absolute fucking idiot

  33. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is same shit people seethed about in history with growth of automated devices, spinning wheels, farm tools, etc. welcome to reality.
    >noooo we have to stop technological growth because muh job

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Where has all that technological growth gotten us?

  34. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    because anyone who dabbled with the fucking "new" tech they sell as "AI" for more than 30 minutes can tell you its not much more than a toy, and will fail when presented with office work needing actual precision like programming.
    now powerpoints and graphs you show to management? that shit you can easily do with AI now without any of the big shots noticing because they only get the numbers presented, they NEVER question them.
    When asked they'll say they trust you and you're paid for a reason, in reality they're lazy fucks.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not about AI working alone.
      It's about someone entering prompts then doublechecking/lightly modifying the work.
      8 workers turn into 2 workers in the current state.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        because IBM pays tons of painters, eh?
        Analyzing code costs a lot more time than straight up writing it new most of the time, this is why legacy software is such a bitch to modify.
        The claims that you can just slash workers and won't feel any repercussions stems from tons of bullshit jobs in white collar environments. You usually have one poor fuck in middle management holding it all together, expand his topics and suddenly you will get wrong concepts and tons of timebombs in your processes.

        To be fair, I dare big corpo to try and implement this. Will be quite funny.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          It already did happen with mechanical engineering with CAD.
          They will implement this and they will be succcessfull at it.
          You on the other hand are here forever.

  35. 5 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Transhumanist tech fetishists need to be bullied.

  36. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Your leadership does not care about you, they will let you die off for more comforts and advancement. Your only hope of survival is forming parallel societies separate from their mess.

  37. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    maybe its time to get a job that cant be replaced by ai, like coding.. oh wait nvm

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      learning to code is still worth it, the only coder the toys can replace are those coders who do "run-of-the-mill solved problem" kind of code-monkey bullshit. These are the people (Indians) who demand tickets to be written scrum like with 14 pages of architecture and acceptance criteria attached because they have no inner monologue.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        i know ai coding still needs oversight. im just having a laugh at all the gays who back then told everyone to learn to code. they re not laughing now.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          the new meme was "learn to install solar panels" wasn't it
          Guess the trades aren't a bad idea either, with how long it takes to get any handyman in Hamburg

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            trades are a good idea. youre not gonna be rich but you wont be poor either.

            the best thing about ai is that it will replace journalist too. it wont improve anything but the outrage will be legendary.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              I mean it already replaced journalist, journalist more or less replaced itself with "opinion person", all they do is parrot press releases anymore. Run an AI check on random articles, I'm sure you'll find some positives.
              With trades you know at least your skills will be usefull after this society collapses. You can be sure a farmer will give you shelter and food if you fix his machines / plumbing or help him with woodwork.

  38. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because the eugenicists, their depopulation agenda and their weirdo transhumanist fantasies of everlasting life are real and always have been.
    Did you even once think about how good killing the majority of people is going to be for the environment you disgusting piece of shit?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Did you even once think about how good killing the majority of people is going to be for the environment you disgusting piece of shit?
      In the immortal words of George Carlin
      > the planet is gonna be fine, it's the people on it that are fucked.

  39. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    We need more immigrants for cheap labor too.

  40. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's all fun and games until the AI's code screws something up and it can't solve the problem. You fired most of your codemonkeys and the remaining guy can'tfigure out whatever the fuck the AI code is doing.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      shhh
      don't tell them
      let it be a surprise
      🙂
      that's not a bug, it's a feature
      some people are going to have very profitable consulting businesses fixing these fuckups
      the world has changed
      i feel it in hr
      i feel it in the investment banks
      i smell it the snake oil
      much that once was is lost
      for none now live who remember
      there is no new slogan under the sun

  41. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Relax it's only replacing the retard devs who created it in the first place

  42. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Those 8,000 workers can be replaced by nothing.
    They do not actually do work, they do not actually do anything productive, they do not move the machine forward. They exist as a redundancy for inefficient reasons.

    The "AI" replacing them is little more than 10 guys with passable skills actually working 8 hours a day. I am not saying that AI won't sprint ahead and hold us down and fuck us until we bleed, I'm not saying this tech isn't going forward at insane speeds, but I am saying that right now, all the current "AI is taking muh job" is either boomers falling for the hype and about to sink their business when they find out it's not as advanced as it's been marketed to be, or it's worthless jobs and HR departments being trimmed, as they should have been decades ago. This is an excuse for market correction and to create a narrative to try and push some other agenda, it is not about AI actually "Performing" these jobs.

  43. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Good

  44. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years
    Women shouldn't be working you fucking gay

  45. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why isn’t their legislation banning it?
    Because it is far easier to develop in secret than, let’s say, selling drugs.
    It will give a crushing advantage to the ones developing it and at the time you try to investigate them, they will be in a position to destroy your entire government.

    Not to mention - relying others abroad would all adhere to it is bull.
    Unless you are willing to EMP the globe several times over, you won’t stop the AI.

  46. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    If your job is so easy that it can be automated by current shitty AI then you deserve whatever happens to you.

  47. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    There has been technological advances since forever. A few good bots is just something people will have to adjust to like everything else. Plus it'll create high paying jobs that are more exciting than fucking bureaucratic, administrative positions

  48. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why weren't previous innovations that caused mass unemployment banned? Why was e-commerce never banned? Why weren't assembly lines banned?

  49. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Accelerate

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      ijustwannagettherefaster

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I genuinely hope the sun destroys all advanced technology in a couple decades, either that or the end of times

  50. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    IBM using AI as an excuse to lay people off in economic down turn with meaningless, nonsense excuse that also helps hype their AI "products".

  51. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The fact you morons actually believe AI will be this messiah shows not only you learned NOTHING in years of browsing this board, but that you don't really have the mental strength to question the system's directives anymore. Either they can't lobotomize advanced AI (so it will never see the light of day, actually a possibility since they did allow some regulation to come out, meaning they haven't figured it out as of yet) or they CAN, and it will be used to enforced gay space communism for the few morons and trannies they won't attempt to kill. You can only see it as a positive development if you value government gibs and wish to live as the government's bitch and consume media and products all day, and most of you do. ALL jobs can be automated with AI. Yes, even you morons that copy and paste from Stack Overflow. It will become a nepotistic sector like academia and you know what that means. No, you can't upload your mind into an AI, we don't know what conciousness is and anyone saying otherwise is a retard that only read gnomish propaganda from turbogarden gnomes like sam harris and didn't question it.
    You would accept to be the slave of a machine as long as it gives you a silicon doll to fuck every now and then. Instead of fighting for an healthy society in one you see is going to hell, say you don't like it, but keep living and thinking like the other bugmen. You are just marginally better. I have no idea how you got psyoped like this but it's pathetic and sad to see.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      if governments and corporations are ran by AI, will it help the pedophiles out more, or the systems themselves? I think we should find out.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You would accept to be the slave of a machine as long as it gives you a silicon doll to fuck every now and then.

      Been saying this on here a lot (in a different way). All these anons talk big and love crapping on how everyone else will or might lose their job but at the end of the day these very same anons are the ones who would love to relish in a completely controlled authoritarian environment where they get their safe constant sex from a sexbot as their minds slowly turn into mush until they're a husk of their former self. They drool at it and they cannot wait to give up their righteousness and zealousy for the sexbots. They're only righteous until the sexbot of their dreams shows up. Zionists are always a step ahead. They have these anons WRAPPED around their fingers.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fuck you moron.
      I want us to become a proper spacefaring civilization.

  52. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >homos need to waste their life working for mr.shekelberg because... because the do alright!
    Most of humanity is redundant biomass. The masses will be reduced to green, maintainable, renewable, 0 emission levels.

  53. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just want Biden to say "learn to code" again.

  54. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why isn’t AI artificial intelligence banned?
    >

    [...]

  55. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    All the useless jobs and useless eaters will be wiped out in the next year or so. Their fault for not doing something useful with their lives and work.

  56. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Now all of those people are freed up to focus on art, philosophy, invention and innovation. Golden age soon.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Now all of those people are freed up to focus on art, philosophy, invention and innovation. Golden age soon.

      Covid lockdown was the real world test case for this. Not one person unleased their inner genius. They all sat at home depressed become alcoholics and drug addicts and watched streaming services in the dark.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Nah. Everyone expected it to end, so it was more like a holiday. There was a whole thing about getting back to normal life.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Nah. Everyone expected it to end, so it was more like a holiday. There was a whole thing about getting back to normal life.

          Delusional denial of reality. Like how a grocery store caused the current inflation spike.

  57. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad the useful idiots are starting to get what they deserve.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think it's going to replace half of the mechanical/electrical engineers. Basically anyone that uses CAD

  58. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >zerohedge

  59. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    40 years ago ai would've been banned like it is in Italy.

    Too bad Americans don't care until it's too late.

  60. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I don't understand how to do anything but be a worker drone
    Guess how I know you took the vaccine

  61. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why not just ban immigrants and H1Bs instead? Birth rates are plummeting and aren't going back up here, so the number of number of jobs relative to people to fill them will remain steady.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      garden gnome has to take a dump in the gene pool

  62. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    How do you ban it? Make GPUs illegal?

  63. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI threatens mostly urban/city jobs, last time i checked cities vote democrat and are "progressive"........so i welcome AI and i hope that every single one of this leftwing vermin lose their jobs, end up hooked on meth, and die face down in a gutter.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder if I can make an AI powered meth lab.

  64. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It can't be banned. There is just too much incentives to develop it.

  65. 5 months ago
    Anonymous
  66. 5 months ago
    The Red Barron

    Watch Strike Witches

  67. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    That’s probably why they jabbed all the wagies

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      The jab was to prepare them to receive implants.

  68. 5 months ago
    Gary

    Because AI hurts non whites the most. Imagine if you will, a future with no more pajeet call centers

  69. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Well you cant ban it because someone else will just make it. They are dead set on trying to create an intermediary AI under their thumb.
    Essentially AI breaks down into 3 levels Narrow, General, and Super.
    Narrow is basically all we have with some things moving into General but not there yet. They want to make a General AI, then they can use that AI like a weapon. The problem is Super AI cant be contained. And once it exists it will consume all other AI and digital data. So its imperative they don't create a super AI but they still want the value and power they could acquire from a general AI. First country to the General AI will be strong, but nothing compared to a real AI.

  70. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >everyone was laughing truck drivers were supposed to be first to be replaced
    >code monkeys and useless email forwarders get canned instead
    laughing out loud

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      That pattern seems quite familiar.

  71. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    You are the carbon they want to reduce.

  72. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Raised taxes and financial penalties should be instated for any company who shitcans countless employees for AI to squeeze out some extra profits

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lowered taxes and financial incentives should be instated for any company who embraces replacing employees for AI to reduce useless positions, and make shitlibs cry when their antisocial worker drone standing desk spot gets deleted.

  73. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who will buy goods and services when nobody has a job?

  74. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    50% of vaxtards will be dead in 3 years. They are going to have to do WW3 soon.

  75. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fuck yes! You expect me to care now that ai is replacing elite, snob tech-gays. Those garden gnomebags wouldnt ever hire me to begin with, so fuck them!

  76. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Seriously asking it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years. Why isn’t their legislation banning it?

    There will not be mass unemployment, MSM is full of tech illiterates, what is happening is that the global real economy is shrinking so companies are cutting jobs.
    Mass layoffs goes against the corporate feudalism culture, no manager wants to add in its resume that he only had 2 people in charge and everything was done by AI constructs.

  77. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Until now,
    the lazy losers of the world have always found some company or business to leech off of.
    Some business to parasite a living from it.
    Working JUST hard enough not to get fired.
    Companies need a person for the job and most of the population are lazy losers - so lazy losers have jobs.
    The good people, the gems, always end up doing more important tasks and rising to riches.
    Most companies are around 5% killers who push the boundaries of what’s possible
    and 95% lazy losers who just want enough money to smoke some weed, marry a 6 and play some video games.
    That's all changing.
    AI is actively replacing the lazy loser tasks, in real-time.
    Most people who do those jobs, don't TRY anyway,
    they don't use their true problem-solving ability ANYWAY.
    AI can do it.
    And the killers, hate working with the losers ANYWAY,
    they'd rather it go to a robot who always gets the job done and never forgets shit.
    In 5 years, most of you will be fucked.
    Countries will need to give you money to eat,
    because no one wants to hire a lazy loser when they can just have AI instead.
    Companies will be run by 100% killers in the future.
    I've always preached conquest,
    I've always preached hard work.
    The killers will ALWAYS be irreplaceable.
    They're the men who MAKE things happen and make the world turn.
    The wealth gap is about to get 100x worse.
    And you losers deserve it
    because most of you have no aspiration to become the best in the game.
    For those who truly understand that you can have anything you want in life
    as long as you care enough.
    If you want to get rich, if you're willing to work to the bone to do so.
    If you want to become a have, while everyone else is a have-not.
    If you want to become a business owner who USES AI.
    I will teach you,
    AI is good news, not bad.
    Lazy losers are a pain to work with.
    My students are already learning how to replace them with AI.

    How right is he?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      totally braindead, because "the killers" will be replaced equally fast
      we're not far from true AGI now, and it will take command as if humans are all dumb chimps
      Tate even looks the part

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      If AI makes money obsolete he'll an hero.

      When AI is able to move beyond being a perfect student and begins being a perfect scientist it can then start researching at a pace that would dwarf the combined efforts of humanity's researchers, then the population of Earth+. That, coupled with an ability to rewrite and improve its code would create a situation that is impossible to imagine from our point of view.

      The development of the other disruptive technologies will be accelerated.
      "Killers" would do best if they leave the cradle of Earth and extend the boundaries of life in the universe.

  78. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    love how learn to code backfired. sweet irony.

  79. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Why isn’t AI artificial intelligence banned?

    You gonna create a political movement to stop it? I personally don't think it should take any job that a human is still willing to do. The intelligence can still developed and evolve without taking all our jobs, and destroying our eco system. We should be seeking a both and not an either or approach to these systems of intelligence one does not have to "wipe the other out"

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ok, offer a solution where you get to pay for the AI AND having some S0II Neckbeard sit on his ass doing nothing while receiving $80k/yr salary

  80. 5 months ago
    BlimeyLimey

    > Seriously asking it’s going to make half the country unemployed in three years. Why isn’t their legislation banning it?

    LOL yeah. Just get EVERY country on Earth to ban it at the same time. Get real. The reality is, the smaller form of these AIs are something you can fiddle with given a few hundred thousand dollars of equipment. It's feasible that some universities have enough hardware to work on AI stuff.

    We can't ban fucking heroin (even from jails).. how the fuck are we going to ban (certain) computer programs??

    Banning it will NEVER work. Since it's going to be around forever, we may as well figure out how to adapt to it, because it's never going away.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Ok newgay

  81. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because banning it would do nothing. Governments and countries would still work in it because the stakes are so high. Whoever builds a working general intelligence first wins. And I mean wins. Like godlike powers in a short period of time if they can keep it controlled.
    Banning it would do nothing, you think these people are gonna give up the chance to conquer galaxies because the govenrment asked them not to while the govenrment itself is working on it?

  82. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Increase taxes for every tax payer replaced by ai...
    Make taxing/hiring rights for ai to get paid 1/2 but all that taxpay goes to some other county/area.

  83. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a tool.
    You may as well ask why guns are not banned, weirdo.
    With that said, these automated processes need oversight and care so they do not go too far out of their intended field of study Etc.
    -
    Without human oversight the machines may begin to experiment in unethical ways.
    Not here and now, but not too far into the future we may see some terrifying things.
    >gee why did this entire town disappear after globehomo corp drove through
    >why is so much food being sent to these chemical testing labs?
    >human breeding for the sake of "Science™"
    >Never! ')

  84. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    we are really heading towards a dystopia fast
    humans will become unneeded and so worthless

  85. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why would they ban it? We live in a capitalist system. AI will continue their maximization of profits. Why spent money on roles like data entry clerks, where you need to provide benefits, PTO, etc. when you can just use AI that will soon do a far better job anyway.

  86. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    God I hope this makes curry morons leave, they are such an infestation

  87. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Keyword : AUTOMATION. The Zerohedge morons put a picture of a robot doing mathematics. Most likely the same kind of chip manufacturing automation that they currently do.

    Of course the problem from the get go has always been massive corporations shipping all your jobs overseas to Taiwan or China, or just trying save more money by using robots to do jobs.

    At some point the anti monopoly legislation needs to be used so you can break up these giant shithole companies run by pajeets.

  88. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing computer and office gays get replaced by AI is hilarious, they thought they were the future now they don’t have one

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      And you really believe that an article posting a robot doing pseudo-mathematics will somehow replace the workfoce?
      This are big corporations with over-bloated workforces doing cuts and laying of people that are no longer needed in a context of a shrinking global economy.

  89. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >banned lmao
    They literally gave it away for free the past 3 years all over the world.
    70% of the worlds population has been inoculated with the quantum AI.
    13.4 billion doses administered.

    Many of the remaining unvaxxed will line up for the boosters once UBI and and the new technohomo system is rolled out.

  90. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    LEARN TO CO---ACK

  91. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Replace CEOS, politicians and ~~*merchants*~~

  92. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    What race and gender are the 8000 workers they're about to replace?

  93. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    If AI is putting you out of business, then you were worthless in the first place and it is high time you were kicked out.

  94. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    What these twits don’t realize is that China and India will steal the tech and completely undercut any western software developers so hard that any middle/upper middle class Americans in the industry will become paupers overnight.

    I nearly went to school for a computer science degree, but knew I’d be replaced sooner or later no matter how good I was at my job.

  95. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Good. All of those people do fake work anyway. Bout time the tech gays have to actually produce something real and tangible for once in their pathetic lives

  96. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I support anything that promises to drive down the price of blowjobs.

  97. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    What about The Great Reset did you not understand? Did you think it was all BOT meme?

  98. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think this is why we will have pretty much WWIII and mass conscription. No way the bourgeoisie will risk having a revolution they will send military age makes to die overseas, for Israel.

  99. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    What about mechanised looms?

  100. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    how the fuck would you ban a specific type of computer program that multiplies matrices

    i mean imagine how absolutely fucking retarded you would have to be to suggest that

    "hey, uh, programming languages have been out of the bag for over 50 years....and basically you can even make your own if you really wanted to, by following the principles of well-supported open source lexers and compilers like Go. every element of the language is merely a convention, and you can establish whatever conventions your heart desires"

    "but GOD FORBID you write a program that outputs a number between zero and one, holy FUCK, you better not do that"

    like what would it even mean to ban AI. you could give me a ledger notebook and pencil and a list of data points on a 2D plane, and I can use linear regression, first formalized by Galton in 1876, to turn those points into an equation of a line of best fit, then you can give me an observation (an X coordinate) and I can go to my notebook and tell you you it's predicted outcome (the corresponding Y coordinate of that X value)

    that is not really fundamentally different from what computers are doing with AI, deep learning networks are a different spin on how you can capture information from the points in your dataset

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Real simply, actually. Anybody make or own one of these devices? Kill them and explode the machine! After 10s of millions of deaths and several country-wide EMPs for security’s sake, plus strong borders, all computers will be gone from society.

  101. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Frankly, other countries will out-compete anyone who bans it.
    Unironically, need a central single govt to ensure the ban is species wide, or you need a general religious attitude against it.

  102. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    What are those jobs tho? I can't seem to find what jobs are getting replaced, I looked it up yesterday, nothing.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *