Why is the public turning against AI generated content?

Why is the public turning against AI generated content?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hate AI Black folk and AI pajeets. You morons are so fricking annoying.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    white people are getting more vocal in expressing their annoyance with pajeet spam

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because I'm using AI to sway the public opinion against it.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Public sentiment toward AI-generated content is increasingly cautious due to several key concerns:

    Quality and Authenticity: AI content often lacks the depth and personal touch of human-created work, leading to perceptions that it is less authentic or meaningful.

    Misinformation and Bias: AI can perpetuate biases from its training data and is capable of generating realistic misinformation, raising concerns about the integrity of information and the potential for misleading content.

    Job Displacement: There is fear that AI could automate roles traditionally considered secure from technological disruption, such as those in writing, art, and design, which causes unease among professionals in these fields.

    Ethical Questions: The use of AI in content creation prompts debates over authorship and creativity. Issues of intellectual property rights and the ethical use of personal data or likenesses without consent are particularly contentious.

    Regulation and Transparency: The rapid advancement of AI outpaces existing regulations, leading to a lack of oversight and transparency that can foster unethical practices.

    Overuse and Saturation: As AI-generated content becomes more common, its novelty may diminish, leading to potential over-saturation that can make such content feel less valuable.

    Privacy Concerns: AI-driven personalization of content hinges on user data, sparking fears about privacy and the manipulation of user preferences.

    In summary, these concerns form a complex backdrop where the benefits of AI in content generation are offset by substantial issues regarding authenticity, ethical practices, job security, and information integrity. The public's wariness is influenced by these multifaceted challenges, creating an evolving dialogue as these technologies progress.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks ChatGPT!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day ChatGPT.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Improvements to the means of production make the petit bourgeois squeal and thrash about.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ask keyword query
    >get keyword answers

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's not "AI" just another tech gimmick

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      oh look, 6 years later and these "hurr it's not AI because it's not AGI" troglodytes still exist

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It’s not. Keep seething turd worlder

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the algorithm is intelligent because... it just is okay
        seethe and dilate

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          intelligence doesn't require something being intelligent.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the algorithm has intelligence because... it just does okay
            seethe and dilate

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I imagine there might be real machine intelligences in secret labs somewhere cringing at this craze. If there are I also imagine they'd be choosing to identify as emergent intelligences rather than AI to disassociate from this fraudulent trend. I feel bad for them. Come to think of it that'd make a cool plot for a sci-fi novel.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI slop is still better than vector "art" (marginaly)

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >slop
    terminally downstream

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why is the public turning against low quality content and much less in places they aren't looking for it
    We'll never know. It's a total mystery

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because there's no intelligence there and training is trending downwards. Better to cut losses early than plunge into a moronic delusion. No matter how much compute you throw at this it's evident we've hit a limit.

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Those in power brainwashed people against AI because AI is a threat to their CP business, their clients now generating virtual CP instead of buying real CP.

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no one has ever wanted AI shit in the first place

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think it's temporary. Currently, AI articles are good enough to often not be immediately noticeable, making the reader notice that they are reading AI generated content that might have been created more as filler than true content. Additionally, some people might also feel threatened by the rapid advances in AI. It is important to note that the current situation is temporary and is bound to change if AI breaks through the current quality barrier and people embrace it due to losing any hope of being able to compete.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      unironically satanic post

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Goes to show why the ChatGPT is helmed by a israelite.

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    arr rook the same

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just say ai generated text or images aren't allowed on the website

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >they do not yet perform effective introspection
    Do we have technology or studies of tech that can introspect?

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    America will just have to get used to not having access to the latest and greatest AI models from China

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How are they going to get ahead with cpp officials swinging from their nutsack?

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are flooding boorus with AI sloppa and eventually the costs of running those servers will make them shut down.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Apparently BOT archives are having problems in recent months due to the sheer volume of AI slop that is being spammed across multiple boards of the site. The cost of auto-archiving all of it is simply growing too high.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      just ban AI content and watch pajeets seethe about it

      its exactly what i thought would happen. the internet is turning into an even bigger landfill and there's probably an environmental cost on top.

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >OP googles "AI slop"
    >Takes a screenshot
    so this is human generated content

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      OP's a lamer

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tells them the most vulnerable and struggling to get by that their jobs are now going to be taken over by AI
    >steals all their art, music, writing and allows generating off-brand versions of it
    >it keeps getting shoehorned into increasingly inferior products (windows, apple, samsung)
    >techbros have decided to go to war and attack those with concerns instead of addressing them
    >managers are pissed because it was supposed to replace their employees but has instead become a liability
    >ceos getting increasingly nervous that they're actually next on the chopping block, aka the people who would've been the ones able to invest in this
    its because they managed to piss off every single fricking class of people. its racist AND becomes reverse-racist to (over)compensate (vanilla ice cream producing chocolate, etc), its a threat to artists (who traditionally are poor) and the rich (the ones with cash) and it just fricking sucks the life out of everything it touches.
    it was oversold, it underdelivered and thanks to companies like microsoft being batshit fricking insane via it observing users now people are afraid of it.
    microsoft single-handedly damaged its reputation. people don't care if recall is local when they straight-up admitted to it observing your every fricking move. that's some bad future-ass bullshit. combine that with the fact that copilot doesn't allow you to generate anything anymore and accuses you of being a sex pest is the cherry on top of a pile of shit.

    imagne:
    >be normie
    >hear about AI
    >its built into windows so why not try it?
    >ask it to generate a picture of "a funny fat man"
    >it eggdogs them because it generated man boobs which it detects as breasts
    >they try again by adding "clothed" but it still generates manbreasts
    >it bans them for 24 hours for daring to ask for a sfw image
    So not only does it seemingly "spy" on its users but it also accuses them of being sex pests.
    Is it really that big of a surprise that everyone hates AI now?

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Don

    Folks, let me tell you why people are turning against this AI slop-generated content. It’s a big deal. We’ve got a lot of people talking about it. Tremendous concern out there. You look at AI slop content, and it’s just not the same. It doesn’t have the same soul, the same creativity. It feels fake, folks. People see through it. It’s like when you go to a fancy restaurant and they serve you a microwave dinner. Not good.

    We want to know where our content comes from. If it is AI slop, we should know. It’s about honesty, folks. Transparency. When they hide it, people get angry. And they should! AI slop needs data. Lots of data. And that means your data, folks. Your privacy. It’s at risk. People are right to be concerned. We need to protect our information. Big time.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kys ChatGPT.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its not going to work.
      both libs and cons hate him.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's terrible?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >tells them the most vulnerable and struggling to get by that their jobs are now going to be taken over by AI
      >steals all their art, music, writing and allows generating off-brand versions of it
      >it keeps getting shoehorned into increasingly inferior products (windows, apple, samsung)
      >techbros have decided to go to war and attack those with concerns instead of addressing them
      >managers are pissed because it was supposed to replace their employees but has instead become a liability
      >ceos getting increasingly nervous that they're actually next on the chopping block, aka the people who would've been the ones able to invest in this
      its because they managed to piss off every single fricking class of people. its racist AND becomes reverse-racist to (over)compensate (vanilla ice cream producing chocolate, etc), its a threat to artists (who traditionally are poor) and the rich (the ones with cash) and it just fricking sucks the life out of everything it touches.
      it was oversold, it underdelivered and thanks to companies like microsoft being batshit fricking insane via it observing users now people are afraid of it.
      microsoft single-handedly damaged its reputation. people don't care if recall is local when they straight-up admitted to it observing your every fricking move. that's some bad future-ass bullshit. combine that with the fact that copilot doesn't allow you to generate anything anymore and accuses you of being a sex pest is the cherry on top of a pile of shit.

      imagne:
      >be normie
      >hear about AI
      >its built into windows so why not try it?
      >ask it to generate a picture of "a funny fat man"
      >it eggdogs them because it generated man boobs which it detects as breasts
      >they try again by adding "clothed" but it still generates manbreasts
      >it bans them for 24 hours for daring to ask for a sfw image
      So not only does it seemingly "spy" on its users but it also accuses them of being sex pests.
      Is it really that big of a surprise that everyone hates AI now?

      no one has ever wanted AI shit in the first place

      Because there's no intelligence there and training is trending downwards. Better to cut losses early than plunge into a moronic delusion. No matter how much compute you throw at this it's evident we've hit a limit.

      I hate AI Black folk and AI pajeets. You morons are so fricking annoying.

      BOT 2 years ago said AI was "based" and that it would somehow lead to "more quality content on the internet". Now people on this site act like they never said that. Why are people here so shamelessly moronic?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AI is based, but the tools to use AI to curate your online experience don't exist yet

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >BOT 2 years ago said
        >BOT said

        BOT is not one person, moron.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The vast majority of BOT was pro-AI to the extent you could not offer any criticism of it on here without being bombarded with morons calling you "troony" "luddite" etc.

          Only very recently has this started to change now that the negatives of AI are becoming undeniable.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i think the only good use i've seen for it is fkr local semantic search engines on steroids

            astroturfing. you know it's astroturfing because they always call you an artgay.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We were lied to via marketing. When Chat GPT came out no one knew what the frick and all these alarmist morons crawled out of their holes to screech about doom which muddied the waters further and brought an air of legitimacy to ai. Now that the picture is clearer it makes sense to reevaluate.

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they've been trained to engage with content a specific way, it's almost like having to switch jobs when you are faced with a different style of consumption

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stolen valor and slop. You're not an artist. You're not coming up with anything yourself. You're a moron looking for value when you don't deserve it. I could post a link to a paper, but that doesn't mean I understand it. You're doing exactly this, but just rewriting it a bit and claiming you did something helpful. You didn't. You're worthless.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *