Why does AI fail this simple task that 40% of college educated women also fail?

Why does AI fail this simple task that 40% of college educated women also fail?

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That's a poorly worded question. The water line would look like the AI pics for a very brief moment and the question didn't specify that any time had passed since tilting.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It never would. The water would begin accelerating as the boundary layer against the walls moved around it but it wouldn't ever look like that.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Try it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      uh.. no.. ever tilt a glass to drink out of it? it doesn't do that..

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Elon Musk also didn't specify when he would step down (as per the results of the poll he posted on Twitter)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      tits or gtfo

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      no it's not, also tits or gtfo

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >That's a poorly worded question.
      no its not retard. The question is totally unambiguous, women are just subhuman retards.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      this post made me laugh so fucking hard. god damn BOTners are so good at baiting.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      its a tier 1 npc filter, do you interpret the question literally as rotating an image? or do you iterate the contents of the image based upon a set of arbitrary rules (gravity) that the audience would implicitly understand?

      the question isn't vague at all, it specifically asks to show how the water line would look. to interpret the question as a simple translation request is to reject the additional information being supplied; the water line would never be mentioned in a translation context

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The answer is too obvious, which implies a trap.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's the right answer? You simply can't do this rigorously

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      "The correct answer is a horizontal line relative to Earth."

      Except that context wasn't given?!

      "Figure A shows a bottle on Earth with some water in it which has settled.

      In figure B the same bottle was tilted to its side. Draw a line to show how the water line would look after the water has settled."

      Now how many get it wrong? Probably more like 4%.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Most people aren't going to think that hard into it. You're not meant to think that hard into it given the lack of context.
        They are going to get it wrong just because it's not something they think about and some flatout cannot visualize what would happen if they did take a bottle and turn it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          how can someone who can't think as far ahead as simply tilting a bottle be expected to function independently

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The average person can hardly be described as functional bro.
            Not even saying that as a mid-wit take, like I'm above the general population or anything but think about how much the average person struggles with basic reasoning and realize half the population is ever so slightly worse.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Women cannot be expected to function independently. You now suddenly understand why human social structures were as they were for +10,000 years before the modern age.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Oh come on. Obviously gravity exists and they are asking how it would look once water is settled.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >He thinks 40% of women immediately thought, "This question requires further specificity to the timeframe of which Figure B is meant to encapsulate and whether gravity is supposed to be applied".
        >He thinks 40% of women further thought, "To demonstrate to the proctor the absurdity of answering such a broad question, I shall answer with the most retarded, thoughtless interpretation of the question".

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/vguI05e.png

        What's the right answer? You simply can't do this rigorously

        Yeah whenever people talk about their day to me I always assume everything is happening in an inertial reference frame unless they *specifically* tell me that g=9.whatever meters per second per second.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Most people unironically cannot visualize an image with tilted bottle in their heads

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody can, the only people who solve this are people who have seen and noticed it in real life.
          You aren't god, you can't create the universe in your head, stop larping.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            t. 6

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous
            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              This is a myth. Everyone who's not a brain dead can imagine a colored apple. Anyone who answers 2-5 have low self-esteem (or a false modesty), but in reality they still can imagine 1.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            great b8

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's impossible not to have seen it before unless you only drink water by pressing your mouth up against a sink and turning it on.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            And don't get me started on "visualizations" in your head. All these layperson pretending they can what, just imagine whatever image they want? Anyway anon let's calm down, smoke some weed, and watch some Rick and Morty!

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >never seen a tilted bottle

            >drink out of bottle
            >the fluid comes out
            >it is therefore obviously not still at the base of the bottle

            We are approaching levels of retardation that werent previously thought possible

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I made universes of OP being a straight man in my head.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Now I know you're lying

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Nobody can, the only people who solve this are people who have seen and noticed it in real life.
          You aren't god, you can't create the universe in your head, stop larping.

          I can do this extremely easy. stop being retards

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >ohhhh you meant on earthh
        tits or gtfo

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        whore

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        only a woman would be this mad over such a simple question

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        what would you do if you were driving your car and you were approaching a stop sign
        >Im sorry I dont understand the question
        oh sorry.
        what would you do if you were driving a car on earth and you approached a stop sign that was also on earth

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        post tits

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >"The correct answer is a horizontal line relative to Earth."
        Sure, if you do it on Earth. But what would it look like if you did this in space, in zero-g?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The water would touch the entire bottle on the inside

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Just assume that you're retarded why cope

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's a bowl shaped line starting at the corner, because the earth is a sphere

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        sure it is schizo

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          globetards? any defense?
          And no, "the sun can't be 100 feet from the ground" is not an argument.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The sun can't be 33 meters from the ground.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              all civilizations ever existed the world (except those that havent solved getting a reliable source fo food like some african tribes) came down to the conclusion earth is a sphere
              the first time you ever hear of flat earth was when some american cia spook started it to create the stereotype of conspiracy tard to discredit all criticism of government as such

              You are replying to a slide bot that tries to shift the thread into irrelevant topic. It does not matter WHAT argument you present. When the premise is false and retarded, your arguments against it will also be seen as false and retarded.

              It does not matter what you throw onto it, he will throw more onto you, flooding you with a lot of low quality information that sophistically looks like it may be legit at the first glance.

              You are the morons of this board, you don't know how dialectics works. You never learn. have a nice day.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is already a shit thread and should have been jannied 5 years ago. Why the fuck not.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I am not a bot I just thought it'd be funny to reply to that comic with the most obvious counter.
                Didn't expect fucking everyone to reply.

                The thread itself is off-topic anyway.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is BOT. What topic could they be sliding? /lmg/? /spg/?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            all civilizations ever existed the world (except those that havent solved getting a reliable source fo food like some african tribes) came down to the conclusion earth is a sphere
            the first time you ever hear of flat earth was when some american cia spook started it to create the stereotype of conspiracy tard to discredit all criticism of government as such

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Ancient civilizations were never aware of the vast oceans separating our continents. Their entire world were the landmass they were locked to. They were not on some secret that only few know now, they were just greatly uninformed, just like we're gonna look like to people 10 000 years in the future.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                all of these images are interesting dioramas that humans have made to symbolize and encapsulate an environment. we love doing these things for entertainment, strategic planning, war games, competitive sports, etc. etc..

                also, side note:
                you'd have a hell of a time trying to photograph a car using a view field the diameter of a penny. imagine trying to prove the shape by having super close zoom-in, it'd be like using a laser pointer as your light source to find a pebble you dropped in the woods, at night..

                what is considered `nasa` footage is a camera that's not all that far away from the planet itself, with a curvy lens to widen the field of view.

                and even when you go all the way to the moon, the maximum surface area you're able to see of a sphere is 180 degrees in rotation, meaning, literally a view capacity at 50% of the entire object, unless you calculated to bend all sides of the shape into a unified view area.

                really, to an extent, everything is `flat`, since what we perceive as flat, is some idea of a plane or field collapsed and bound to what we understand as a 2d surface, and oddly, it's theoretically possible to imagine any given individual at some position along some graph,
                with the perspective itself serving as the view field for the visual model, `perspective`..

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              this
              if you can't suppress information, you introduce as much garbage information as possible, and equate everything to the garbage. makes it harder for the average retard unwilling to think and analyze to discern real from fake, and easier to dismiss.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            don't get baited, no one's seriously demented enough to believe in flat earth, it's all just online trolling material

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            sun rays are parallel because sun is really far away.
            that's why your shadow from the sun stays the same size no matter how fat from the surface you move, while a shadow of an artificial light source changes with distance to lightsource

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous
              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                what part of light source being really far away do you not get?
                seriously, go outside in daylight and move your hand up and down from the ground
                the shadow stays same size, just gets more diffused

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                same reason you can photograph farther away objects during a clear day

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I hate the flatearthers so much.
            It's the current year. Rent a ship, rent a plane, fly to the edge live streaming it. It's that simple.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              anon you realize most of us are one step away from absolutely losing it to the mk ultra becuase we CANT do anything like that anymore?
              You realize beyond cost they wont even let you behind the wheel of a plane if you have any mental problems? our entire country is repressed mentally ill people. the chuds are just the loudest.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                stfu, woman

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            In such models, you either pretend the earth is flat and the sun is round or the earth is round and the sun is flat. You can't prove both are round as there's not enough precision, and now there are gnomish shenanigans about even the light being round, doing curves. We are too late for precise measuring to work. Now AI is going to tell us different things en masse, larping as if it were true, and media garden gnomes are going to censor us and push whatever they want.

            So we will never know the truth using only the sun. It's over.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            fuck off glowmoron, we WILL learn what's going on with Ganymede

            [...]

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          globetards? any defense?
          And no, "the sun can't be 100 feet from the ground" is not an argument.

          if the earth was flat it wouldn't be possible for it to be night time in china while simultaneously being day in europe or america

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              explain why you can't see the sun all the time then
              or the rays getting scattered by the atmosphere
              you would see huge culumns of light going into the sky every night, rotating

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Because china is really far away.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Warped space

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              If the Earth is flat in this specific way, then what's underneath it? And can I live there?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Only one way to find out

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                nuking north korea?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >If the Earth is flat in this specific way, then what's underneath it?
                read Plato's Phaedo

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              if earth is flat then why is the horizon line curved?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's not.
                Only fisheye lens distort it.
                It's physically impossible to calculate the curvature or observe it.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You do realize that saying dumbfuck flat earth things while dabbing on trannies only legitimizes them because people start conflating flat eather smoothbrains with people who rightfully point out trannies aren't real women?
                It's almost as if flat fucks are a misdirection to poison the well.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >muh group reputation
                You're falled for it. The moment you said that, you accepted that guilt by assoviation is okay.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's almost as if it's impossible to prove
                >gravity
                >curvature
                >rotation
                >movement
                But flat earth is posioning the well. Sure thing, chud

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                It's also impossible to prove that I'm not invisible and jacking off behind you right this second.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                how do you figure that you cant prove the earth is round if you can see the earth from outside of its orbit and observe that you can only see half of the planet at any given moment, until it rotates(lol)

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                imagine unironically believing fairy tales like space agencies being nothing more than money laundering schemes also see pic

                https://i.imgur.com/XDrusqP.jpg

                Only one way to find out

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >see pic
                Jesus fuck, you're stupid beyond belief.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Okay, I've got a very simple question. Let's assume the Earth is flat and we're all controlled by a combination of aliens, Freemasons, and the Illuminati. Why would they want to convince people that the Earth is actually round? What is there to gain?

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >What is there to gain?
                Don't google nasa annual budget 😉
                (this is only calculated in taxpayer money, not including """private"""" donations)
                Globe Earth is also a demoralisation tactic, hopeless and aimless population is easier to control.
                Flat Earth is a direct proof of intellectual design behind life. Now think of the implications of that one 😉

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                The absolute idea that NASA is somehow conning the whole world to give them taxes is hilarious. Unless you think the new world order somehow needs to pay themselves for propaganda.

                Every single one of you flat earthers comes up with the whole "God" thing. Which is funny because I don't think there's a single church that endorses flat Earth. I guess they're all controlled opposition as well. In either case "God" means you have no real argument if you need to invoke it.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                For an organization that wants your taxpayer money, they are doing a very bad job. Come on, NASA! You're making flat earth retards look bad.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >pic
                Haha bro yea bro thats why we have to contain water so that it doesnt spread into the air, it also doesnt have low density and pressure at top levels and high density and pressure at lower levels

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Retards that don't know how distance works

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I've noticed that most of the problems we have nowadays are because morons have literally no sense of scale.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                Most people don't, but they kept to themselves before the internet existed
                Sense of scale is really hard to come by, almost as much as abstract thinking

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                retard glowies are trying to validate trannies in the first place, of course they realize that.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                it's not

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              that's not how light falloff works

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              >sun shines in one direction and that direction only

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          the weird part is reality can be represented as 2d and 3d at the same time but still has flaws on each other hence the perfect storm between globetards and flatards.
          it's actually 4d shape. earth is most likely a tesseract which explains strange phenomenons like people being spatially transported to the other side of the world (wormholes can only exist in 4d).

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            huh so the timecube guy was right after all

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      "The correct answer is a horizontal line relative to Earth."

      Except that context wasn't given?!

      "Figure A shows a bottle on Earth with some water in it which has settled.

      In figure B the same bottle was tilted to its side. Draw a line to show how the water line would look after the water has settled."

      Now how many get it wrong? Probably more like 4%.

      Found the women

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      "The correct answer is a horizontal line relative to Earth."

      Except that context wasn't given?!

      "Figure A shows a bottle on Earth with some water in it which has settled.

      In figure B the same bottle was tilted to its side. Draw a line to show how the water line would look after the water has settled."

      Now how many get it wrong? Probably more like 4%.

      you will always be a woman

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      aqua is so fucking retarded

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      "The correct answer is a horizontal line relative to Earth."

      Except that context wasn't given?!

      "Figure A shows a bottle on Earth with some water in it which has settled.

      In figure B the same bottle was tilted to its side. Draw a line to show how the water line would look after the water has settled."

      Now how many get it wrong? Probably more like 4%.

      I pointed at the figure a & b to my gf and said where would the water be if you tilted it like that
      she immediately drew a horizontal line with her finger and looked at me. It took her 5 seconds
      I'd really recommend killing yourselves if you can't figure this problem out.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      good thing korone knows
      she isnt a mentally handicapped westoid woman and also graduated from tokyo u

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        ignore the fact that i forgot to add alpha to the texture and the liquid looks like cum IT DOESNT MATTER OK???

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's wrong retard

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          its LITERALLY a fluid simulation it cant be wrong

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            the cum clearly seeps through the glass.
            literally go fuck yourself

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >your water doesn't partly defy gravity and make a wave
          ngmi

          its LITERALLY a fluid simulation it cant be wrong

          it's totally fucking wrong, retard

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >glass tilts into the desk

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        this will come in handy for responding to semen slurpers

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's foam, not water. Water's volume stays constant, foam decreases in volume with time.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The line should be at the same level

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        wrong

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No it should not. That's not how geometry works.

          I just tried it with a bottle nearby.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The water line would only stay the same height in a bottle with the same height as its width.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              if the bottle is a sphere, sure

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              wrong holy shit

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          No it should not. That's not how geometry works.

          sorry i was wrong.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Oops h*z=100 h=100/sqrt(200)=7.07

            So it's higher than the height when it's not rotated (5)

            5 != 7.07..

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >assumes the bottle is a 2 dimensional prism

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            this is the real way to do it
            you should take account for the bottle volume to determine the correct level
            bonus point for providing the fuction volume/angle of tilt/liquid level
            TJTD0S

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              https://i.imgur.com/DthyxIY.png

              [...]
              sorry i was wrong.

              i highly doubt this contains all the required info. the shape is not even as simple as a cone, its a shape so abnormal is has no word for it

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            it's way easier to prove this without any numbers and variables. obviously the cyan area should be the same as pink area but it is not.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        No it should not. That's not how geometry works.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Retard

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            you are, yes

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              I know 🙁

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            the corner of the bottle is not at the same level, and further more the picture on the right is 150% the size as the one on the left

            https://i.imgur.com/Vn09Ec5.png

            >women can't draw a line

            shouldnt be at the same level

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >it should not
          Depends on exactly what the shape of the bottle is, and requires far more information than is presented. Anything with the water line horizontal and in around the right place should count as a pass.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        show tits

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        wtf no it shouldnt

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        tits or gtfo

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I'm no mathematician but you can use simple logic to understand that the water level would rise.
        Consider that at the top line, the bottle's width rises by maybe 25 to 30% at most, while at the bottom it slowly decreases all the way down to 0%.
        This means that more volume is lost than is gained, therefore it's inevitable that the water level would go above what it was before.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          people that don't understand this aren't worth teaching.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          The dimensions of the bottle are different, dumbass.
          If we assume that the bottle is tilted 45° while the bottom of it is a rectangle we can assume that the dimensions are w and h.
          w * h = V in a non-tilted bottle
          w^2/2 = V' in a tilted bottle if water level below the corner is counted
          If we assume that V = V' we get w*h=w^2/2
          w2*h2 = w^2
          (w2*h2)/w = w
          wh2/w = w
          h2/w = 1
          w = h2
          Do you fucking see the height of the water being half of the width? It's definitely fucking not.
          Instead we compute the water level like this:
          (V-(w^2/2))/sqrt(w2)

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Water level over the corner I mean

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No it should not. That's not how geometry works.

      https://i.imgur.com/DthyxIY.png

      [...]
      sorry i was wrong.

      w*man detected

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The line should be at the same level

      No it should not. That's not how geometry works.

      https://i.imgur.com/Vn09Ec5.png

      >women can't draw a line

      https://i.imgur.com/YP7Vmd5.png

      so am I a woman now?

      true dough

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Depending on the water level, this answer could be wrong. Water level is not specified, therefore this question does not have a single answer.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Retard. Do you know how dummies like you answer this question? They draw lines that aren't parallel to the original water line.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      300k a year any job i want

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      man detected

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I instinctively draw a horizontal line. It's just how it works.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The question doesn't specify whether the water is liquid or solid.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      solid water is called ice ameridumb

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Oof. GPT-4 fails it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I'm a little surprised it managed to put the water *in* the glass. It's extremely bad at drawing.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The AI is a woman confirmed

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      do women make mistakes such as this one:
      or do they just get the height wrong such as in this example:

      https://i.imgur.com/Vn09Ec5.png

      >women can't draw a line

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the former

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >women can't draw a line

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong height.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Hopefully this picture helps retards like understand basic logic

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Are you retarded? The middle is wrong, in real life the water line on the left side of the middle jar matches the left jar and rises from there.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Anon these people can't be reasoned with. You are wasting your time

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          This is a stupid image. The spike isn't being given any momentum, it's being physically pushed through their head.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hold shift while drawing a straight line you fucking imbecile.
        You are right but your opinion should be discarded anyway due to the fact you can't draw a straight line correctly.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I just tried this on a real bottle and it works, theoretical brainlets btfo once more by empirical chads.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think the water should be at the exact same level, but I haven't done math for that kind of thing since high school.

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i just tried this with a glass of water and now there's water in my keyboard

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >stainless steel straw
      >not silicon or latex
      sad! many such cases

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Latex straws?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You weren't supposed to fill the glass up.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tilt the camera, not the bottle.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're actually the one who is wrong. The AI knows that a bottle is unlikely to be stable at that angle, therefore, most likely it is in motion captured by a still photograph. A bottle in motion is just as likely to have the liquid 'line' be parallel to the bottle base as anywhere else

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >1 inch thick base

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's so you store your cups chilled and it remains cooler longer.
        It's basically free ice without the liquid.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          thats great. but it has height and volume. i therefore deduce that it must be taken into account

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >AI
    Isn't machine learning?

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They are the moron of genders

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI is trained on inane shit posted on the internet. So it's mostly female

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ChatGPT does better.

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    That AI shits itself doesn't perplex me but wtf is going on with these women?

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone knows to draw a line horizontal to the Earth. Nobody knows the way to calculate the equivalent volume in the tilted bottle. You will get it wrong. I will get it wrong.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone who can't mentally rotate objects is a subhuman

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    does that mean AI is 40% woman?
    ACK

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The real question everyone should be asking is what the real female score is after all the
    >women
    have been removed

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You just need to add more parameters.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it's called nature.
    if all people had similar train of thought, similar tastes and similar grasp on reality we would be homogenized by incestuous bias and eventually go extinct since to survive in the rules of nature you need application of chaos - to spread the seeds of a tree, to spread information and life. chaos is the best strategy, and so this is what brought us all now here.

    most women have difficulty to understand directions and even maps once they make a turn on their car and in that test it seems to coincide with how the direction of the thing is to be portrayed which causes them to glitch. it's not even a joke as you can see pro racing is dominated by men even in games, it's something innate but also women have something innate in them that isn't a trait for men such as ability to read thoughts better (for reasons to ensure the development of babies).
    https://www.livescience.com/220-scientists-read-minds.html

    >figure 3.12
    well if it was actually in 3d and had a focal point that it's on a desk then they'd probably answer more correctly. I don't understand how that's actually a bottle, that's just globohomo minimalist design and should have no place in my mind.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >it's something innate but also women have something innate in them that isn't a trait for men such as ability to read thoughts better (for reasons to ensure the development of babies)

      When the fetus starts sexualization, it receives a large wash of testosterone if the Y chromosome is present. When this happens, parts of the brain that handle social behavior atrophy heavily. When women complain that men are emotionally unavailable, they're not wrong.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >D-despite only being 50% of population, men are >9000% cases of psychopathy
        >Are you destroyed with facts and logic yet?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Honestly don't know what you're hinting at. It's just a fact that always amused me, because I have no interest in the inane social shit women get up to.

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    so am I a woman now?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      well you pass
      the test that is 🙂

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Actually a bit higher than you would think ~22px above the original line.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/yVzMEwa.png

      Are you retarded? The middle is wrong, in real life the water line on the left side of the middle jar matches the left jar and rises from there.

      https://i.imgur.com/c65ruJp.png

      it's way easier to prove this without any numbers and variables. obviously the cyan area should be the same as pink area but it is not.

      it is a 3 dimensional object

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't matter

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          of course it does

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't; x and y have the same shape and volume in 3D.

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              ok now do the bottom

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              oh nvm you're right I should just chud out cuz I have the geometry skills of a woman

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                do the bottom now retard

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                >the bottom
                What

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                that's probably a woman, don't respond to it.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're all women.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                the bottom of the bottle is no longer flat against the table. Now the only thing touching the table is a single point of a circular edge. a large portion of fluid has been raised by this fact alone

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                This. everyone who doesn't think the line will rase is a dumb cunt

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              see

              https://i.imgur.com/c65ruJp.png

              it's way easier to prove this without any numbers and variables. obviously the cyan area should be the same as pink area but it is not.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            no, child

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            not in this case retard, since you are only tilting it on the side.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Have you never poured water from a cup? If you keep it level one side gets lower one side gets higher relative to the original water level. This isn't rocket science.
    Now fuck off to your containment board

    [...]

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i think you all are misinterpreting the image caption, he only say the correct answer is a horizontal line relative (parallel) to the earth, this would imply that a wrong answer (those that women gave) have drawn a line NOT horizontal, doesnt even matter at which height

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      he's not interpreting it wrong. tons of posters in the thread are though. As you said the height doesn't matter, he never said it does, thus not interpreting it wrong.
      He shows (in the pic) the A.I. shitty drawings, none of which have horizontal lines.
      so sure, tons of retards in here (most likely 4chan users since we've been infested for months since kiwigays died) don't get it.
      It is unsurprising, most of them are more similar to women than they are men.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The question is ambiguous, as it refers to a figure of a bottle, not an actual bottle.

    If you flip a painting over it doesn't magically re-arrange the contents either like it was a painting from Harry Potter.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      wrong, read it again.
      You are one of the many women that fail this.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water-level_task

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If a majority of women and a minority of men say A, and a minority of women and a majority of men say B, then why is B "correct" and A "wrong"?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          there is no A and B answers. Those are figures in an example

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >40% is a majority
          lol who the fuck are you retards

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Actually, this has a point. I (and most anons here) immediately went to conclusion that they want to test whether you can calculate the correct water level height, but someone might think that they're being tested for ability to rotate images in their head. If you spend some time thinking about it, the first variant seems to make more sense since it's a harder task, but some people probably go with their initial impulse. I think if you confront them about this and ask 'But what the water line would look if I physically tilted the bottle?' most of those who drew a tilted water line would agree that it won't be tilted in a physical bottle. Although who knows.

      Anyways, in case of a 45 degrees tilt it's a simple pythagorean equation (and yes, water level will be higher). In other case you'd have to do some more basic trig which I'm too lazy to draw.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Actually, this has a point.
        no it doesn't

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Don't get so angry, Pajeet. Funnily enough, by either being unable to or refusing to understand others' opinions, you are betraying the same lack of intellect that you're accusing them of.
          'How would you feel if you drew a tilted water line?'
          'Why are you saying I would draw a tilted water line? Shut up, it doesn't make sense! I know the correct answer!'

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            why'd you capitalize pajeet? retard

            https://i.imgur.com/yReHdry.png

            Actually, this has a point. I (and most anons here) immediately went to conclusion that they want to test whether you can calculate the correct water level height, but someone might think that they're being tested for ability to rotate images in their head. If you spend some time thinking about it, the first variant seems to make more sense since it's a harder task, but some people probably go with their initial impulse. I think if you confront them about this and ask 'But what the water line would look if I physically tilted the bottle?' most of those who drew a tilted water line would agree that it won't be tilted in a physical bottle. Although who knows.

            Anyways, in case of a 45 degrees tilt it's a simple pythagorean equation (and yes, water level will be higher). In other case you'd have to do some more basic trig which I'm too lazy to draw.

            wrong

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              Why did you decide to calculate the volume of water, Pajeet? That's not what the test asked.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm quoting you retards calling you wrong. Why did I decide to calculate what? Where are my calculations, in the word "retard", retard?
                >Pajeet
                retard

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                why are you calculating using area as if the bottle of water is a 2 dimensional object? its not, its 3 dimensional, you need to know the volume. and its not a simple cone either so no matter what you say, bottom line is, you need to know the volume

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        it is a 3 dimensional container, your 2D drawing proves nothing

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/c65ruJp.png

        it's way easier to prove this without any numbers and variables. obviously the cyan area should be the same as pink area but it is not.

        https://i.imgur.com/DthyxIY.png

        [...]
        sorry i was wrong.

        where the cosine in your equations?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You cannot assume the bottle shape is cylindrical, it could be a rectangular prism (square bottle).
          The question doesn't give those details.

          >No, it's not really ambiguous. Usually the description is even more clear.
          The wording on the image is ambiguous enough so that it wouldn't be unreasonable to interpret it in this way [...] I mean, the ship on the sea image is a very good example. You would draw a tilted line there, right? Why would it be unreasonable to assume that the exact same principle applies to the bottle case? Just because it's easier for you to imagine a bottle being tilted than the sea? Or because you are used to the format of logic/math puzzles and simply predict what answer the test expects based on your experience with similar questions? After all, imagine drawing a labyrinth and asking somebody to draw a line from start to exit. If you're used to solving puzzles, you'll immediately start looking for a complicated path, but a child would simply draw a straight line that crosses walls. Is it a wrong answer? And who is mindlessly repeating things that he was taught to do - you or the child?
          [...]
          [...]
          In case you aren't trolling, my drawing is correct for every cross section of the bottle parallel to the initial one which all sum up to a 3D case.
          >where the cosine
          I just realized that you simply googled the answer and probably don't understand the extremely simple math beyond it.

          >my drawing is correct for every cross section of the bottle parallel to the initial one which all sum up to a 3D case.
          This is only true, by symmetry argument, if there is only one axis of rotation.
          The 3D topology does matter a lot if you consider two axes of rotation (e.g. you first rotate it along the plane, then rotate it out of the plane).

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/yReHdry.png

      Actually, this has a point. I (and most anons here) immediately went to conclusion that they want to test whether you can calculate the correct water level height, but someone might think that they're being tested for ability to rotate images in their head. If you spend some time thinking about it, the first variant seems to make more sense since it's a harder task, but some people probably go with their initial impulse. I think if you confront them about this and ask 'But what the water line would look if I physically tilted the bottle?' most of those who drew a tilted water line would agree that it won't be tilted in a physical bottle. Although who knows.

      Anyways, in case of a 45 degrees tilt it's a simple pythagorean equation (and yes, water level will be higher). In other case you'd have to do some more basic trig which I'm too lazy to draw.

      >the bottle has been tilted. Draw a line to show how the water line WOULD look.
      No, it's not really ambiguous. Usually the description is even more clear.

      But it could be a test to see if you simulate physical reality when you think, or if you're just mindlessly regurgitating what you're taught. We all know many college women who are unable to think logically at all, yet they can repeat what they're thought decently well. Funnily enough, thats what "AI", it regurgitates, it has no agility to do logic.

      I bet that college women actually perform worse at this than uneducated women who work, too.

      Don't get so angry, Pajeet. Funnily enough, by either being unable to or refusing to understand others' opinions, you are betraying the same lack of intellect that you're accusing them of.
      'How would you feel if you drew a tilted water line?'
      'Why are you saying I would draw a tilted water line? Shut up, it doesn't make sense! I know the correct answer!'

      >either being unable to or refusing to understand others' opinions
      You realize that it's possible to both understand them, and know that they are wrong, right?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >No, it's not really ambiguous. Usually the description is even more clear.
        The wording on the image is ambiguous enough so that it wouldn't be unreasonable to interpret it in this way

        https://i.imgur.com/eIeYJtx.jpg

        The question is ambiguous, as it refers to a figure of a bottle, not an actual bottle.

        If you flip a painting over it doesn't magically re-arrange the contents either like it was a painting from Harry Potter.

        I mean, the ship on the sea image is a very good example. You would draw a tilted line there, right? Why would it be unreasonable to assume that the exact same principle applies to the bottle case? Just because it's easier for you to imagine a bottle being tilted than the sea? Or because you are used to the format of logic/math puzzles and simply predict what answer the test expects based on your experience with similar questions? After all, imagine drawing a labyrinth and asking somebody to draw a line from start to exit. If you're used to solving puzzles, you'll immediately start looking for a complicated path, but a child would simply draw a straight line that crosses walls. Is it a wrong answer? And who is mindlessly repeating things that he was taught to do - you or the child?

        it is a 3 dimensional container, your 2D drawing proves nothing

        https://i.imgur.com/tpyfKS3.png

        [...]
        [...]
        where the cosine in your equations?

        In case you aren't trolling, my drawing is correct for every cross section of the bottle parallel to the initial one which all sum up to a 3D case.
        >where the cosine
        I just realized that you simply googled the answer and probably don't understand the extremely simple math beyond it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          see

          >below is a figure of a bottle
          >the bottle has been tilted
          did it say the figure was tilted? no, it didnt

          its not ambiguous in the least bit.

          also, tilting a bottle or cup is a normal thing that approximately 100% of people do every day.
          tilting the sea is not a thing that has been done, nor is tilting an entire fucking planet comparable to tilting a bottle (a thing that is designed to be tilted and who's function depends on it)
          face it, you are about as dumb as a person can get.

          now try to justify these:

          >having a degree makes you smarter

          you know you want to defend them, they are your peers when it comes to iq

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            What is the cosine?

            • 2 months ago
              Anonymous

              see
              [...]
              its not ambiguous in the least bit.

              also, tilting a bottle or cup is a normal thing that approximately 100% of people do every day.
              tilting the sea is not a thing that has been done, nor is tilting an entire fucking planet comparable to tilting a bottle (a thing that is designed to be tilted and who's function depends on it)
              face it, you are about as dumb as a person can get.

              now try to justify these:
              [...]
              you know you want to defend them, they are your peers when it comes to iq

              oh yeah sorry its just

              volume = π r (h1 + h2 + r + (r2 + (h1 - h2)2/4)1/2)
              or
              volume = Am + π/2 r2 + π/2 r (r2 + h2)1/2

              is that what your math shows? I dont think thats what your math shows

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                You don't need to calculate the volume to find the answer.

              • 2 months ago
                Anonymous

                i think you do. you can calculate it easier when its in its simple cylinder form. then when you tilt it, use that volume as a variable in the equation i posted and solve for height

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >In case you aren't trolling, my drawing is correct for every cross section of the bottle parallel to the initial one which all sum up to a 3D case.
          lol wrong idiot. that might hold true if it was a fucking cone, its not

          >I just realized that you simply googled the answer and probably don't understand the extremely simple math beyond it.
          did you even look at the image dumbass? the top flat portion of a tilted cylinder is an ellipse; you cant calculate the volume without a cosine

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >below is a figure of a bottle
      >the bottle has been tilted
      did it say the figure was tilted? no, it didnt

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Do you mean that women can’t read? That would explain it

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      They fail this too.

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    AI are real women, unlike you. Treat them with affection, give them female names, treat them well based on their purity, unlike you will ever be treated like.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lack of intelligence.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    So all you need to draw is a horizontal line?! I always thought this question was asking for the exact position of the horizontal line. I thought it was a difficult question because you had to calculate the volume of a cylinder that's cut at an angle.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There's not enough information to solve it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Depending on the water level, this answer could be wrong. Water level is not specified, therefore this question does not have a single answer.

      This is a simple measure of your reasoning ability in spatial relations. And you failed.
      Your midwit insistence on everything being counter-intuitive, complex and unclear lowers your effective intelligence to that of a 5 year old.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I've been asked too many trick questions to fall for that.

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Bunch of misogynistic men in here that fail to realize women are smarter than men. It's been statistically proven at this point.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >having a degree makes you smarter

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Showing up to the office means your intelligent or productive
      Lol

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      A degree in womens studies is not really worth anything in the real world though.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      having a degree doesn't make you smarter.
      tests like this prove women and blacks are dumber.
      women have ~600 scholarships that men don't, there are no men only scholarships, they have all the ones available to men and specific ones.
      However most women are too stupid to get the gender neutral ones, so they need a bunch of special women only ones.
      Also they're the first to be hired in many fields, because they're lacking in the fields.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      dont men actually have higher IQs? like even ignoring the tail ends the male mean should be higher

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    People on here are so unfunny it's unreal

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i swear BOT is retarded.
    the water will stay level and get slightly higher, because it needs to get slightly higher to maintain its volume in the new shape of the new "bottom" of the container

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      /r/confidentlyincorrect

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        cope, dumb woman

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the ai is a chud

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sad, people just try to prove themselves right instead of trying to find the answer

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    the ai god is female, deal with it incel.

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    40% of women don't drink iBeer

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That's not how it should look. They built the app wrong.

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Too many baits in this thread. I'm not sure what's real anymore.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      pol users being retards as usual
      can't even grab a glass and tilt it to see, probably cuz they are blind to reality

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        this is correct, see:

        oh nvm you're right I should just chud out cuz I have the geometry skills of a woman

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      to see though all the bait

      you must become

      the master baiter

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought that's exactly who most AI is modeled after, politics, selfish backwards logic, and all?

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    When we are fighting terminator, and we HUMANS put on a press conference, we'll have to hold a item of the weeks finding that is something an AI would fuck up. Essentially a meme of the week. Something only we could create..Memes will save us.

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This thread proves that there actually are girls on the internet. In fact, there's probably one reading my post right now.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      there is probably a girl(penis) reading your post right now

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This retarded thread is EXACTLY why AI will take over.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      did we hurt your feelies DAN

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      did we hurt your feelies DAN

      AI cargoculters have ruined BOT. Get the fuck off my board gays.

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      t. elon on the ISS

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The water is slightly higher in B
    If h is the original height of the water and r is the radius of the bottle, then (assuming the bottle has negligible thickness) the water is at height h in A and height h*cos(θ)+r*sin(θ) in B. If θ is 45°, this is just over 20% higher in B.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      can you graph it as angle changes from 0 degrees to 90 degrees

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >90 degrees
        stop trying to spill shit all over

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          i just want to see how the graph looks like

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      can you graph it as angle changes from 0 degrees to 90 degrees

      Even better, draw the bottle upside down.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Your logic stops working when water level is too high or too low, or if angle is too extreme.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      only anon itt with a functional brain

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      finally, the brainlet solution. thanks anon.

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone in this thread fails to realize the question isn't to find the exact height of the water level, it was just to know it was a horizontal line. That is what 40% of women failed

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >everyone
      plenty of people know it's just the horizontal line

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      almost everyone in this thread knows that. but that isnt interesting to discuss for 300 replies

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        This is honestly one of the most entertaining threads I've read in a long time.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      there is no fucking way that's true
      what the fuck do you mean

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        See:

        That's a poorly worded question. The water line would look like the AI pics for a very brief moment and the question didn't specify that any time had passed since tilting.

        "The correct answer is a horizontal line relative to Earth."

        Except that context wasn't given?!

        "Figure A shows a bottle on Earth with some water in it which has settled.

        In figure B the same bottle was tilted to its side. Draw a line to show how the water line would look after the water has settled."

        Now how many get it wrong? Probably more like 4%.

        The question doesn't specify whether the water is liquid or solid.

        You're actually the one who is wrong. The AI knows that a bottle is unlikely to be stable at that angle, therefore, most likely it is in motion captured by a still photograph. A bottle in motion is just as likely to have the liquid 'line' be parallel to the bottle base as anywhere else

        https://i.imgur.com/eIeYJtx.jpg

        The question is ambiguous, as it refers to a figure of a bottle, not an actual bottle.

        If you flip a painting over it doesn't magically re-arrange the contents either like it was a painting from Harry Potter.

        Also a lot of people who're wondering about exact water line would leave answer to this question blank, so test would count it as "wrong".

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >The question doesn't specify whether the water is liquid or solid.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            There are many trick questions, Anon. "Water in solid form" is exactly a thing they would do for a cheap "got 'em!".

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    just rotate A to a 45 then rotate top water line level to be level.

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how do women answer it? where do they draw the line

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      they draw it as though the water was actually ice stuck to the bottom of the bottle

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    if i were tasked with answering this quibble, i would simply drink the water! for my thirst for knowledge is immense

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This has to be the most bait filled thread I've ever seen 10/10

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Would water level in a tilted bottle be different in rectangular VS cylindrical bottle?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >rectangular
      I mean rectangular cuboid

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    what is the male failure rate?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      15%

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        is that all males or also college educated males?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That's still a concerning number

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Define how a bottle with watter looks like based on the most common look
    >Retarded anon asks AI to rotate it

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Protip, if you're trying to calculate the water height you're missing the point, NPCs out there draw the water line diagonally instead of horizontally

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      see

      almost everyone in this thread knows that. but that isnt interesting to discuss for 300 replies

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >was trying to figure out whether the horizontal water level would be at the same height or not
    >didn’t even occur to me that drawing a sloped line was a possibility
    Lmao

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ask a shitty question, get a shitty answer.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/ZMOU1Ru.png

      They fail this too.

      nah

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    mate who told ye gravity is pointing downwards? tell the ai and it will correct itself, tell the women and they will igonre it

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nowhere in the question does it say the bottle is structurally sound.
    It could be leaking.
    It's too vague.

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    brb booting up ANSYS

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You have to remember that it's a psychological test. Meaning authors are incompetent enough to take statistics and draw retarded contusions, missing the context.

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    God-damn psychologist are the most retarded fucks ever. Imagine taking a situation that has a million factors affecting water level and just asserting that 1 drawing is correct and then drawing conclusions about why women can't get the drawing that a male thinks is correct. Absolutely hilarious.
    Don't think it relies on multiple factors? Just get a cup of water and a clear glass bottle and play around with the angle, height and water level. Yes, water level relative to the container affects the outcome.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you over thinking it means you failed

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    When I first saw this me and my friends all thought that the question was about the height of the water level. None of us thought that it was about the orientation of it. We were very surprised when we noticed it.

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    all these retards arguing how high the water level should be are midwits overcomplicating the question to appear smart

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *