You ever look at how shit in the past was all handcrafted furniture, hand sewn clothes, and how beautiful cities were and things like that? The industrial revolution turned society in the soulless ad-filled hellscape it is now with all products generic plastic poison shit.
Ai art is the exact same thing, but for art, and music, and books, and movies, and games etc. It's going to make the few soulless aspects of life soulless like the rest
Cringe. The beautiful things were as limited then as they are now and for the vast majority the mass produced goods were an improvement to what they had before
>what is planned obsolescence and having underpaid chink workers make everything
y-yeah!! it's all better now!! brb buying lightbulbs and replacing my 2 year old washing machine!!
What the fuck are you talking about, I am just saying that something is better than nothing, and hard to produce goods only means nothing for many
Fucking kek'd at how lowgrade this shitpost is. >my typed pixel content is lowgrade on purpose so other anons dont steel my idears. hurr durr >IMMA SMART TYPER KEYBOARDER HURR DURR
What the fuck are you guys talking about for real, this is only going to increase the consumption of art
>the vast majority the mass produced goods
House appliances, cars and lightbulbs are all made to break. Even medical equipment isn't exempt from planned obsolescence. Tech companies constantly push "new" phones and make old ones obsolete artificially.
This is an incomprehensible waste of finite resources, a waste of energy and non-recyclable components.
[...] >No anon, you better give some examples because i know that in the "past" those things were worse
Lol you are insanely stupid. Read about plannes obsolescence. Also, did you know that chicken used to have a taste before they started stuffing them with roids and goyslop to make them huge, watery bloated sacks of nothing? Yep, chicken used to have its own taste and smell and you didn't have to douse it in spices and salt to make it palatable. And they didn't add sugar in every single food you eat to keep you hooked on store bought crap. And they didn't put starch in nearly every food because its cheaper that way. God you people are fucking retarded lmao.
So what are you going to do about it, plan the economy?
>ree white people
Oh that is why you sound like a retard
ARISE CONTENT LEECHES.
HERE'S YOUR FREE (You)'s DONT SPEND THEM ALL AT ONCE TWITCH REDDITOR TWITTER YOUTUBER CANCER FILTH SCUM *laughs in autistic fatass white kid with glasses*
Fucking kek'd at how lowgrade this shitpost is. >my typed pixel content is lowgrade on purpose so other anons dont steel my idears. hurr durr >IMMA SMART TYPER KEYBOARDER HURR DURR
>the vast majority the mass produced goods
House appliances, cars and lightbulbs are all made to break. Even medical equipment isn't exempt from planned obsolescence. Tech companies constantly push "new" phones and make old ones obsolete artificially.
This is an incomprehensible waste of finite resources, a waste of energy and non-recyclable components.
>You ever look at how shit in the past was all handcrafted furniture, hand sewn clothes, and how beautiful cities were and things like that?
No anon, you better give some examples because i know that in the "past" those things were worse
[...]
There's a lot of artists getting mad and trying to take action against ai art, if you haven't seen that then you live under a rock
>No anon, you better give some examples because i know that in the "past" those things were worse
Lol you are insanely stupid. Read about plannes obsolescence. Also, did you know that chicken used to have a taste before they started stuffing them with roids and goyslop to make them huge, watery bloated sacks of nothing? Yep, chicken used to have its own taste and smell and you didn't have to douse it in spices and salt to make it palatable. And they didn't add sugar in every single food you eat to keep you hooked on store bought crap. And they didn't put starch in nearly every food because its cheaper that way. God you people are fucking retarded lmao.
>muh planned obsolence >muh goyslop
Not real examples, much less about the original statement. Anon is just your average tinfoil schizo who thinks everything is worse because BOT said so
>You ever look at how shit in the past was all handcrafted furniture, hand sewn clothes, and how beautiful cities were and things like that?
No anon, you better give some examples because i know that in the "past" those things were worse
nobody is. artists are still drawing. aigays are generating tits. people are just doing whatever. and you're sitting here making AI threads because you failed at being an artist. poo in loo.
There's a lot of artists getting mad and trying to take action against ai art, if you haven't seen that then you live under a rock
your shitpost is actually worthless because of the simple fact you couldve waited two more seconds and got trips. >kek
A.I. should destroy humanity just because of this dumbasses clownery. al
Only the rich could own those things, what you're seeing is the top 0.1%. Those things took a lot of time and money, soe thing no peasant could ever afford, only the elite
Well, nowadays not even rich can have those so lol. also you are wrong here > 0,1%
First, a beautiful city was a communal benefit. And the real percent of elite who could afford fashionable handsewn clothing and carved furniture was more closer to 30% than 0,1%. Basically all non farmer professionals could have them. The price for those items wasn't as immense as you think it was, the crafting class would not survive on just aristocrats being the commissioners, they would need to appeal to regular folks too. Nowadays such services are so insanely priced because they are so rare, but back in the day there would lots of workshops competing with each other for customers so they would need to bakance their prices to a reasonable measure of what a city dweller can afford. Yes of course those items were not made to become obsolete and could last centuries, so what's considered reasonable price was also somewhat different. But the point is, non elite could have it too, just not on the same replaceable terms as elites, who would change ensembles regularly.
That's absolutely true. The music ai generates is going to be incredibly soulless but it will work just fine because it will cut down on production costs.
nobody is. artists are still drawing. aigays are generating tits. people are just doing whatever. and you're sitting here making AI threads because you failed at being an artist. poo in loo.
>A.I. exists to serve man and never to rule over
Ignore this shitpost. This anon's brain is melted and all of his sympathizers are white neo-nationalist scum. >A.I. art has put me out of business. >A.I. has destroyed the job markets. >A.I. has generated more wealth for white men who dominate the Human Resources departments and private equity hedge firms.
These fucks couldnt read a string of code if your life depended on it, fucking clowns.
>artist makes valid point about A.I. art by drawing a picture of A.I. art and the community of white wannabe sigma males who have been clowned into believing they're "nerds" and "smarter than everyone else" by "coding le meme strings and downloading GoggleAdware."
Goddamn. No wonder you fucks just keep typing and wageslave until 99 with no retirement.
Because they are retarded retards who think they can shout and thereby stop time. >b-but the beta models they just released last year can't do hands :~~*
okay moron just wait a decade and we'll see
Industry is illegitimate anyway. Who gives a fuck what makes money. People elevate themselves through art and it cheapens that experience when you need to sell it. Society should shift to better facilitate the arts instead of getting a bunch of STEMlords to better sell products to make 7 people wealthy beyond comprehension.
because artgays are gonna be out of jobs. because what they are to the consumer is basically a prompt machine but it costs 400$. same thing is gonna happen with AI voice actors
These dumbfucks can visibly see that A.I. has had gigachad-sized effects on society >HR firms using A.I. with jobs >Ad-ware A.I. being pre-built into products >A.I. replacing social lives, revolving door jobs, literal body parts, and now can generate content such as art
OH BUT DAS GOOD CUZ PROFIT OVER PROPERTY RIGHT?
WHO CARES IF KEVIN GOES HOMELESS?
RIGHT KEVIN?
Industry is illegitimate anyway. Who gives a fuck what makes money. People elevate themselves through art and it cheapens that experience when you need to sell it. Society should shift to better facilitate the arts instead of getting a bunch of STEMlords to better sell products to make 7 people wealthy beyond comprehension.
Think about your favorite competive video game. Now I'm gonna make an AI that analyzes the top 1000 players to replicate their playing ability as a bot. I then start mass uploading that bot to live servers, pretending they're real players, enough to the point where there's a god bot in almost every round you play. Is that fair?
Too many assumptions that they will play like the actual players also assuming that counter measures wont exist to protect that, in other words your a fucking retard
i literally wouldn't care because all multiplayer videogames now use fun-killing skill-based matchmaking that guarantees you lose 50% of your games by matching you against players who might as well be robots anyways
your 'nightmare scenario' is already true half of the times that i load up the game
artgays (who are usually brainlets) desperately astroturfing 'actually NOBODY likes AI art, btw my commissions are open $80 for a headshot of your OC!' so their only way of making money isn't taken from them
They're jealous, crappy, generic artists (mostly "SFW" ones) afraid of competition. And the irony is that most of them are "science/technology good" larpers that used to be mock boomers for being afraid of technology.
>"I made this with love!"
They seriously think that this is a valid argument against AI art? Nobody gives a shit about you "putting love" in your art if it looks crappy or boring.
I didn't really notice they were. I suppose people who claim that it makes them a skilled artist would be laughed at but the art itself can look cool. I've been messing around with NAI myself for a couple of days and got some interesting results.
Because it pretty much killed a large market for cover art, book covers, and conceptual designs over night. That's a lot of people no longer getting paid, and it's only going to get worse in the future. And thats without even mentioning the blatant piracy. From an obvious financial perspective it's actually a legitimate reason to be upset for many.
That being said, i'd be lying if I said I didn't get enjoyment out of seeing all the clout chasing Instagram artist seethe with rage. The irony of depending on an algorithm for exposure just to get replaced by another corrupt algorithm is just too rich to me. They had their chance to speak out against Algorithms being unfair towards artists and they did nothing. With their thousands of followers they hoarded all of the attention using a corrupt algorithm and they sure didn't mind playing a rigged game back then. Now that the game is rigged against them they all of sudden wanna cry.
You ever look at how shit in the past was all handcrafted furniture, hand sewn clothes, and how beautiful cities were and things like that? The industrial revolution turned society in the soulless ad-filled hellscape it is now with all products generic plastic poison shit.
Ai art is the exact same thing, but for art, and music, and books, and movies, and games etc. It's going to make the few soulless aspects of life soulless like the rest
Cringe. The beautiful things were as limited then as they are now and for the vast majority the mass produced goods were an improvement to what they had before
>what is planned obsolescence and having underpaid chink workers make everything
y-yeah!! it's all better now!! brb buying lightbulbs and replacing my 2 year old washing machine!!
What the fuck are you talking about, I am just saying that something is better than nothing, and hard to produce goods only means nothing for many
What the fuck are you guys talking about for real, this is only going to increase the consumption of art
So what are you going to do about it, plan the economy?
Shut the fuck up you fucking shitstain.
I dont owe you jack fucking shit you goddamn content leech.
Calm down son. It's just drawings.
ARISE CONTENT LEECHES.
HERE'S YOUR FREE (You)'s DONT SPEND THEM ALL AT ONCE TWITCH REDDITOR TWITTER YOUTUBER CANCER FILTH SCUM *laughs in autistic fatass white kid with glasses*
Fucking kek'd at how lowgrade this shitpost is.
>my typed pixel content is lowgrade on purpose so other anons dont steel my idears. hurr durr
>IMMA SMART TYPER KEYBOARDER HURR DURR
>the vast majority the mass produced goods
House appliances, cars and lightbulbs are all made to break. Even medical equipment isn't exempt from planned obsolescence. Tech companies constantly push "new" phones and make old ones obsolete artificially.
This is an incomprehensible waste of finite resources, a waste of energy and non-recyclable components.
>No anon, you better give some examples because i know that in the "past" those things were worse
Lol you are insanely stupid. Read about plannes obsolescence. Also, did you know that chicken used to have a taste before they started stuffing them with roids and goyslop to make them huge, watery bloated sacks of nothing? Yep, chicken used to have its own taste and smell and you didn't have to douse it in spices and salt to make it palatable. And they didn't add sugar in every single food you eat to keep you hooked on store bought crap. And they didn't put starch in nearly every food because its cheaper that way. God you people are fucking retarded lmao.
>Lol you are insanely stupid
Yet anon keeps refusing to give examples, a bit insecure aren't you?
he just gave you a bunch of examples, case in point dumb sped
>muh planned obsolence
>muh goyslop
Not real examples, much less about the original statement. Anon is just your average tinfoil schizo who thinks everything is worse because BOT said so
>You ever look at how shit in the past was all handcrafted furniture, hand sewn clothes, and how beautiful cities were and things like that?
No anon, you better give some examples because i know that in the "past" those things were worse
There's a lot of artists getting mad and trying to take action against ai art, if you haven't seen that then you live under a rock
fpbp
your shitpost is actually worthless because of the simple fact you couldve waited two more seconds and got trips.
>kek
A.I. should destroy humanity just because of this dumbasses clownery. al
Only the rich could own those things, what you're seeing is the top 0.1%. Those things took a lot of time and money, soe thing no peasant could ever afford, only the elite
Well, nowadays not even rich can have those so lol. also you are wrong here
> 0,1%
First, a beautiful city was a communal benefit. And the real percent of elite who could afford fashionable handsewn clothing and carved furniture was more closer to 30% than 0,1%. Basically all non farmer professionals could have them. The price for those items wasn't as immense as you think it was, the crafting class would not survive on just aristocrats being the commissioners, they would need to appeal to regular folks too. Nowadays such services are so insanely priced because they are so rare, but back in the day there would lots of workshops competing with each other for customers so they would need to bakance their prices to a reasonable measure of what a city dweller can afford. Yes of course those items were not made to become obsolete and could last centuries, so what's considered reasonable price was also somewhat different. But the point is, non elite could have it too, just not on the same replaceable terms as elites, who would change ensembles regularly.
>something more valuable isn't more scarce bro I swear!!! We should just live in poverty to be surrounded by beauty anyways
That's absolutely true. The music ai generates is going to be incredibly soulless but it will work just fine because it will cut down on production costs.
>The music ai generates is going to be incredibly soulless
Why tho
>implying any art, music, books, movies, and games from the last ten years are worth saving
nobody is. artists are still drawing. aigays are generating tits. people are just doing whatever. and you're sitting here making AI threads because you failed at being an artist. poo in loo.
>A.I. exists to serve man and never to rule over
Ignore this shitpost. This anon's brain is melted and all of his sympathizers are white neo-nationalist scum.
>A.I. art has put me out of business.
>A.I. has destroyed the job markets.
>A.I. has generated more wealth for white men who dominate the Human Resources departments and private equity hedge firms.
These fucks couldnt read a string of code if your life depended on it, fucking clowns.
Whoever made this was really upset.
>artist makes valid point about A.I. art by drawing a picture of A.I. art and the community of white wannabe sigma males who have been clowned into believing they're "nerds" and "smarter than everyone else" by "coding le meme strings and downloading GoggleAdware."
Goddamn. No wonder you fucks just keep typing and wageslave until 99 with no retirement.
>ree white people
Oh that is why you sound like a retard
You sound really upset.
Seems like you guys are forgetting the original question
Ai can't even draw a black dick correctly
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/unstablediffusion/unstable-diffusion-unrestricted-ai-art-powered-by-the-crowd/description
Because they are retarded retards who think they can shout and thereby stop time.
>b-but the beta models they just released last year can't do hands :~~*
okay moron just wait a decade and we'll see
I think AI art should be used as a tool. Hotdiggedydemon used AI art as backgrounds for promos
Industry is illegitimate anyway. Who gives a fuck what makes money. People elevate themselves through art and it cheapens that experience when you need to sell it. Society should shift to better facilitate the arts instead of getting a bunch of STEMlords to better sell products to make 7 people wealthy beyond comprehension.
because artgays are gonna be out of jobs. because what they are to the consumer is basically a prompt machine but it costs 400$. same thing is gonna happen with AI voice actors
These dumbfucks can visibly see that A.I. has had gigachad-sized effects on society
>HR firms using A.I. with jobs
>Ad-ware A.I. being pre-built into products
>A.I. replacing social lives, revolving door jobs, literal body parts, and now can generate content such as art
OH BUT DAS GOOD CUZ PROFIT OVER PROPERTY RIGHT?
WHO CARES IF KEVIN GOES HOMELESS?
RIGHT KEVIN?
>keks in autistic
Think about your favorite competive video game. Now I'm gonna make an AI that analyzes the top 1000 players to replicate their playing ability as a bot. I then start mass uploading that bot to live servers, pretending they're real players, enough to the point where there's a god bot in almost every round you play. Is that fair?
people will just play a different game
I asked "is that fair" not, "will you find a different game to play"
what do you do when all fields get this treatment? become a plumber since thats hard to automate? the openings arent infinite
Too many assumptions that they will play like the actual players also assuming that counter measures wont exist to protect that, in other words your a fucking retard
>your a fucking retard
filter evasion
i literally wouldn't care because all multiplayer videogames now use fun-killing skill-based matchmaking that guarantees you lose 50% of your games by matching you against players who might as well be robots anyways
your 'nightmare scenario' is already true half of the times that i load up the game
>Is that fair?
This literally happen in SC2 with a bot and pro players compete against it
artgays (who are usually brainlets) desperately astroturfing 'actually NOBODY likes AI art, btw my commissions are open $80 for a headshot of your OC!' so their only way of making money isn't taken from them
They're jealous, crappy, generic artists (mostly "SFW" ones) afraid of competition. And the irony is that most of them are "science/technology good" larpers that used to be mock boomers for being afraid of technology.
>"I made this with love!"
They seriously think that this is a valid argument against AI art? Nobody gives a shit about you "putting love" in your art if it looks crappy or boring.
i love philliph bankss
I didn't really notice they were. I suppose people who claim that it makes them a skilled artist would be laughed at but the art itself can look cool. I've been messing around with NAI myself for a couple of days and got some interesting results.
It does all sorts of landscapes well
You can make them look really realistic too
Because it pretty much killed a large market for cover art, book covers, and conceptual designs over night. That's a lot of people no longer getting paid, and it's only going to get worse in the future. And thats without even mentioning the blatant piracy. From an obvious financial perspective it's actually a legitimate reason to be upset for many.
That being said, i'd be lying if I said I didn't get enjoyment out of seeing all the clout chasing Instagram artist seethe with rage. The irony of depending on an algorithm for exposure just to get replaced by another corrupt algorithm is just too rich to me. They had their chance to speak out against Algorithms being unfair towards artists and they did nothing. With their thousands of followers they hoarded all of the attention using a corrupt algorithm and they sure didn't mind playing a rigged game back then. Now that the game is rigged against them they all of sudden wanna cry.