Which is more realistic? Bringing back coal or turning the whole state into one big open air amusement park?

Which is more realistic? Bringing back coal or turning the whole state into one big open air amusement park?

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

ChatGPT Wizard Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Coal is awesome despite the evil israelites who sell it and the even more evil israelites who concern troll about it.

    Even the waste from the use of coal and mining it are important raw materials.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      poisons the rivers

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        This seems to be also preventable.

        awesome how?

        Besides what I already mentioned, cheap abundant energy, easily converted into hydrogen, ammonia, methanol and many others, emissions from using it as an energy source can be easily controlled, ...

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          https://www.nrdc.org/experts/theo-spencer/new-rule-aims-stop-coal-mining-poisoning-water

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >aims

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      awesome how?

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    How about you fricking off and leaving my god damn state alone. Fricking homosexuals.

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    WV needs to repent and return to Ole Virginny

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Komi is amazing.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Virginia here.

      We don't want West Virginia.

      Virginia is the Massachusetts of the south.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Virginia is the Massachusetts of the south.
        And you think that's something to brag about?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous
          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            problem?

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tourism

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tourism

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    tourism, I think, is the more realistic option of the two

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Coal is so fricking dirty and the only viable way to clean it is with chemicals. Otherwise, tons of mercury is put into the air which pollutes rivers and streams. It's a shame since there are 1000s of years of coal left.

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    West Virginia doesn't need an economy.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      yes it does
      tourism is the only way forward

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    If this country and its regulators weren't absolutely corrupt, WV could lead the way in coal thorium extraction.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Don't let the thread die. Thorium extraction could revitalize our main industry.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      tell me more about it then
      how does it work

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Extraction from coal is not economically viable at this point but it would be the lifeline for the industry. Efforts could and should be made to improve the process but, politics require US to favor uranium. Just throwing it out there. Manchin is too beholden to special interests to make any waves.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Extraction from coal is not economically viable at this point
          seems to be for china and wyoming and far southern WV/eastern KY at the very least for whatever reasons

  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Feds are literally entrenched, your waters and soil are poisoned, and your people treated worse than shit.
    Some of you will survive any hell, but it'll never be pretty.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there's some really clean waterways and some really dirty ones, sometimes right next to one another

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *