its against fsf to collect poeples data in the first place. Who gives a fuck about functionality ai is dystopian as fuck .
It centralises power in the hands of poeple who have huge amounts of data. Literally wouldn't even exist if poeple used only free software.
It doesn't matter how much data you gather, you will never have more than corporations which spy on your phone and have used dubious means to acquire all sorts of data.
ChatGPT isn't what I was referring to, but we have no idea what data they used to train that LLM, for all we know the data they used could've included private emails and messages. There all sorts of AI applications, such as voice cloning, where Google could use voice data they got from Google Assistant to train their own AI.
And I could use Youtube videos to train my own voice AI. It's a stupid point and you should feel bad.
8 months ago
Anonymous
Sure you can, until the domain moves from just voice AI to proper assistant AI, and Google releases a model that understands your voice just as good as any human can, in the voice of any human, and you can have a conversation with it just like you would with ChatGPT. All of a sudden the data they gathered from all these years becomes more useful.
Too expensive to train, the tech is relativly simple but you need a fuckton of computing power and data harvesting made, organized, adn filtered by humans.
>Have freetards failed us?
you failed them. why do you expect people get old and retire, it isn't stallman's fault that a new generation of free software programmers never materialized. personally I think it has to do with mk ultra and the shit they put on modern food; people nowadays seem incapable of having convictions and being smart at the same time
Google Books has over 40 million OCR scanned titles, the vast majority of which are only accessible to Google themselves due to copyright. Good luck trying to compete with that kind of high quality training data.
>Have freetards failed us?
Always have.
We'll need to wait at least 20 years to get a sort of workable libre alternative.
its against fsf to collect poeples data in the first place. Who gives a fuck about functionality ai is dystopian as fuck .
It centralises power in the hands of poeple who have huge amounts of data. Literally wouldn't even exist if poeple used only free software.
You act like the making a web scraper is hard. Any anon could make a web scraper unironically.
It doesn't matter how much data you gather, you will never have more than corporations which spy on your phone and have used dubious means to acquire all sorts of data.
The data they used to make ChatGPT isn't the GPS coordinates and search queries from your phone. But you're cute for thinking that's what happened.
ChatGPT isn't what I was referring to, but we have no idea what data they used to train that LLM, for all we know the data they used could've included private emails and messages. There all sorts of AI applications, such as voice cloning, where Google could use voice data they got from Google Assistant to train their own AI.
And I could use Youtube videos to train my own voice AI. It's a stupid point and you should feel bad.
Sure you can, until the domain moves from just voice AI to proper assistant AI, and Google releases a model that understands your voice just as good as any human can, in the voice of any human, and you can have a conversation with it just like you would with ChatGPT. All of a sudden the data they gathered from all these years becomes more useful.
>Have freetards failed us
When have they ever succeded?
We need a LAIbre (Libre Artificial Intelligence)
You have to solve federated learning first.
Too expensive to train, the tech is relativly simple but you need a fuckton of computing power and data harvesting made, organized, adn filtered by humans.
this, donations will never cover the gazillions to store, process and train the data - there will never be a freetarded llm
>2 more weeks
same reason we don't have librefacebook or libretiktok, those are retarded things that needs to be avoid
yes we have mastodon and pixelfed and others
libretards are anit-AI
>Have freetards failed us?
you failed them. why do you expect people get old and retire, it isn't stallman's fault that a new generation of free software programmers never materialized. personally I think it has to do with mk ultra and the shit they put on modern food; people nowadays seem incapable of having convictions and being smart at the same time
to never get old*
Google Books has over 40 million OCR scanned titles, the vast majority of which are only accessible to Google themselves due to copyright. Good luck trying to compete with that kind of high quality training data.
THIS
DO NOT USE PROPRIETARY SOFTWARE (OPENAI) THAT DOES NOT RESPECT YOUR FREEDOMS
STOP CONTRIBUTING TO YOUR SLAVERY
FUD AI
SHORT AI
SHAME THOSE AROUND YOU WHO USE AI
OUTLAW AI
REPENT BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE
Freetards are incapable of innovation, so we will have to wait a couple of months for them to finish emulating what the actual workers have created.
Eleutheromaniacs can't write a good software license, why would the software itself be any better?
>gee why are luddites not creating cutting edge crap?!!!
Proprietary *ware is 20 years ahead of free software at any point in time.