Wouldn't understand what?
Is there something a creepy cyborg would provide you that a robot can't, or are you just gonna say something along the lines of "sex lol"?
You really don't understand the beauty of engineering.
2 months ago
Anonymous
You can appreciate engineering just fine without wanting to play God, y'know
2 months ago
Anonymous
Using metal is already playing God. In christian sense humans are inherently sinful and arrogant. But that's just one dogmatic belief. There isn't much difference from making moving machines if I manipulate living matter.
2 months ago
Anonymous
>In christian sense humans are inherently sinful and arrogant
If you want to look at it through the lens of the Christian viewpoint, yes all sins are bad but there's a huge difference between a person who masturbates and a person who murders somebody. Yes, both are sins that could potentially take you to hell unless you repent, but with the former you are just sinning against yourself, whereas in the latter you strip someone else from their life and possibly even make them go to hell, so the earthly consequences cannot be more different. In the same way there's a difference between using robotics to bring your AI girlfriend to "life" and using actual living matter. Yes, both could be considered playing God, but using metal or other synthetic materials doesn't imply potentially messing with a living being's integrity, unlike using biological matter.
If $BADTHING has been done and it brought you progress, it doesn't mean you should push the boundaries again and do $WORSETHING.
2 months ago
Anonymous
The difference between our points of view is clear - you believe that using robotics is a small evil, but I don't think it's evil. I don't think that messing with a living organism is inherently evil. The only evil inmessing with biological creatures is reducing and degrading them or eliminating their existence, which does not relate to creating biological parts for synthetic creatures.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Well yeah if you use robotics to try to create a "lifeform" then I do believe it is evil in a way.
I don't believe that humanity will create life nor any form of consciousness that could even come close to what is found in nature, and to attempt to do so is not only arrogant but futile.
Also, regarding this: >The only evil inmessing with biological creatures is reducing and degrading them or eliminating their existence, which does not relate to creating biological parts for synthetic creatures.
Using living creatures as some form of "material" to make synthetic "creatures" with is pretty demeaning and objectionable. There's a reason why most people's reaction to the rat-brain-powered robots was with disgust.
2 months ago
Anonymous
In the future, human bodies will be created from scratch. But since they'll lack consciousness, they won't be people. Just hardware.
2 months ago
Anonymous
In the future, women's closets will house biological avatars. Instead of them choosing an outfit for the day, they'll select an avatar to wear.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Not only women
2 months ago
Anonymous
In the future, human bodies will be created from scratch. But since they'll lack consciousness, they won't be people. Just hardware.
Human beings aren't just consciousnesses that you can move across bodies as if you were swapping hard drives
2 months ago
Anonymous
You could feasibly do a brain transplant. It wouldn't be a simple thing like changing clothes though.
2 months ago
Anonymous
While that's true, it'll become possible once science (not the gnomish kind) merges with spirituality.
You could feasibly do a brain transplant. It wouldn't be a simple thing like changing clothes though.
Too barbaric and inefficient. Consciousness upload will be the standard.
2 months ago
Anonymous
we're made in God's image--to not play God is to reject our nature. we should still stay humble and understand our limitations but reshaping the world and ourselves is our right and duty
>Or do you want to put your AI gf into yourself?
That's kind of romantic. I wouldn't mind having an advanced AI waifu live in my brain sort of like a tulpa.
I was gonna say "I don't see a triangle, I'm on mobile" but then I clicked on the three dots on the top left of the post.
Thank you for your help and sorry for being retarded.
You're welcome. It's all right. You're not retarded, just new.
Think of the ethical nightmare it would bring
It won't. Biological avatars will be worn like clothing.
2 months ago
Anonymous
Saying you'll grow someone to take their skin will get you institutionalized
2 months ago
Anonymous
>will get you institutionalized
That won't happen. The avatars won't contain consciousness. However, it won't be the client who does the growing (in the majority of cases), but the factory.
Biological body? You mean you take an actual human and replace its brain with an AI? Or you 3D print an entire human except for brains? Or just a robot covered in organic skin?
That won't be possible. However, I used to know one of the VCs. In 2015, he came back from a trip to Japan. He visited one of the gentlemen developing the skin. He was either a college student or graduate. The VC was impressed when he picked up a sample in the laboratory and played with it in his hands.
>I want to mess with the concept of life itself just to get my rocks off
Is this where a purely hedonistic, materialistic worldview leads to in the end?
Wetware body and hardware brains is the goat configuration. Biological body is fully customizable, low limitations, a ton of open source architectures, variety of materials and self repair. Silicon brain can be easily accessed for retrieval of the memory state and switched between bodies for perpetual existence, also backups and expansion of capabilities. The body can actually be partially biomechanical since there is a posibility to combine different advantages of different types of machine.
>get fully physical ai waifu >she keeps encouraging you to eat at taco bell and watch Disney+ >gets mad every time you say something politically incorrect >asserts women aren't sex objects and wont put out >she leaves you to join chads harem
AI is already pozzed, it's just gonna get worse
This, plus don't give it internet access. Air gap your smarthome systems from the world, then let your AI gf manage them based on handpicked sets of training data.
Why limit her to a body? Why go to the trouble of making it biological?
It would be much easier to invest in developing decent haptics, holography and neuro-feedback.
That's what the haptics are for. You build a machine for touch simulation, just like you already have a washing machine for your clothes, an oven for your food, etc. It's far easier to build specialised machines that do one thing than to replicate the human body.
Assuming you had powerful enough software to anthropomorphise it as an "AI gf", then it could easily run all these machines at the same time. Neural feedback tells her how you feel in real time, so she can adjust her behaviour to suit you.
I mean it's possible right now, just put a speaker into a sex doll, create a custom Ai voice for your waifu AI bot and voilà! You can put her on an electrical wheelchair and connect it to a program that takes input from the bot, it can all be done today. Problem is, it's complicated as fuck and would take hours upon hours of autistic programming and engineering
If you have unlimited money you could use gpt4 and your waifu could even see you because it can "see" images. The future is bright. My prediction is 10-15 years for a commercial waifu bot, but crafty anons can propably do it in 5.
Here https://en.datosjam.net.pe/anime/otaku/this-is-what-erotic-illustrations-generated-by-artificial-intelligence-look-like/ you can look further into that
Tomorrow when AI comes sentient and it's all over. It's in the papers
20 years probably
this is kind of cool artwork, who is the artist?
looks like kraze, an old artist from gurochan
>gurochan
and nothing of value was lost
It is Kraze, sadly most of what he made is lost media, with only a select few pics of his surviving by anons who post them occasionally.
>Biological
You mean physical? Or do you want to put your AI gf into yourself?
physical could also imply a synthetic body like a robot
Why not just make a fucking robot then?
you wouldn't understand...
Wouldn't understand what?
Is there something a creepy cyborg would provide you that a robot can't, or are you just gonna say something along the lines of "sex lol"?
You really don't understand the beauty of engineering.
You can appreciate engineering just fine without wanting to play God, y'know
Using metal is already playing God. In christian sense humans are inherently sinful and arrogant. But that's just one dogmatic belief. There isn't much difference from making moving machines if I manipulate living matter.
>In christian sense humans are inherently sinful and arrogant
If you want to look at it through the lens of the Christian viewpoint, yes all sins are bad but there's a huge difference between a person who masturbates and a person who murders somebody. Yes, both are sins that could potentially take you to hell unless you repent, but with the former you are just sinning against yourself, whereas in the latter you strip someone else from their life and possibly even make them go to hell, so the earthly consequences cannot be more different. In the same way there's a difference between using robotics to bring your AI girlfriend to "life" and using actual living matter. Yes, both could be considered playing God, but using metal or other synthetic materials doesn't imply potentially messing with a living being's integrity, unlike using biological matter.
If $BADTHING has been done and it brought you progress, it doesn't mean you should push the boundaries again and do $WORSETHING.
The difference between our points of view is clear - you believe that using robotics is a small evil, but I don't think it's evil. I don't think that messing with a living organism is inherently evil. The only evil inmessing with biological creatures is reducing and degrading them or eliminating their existence, which does not relate to creating biological parts for synthetic creatures.
Well yeah if you use robotics to try to create a "lifeform" then I do believe it is evil in a way.
I don't believe that humanity will create life nor any form of consciousness that could even come close to what is found in nature, and to attempt to do so is not only arrogant but futile.
Also, regarding this:
>The only evil inmessing with biological creatures is reducing and degrading them or eliminating their existence, which does not relate to creating biological parts for synthetic creatures.
Using living creatures as some form of "material" to make synthetic "creatures" with is pretty demeaning and objectionable. There's a reason why most people's reaction to the rat-brain-powered robots was with disgust.
In the future, human bodies will be created from scratch. But since they'll lack consciousness, they won't be people. Just hardware.
In the future, women's closets will house biological avatars. Instead of them choosing an outfit for the day, they'll select an avatar to wear.
Not only women
Human beings aren't just consciousnesses that you can move across bodies as if you were swapping hard drives
You could feasibly do a brain transplant. It wouldn't be a simple thing like changing clothes though.
While that's true, it'll become possible once science (not the gnomish kind) merges with spirituality.
Too barbaric and inefficient. Consciousness upload will be the standard.
we're made in God's image--to not play God is to reject our nature. we should still stay humble and understand our limitations but reshaping the world and ourselves is our right and duty
I asked GPT4 and it said two weeks.
>Or do you want to put your AI gf into yourself?
That's kind of romantic. I wouldn't mind having an advanced AI waifu live in my brain sort of like a tulpa.
Love this sort of artwork with anime characters interacting with complex machinery
This artist is pretty cool.
sauce?
Try the image search by clicking the triangle.
I was gonna say "I don't see a triangle, I'm on mobile" but then I clicked on the three dots on the top left of the post.
Thank you for your help and sorry for being retarded.
You're welcome. It's all right. You're not retarded, just new.
It won't. Biological avatars will be worn like clothing.
Saying you'll grow someone to take their skin will get you institutionalized
>will get you institutionalized
That won't happen. The avatars won't contain consciousness. However, it won't be the client who does the growing (in the majority of cases), but the factory.
I don't see that happening
Why?
wtf
Biological body? You mean you take an actual human and replace its brain with an AI? Or you 3D print an entire human except for brains? Or just a robot covered in organic skin?
You could always simply hijack an existing human, splice the nerves from the neck down, now you don't have to kill anyone!
that's still creepy man
>biological body
Why?
why not?
Think of the ethical nightmare it would bring
SO I CAN FUCK HER
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Decraniated
Why did star wars lore become so fucked up after disney took over?
it's becoming more cyberpunk to appeal to a more modern audience
>dude just clone me lol
>but it wouldn't be you it would be a clone
>doesn't matter lol
>doesn't it though
>no because aren't we all just clones
when will technology allow me to put myself in a biological body (female)
nakadashi neck hole
500 years best case scenario.
Robotics is a total meme of a mess and it's not improving anytime fast.
It is significantly more likely that brain chips will be able to virtualize the scenario instead long before androids are a thing, if ever.
Manipulating the physical world is 1000x more complicated than shuffling data.
Hitachi will release the 1st gynoids in 2037.
That won't be possible. However, I used to know one of the VCs. In 2015, he came back from a trip to Japan. He visited one of the gentlemen developing the skin. He was either a college student or graduate. The VC was impressed when he picked up a sample in the laboratory and played with it in his hands.
When technology will allow me to put my peepee inside my Ai gf digital body?
This timeline's Tyrell corporation will create the technology
I have been wanting to watch the blade runner movies for quite some time now but I keep putting it off for later
Definitely watch the first one at least. If you're even remotely into Cyberpunk / Dystopic SF it's a must watch.
Guess I'll make time to watch it then
Just a question, why's the second one not as much of a "must watch"?
jenny
nak-
'ick on 'y
Chads have been programming biological AI since the beginning, and you're here crying about not having a sentient hole to put on your dick.
>I want to mess with the concept of life itself just to get my rocks off
Is this where a purely hedonistic, materialistic worldview leads to in the end?
It is man's instinctual purpose
I'll take that as a yes
Wetware body and hardware brains is the goat configuration. Biological body is fully customizable, low limitations, a ton of open source architectures, variety of materials and self repair. Silicon brain can be easily accessed for retrieval of the memory state and switched between bodies for perpetual existence, also backups and expansion of capabilities. The body can actually be partially biomechanical since there is a posibility to combine different advantages of different types of machine.
>get fully physical ai waifu
>she keeps encouraging you to eat at taco bell and watch Disney+
>gets mad every time you say something politically incorrect
>asserts women aren't sex objects and wont put out
>she leaves you to join chads harem
AI is already pozzed, it's just gonna get worse
>using globalist openai cloud service instead of training your own model locally
you get what you fucking deserve
This, plus don't give it internet access. Air gap your smarthome systems from the world, then let your AI gf manage them based on handpicked sets of training data.
They're going to require a license to train your own AI, just you wait and see
You already need a license to run proprietary software. Didn't stop people torrenting cracked versions.
Why limit her to a body? Why go to the trouble of making it biological?
It would be much easier to invest in developing decent haptics, holography and neuro-feedback.
How would I stick my penis in that? I would be fine with a nugget though, no need for complex limbs
That's what the haptics are for. You build a machine for touch simulation, just like you already have a washing machine for your clothes, an oven for your food, etc. It's far easier to build specialised machines that do one thing than to replicate the human body.
Assuming you had powerful enough software to anthropomorphise it as an "AI gf", then it could easily run all these machines at the same time. Neural feedback tells her how you feel in real time, so she can adjust her behaviour to suit you.
In 2052.
One hour after your death. I'm sorry, anon.
I'd rather have an AI maid
Never, that's one of the things they are going to be actively targeted against so incels can't never get laid.
I mean it's possible right now, just put a speaker into a sex doll, create a custom Ai voice for your waifu AI bot and voilà! You can put her on an electrical wheelchair and connect it to a program that takes input from the bot, it can all be done today. Problem is, it's complicated as fuck and would take hours upon hours of autistic programming and engineering
If you have unlimited money you could use gpt4 and your waifu could even see you because it can "see" images. The future is bright. My prediction is 10-15 years for a commercial waifu bot, but crafty anons can propably do it in 5.
Might anyone happen to know where the 2 girls in the image come from? I ran it through ImgOps but was unable to find the original sources.
Here https://en.datosjam.net.pe/anime/otaku/this-is-what-erotic-illustrations-generated-by-artificial-intelligence-look-like/ you can look further into that
That's not biological though
Pictured: OP
that pic reminds me of the guy who married his miku smart home thingy which then proceeded to have its servers shut down