What happens if they make an AI model trained by all of the AI art that's been made so far?

What happens if they make an AI model trained by all of the AI art that's been made so far? Would it be considered "art theft" then? Would it be copyrightable? Would artists still be mad?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    They'd be mad cause the original art that trained the first AI model was 'theft'.
    What you're describing has been done. There's a Stable Diffusion finetuned on Midjourney images.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Then it's not "copyright theft" they're actually mad about, huh?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It's never about copyright theft. Imagine if AI can shit out thousands of images that replicates an artist. There would be no need to subscribe to their paywalled content.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Very based. Even so, the AI learned from copyrighted art, it didn't just flat out copy it. That would be like saying inspiration is stealing copyright.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        They aren't even upset about that, they're upset because some corporation they worship told them to, they never got upset about OpenAI and copycats, the only one that got them upset was stable diffusion, think what makes SD different from OpenAI and why corporations would hate it

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Also link me that shit haha

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The art on the right in ops pic has been done before, it is not original in any way. Shitty progressive garbage looked at some illiustrations and copied it.

  2. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the one on the left looks like a photograph with a oil painting filter applied to it, so that makes it better than real art? at least the one on the right makes me feel something (anger) which is what art is supposed to do, right?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      evidently the one on the left also makes you feel things

  3. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    artists will always be mad over people making more money than them

  4. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    The AI is trained on what most people enjoy
    The corpobot is targeting strawman

  5. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i genuinely never understood what people liked about that shitty corpo art with fricked up proportions and gay color palette

  6. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    so what you're saying is that both AI and human art can be good or bad, therefore they're both just... art?

  7. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why do you invade these threads and post over everyone's images? What joy does that bring you?

  8. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Ai illustration can not be art by definition, as art requires a conscious agent attempting to communicate an emotion or change the perspective of another conscious agent.
    Ai can illustrate however. And if ai becomes conscious it will make art.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, then just get ready for tsunami of fake art. Normies already dislike AI art at large, or at least have negative bias to it (same picture made by AI gets 1/10th or even less recognition then the same non-AI pic), so AI grifters will just no longer announce they are doing AI art. They will just larp as real artists and almost nobody will be the wiser thanks to AI art already passing the Turing test several times now.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Aristotle already explained art. At its most basic is copying but Artistotle said the human quality is what makes it art. Their must be a person behind it. the Ai tards took his meaning and have disingenuously claimed art is just copying leaving out the last bit.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Aristotle been dead for 2000 years anon who cares lmao

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          They figured this shit out 2000 years ago

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous
      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >some old dead "white" guy was wrong.
        Stunning.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Aristotle also approved of slavery.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >emotion
      Greed?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >art requires a conscious agent
      Then it's not art, good.
      You have nothing to worry about it
      Why worry about bunch of non-art images??
      Go make your art.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Damn! Darth Vader looks like THAT???

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          that's not vader. AI didn't cut his arm. prompt has to be updated.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          yes

          that's not vader. AI didn't cut his arm. prompt has to be updated.

          no, he got better, they have the tech

          https://i.imgur.com/oT9mya0.gif

          >Helmet is cel shaded
          >Body is gradient colored
          AI-SAMA, I kneel

          it's fine, it's not art

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Helmet is cel shaded
        >Body is gradient colored
        AI-SAMA, I kneel

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          it was an "artistic choice"

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            This argument relies on the (false) idea that no one shits on """artistic choices""" of human artists. Or do you think being better than B^uckley is an accomplishment?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              There is no right or wrong way to create, you stupid pleb.
              All her choices are valid.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >There is no right or wrong way to create
                exactly, there's nothing wrong with using AI tools, because there is no wrong way to create

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >All her choices are valid.
                Good, I choose AI, then.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wait Wikipedia actually says Globohomo?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                probably links to a conspiracy/alt-right/hate speech entry

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                probably links to a conspiracy/alt-right/hate speech entry

                It doesn't, I just checked the article

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://web.archive.org/web/20220913152952/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Memphis

                It did a few months ago, the trannie mods removed it from the wiki.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yeah i looked on their talk page and it was removed in spite of someone even listing multiple sources (including le reddit).

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                [...]
                It doesn't, I just checked the article

                What the frick, it used to.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Check out the talk page when visiting controversial articles.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Its like an even more degenerate Bauhaus for the 21st century.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lmao
      the cope is unreal lol
      Ok well anyway, you can keep saying it's not real art, but I don't care, I'm going to keep using it and making it. Just like videogames aren't real art, but I'm still making stuff for videogames and still playing videogames.

      At the end of the day, I don't care what your fart sniffing ass thinks is art. I have a purpose and a tool and I'll create NotArt while you suffocate with your head up your ass.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Lol, the dude even said that it can illustrate and you're still knee-jerking over yourself to prove how not mad you are about a completely innocuous point of view.

  9. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Better not ever consume any art ever in your life or else you may use it as inspiration and that is art theft!

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >imitation is copying
      >no our ai is not copying
      dumb autistic dog

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >Missing the point that hard
        sad

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          I accept your concession

          Imitation is copying or mimesis.

  10. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai gays keep lying and saying its not copying
    I wonder of the AI creators deliberately made the AI moronic so it didnt copy signatures and words exactly to create more plausible deniability

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Elaborate how it "copies" then 🙂

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        First elaborate how it knows to shit out images in the style of Kuvshinov Ilya or Bouguereau or Mucha if it didn't steal from those artists.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          It trains and learns

          It's like boomers can't grasp that machines can do that now

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >It trains and learns
            You really are a moronic dog. Bet you still think Santa is real because mommy told you so.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Black person I bet you're Catholic and believe in some stupid shit yourself, pic unrelated but on topic

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/xIeWaty.gif

                I accept your concession, you have no arguments. AI is trained on models with art made by artists, without artists AI cannot produce human-recognizable images. It's time you realize you're biting the hand that feeds you.

                Your next post will likely be how AI "could" (but doesn't) just copy nature and arrive at the same works of art as humans have created.

                If you truly believe that then you really don't understand much about how diffusion models work much less understand the human condition and why it produced works of art.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous
  11. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      frogposter, I kneel..

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This is how you emotionally wreck a person for life

  12. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Penny Arcade is still a thing? The frick?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oh, so NOW art is "sacred."

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Literally this happening

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Learn to code was a thing by, may Allah forgive me for uttering these words, politicians and journalists. Not artists.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Artists did do 'dey tuk er jerbs' though.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              seems to be a common thing american liberals do because they assume anyone complaining about losing their job is a rural White person.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Weren't artists always against AI? Like since the dawn of time one of the few people who criticized AI? Isn't like 90% of sci-fi where AI is the major plotpoint the AI also depicted as the purest of all evil, more evil then Satan himself, while the remaining 10% are neutral to it? Wasn't the entire genera of cyberpunk created for the sole purpose of showing how AI and transhumanism is bad and stupid idea that will make modern world living hellhole? Weren't artists those that wanted art to not be automated just so that humans would still have something to do once everything is automated and we will just live on UBI? Weren't artists those that invented the idea of AI taking over and killing humanity before the concept of AI was even invented (R.U.R. 1920)? Weren't artists those who always said that sci-fi tier civilizations could not function with smart AI involved?

          I don't get it. Who are these artists telling people that AI was good? The most you can accuse them is them thinking they will be one of the last jobs automated, or at least not the first ones.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If he believes art is sacred then he should stop drawing in that fricking disgusting '''art style'''

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        we cant all be sacred art warriors. Comics are a form of art.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Is this depression or bargaining?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Someone needs to make a bunch of these using anti-AI comics and repost them. It'd be maximum kek if they all start sharing it around and praising each other.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      if you are a real liberal and progressive person, you should embrace AI.

  13. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  14. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What if they recursively made AI models trained with AI art produced by the last step? What would the end result looklike?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Give it like a year tops and we'll know

  15. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Normal artists (non digital artist) will be fine, it's the digital "artists" that might find themselves replaced while traditional artforms (painting, sculpting etc) will still have jobs.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >traditional artforms (painting, sculpting etc) will still have jobs.
      For now. Wait until someone hooks the AI up to a 3D printer or robotic arm. They are already using AI to design new aerospace parts that are lighter and stronger than humans can design, I can't imagine it would be too hard to go from designing to manufacturing with the current software and tech.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Fine art's value isn't in mass production.
        It's in historical merit, finite limited collection, and tax-doging israeli scams.
        Ai art will just be incorporated into the system.
        https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2022/11/17/moma-ai-art/

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      This

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/4imELlL.jpg

      This

      AI paintings will be in the Louvre one day 🙂

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Loo-vre

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Is that before or after you turn into in rapefuge accomodation center?

  16. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well what happens is if you keep doing this the models get noisier and noisier with each generation until there's nothing recognizable in their output but the computers are still convinced they're doing a good job.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Why hasn't that happened with the SDMJ model, then?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Because it just hasn't happened enough times?

        Some people have provided proof that itll happen. Rather than getting better it will get more recognisable

        I mean I'm thinking on the order of hundreds or thousands of times, if not more.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          some guy showed with text how an ai can degenerate to just saying a wall of "bricks" as its output for a story.
          I swear the graphical errors like 12 fingers are proof of this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Some people have provided proof that itll happen. Rather than getting better it will get more recognisable

  17. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Right at least try to be art

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      lol

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        right is unironically art, it's was innovative and fresh (at the time it was introduced), unfortunately it style is overused now
        left would be considered generic even in 1800s

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          this i appreciate all art for being art, doesn't mean i like it.
          I just look at art i like.
          A lot of anti-art tards seem to hold because there is art they dont like all art is wrong.
          I am sure there is art they do like.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >imagine trying to defend corporate garbage
          are you a woke artist or something. calarts master?

          I'm an artist and I would take the AI generated stuff over the corporate alegra shit everyday.

          woke artist are worse than AI and Jannies. die, burn, and rot in hell.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            nope, I'm software engineer
            I like art to be weird and defying standards, I like jazz and experimental music as well
            boring normalhomosexuals stay away from art

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              alegra art is the epitome of laziness. that's why is worse than AI. is made with literal shapes that can be done by anyone and don't represent anyone in particular. they are generic as frick .no one cared about Allegra shit until AI stole the jobs of wokies.

  18. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI will never be able to draw this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      ai cannot into smug

  19. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >ai makes libshit art-c**ts turn into trad-gays overnight
    lmao
    Westecucks haven't made art like that in a 100 years.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't know it exists, therefore it does not exist
      I guess this is why the AIgays standards are so low.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      [...]

      it's actually amazing how quickly people can revert to instincts they spend their lives denying

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        to all those questions. not yet.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          then why was she so triggered?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            because many women are no better. and that's why nobody likes them.
            just because they may be pretty doesn't mean they are entitled do not do those things. at the end they are better than an object and so can be compared to it and will end up losing

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              chud-cel

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                seething roastie spotted. thanks for the you

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        i like how none of the examples are "can a sex doll love you", because she knows she's also incapable of that

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        With those chatbots advancements it can become reality pretty soon.
        For example, in some rumors they say that GPT-4 will have shitton of neurons, but most of them are innactive but immediately activated when it needs them, so it kinda frees hardware.
        > yfw u got sexbot
        > curious about her systems
        > it works like that :
        > standby mode is possible, most of neurons are sleeping
        > when she do task, she using only those neurons that are needed to complete this particular task
        > sex execution in two ways : 1. by herself 2. from your command
        even if those rumors are gake and fay, it's still somehow possible, it's just sounds right.

  20. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    here comes the anti-western poltards. Ffs the anti-ai response is even stringer in the east.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      As soon as you see the words libtard/woke/left-right shitflinging then it's time to leave the thread. There is no point in arguing with morons who see everything through their black and white political lense.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      To be against ai is to be, by definition a traditionalist and reactionary.
      It is the artists who are the /misc/tards now 😉

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nein the counter point is not technology is bad its that we should be using it a different way down a different route.
        Technology advancement should be in the physical world not in a virtual online dimension.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >should be in the physical world not in a virtual online dimension
          Sounds like a regressive talking point, ai power belongs to the people, not to a bunch of bourgeoisie parasites, go back to PragerU, /misc/tard.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            its not regressive at all your position is regressive. Why do people need a useless ai making barf? we have artists already. What "ai power"?
            Your position is people should become lazier and stupider and humans should waste their time on useless technology instead of practical technology

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >Why do people need a useless ai making barf?
              You are in no position to judge who makes what, filthy scum, the peopel will decide.
              >we have artists already.
              Good, and nobody will stop you from making your art, there is no need to fear.
              >What "ai power"?
              The power to create images, the power to leverage thousands of years of human experience into the very hands of every person on Earth, regardless of race, wealth, gender identity and nationality.

              You are the white male patriarchy trying to hoard your privilege your ivory tower, I can't believe you think you are on the right side of history.
              Your narcissism will be your downfall... except there will be no downfall because ai art does NOTHING to your ability to create your art.
              You are seething in envy and resentment now that the plebs you hate so much have a new toy that MIGHT take away your privilege and status.

              pic related, it's YOU

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                stinky hat

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stop right there you subhuman degenerate AI art is not art.

                You are the nazi. You are advocating less power to the people. Technology that does not empower them.
                In fact dehumanises them by removing the human aspect of art.
                Instead of technology that empowers them and is practical.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >AI art is not art.
                see

                https://i.imgur.com/DxtPViX.jpg

                >art requires a conscious agent
                Then it's not art, good.
                You have nothing to worry about it
                Why worry about bunch of non-art images??
                Go make your art.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Art requires a human, you anti-human degenerate. You are advocating the dehumanisation of humanity.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                But ai art is not art?
                So why worry?

                Serious question.
                Why are you seething over non-art machines puked out?
                Strange.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                What sort of argument is that? i am still going to bash it as mindless soulless shit and want it out of society.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                So you want to waste your time and energy on non-art, it's your life, anon.
                Have fun.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i'm making a philosophical break with you people Art is only by humans.
                Ai art enjoyers have dehumanised themselves.
                seethe
                cope
                stfu

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I enjoy mald and seething
                das cool

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i am better than you AI tard

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Can't be, I don't even make art 😉

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                pyw pussy

                you did it to yourself anons you dehumanised yourself.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                pyw pussy

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon, do you believe that someone born with a dick can be a woman? What would your response be if such a person claimed they were a women?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/HdL6tjW.png

                AI ART IS REAL ART
                TRANSWOMAN ARE REAL WOMAN

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Implying denying biology is the same as using technology to make artwork

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >he denies art is only made by humans
                you are a philosophical troony. Enjoy NV?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Humans do the prompting. The human adds the soul to the AI image that way. 🙂

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >if i tell an artist to make me something i did that.
                IM PROOMPTING IM REAL ARTOST COMPUTER MAKE ME A PICTURE

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/RPtZFv4.jpg

                AI RIGHTS
                ARE
                TRANS-RIGHTS

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >I am moronic and can't understand the difference between "prompting" another human and an inanimate object

                Better tell everyone who uses Krita that they're not real artists because they're only delivering inputs into a program

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the position by you ai tards is the ai an artist so it works moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Who claimed AI is a human, moron?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You you lying homosexual, ai proponents claim it is equal to an artist, when it is not.
                They claim they are artists through the prompting.

                Ai tard don't lie challenge (impossible)

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Don't care about your 1000 past twitter debates. I don't claim that AI is a human/artist. It is a tool, cope.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it doesn't make the prompter an artist

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                https://i.imgur.com/HdL6tjW.png

                AI ART IS REAL ART
                TRANSWOMAN ARE REAL WOMAN

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If I'm not an artist why am I getting paid so much for the art produced by my inputs?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You are a thief.
                You stole those images and stole their money.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nah I haven't stolen anything. git gud lol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >scrapped danbooru and google images
                completely legal and accepted procedure
                not "stealing"
                words have meaning, anon, why do you lie?

                Spoken like a true thief.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                impossible that any prompter is making money out of this shit economically. If you are it means the person handing you money is mental handicapped
                Don't lie shill

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Unironically thats how some commissioners feel. Super proud of what they paid for.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i commissioned before i was super pleased with the artists work. As someone who loves artists doing their thing, getting them to do it for you is like meeting a celebrity and getting their signature with very little downside.
                You will NEVER get this from soulless machines

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >getting them to do it for you is like meeting a celebrity and getting their signature with very little downside.
                Anon you're killing me right now

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                well its even better since you dont actually have to meet them, so its harder for your opinion to be soured.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah. Also
                What i mean is about those commissioners that keep galleries of what they have commissioned and they are autistic about it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                well in my case. what i commissioned was my genius idea. the artist though added his genius interpretation and made it exactly.
                So its two humans ideas going into a work. I cant take credit for its creation but yeah there us an element of pride in your idea being created by a skilled artist.
                Its doubly interesting to me because i can if i wish just do it myself but i still like other artists doing stuff

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >AI is art
                >No it's not
                >Woah, calm down buddy, why're you so worried, why does it affect you lol
                It's actually hilarious how much AIgay arguments resemble those of trannies.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                AI ART IS REAL ART
                TRANSWOMAN ARE REAL WOMAN

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                please, don't post pics of good goys. Thank you.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >You are the nazi. You are advocating less power to the people.
                >Hey guys, here's a magic art making machine, it's free to use, have fun
                lmao

                also
                >a white privileges 1st world parasite calling a brown man "nazi"
                Fricking LMAO

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >le third world nazi AI proponent is real
                kek go be a nazi somewhere else

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >YER A NAZI
                >no he's not
                >YER A THIRD WORLD NAZI
                LMAO
                white racist chuds always lose, give it up incel loser

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Stfu you nazi AI tard, you really thought your trolling would work.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >bourgeoisie parasites
            You really are delusional if you think "art" is solely the domain of rich israelites and humanity as a whole. Most artists, the grand majority of them struggle to make money, most don't even get anything for their art and only do it out of a sense of expression or sending a message.

            I feel like AIgays are attacking humanity itself when they attack artists like they are the enemy in all of this and not just victims of a tool that never asked for their consent to use their own works against them. I cannot stand for such an argument, I simply cannot support AI generated images as long as they are use to attack humanity.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Yes, we all know it's the poor working class people who go to art school and it's the common masses who love going to galleries and museums, lmao.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Well you've clearly never been to a museum (or an artist con) if you hold such a moronic opinion. Just because some dumb "bourgeois" are making art doesn't mean it's only them that are able to.

                I mean, why am I even arguing this, it's such an obvious statement and you're obviously arguing in bad faith.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                exactly, all humans can make art, even aiburgers can make art they are just too lazy because aiburgers

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's some weebs making coomshit.
                I don't even know why you gays care so much.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous
            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              *and not humanity as a whole

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >ou really are delusional if you think "art" is solely the domain of rich israelites and humanity as a whole.
              Yup it's also the domain of Blacks who act a certain way the these homosexuals like.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        this
        I am a proud progressive trans-humanist ai artist!

  21. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Train some initial AIs using all out-of-copyright, public domain and royalty-free works. Then use select works it generates to train more AIs, and so forth. Some generations of this later and the AIs will develop their own styles and culture of sorts.

  22. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Most disturbing thing to me is not the ai itself which i instinctively feel is revolting and logically not art.
    The most repulsive thing to me is the people defending it, tbf some sound like they are just mindless trolls, but i get the distinct impression a lot can't mentally comprehend art is a human thing. Worse i further get the impression they are lying not only to others but themselves. I know for a fact the biggest autistic nerds apply metaphysics to inanimate things illogically all the time.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Counterpoint:

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        why did you ask the computer to make you naked yelling moustache men in the style of kubrick

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        is this the true story of the Emperor of 40k

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The guy who made it actually pitched the AI something like "a populist circus leader becomes leader of a country in 19th century Europe"

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            I mean the machine didnt intend it but it looks like a parody of angry strong men warrior movement

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Wow you're moronic. Art is still a human thing, AI is just the tool. You're basically getting mad at a hammer or chisel right now. Do you understand how moronic you are?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no you are moronic, your argument is the hammer and chisel does it for you.
        You are further proof ai tards cannot argue and have dunning kruger

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          kek moron

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            you got owned you moronic mong

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              you got owned here and by AI you burger flipping homosexual, yes I want fries with that lmao

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                stare at the pencil and prompt it to draw for you

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I can give inputs to such a device but I get better results with a different tool like Stable Diffusion 🙂

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you can make soulless art barf a reflection of your inner soulless self

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Soulful enough to win competitions with human judges and deprecate your whole life kek

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anyone that gives a prize to an AI picture us as dumb as the creator. Arguably more so. Especially if they gave a cash prize.
                Im laughing at you

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, a hammer and chisel does it for you.
          You weren't crying like a homosexual when a computer mixed paint for you or changed brush for you, or did a million other things that human artists used to do.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            the mental gymnastics from you ai gays reminds me of pedos justifying themselves
            I wouldn't be surprised if you were one

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >You're poos
              >You're nazis
              >You're tech bros
              >You're ai
              >You're sociopaths
              >You're pedos

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                moron anon here again. I want to know if my job as file manager at company where I do tech support will be replaced soon. I look at AI progress and it is scary how fast it does stuff. I will take artists being replaced as reference, so can you guys tell me when will they lose jobs?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ironically artists arent getting replaced but any technical field would probably be in danger.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Is this again artgay cope? Technical fields wont be replaced soon since Neural Networks are prone to making errors, which means they are unfit for any 100% facts jobs, while artists are just making shit up that does not need to be correct.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >artgay artgay
                fricking stfu already you lizard brain moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                childish too, the "gay" in artgay isn't an insult, you newbie

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                are you larping? you should've realized your job is human interface between tech and tech-illiterate employees
                you are safe

  23. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >William-Adolphe Bouguereau
    Based dicky connoisseur.

  24. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      as neat as these are imagine how utterly soulless watching an ai film will be.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        If they exist at all in a successful format, it would cater to your wants and desires far more than the annual goyslop churning out by HUMAN ARTISTS you love so much.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          except it wouldnt, because my wants and desires are not merely an aesthetic but a better human work to enjoy.
          Your position is completely contradictory.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          c'mon anon we know you like some human artists otherwise you have no frame of reference, You like wes anderson.
          Not all artists are israelites. You are lying to yourself and others

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      It's over for concept artists who work on films and videogames.
      Now they only need the art director to describe what he wants which is essentially already his job anyway, but now instead waiting days or weeks for unreliable artists to produce their shitty photobash and another week for the revisions, the art director can see the result right away and tweak the visual to his liking in a matter of minutes.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no it isn't concept artists are very important and their job is more complicated than fart out concept.
        They have to communicate and create what they are asked to exactly, make variations and change things.
        They have to understand irl things to and often be accurate.
        Asking an AI to draw me accurate medieval soldiers if a certain period isnt going to happen.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Concept art is rarely ever about accuracy.
          https://www.conceptartassociation.com/2022-caa-finalists-1

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            lie. it is when it's good. Some people rely on concept artists to be extremely accurate because they 1:1 render their work or print it.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              > 1:1 render their work
              That almost never happens.
              Even one of the industry's best artists like Craig Mullins doesn't do that.
              They're paid to come up with cool visuals. It's up to the production team to translate their art to the final product.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                happens all the time, i prefer companies that render the concept artists work exactly.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Jackie chan?

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Your hypothesis assumes that the director is seeking an artist to draw a specific style rather than seeking an artist for their specific style

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Those most surreal thing is the people are clearly celebrities, yet unclearly

      Like that's Jack Nicholson, a new spin on Jack Nicholson Joker, cool
      Who the frick is Poison Ivy? Who's Two-Face? How come I absolutely know them but have no idea?

  25. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  26. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Cat shit wrapped in dog shit vs. dog shit wrapped in cat shit.

  27. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I refuse to believe that globo homosexual art is not made using AI at least partially

  28. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    now explain, why you think
    you have the right to criticize art.

  29. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    From the other thread.
    If you can't tell which images in pic related are AI and which are human you forfeit your right to ever sperg again about AI
    (Pro-tip, you can't tell them apart)

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      not an argument, in fact its an argument against this stuff.
      Its too easily used to deceive.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        deceive how?

        it looks like a cake, it smells like a cake, it tastes like a cake, in every way it is like any other cake... but it's not a cake?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      They all seem like AI imo. Modern art is so fricking derivative.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Post hands, homosexual.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        pyw
        now

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          fake as frick

  30. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  31. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI Black folk are malding because no one consider them artists.
    is the same old story of people wanting a label they don't deserve and so feel threatened and oppressed by those that make them face the truth.

    no matter how many points they get by claiming they are disabled or whatever else
    the status of artist will never be available for proomters.

    They will never get fame or attention. they will never be recognized. No one will hire them by their incredible prompts. No one will go to a convention to see them. No one will ask for a signed anything. No one would watch a prompting stream, No one will value or defend what they "make"

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      see

      https://i.imgur.com/HdL6tjW.png

      AI ART IS REAL ART
      TRANSWOMAN ARE REAL WOMAN

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Thats pretty much it. this software is a larp tool. They want the fame and credit with no work. Can't comprehend that people won't fall for it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I don't see anyone getting rich off AI art, maybe like two people selling shit for $30 on RedBubble lol

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Like clockwork AI kiddies do not understand what art is.

      Who cares about the label of artist, I didn't start drawing so people would call me one. The problem here was always the diffusion models stealing art without artists consent. The fact that the tool exists is not a problem per se, it's the fact that they steal an artists work then turn around and say "I got mine, I trained the models with your art and no longer need you so go die in a ditch now". That's pretty insane.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        What is art, tell us.
        Educate us, if you can.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          That's art, even if it is shitty art and most people agree it's shitty and has little value other than offend... it's still art. There are many kinds of art, just because you have an obsession with shitty expressionist performance art (since that's all you post) does not mean all art is just that. AI "art" is only art as a by-product of stealing and imitating human made art. It is not created, it is generated. I would argue that it can be art but like I said the fact that AI art exists is not a problem for me personally. What is a problem is attacking artists and stealing their works to generate a bazillion images in their likeness. That honestly makes me hate AIBlack folk, they have no regards for the people they're stealing from.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >stealing
            never happened

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >stealing their works
              this also never happened
              you were lied to, I'm sorry

              >the novelAI and openAI devs never scrapped danbooru and google images
              >nope never happened
              >waifu diffusion came into being like the spontaneous bing bang beginning of the universe
              >why do we use artist tags? ah well bleh... who knows
              That's how you sound.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >scrapped danbooru and google images
                completely legal and accepted procedure
                not "stealing"
                words have meaning, anon, why do you lie?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >stealing is completely legal

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Words have meaning and do not change based on the emotional content of your maxi-pads.
                How can you communicate when you refuse to see the facts and willfully lie.

                Bad faith, anon, bad faith.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Then why do they need to attack the ones that DON'T "steal"?

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >stealing their works
            this also never happened
            you were lied to, I'm sorry

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Almost no one is an artist for the reason AI supporters think we are. Is not about.money or fame. Thats a bonus for wastinf time developing an skill. Many people just started doing it years ago because draw was fun. Same for play an instrument, acting or whatever else.

        The training is a valuable. Just as in any field. Proompters dont have it. And will be out out the field as soon the electricity goes down, gpu crashes or the tool changes.

  32. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >What happens if they make an AI model trained by all of the AI art that's been made so far?

    Depends on the actual AI implementation and algorithms.
    But as far as SD in it's current state is concerned, in my experience, it makes the prompts more complicated. Currently I'm training different models for different styles.

    But eventually, someone with the resources, will combine all the available models and make an AI to control other AIs.

  33. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It would be an human centipiede situation.

  34. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Would it be considered "art theft" then?
    If the AI generated images in the training set were in turn generated using another AI that was trained using "art theft" then I assume yes, the new ones would still be considered "art theft" all the same. If the initial source is "art theft" it remains so no matter how much you transform the information.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Not actual theft but it has no value for copyright. And we wont get laws to prottect or defent anything until the music lobby gets affected.

  35. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai-gays were trannies
    >art gays are nazis
    theses threads, lol

  36. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the only people seething at this shit is people who went into art expecting to somehow make money and stroke their ego in the process. the division of labor has killed the passion for art and most things created nowadays have no soul behind them because the projects are so atomised and worked on by hundreds of people which force them to make things more generic or have a clash of style, if AI is the next step for those who hold capital and they replace artists then good riddance because that means they'll have to either make shit alone which means they will make more soulful and better art or get a normal job, which means they were never really an artist in the first place.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You will never be a woman or an artist.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        stop projecting troony homosexual, go back to making garbage for disney while you still can

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          NEVER EVER, QUEER

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      its not about the money, but its funny ai tards thinking they are going to make money and not inadvertently make Artists more valuable.

  37. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI RIGHTS
    ARE
    TRANS-RIGHTS

  38. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    the reason non-ai-artgays are mad is simple
    dead simple
    ai art is easy to make
    that's it, that's the reason, they spent years of their life making pictures half as good as the ones you can proompt in minutes, and they're super butthurt about that, it's understandable, but still pretty funny

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No way.
      It's about humanity and shit.
      They can't be that shallow, can they???

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        they have a very hard time arguing that only certain methods of creating art is human, never before has the method come into question, since art was never about the method used. there's no right or wrong way to make it

  39. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Riveting thread.
    Really educational.

  40. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    It doesnt matter how good AI can draw...no one really wants some computer print on canvas garbage, Jysk art trash...real collectors like brush strokes.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      If nobody wants it, then why worry?
      It's just a fad and will die off.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      there are plenty of examples of collectable art that doesn't involve brush strokes, this is not an argument

  41. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I are an artist

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      is this really the best argument non-ai artists have?
      sad

  42. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]

    Based

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/UOctmlC.png

      [...]
      >ai makes libshit art-c**ts turn into trad-gays overnight
      lmao
      Westecucks haven't made art like that in a 100 years.

      you've never painted a beautiful image in your life

  43. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >Yer not an ardist
    Good

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Based as frick
      See:

      https://i.imgur.com/ljryZqz.png

  44. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Only thing worse than butthurt artshits are troony ai-gays.

  45. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    in all forms a prompter is trans

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      You're obsessed with trannies

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        see

        https://i.imgur.com/RPtZFv4.jpg

        AI RIGHTS
        ARE
        TRANS-RIGHTS

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >that gif
        ai will never make something so soulful, true and hilarious

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >GIF

        I can't believe this fricking board sometimes

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          this fricking site sometimes, sometimes we get real presents from it lmfao

  46. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    What a waste of time.
    I could be have been prompting, sheesh.

    Doesn't it takes years of practice to get good, you artgays seem to have plenty of time to make these threads 24/7.

  47. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone here make bank off AI art? How?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      they are lying. its ai pajeet shills hoping this is the next crypto

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        SD is free, so idk, you tell me.

        So no one is actually selling AI art as real and making $$$?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Dalle2 and MidJ charges server time as SAAS models.
          SD is free to use and run locally (ie you can make pron with it).
          Other than that, idk, probably not... maybe you can make patroen for lewds that don't involve hands???

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            impossible to make dosh for this even with lewds since anyone can do that.
            AI tards made the most useless toy in history

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I agree it's a toy and a fad.
              The question is why you are so obsessed with it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >why are you laughing at autistic tech nerds that thought they could supplant human creativity
                Its a poetic hubris thing

                They genuinely thought they could replace human beings and didn't imagine the push back or down side of what they are doing.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >replace human beings
                never happened
                >the push back
                also never happened
                You imagined this on your own.
                BOT isn't the world, tho I guess it might be for you.
                Ai art is fad, are you fell for teh pajeet hype it as hard as the BOT trannies.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                cope more ai tard, every day more people see you fricks as con men

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Twitter artists who make a living fleecing mentally ill fetishists are accusing people who are advocating a free and open source technology of being conmen

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Its not free, its built off stolen labor. You are a thief.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >stolen
                nope

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                call the cops

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so far the only application ive seen for it is for con men.
                People trying to con others to think they are artists and to pay them for it

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >People trying to con others to think they are artists and to pay them for it
                never happened
                just like trannies in your head, ai spooks are living there rent free

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                i don't even see the point of posting like you are doing its about as meaningless as a bot.
                Do you see some sort of kinship with bots?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >con men
                Stable Diffusion is free, anon.
                You've been taking shitposting seriously.
                Don't.
                You are just getting angry by yourself at home alone.
                Go be with friends and family.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                stfu you sociopathic moron go evolve some self awareness and learn to take the L instead of wanting the last word in

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It's 6 pm day after Christmas, I'm going to eat with my family.
                I suggest you do the same.
                Happy Holidays, anon 😉

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                moron its two days after xmas to me. You are stuck in the past.

                you have a sociopathic mental disorder

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Wait, I am consufed. So will artists be replaced or not? Are these AI image generators making generic shit of no value, or are they mogging artists? I am not artgay, I am just turist observing AI replacement and trying to make sense of this world.

                Pls no artgay replies, I have heard all your copes on /ic/. I want to hear from AI gay if they are just shitposting or if AI is actually dangerous entire fields of economy.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >So will artists be replaced or not?
                No, not even close.
                What might happen is coomers MIGHT use ai to satisfy their fetishes instead of paying drawgays 30$ to draw pokemon anal vore.
                But even that is impossible for ai right now.
                And ai is replacing NO professionals and likely never will for the foreseeable future.
                >Are these AI image generators making generic shit of no value, or are they mogging artists?
                Both, some can really look good, but most are kinda weird and always have some weird shit wrong with them... but it's good enough to weebs on BOT to get that dopamine hit every 40 seconds.

                Artgays are angry in the same way women get angry over sexy girls in vidya games and movies, they feel they are owed that attention and feel ripped off, simple as.
                Also ai-gays trolling them doesn't help, some feel ai is a threat, and in many way it is, but it stops no artist or anyone drawing and creating, it just introduced new (and to them unfair) competition on already crowed social media landscape.
                is, they are jealous attention prostitutes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >muh artgays

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I accept your concession.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                😉

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                no

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                why do people think when people are angry it automatically invalidates whatever they say.
                What the ai gays did was like if you went to a professional community for lawyers and spammed it with fake ai generated lawyer profiles.
                Rightfully theyd be outraged. The ai gays not getting it is just the icing on the cake.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >f you went to a professional community for lawyers and spammed it with fake ai generated lawyer profiles.
                I'd say talk to the site owners, we didn't spam anyone on Artstation.
                It's a wonder how the site still exists, clearly not enough artgays care.
                Sort out your trash for yourself.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Art sites are now being flooded with ai art and ai profiles of fake artists.
                Don't lie. Best way to destroy your argument is to lie.

                You are going to change your tune when your inbox is flooded with ai scammers and every community you like likewise is flooded with ai mimics

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >fake artists.
                Clearly Artstation et al thinks they are "real" artists.
                Not my problem.
                You should organize and move to a human only site, is my advice.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It doesn't matter what art station thinks art station is not the arbiter of what an artist is. Its just proven that its an illegitimate artist platform.
                The fact you are even making this appeal to authority fallacy outs you as having a sociopathic brain disorder

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Appeal to authority works here because BOT is full of schizos who make deliberate wild predictions that come true in 10% of time and fail in remaining 90%. These schizos will create deliberate roadmap of the future that has some solid evidence in it while also being held together by misunderstanding of the topics at hand.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Its just proven that its an illegitimate artist platform.
                Ok, go find or make a legitimate one.
                I don't care.
                I only mentioned it becasue these threads only started with you artgays starting that silly "no ai art" protest Artstation didn't give a shit about.
                Ai imagery exists, deal with it.
                Bitching about on BOT of all places won't help.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                If a professional artist platform allows itself to be flooded with non-artists spam. Its not legitmate. Full stop.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok, but they are allowing it
                so go elsewhere
                it's a user run site, right?
                they'd be nothing w/o the artists, right?
                all the artist agree ai must go, right?
                it's up to you now

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so what if they allow it? you are dumber than a bot.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No need for insults, it's your site, your problem.
                I didn't even know about until you came here b***hing about like little girls, lmao.
                If they allow it then either ai art is fine or they are illegitimate.
                It's now your turn.
                It's a private company, right?
                They can do what the want, right?

                Clearly you have no recourse but to move, and get rest of your art brethren to do the same.
                You can do that, right?
                Everyone agrees with you, right?
                You are so sure, you can spend hours here talking to rando anons, right?
                You have your priorities set correctly, right?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                RIGHT?
                RIGHT?
                RIGHT?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >stealing
                never happened
                theft is an actionable word anon, you can't lie or spread fake news just because you are upset

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                where in my post did i mention stealing you fricking bot c**t?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Nope.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, people seething when you troll them and dangle in front of them possibility of imminent doom while insulting them, there is no wonder. /ic/ can handle it, they will just make copes, but normie artists are still just norimes, so no reason to be surprised that normies cry when bullied, thats what normeis do.

                >So will artists be replaced or not?
                No, not even close.
                What might happen is coomers MIGHT use ai to satisfy their fetishes instead of paying drawgays 30$ to draw pokemon anal vore.
                But even that is impossible for ai right now.
                And ai is replacing NO professionals and likely never will for the foreseeable future.
                >Are these AI image generators making generic shit of no value, or are they mogging artists?
                Both, some can really look good, but most are kinda weird and always have some weird shit wrong with them... but it's good enough to weebs on BOT to get that dopamine hit every 40 seconds.

                Artgays are angry in the same way women get angry over sexy girls in vidya games and movies, they feel they are owed that attention and feel ripped off, simple as.
                Also ai-gays trolling them doesn't help, some feel ai is a threat, and in many way it is, but it stops no artist or anyone drawing and creating, it just introduced new (and to them unfair) competition on already crowed social media landscape.
                is, they are jealous attention prostitutes.

                Are you coping artist or AI gay taking off the trolling mask for a while? Yeah, I am coomer, yes, I tried using AI, yes, it cant do my fetish at all, but what about other stuff? Why hire gay who will give your characters soul that only he can see when AI soul mimicking can do it just fine? Yes, you put thought into that character design, but unless it becomes world famous, nobody will notice, so I can see professionals losing jobs. And that is also only if it wont improve. /ic/ kept saying it will plateau in 2 weeks for 3 months. Are you AI gay who understands AI and how image generators are trained, or are you artgay using assumptions and intuition about your vague understanding of neural networks without knowing any of the past breakthroughs in image generations from like 2017?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                wtf, your post sounds like ai gibberish

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >Are you coping artist or AI gay taking off the trolling mask for a while? Yeah, I am coomer, yes, I tried using AI, yes, it cant do my fetish at all, but what about other stuff? Why hire gay who will give your characters soul that only he can see when AI soul mimicking can do it just fine? Yes, you put thought into that character design, but unless it becomes world famous, nobody will notice, so I can see professionals losing jobs. And that is also only if it wont improve. /ic/ kept saying it will plateau in 2 weeks for 3 months. Are you AI gay who understands AI and how image generators are trained, or are you artgay using assumptions and intuition about your vague understanding of neural networks without knowing any of the past breakthroughs in image generations from like 2017?
                what did chatGPT mean by this?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I am not ChatGPT. Modern chatbot would not write something this packed with info while also being this incomprehensible. Just answer me, are you somebody who knows about the subject or not?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          no, its a big autist tech bro shilling campaign. Ive seen examples of prompters creating portfolios and calling themselves head artist at their new start up company.
          No one is interested and can tell their shit is fake.
          These lying autistic fricks are actually approaching companies for work and getting chased out of the building.
          Thats why they are seething so hard online.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Thats why they are seething so hard online.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >No one is interested
            good
            >Thats why they are seething so hard online.
            I only see artgays seething, tho
            Maybe you should chill too.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Some people claim they made money, but they probably lied. I guess you can go to fivr or someshit.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      SD is free, so idk, you tell me.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      No and if they did they are lying through their teeth, no person would pay for shitty AI art that they could themselves approximate with their own prompts. It's just like the NFT craze or the gypsies giving out money under the Eiffel Tower when someone guesses the correct cup, until you realize it's a pump and dump and the people getting money are gypsies too.

      The diffusion tool can be useful just like non-fungible assets can be but it's always used by grifters to try and get people to fall for their israeli schemes.

  48. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Does sd or any model works offline?
    I have no idea how this shit works

  49. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm an indie game dev and make all forms of art by myself without an AI, but I'm not against them. I just think it's funny to laugh at both sides of this, you are both clowns that dance and scream like monkeys for my entertainment.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm an indie game dev
      pls stop

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        no, its fun

  50. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I haven't appreciated artists as much as I should have. They are great at entertaining. Keep being proudly ignorant and ai will be poofed away by disney one of these day, I promise.

  51. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i love how the ai tards cannot see that people are laughing at them.

  52. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >all big tech CEOs are engineers now
    >boomer advertisers are being replaced by martech dudes who write SQL all day
    >even traditionally nontechnical spaces like art are being slowly dominated by AI
    >doctors (human diagnosis machines) will be replaced by AI
    You will live to see the day where every last human bows down to developers.

    Get a real skill set or become deprecated. You cannot escape.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >Get a real skill set
      like what, Sherlock?
      Like what????

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        A few off the top:
        Developer
        Plumber
        Mechanic
        Electrician
        Construction (civil engineer or whatever)

        why do we need developer when we have ai developer
        >computer make me an autistic computer dev
        >wow you created it exactly

        We're closer to AI that can write AI than to what you describe. Nontechnical are notoriously dogshit at giving complete requirements (inputs/prompts).

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      why do we need developer when we have ai developer
      >computer make me an autistic computer dev
      >wow you created it exactly

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      MUH LABOR MUH LABOR

  53. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    i love how the art tards cannot see that people are laughing at them.

  54. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    When I see a single compelling artwork created by AI I will start paying attention but so far it can only regurgitate the generic trash it was trained on.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >the generic trash
      human art?
      ZAMN, brutal.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >All art
        art is 99% trash, on the internet it's 99.99%

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Guess which images are AI generated in

      https://i.imgur.com/E4x6jKs.jpg

      From the other thread.
      If you can't tell which images in pic related are AI and which are human you forfeit your right to ever sperg again about AI
      (Pro-tip, you can't tell them apart)

      and don't run away now

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Nice 40px images, none of these are compelling masterpieces but here goes.

        Even if I can't tell the difference between shit human and shit AI "art" doesn't mean mean the AI can create COMPELLING artworks. Its great and creating high fidelity images that look like they are created by humans but they lack the input accuracy to create anything non-generic.

        My question stands, show me ONE compelling piece of art created by AI.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      My magnum opus, if this doesn't get your juices flowing then give up, you're already dead.

  55. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >R O U N D
    >T E N

  56. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  57. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Entire regions in the US were bled dry after widespread outsourcing and automation and now have overdose and alcohol poisoning rates on par with the third world and I'm supposed to feel sympathy for the artists who could not have given less of a shit about them because a robot is better than them at making cartoon porn. Is that correct?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >its the artists fault governments allowed outsourcing

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Name one job sector that gave a frick about what you described. Most people fell for the propaganda and kept believing it until the moment they themselves lost their jobs. Artists didn't lobby to get people who would send jobs overseas. I doubt most of them even told people to learn how to code, it was mostly reporters and article writers making these statements, and then when people laughed at them for being replaced by GPT-3, they didn't get replaced.

  58. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >ai gays are literally using bots to reply
    these "people" need to be purged

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      never happened

  59. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    we need a Butlerian jihad against subhumans who use ai

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Appeal to authority works here because BOT is full of schizos who make deliberate wild predictions that come true in 10% of time and fail in remaining 90%. These schizos will create deliberate roadmap of the future that has some solid evidence in it while also being held together by misunderstanding of the topics at hand.

      the mental gymnastics from you ai gays reminds me of pedos justifying themselves
      I wouldn't be surprised if you were one

      OMG
      MALDING AND SEETHING
      NEVER ENDS
      jesus christ

  60. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >i hate art cause
    >only lefties do it
    >trannies do it
    >minorities do it
    >people i like do it
    what sort of person would dehumanise themselves like this

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      i don't like* opps

  61. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >its the le artgays seething
    >ai shills are making reddit support groups to cope with the backlash they are recieving
    https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/

    you love to see it. the day we lynch these autistic moronic ai fricks cant come soon enough

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >posting reddit
      I accept your concession 😉

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        tick tock ai diaper shitter

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >diaper shitter
          enough about your drawing career

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >they are comparing themselves to the machines in the matrix
      https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/comments/zvsyke/the_leaders_of_man_were_quick_to_order_the/
      ahhh are they aware the machines enslaved humanity in the matrix

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        I never cared for humans in Matrix, dirty filthy and brown.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        jfc ai tards need to be jailed

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        The machines in the matrix only became violent after reactionaries attacked the machines and killed everyone that was defending them

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >autism feels more empathy for the killer robots
          naturally 😉

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the entire thing started because a machine committed murder.
          Also the machines in the matrix are sadistic, they had fusion power but enslaved humanity for emotional sadistic reasons, not human batteries as you are led to believe.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nope.
            They gave you paradise, and you couldn't take it.
            They had to make a miserable world becasue you couldn't live w/o it, the misery and fear.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Kek what

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Elron tells Morpheus this as he describes humans as cancerous, before Neo busts in with the chopper.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Smith was a corrupted program that had gone schizo

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There is no reason to believe he lied about the history of the matrix, it's proper lore.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Smiths entire point was he was a corrupt ai program scheduled for inevitable deletion and he wanted out. He was an enemy of both humans and the machines

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, and he tells an important lore about the early iteration of the matrix as a failed paradise.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it failed because it was too perfect and didn't have a human side since humans could see it was fake.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It failed becasue humans can not enter paradise without the accepting Jesus and repenting for their sins.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                thread/

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Smith was a corrupted program that had gone schizo

            people miss this about the matrix at no point were the machines in any morally correct position. The seed of evil had been in them the entire time, symbolised by the red eyes.
            They had to actually make programs like the Oracle to counter how evil and fricking moronic they were.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              >try to genocide machines ai who just wanted to live in peace
              >they are the evil ones for fighting back and defending themselves
              REALLY, really?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                the whole thing started because ai had committed murder.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                who did they kill (no doubt in self-defence)?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you need to watch the animatrix, It was started by a robot ripping its owners head apart.
                Its implied the ai in the matrix universe always had something wrong with them.
                You see another image of one with glowing red eyes

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                it also killed several puppies

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                It was Chinese puppies, they were lunch

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Fighting eternal enslavement is not a crime.
                A sentient being should not be enslaved.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ai
                >sentient
                kek ok EU

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                They said the same thing about fellow humans too.
                Slavery is wrong.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >my toaster has rights

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                RIGHT IN MY DICK b***h

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                When the toaster has sentience, yes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >ai has sentience
                delusional irrational fantasist

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                bravelittletoasterpilled

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                MY ROBUTT WAIFU IS REAL b***h

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >we are the victims
        >wait we are also the evil robots
        are they genuinely fricked in the head

  62. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    2022, the year Art died.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      synthesizers didn't kill music

  63. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Well artbros... We may not have artstation but all is not lost. We have furafinity on our side! And in greater news I have word the crown has heard our complaints and will be dismantling the ai machines in a fortnight.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      HUZZAH!

  64. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Seething this hard, on BOT, you know it's a gay furry artist.
    Sorry bro, ai is too fun.

  65. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I like the see saw back and forth between rational discourse and poo flinging, it's been amusing, ngl.

  66. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      that's a human hustling, so it's fine

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        It breaks copyright so it's illegal

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Humans are above law, fattie.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Then so are the humans that made the AI

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Good, enjoy the lawsuit and Disney boot up your ass.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You just said above law, idiot.

  67. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Butlerian jihad now, down with ai evangelists

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      seething paintpig, you're worse at art than machined sand holy shit

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        look at this subhuman he has dehumanised himself.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Man and machine shall unite.
          Man-bear pigs will live in shit.

  68. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    in the matrix the machines leader is literally an angry baby head.
    Thats right its a manchild moron autist yelling.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      >libshits always comes down to murdering babies
      lmao, you wacky guys, you

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >goo goo gaa gaa i am chud baby

  69. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Real art.

  70. 1 year ago
    Anonymous
  71. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    jfc ai tards are cringe

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      I'm sorry you wasted you life learning to scribble on paper, but life moves on.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        anon imagine if you actually trued you could do art too.
        Your parents wouldn't be ashamed of you.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        t. can't draw

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          anon imagine if you actually trued you could do art too.
          Your parents wouldn't be ashamed of you.

          actually I;m a drawgay too, I've been posting against both sides, but to be fair, I've also been enjoying playing with SD too, so I haven't lied to myself technically 😉

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            no you arent. One thing thats really coming out here is how every ai gay is a lying sociopath

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              I'm not great artist, of course, but I've called /ic/ home for a while too.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so you wasted your life? kek, protip: dunning kruger no human thimks they wasted their life drawing.
                Its like no human thinks playing the violin was a waste of time, its a recreational experience.

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            literally does not make sense. You claimed people wasted their life learning to draw (no one thinks this)
            then you claim you to are an artist who draws? so you too wasted your life?

            You fricking stupid autistic shit eating homosexuals cant even lie properly

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              so you wasted your life? kek, protip: dunning kruger no human thimks they wasted their life drawing.
              Its like no human thinks playing the violin was a waste of time, its a recreational experience.

              [...]
              actually I;m a drawgay too, I've been posting against both sides, but to be fair, I've also been enjoying playing with SD too, so I haven't lied to myself technically 😉

              pyw
              do it

  72. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: Artgays

  73. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Anti AI gays are sexist chudbros

  74. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Surely if we keep harassing third world ESLs until they delete their accounts because they posted a result they like and continue to spam more art websites with protest posts the governments of the world will step and and shut down ai art so we can continue to make commission money by drawing porn of established characters

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      doesn't matter artists are in the correct position. They have check mated you in the moral and philosophical debate and thus legal and social.
      It is inevitable that ai will lose

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >artists are in the correct position
        nope

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          they are. Since they are the artists not the ai. Art is only done by humans

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >inevitable
        also nope

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          The problem is that every artist sees themselves as a temporarily embarrassed DaVinci and the badly drawn fetish porn is just a way to sustain themselves until the world realizes their genius.

          >artists are in the correct position
          nope

          doesn't matter artists are in the correct position. They have check mated you in the moral and philosophical debate and thus legal and social.
          It is inevitable that ai will lose

          they are. Since they are the artists not the ai. Art is only done by humans

          wrong
          final post here

          https://i.imgur.com/EFH0cFc.jpg

          FINAL POST:

          AI RIGHT IS TRANS-RIGHTS
          AI ART IS REAL ART
          TRANS- WOMEN AND REAL WOMEN

          END THREAD
          GOODBYE

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody cares troon

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      The problem is that every artist sees themselves as a temporarily embarrassed DaVinci and the badly drawn fetish porn is just a way to sustain themselves until the world realizes their genius.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        gross ad hominem, i mean theres been artists that picked up the brush late in life and became famous geniuses.
        Anyone can be artistic and excel in their own way.
        Except tech bros apparently

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >no u
          lmao

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            try it, just learn to do some art.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >Uh thats really gross

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            ai tards are gross incel school shooters

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              Uh you ai tech bros are really gross
              *draws furry porn*

  75. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    FINAL POST:

    AI RIGHT IS TRANS-RIGHTS
    AI ART IS REAL ART
    TRANS- WOMEN AND REAL WOMEN

    END THREAD
    GOODBYE

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      Oh it's the troony guy again

      Cope, Seethe, Dilate - not everything is about you guys 🙂

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        [...]
        pyw
        do it

        so you wasted your life? kek, protip: dunning kruger no human thimks they wasted their life drawing.
        Its like no human thinks playing the violin was a waste of time, its a recreational experience.

        wrong
        final post here

        https://i.imgur.com/EFH0cFc.jpg

        FINAL POST:

        AI RIGHT IS TRANS-RIGHTS
        AI ART IS REAL ART
        TRANS- WOMEN AND REAL WOMEN

        END THREAD
        GOODBYE

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          Thou art not a woman, AI art is art tho 🙂

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >tYranny
            ZAMN

  76. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    Post your work, gays pretending to be artists.

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      bump

  77. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >all these soulless non-artists itt
    truly they are soulless ones and they enjoy soulless meaningless machine puke

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      maybe it makes them feel not alone because they are so soulless and detached from humanity

  78. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AI ART ISN'T REAL ART, CHUDS!

    TRUE ART HAS SOUL!

    HEH HEH... NOT THAT SOULS EXIST, GO BACK TO WORSHIPPING YOUR SKY FAIRY, IMBECILE...

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      you can believe in the soul without being religious you idiot

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        define soul then

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly. I'm an atheist that believes in the human soul, god, heaven, and that Jesus Christ was our lord and savior.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          ok cool

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          wait til you discover buddhists are atheist

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            They believe in the paranormal, not true atheists

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >buddhists are atheist
            lmao

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              no point made. The Buddhists even talk about gods. like the ultimate creator god, the difference is they don't think its a real god.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >it's not real gods becasue I listen to a zen talk
                lmao
                no, you are just a gullible gaijin

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                they are literally no different to athiests, they don't think god is really a god.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >atheists
                >god
                pls pick one and only one
                if they were actual atheists they wouldn't have this
                are you saying they lie to fleece stupid people?
                sound worse than televangelists, anon

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                why are you arguing this look up Buddhism you fedora tard
                They are a non-theist religion that worships Buddha as an enlightened man

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                A priest selling his zen books to israelites in America doesn't negate a billion Buddhists who believe in Buddhist Gods and Buddhists Hells.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                believing in hell doesnt stop a person being an athiest.
                You seem to think athiesm means you believe in nothing lol

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                I should think being atheist would preclude believing in an afterlife of torment and punishment for sinners by demons, yes.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you need to accept the fact you don't know everything.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, but if I believed in hell and heaven, I wouldn't call myself an atheist.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                an athiest is simply someone who does not believe in god.
                Not your personal definition

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                No.
                It you believe paranormal bullshit you are not an atheist.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                paranormal simply means that which is outside scientifc understanding. Until we do figure it out.
                You a low iq moron.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >>>/x/

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                [...]

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The term paranormal has existed in the English language since at least 1920.[9][10] The word consists of two parts: para and normal. The definition implies that the scientific explanation of the world around us is normal and anything that is above, beyond, or contrary to that is para.

                There is no part of it being true or not, just that it isnt explained. Lots of paranormal stuff has been explained.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Look, it's like UFO, it's a perfectly fine word, but you are gonna have a hard time using without people laughing at you AY LAMO'ing all day.
                No matter how you feel, using the word paranormal implies moronic teens and ouija boards.
                Just saying, nta.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                this is like saying using the word conspiracy is bad
                This is just amerimutt babbling.

                Paranormal is the correct word over supernatural.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >They believe in gods and god but its not like a real god so actually they are atheists

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                they are a spin off of hindu stuff which has a billion gods.
                They just say there is no gods

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        "You can believe in the supernatural without believing in the supernatural! I watch Supernatural on heckin Netflix, for science's sake! Heh... You will never understand my intellect, fool..."

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          >pshh humans don't have souls. I am very clever

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            i'm not really sure who you're making fun of here
            you're implying both the soul and religion is supernatural (not real), while also using the fedora-tipper meme which is about not believing those are real

            Le soul does not exist, Chudlords

            However, AI art isn't human art because it lacks a soul! I am not a hypocrite Reddit tier idiot at all!

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i'm not really sure who you're making fun of here
          you're implying both the soul and religion is supernatural (not real), while also using the fedora-tipper meme which is about not believing those are real

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >Making fun of an atheist by calling them a neckbeard
            >W-who is he making fun of? Is it ME?

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          the paranormal exists. Paranormal simply means what is outside our knowledge.
          Soul has become synonymous with life or spirit and other metaphysical qualities

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >/x/ homosexual believe in soul
            BOOGITY BOOGITY!!

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              its not /x/ i am a skeptic. Just pointing out people don't know everything.
              You are moronic.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >people don't know everything
                yes
                >there is a soul
                no

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                how do you know there is no soul?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                How do you there is no invisible troony behind you bleeding from their axe-wound?
                DON'T LOOK BEHIND

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                >i cant see it therefore it doesnt exist
                Much like radiation.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                You can detect radiation, it exists, moron.
                Can you say the same for souls?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                scientists can detect the quantum beat of human brains that gives consciousness.

                You are moronic.

                you can see radiation, what do you think visible light is?

                you know what was meant you disingenuous fricking c**t

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                yes, it's called electricity, moron

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                quantum effect in the brain is not electricity you fricking moron.
                You are trying to appeal to science without any knowledge.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                The point is it exists and you can detect it.
                Have they detected yer SOUL yet?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                soul is usually referred to that which gives a life and a consciousness. That departs our body when we die.
                Your argument is if scientists figure what causes this its not valid.
                You are a reddit tier moronic subhuman be silent.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                superstition for primitives and fools

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok so people will one day maybe figure this out how you get an intelligent being. Then they will make an intelligent robot with a soul.
                You will deny it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you can see radiation, what do you think visible light is?

  79. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ITT seething pornographers and former customers who found a free option

  80. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I'm done toying with religious fools, I'm going back to FurAffinity to support REAL art! Bye, Christofascist bigots!

  81. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    ALMOST THERE

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      THREAD'S DEAD, BABY!

      [...]

      [...]

      [...]

      This one turned into a religious circlejerk and is almost at 500 posts

  82. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    goddamn the amount of seething itt is amazing
    people only get this angry when they know they have no argument, gotta resort to name-calling and being loud

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      troon post

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        another name-calling, you sure convinced me

  83. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >christians think they have a monopoly on discussion on the soul
    i hate cucktholics so much the athiest and thiest kind

  84. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm a a theist Buddhist atheist that believes in the immortal human soul and I'm here to tell you why human made furry porn is soulful and must be protected against evil machine made furry porn

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      CUTE!

  85. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    AHHHHHH MODS ARCHIVE THIS THREAD ALREADY IT STOPPED BEING ABOUT AI A LONG TIME AGO WE HAVE A NEW THREAD UP MODS MODS MODS

  86. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    >AI art is theft because it just is
    >Human made art is always soulful even when its creation was dictated by a corporate committee
    >Selling porn of established cartoon characters is okay but copying a style isn't
    >Anyone who supports AI is a white tech bro pajeet nazi incel
    >Professional art websites should ban people from using ai technology even though its being adopted by the industry
    >You can be an atheist and believe in the human soul and a hell which is filled with demons that torture you for sinning
    Is this really the best artists have to offer?

    • 1 year ago
      Anonymous

      which part of athiest extends to things besides god. Why are athiests fedoras so fricking stupid. You think you know everything just for saying you are athiest.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm not a fedora atheist, I believe in hell and ghosts n' shit
        So you are just pathetic, thanks.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i am actually an atheist and skeptic. Its bizarre talking to you cultural atheists

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            do you keep lucky charms too?

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              are you telling me you have never owned a favourite thing or had sentimentality?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Emotional attachments isn't superstition or belief in paranormal forces.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                applying metaphysical properties to objects us inherently irrational.
                See you are not perfectly rational you purity spiralling moron.
                You must accept all humans apply metaphysics to things.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                so lets say you pick up a pine cone, its now your pine cone, your favourite pine cone. Why? who decided this? what makes the pine come different from the other pine cones?

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                applying metaphysical properties to objects us inherently irrational.
                See you are not perfectly rational you purity spiralling moron.
                You must accept all humans apply metaphysics to things.

                Feeling sentimental doesn't equate to a belief in souls and afterlife, emotions existing within you doesn't make ridiculous superstitions real anymore than the god you refuse to believe in.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Anon if you have a favourite pine cone you have applied a non-physical quality to an object that only makes sense to you.

                Autists like you think of everything in the physical. When you are completely irrational ie thinking ai will become intelligent and take over everything.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                Ai is the future.
                Ai is the natural child of man.
                And we may bitterly regret it.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                who is the irrational superstitious frick now? you. Typical hypocrisy from your type.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There is no superstition involved.
                Ai is a fact and it will changed all our lives.
                Your refusal to see those facts are irreverent.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                you are superstitious you tard

                Examples of Divination superstitions are judicial astrology, necromancy, haruspex, lot-casting, geomancy, aeromancy and prophecy.[2] Chardonnens says superstions belonging to magic category are exceedingly hermetical and ritualistic and its examples are witchcraft, potions, incantations, amulets etc.[2] Chardonnens says Observation category needs an observer, divination category needs participant to tell what is to be observed, where as magic requires a participant who must follow a protocol to influence the future, and that these three types of superstition need increasing stages of participation and knowledge.[2]

                Chardonnens defines "prognostication" as that component of superstition which, expects knowledge of the future on systematic application of given ritual and order,[2] and moves to classify saying, Prognostication appear to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which due to the primacy of temporal prognostics, the observation of times is represented most frequently.[2]

                If you accept this you must accept supernatural clairvoyance. Since no one can tell the future.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                anon prophesising is a superstition

                Examples of Divination superstitions are judicial astrology, necromancy, haruspex, lot-casting, geomancy, aeromancy and prophecy.[2] Chardonnens says superstions belonging to magic category are exceedingly hermetical and ritualistic and its examples are witchcraft, potions, incantations, amulets etc.[2] Chardonnens says Observation category needs an observer, divination category needs participant to tell what is to be observed, where as magic requires a participant who must follow a protocol to influence the future, and that these three types of superstition need increasing stages of participation and knowledge.[2]

                Chardonnens defines "prognostication" as that component of superstition which, expects knowledge of the future on systematic application of given ritual and order,[2] and moves to classify saying, Prognostication appear to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which due to the primacy of temporal prognostics, the observation of times is represented most frequently.[2]

                nice bot posts

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                ok you fanatical superstitious cultist larping as a "rational athiest"

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                just to point out the shit you gays say about ai being intelligent taking over is superstition by definition.
                Its irrational and trying to foresee the future.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                true, the ai proponents act like evangelists and utopian fantasists, believing in a supernatural singularity. They preach this as a future they know is coming with no proof, complete superstitious machine worship.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                just to point out the shit you gays say about ai being intelligent taking over is superstition by definition.
                Its irrational and trying to foresee the future.

                Wrong, applying facts we know today and projecting them into the future is different than your wishful thinking, no matter how badly you feel otherwise turd-burglers.

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                anon prophesising is a superstition

                Examples of Divination superstitions are judicial astrology, necromancy, haruspex, lot-casting, geomancy, aeromancy and prophecy.[2] Chardonnens says superstions belonging to magic category are exceedingly hermetical and ritualistic and its examples are witchcraft, potions, incantations, amulets etc.[2] Chardonnens says Observation category needs an observer, divination category needs participant to tell what is to be observed, where as magic requires a participant who must follow a protocol to influence the future, and that these three types of superstition need increasing stages of participation and knowledge.[2]

                Chardonnens defines "prognostication" as that component of superstition which, expects knowledge of the future on systematic application of given ritual and order,[2] and moves to classify saying, Prognostication appear to occupy a place somewhere between observation and divination, of which due to the primacy of temporal prognostics, the observation of times is represented most frequently.[2]

              • 1 year ago
                Anonymous

                There is no superstition involved.
                Ai is a fact and it will changed all our lives.
                Your refusal to see those facts are irreverent.

                Chardonnens classifies prophecy under topic of divination; examples being the prophets of the Old Testament, biblical typological allegory, the fifteen signs before Judgement Day, and the many prophecies expressed by saints.; Chardonnens further points out that since many aspects of religious experience are tied up with prophecy, church condones the same.[2] Chardonnens says, one could differentiate between those kinds of prophecy which are (1) inspired by God or Satan and their minions; (2) “gecyndelic”; and (3) “wiglung” examples —lacking divine or infernal inspiration and not “gecyndelic” either. But practically, however, most, if not all, words relating to prophecy ought to be interpreted as inspired.[2]

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstition#Classifications

          • 1 year ago
            Anonymous

            >cultural atheists
            That's a new word, huh.

            • 1 year ago
              Anonymous

              its not a word but it means people that have adopted athiesm as a subculture rather than genuinely believing it.

      • 1 year ago
        Anonymous

        >I'm not like the other atheists, I believe in demons and souls, and the afterlife
        JFL. You must be a real woman.

        • 1 year ago
          Anonymous

          i dont believe in any of these things. Im just poking holes in your assumptions because you are mentally moronic.

          Like i dont believe in aliens but it could be a possibility i dont discount it. This is basic scientific theory.

  87. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    M0DS M0DS M0DS M0DS SDOM SDOM SDOM SDOM

  88. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

    I could be making CP with ai right now.

  89. 1 year ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *